Time To Keep The Defensive Coaches
"There's just so much to offense that a coach really does have control of," [Bill Walsh] said. "Defense is just a matter of having the personnel."
"The Blind Side", by Michael Lewis, p. 122.
The defense just finished up a mixed season.
The pass defense was great at times, but vanished in some late season losses at New Orleans and home against Houston. Still it was really one of the finest units in the NFL and excelled despite the absence of a reliable pass rush.
But the run defense was dismal. Dallas ran for over 200 yards against them. Carolina had five 1 yard TD runs against them. They lost a number of games (Tampa Bay, Atlanta, Tennessee, Minnesota, Carolina, Jacksonville) and allowed another game to go into overtime (at Chicago) when the run defense didn't hold up at the end and allowed a big TD drive.
The first person under scrutiny is defensive coordinator Bob Sanders. Before joining the Packers in 2005 as an assistant under then defensive coordinator Jim Bates, he coached at the University of Florida in the 1990s and for the Miami Dolphins from 2001-2004. The defense was better in 2005 (after being awful in 2004), they were great in 2006, and very good in 2007. As the quote above states, a defensive coach needs good players. But for those who wonder if Sanders really has the chops to be a good defensive coach, his resume is pretty impressive.
Ironically, the JSOnline article I've linked to spent a lot of time discussing how the pass rush struggled and the defense plays man-to-man coverage instead of the more common cover-2 scheme. But the pass defense wasn't the problem last season. S Nick Collins and CB Charles Woodson are heading to the Pro Bowl.
There is no reason Bob Sanders doesn't deserve to keep his job. He needs some better players along the defensive line.
Another wrinkle to this story is the potential interviews that linebackers' coach Winston Moss might have for head coaching vacancies. I've never understood the love for Moss, or why he was promoted to assistant head coach before the 2007 season. The linebackers he's coached have never been outstanding. They've never been bad either. There must be something about meeting the man in person.
A side note; the above quote is from a book about All American LT Michael Oher. As you can see from the preceding link, he's rated as the top player entering the 2009 NFL draft by NFL Draft Scout.com. I've read "The Blind Side" and the Detroit Lions deserve another 0-16 season if they pass on this guy.
Comments
great post
i don’t understand the scrutiny sanders is under. he was good last year and the he’s dealt with a bunch of injuries this year, if they have someone whose considered a guru available i could kind of understand it, but otherwise, he’s nothing more than a scapegoat and a person for fans to say, “see we’re making a change towards progress”.
I untuck my shirt!
by Michael M on
Dec 30, 2008 1:21 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
The change towards a "guru" does not always have a great success rate
Mike Martz and Al Saunders once could have been considered offensive gurus.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
by jobe on
Dec 30, 2008 2:50 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1 to mitch
Sanders cant help injuries! when everyone was healthy this D was one of the best! when you lose a MLB and a corner of your pass/rush D (jenkins) and your safeties it will hurt! the D does not need a new play caller this season just proved they need more depth!!! on the line, Justin Harrell has proved he can only stay healthy for as long as he can take a shower. We need Dline help and then some secondary help. Draft some rookies let them watch under some vets and if needed let them step up and proof the belong if they dont put some one else in! this is almost like baseball in a way with what have you done for me lately type of scheme but maybe thats what we need! make them earn their pay checks if they dont sit them til they proof they can! ST needs help! we cant be letting teams get to the 35+ late in the games. but we still need DEPTH in our D!!! not just ready to start players we have great starters but we need competitors and guys that want to play out there! guys that when an injury happens are not shell shocked and know how to handle it!
by bizzle4 on
Dec 30, 2008 8:12 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Michael Lewis is incredible
Moneyball and the Blindside are two of my favorite books of all time.
The Packers need to be very active in claiming players throughout the college free agent signing period. You can’t just sign one or two stud free agents (I’m looking at you Mr. Haynesworth) and expect the D-Line to be fixed.
I know some of us get frustrated with the heavy use of cover one and cloud coverages instead of just the standard cover two used in the NFL today, but I tend to trust coaches. There are very few Mike Martz’s in this league, if something isn’t working, they won’t hesitate to swalllow their ego and change. Bob Sanders recognized the great season Woodson was having and put him on number one receivers rather than Al Harris. Your right, Brandon: Defenses are successful through personnel decisions and not so much schemes. Not even Dick Lebeau or Monte Kiffin could have been successful with the guys Denver was playing with on defense.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
by jobe on
Dec 30, 2008 2:47 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I never understood the interest in Winston Moss either
He must be a great interview but then again, Mike Sherman was a great interview. I remember hearing about Chargers Defensive coordinator Ron Rivera coming into an interview for a head coaching job as a front runner for the job and left it out of the running. Herman Edwards is a great interview. A guy like Bill Belichick is a great coach. Think there’s some difference in demeanor there?
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
by jobe on
Dec 30, 2008 2:54 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
If you don't have the time to read Blindside
Read the excerpt from the NY Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/magazine/24football.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&pagewanted=all
by grant76 on
Dec 30, 2008 11:05 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs










