draft insight
First of all, I need to say that I trust Ted Thompson. Over the past 3-4 years, he has built this team into an NFC contended. His methods might be unconventional, but they are working.
Onto the actual draft: I <em>hated</em> that T-squared traded out of the first round. Yes, it was smart financially and yes, it only moved them from 30 to 35. But the player (arguably) he was targeting was Brandon Flowers, who almost made it but got snapped up by the KC Chiefs at 34. Flowers was an excellent player that could shore up the CB position, especially as Al Harris and Charles Woodson get older.
That all said, I <strong>loved</strong> the Jordy Nelson pick. The kid is a straight-up baller and will be a valuable contributor when Donald Driver starts to decline. Between him, Jennings, Jones, and Koren Robinson, the WR position should be stacked for years and years.
I was confused by the Brian Brohm pick at first, but the more I thought about it, the more I liked it. It gives Green Bay a little more national exposure, but it has people focusing on the so-called "controversy" at QB. A-Rodg is going to be a fine player, Brohm will make a superb backup and (probably) excellent trade bait down the road. I see this situation playing out a lot like the Mike Vick-Matt Schaub situation in Atlanta a few years ago. Hopefully Rodgers can play the Vick role without all the extracurriculars, and we can turn Brohm into major draft ammunition.
Patrick Lee was a great value pick and, if he can learn what Al Harris and Charles Woodson have to teach, he'll make a solid replacement for when they're gone. The two O-linemen taken were also puzzling, one of them wasn't even featured on espn.com's scouting report. But, Teddy's made it work before.
All in all, I think this draft was overlooked by the majority and undervalued by the experts who did look at it. A B/B- from Mel Kiper's Hair today fits perfect; the team didn't fill any huge needs or draft any major college superstars. But the 2008 draft class for the Pack is going to go a long way to solidifying the team with young talent and keep them in contention for a long time.
0 recs |
2
comments
Read Related
Comments
Overlooked
Watching draft commentary/grades, it seems like they can fall into two categories. Either the team did a bad job in reaching for a player, or traded down and still managed to reach for a player like Matt Millen did. Or they did a good job by trading up, or drafting a guy who slipped, and traded for an additional pick in the first round. Basically any team that did a good job was like Kansas City who traded their star defensive end Jared Allen for a few picks and were able to draft two good lineman. Or Dallas because they had two picks.
They don’t know what to think about a team like Green Bay. They weren’t going to get a star player with their 1st round pick anyway, but they traded down for some more picks and got a well known college QB, so let’s give them a B grade. It’s cheating, but I don’t expect these guys to know every team inside and outside. I’m not familiar with any team’s needs other than the Packers. Although it’s easy to pick on Matt Millen for all I know he added depth at exactly the positions Detroit needed it and it will turn out to be a solid draft for him.
by Brandon on May 2, 2008 11:02 AM CDT 0 recs
Patrick Lee was on some great Auburn defenses
and was probably mentored behind some very good college corners in Carlos Rogers and Junior Rosegreen. He’s 6’0, which is good height, and hes pretty strong as well so Al Harris really has no choice but to mentor this guy. If he just grows dreadlocks, he will truly be one of ours.
Being from Maryland, and routing for the Terrapins, I was very excited we picked up Joey Haynos, the TE from Maryland. I watched his entire career at Maryland, and he was pretty good in Ralph Friedgen’s offense for what his athletic abilities are. If he really commits to the weight room, he could make the team as a Jason Dunn-type blocking TE.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
by jobe on May 13, 2008 12:46 AM CDT 0 recs






