Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Gift Of The 2003 Tigers

Friday Injury Report for Week 2

Every week it seems like the Packers have half their team on the injury report, and the other team has three guys listed. Are the Packers injury prone or just brutally honest?

It looks like all these guys will play, except C Scott Wells, RG Josh Sitton, and CB Charles Woodson. The offensive line was fantastic against Minnesota, except for penalties (especially you Tony Moll!), so there's no reason to rush Wells. I'm not sure Sitton would start even if he was healthy. Woodson is a big loss, he's not being ruled out until game time but it doesn't look good. CB Tramon Williams would start in his place, and he already had one pass interference penalty this season. I can't see how Woodson will be able to play for a few weeks, at least, on a broken toe. No one in the secondary can replace his coverage skills and his ability to grab INTs.

Player Pos. Injury Friday Participation Friday Status
Atari Bigby S Bicep Full Participation Probable
Brandon Chillar LB Back Full Participation Probable
Chad Clifton T Knees Full Participation Probable
Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila DE Knee Did Not Participate Probable
Ryan Grant RB Hamstring Full Participation Questionable
Brandon Jackson RB Concussion Full Participation Probable
James Jones WR Knee Full Participation Probable
Ruvell Martin WR Finger Limited Participation Questionable
Charlie Peprah S Hamstring Full Participation Questionable
Aaron Rouse S Ankle Did Not Participate Questionable
Josh Sitton G Knee Out Out
Scott Wells C Back Did Not Participate Out
Charles Woodson CB Toe Did Not Participate Questionable
Poll
Do You Think Woodson Will Play This Week?
Yes, He'll Play Through The Pain
19 votes
No, Not This Week
12 votes
No Way, He's Out For Weeks
2 votes

33 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Our front seven should absolutely dominate the Lions

I think we’ll be fine without Charles Woodson. We obviously need him more when we play Dallas, the next week.

Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey

by jobe on Sep 13, 2008 3:35 AM CDT reply actions  

Agreed;

the defense doesn’t necessarily “need” Woodson as much as they would against a more potent offense, like Dallas or Indy.

That said, I hope that:

Tramon Williams is up to covering Roy Williams. Tramon is a pretty good player, but I don’t think he’s as physical as Woodson, and when he tries to be he will get flagged for it.

Al Harris is up to covering Megatron. Obviously, if Woodson is out, this is the answer to the Calvin Johnson question. Harris is big enough and strong enough to cover Johnson, but his age is starting to show and he’s frankly not able to get away with as much contact as he was even last season.

Bob Sanders finds a way to give both guys help when they need it. Roll a safety to one side of the field. Double up when in nickel or dime packages. Blitz more to try to take advantage of Detroit’s line troubles. These are all necessary moves, but they’re also risky in that they open up seams in the middle of the field, underneath routes, and holes in coverage left by blitzing defenders.

Considering Dan Campbell is on IR, the only Lions’ player that even remotely resembles an offensive threat (pass defense-wise) is Mike Furrey. Also, given the amount of pressure that they put on Tavaris Jackson last week, and given that Kitna is not nearly as mobile, the defensive line should have a pretty good outing. Control Roy Williams and contain Calvin Johnson as much as possible, and this should be a win.

"I'm so clean, cats think I sip Ajax."

by Mitchell Maurer on Sep 13, 2008 9:02 AM CDT reply actions  

Try replying to my comments

Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey

by jobe on Sep 14, 2008 1:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Isn’t that what I did?

"I'm so clean, cats think I sip Ajax."

by Mitchell Maurer on Sep 14, 2008 3:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

no, by pressing the reply button

Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey

by jobe on Sep 14, 2008 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

ohh

my bad

"I'm so clean, cats think I sip Ajax."

by Mitchell Maurer on Sep 14, 2008 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Acme Packing Company, the SBNation blog for fans of the Green Bay Packers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gassertaylor_small
APC Open Thread #33: Ron Dayne Thread? Why Not?
Packer_brewer_badger_logo_small
The APC Helmet Logo Bracket Tournament: Elite Eight

Recent FanPosts

03112008811_small
Clearing Cap Space & Roster Spots!
Pack_small
Current Cap Situation
03112008811_small
Wow... Won't Ever Doubt TT Again... (Of course I will... : )
Small
When And Why
Small
Where were you?
Ukcat_small
How about a little love for Cobb!!!
Jordy_nelson_small
MVP baby!
Football-funny-pic_small
NFL could add two new teams

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Acmepackingco_small Brandon

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Ayrton_senna_1988_canada_small Vermont Cubs Fan

Texbucky_small texwestern

Gassertaylor_small OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Img00243_small Kevin McCauley