Dom Capers Is The New Defensive Coordinator
I write a post comparing the four veteran coaches the Packers have interviewed for the defensive coordinator opening, and half an hour later it's leaked that they've hired Dom Capers.
Of the four veteran coaches Mike McCarthy interviewed, Capers is the oldest, has the most experience in the NFL, and the most experience as a head coach. He's been a head coach for many more seasons (nine) than McCarthy (three).
From JSOnline.com:
Capers made himself known with a 3-4 defense but he has worked with other defenses as well and probably will employ a hybrid 3-4/4-3 defense. This season, Capers was a special assistant with the New England Patriots, coaching mostly in the secondary...
In Capers, McCarthy would be getting a coach who cut his teeth in the 3-4 system and used it consistently, sometimes with great success and other times with little. During his three years as head coach of the Houston Texans, his biggest failure was getting the defense established. Twice it ranked 31st in the league.
Capers, 58, has some experience running the 4-3, too, and undoubtedly picked up some wide-ranging concepts from Bill Belichick during his year with the Patriots. Part of his interview with McCarthy presumably was to see how compatible their defensive philosophies are.
When Carolina played the Packers in the 1996 NFC Championship game, Dom Capers was the head coach for Carolina and they used a 3-4 scheme. He also loves the zone blitz:
“For us,” said former Carolina Panthers head coach Dom Capers, a generous user of the zone blitz, “it’s a way to put pressure on the quarterback and yet not have as much risk involved as if you’re locked up with a man. It’s not as defined for the quarterback to read because you’re passing receivers [from defender to defender], as opposed to being clearly locked up on a receiver. We think it gives us some ability to create confusion and indecision on the part of a quarterback.”
I've never seen the Packers run a zone blitz under any defensive coordinator. It would be a brand new world for most of the defensive players who return next season, but maybe that is what Mike McCarthy is trying to do. It's time to shake up the defense. Since the Packers defense was outstanding in 2006, pretty good in 2007, and had an excellent pass defense in 2008, I'm not sure a complete overhaul is in order. But an overhaul is coming.
Ironically, I just watched a replay of the Tuck Rule Game from the 2001 AFC Championship. The famous play happened on a zone blitz, Oakland's defensive end dropped back to take away the slant route and CB Charles Woodson came untouched on a blitz to force a fumble an incompletion. So at least Woodson is familiar with how the zone blitz should work.
I think it really comes down to whether DE Aaron Kampman can become an outside linebacker. If Capers believes Kampman can become an outside linebacker, like OLB/DE hybrid Terrell Suggs, then they'll switch to a 3-4. It will be interesting to see what Capers says when he's introduced at a press conference.
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
I'm excited again
This hire has got me salivating for football a full 6 months early. I wonder if Capers can finally find a use for Poppinga?
by PackaCracka on Jan 19, 2009 11:08 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully he finds a way to move him to special teams for good.
by Old World Flavor on Jan 19, 2009 12:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
agree
Poppinga just doesnt have what it takes to be a starting OLB he plays the run alright but he cant play the pass well due to lack of speed. Chillar is by far a better player for the job
by bizzle4 on Jan 19, 2009 1:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Chillar to me
looks like he can play as an inside linebacker. I also think Barnett could work as well. I could imagine Barnett being a Larry Foote type.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
by jobe on Jan 19, 2009 4:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
3-4?
would/ will be an interesting sight to see the green and gold come out in a 3-4. but lets take a look at what we have for it.
lineman
END- Jenkins- I dont think he could adapt enough to beable to cover anyone if played the OLB
NOSE GUARD- Pickett- being one of the biggest guys on the team perfect for him
END- Would hate to have to have Kampman be just a line filler- So a mixture of the other DLine could fit Harrell (if he can get suited up without hurting himself)- Cole- Montgomery- Jolly- Hunter- all could sub in throughout the game. As the DLine did in ’07 keeping everyone fresh
OLLB- Kampman if he understand the coverage- Bishop If Kampman plays the end
MLB-Barnett- Healthy and in a 3-4 I think this could really improve him not having to be a sideline to sideline and just really look to stop the run.
MLB- I dont know if I like Hawk here. He seemed to be very confused this year playing a MLB might try Bishop hes a great athlete and showed some promise this year.
ORLB- Hawk or Chillar. Mixing them in could also work.
by bizzle4 on Jan 19, 2009 1:41 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I really don't know how they're going to use Hawk
He certainly isn’t a pass-rushing Terrell Suggs type and will likely never be. His motor will be wasted taking on guards if he’s inside I believe.
It’d also be a shame to waste Kampman’s tremendous motor on a two gap end spot. Not to say that’s not a position of skill, an Aaron Smith and a Richard Seymour sure are valuable. Ravens OLB Jarrett Johnson and Patriots OLB Adalius Thomas are all similar sizes as Kampman, and Thomas specifically came into the league as a 3-4 end the Ravens moved to OLB. I think Kampman can become an OLB/DE.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
by jobe on Jan 19, 2009 5:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Kampman = Suggs
Watching the AFC Championship game, I thought Suggs looked a lot like a defensive end trying to play outside linebacker. I didn’t count how many times he went into a 3 point stance, but it happened frequently. Arguably he is primarily a defensive end, he even challenged Baltimore about it when they used the franchise tag on him as an outside linebacker when he considered himself a higher paid defensive end. I think Kampman can move to outside linebacker, but he’ll still seem more like a defensive end on a lot of plays.
I think they keep Hawk outside. Barnett and Poppinga are middle linebackers, they both are locked into long term contracts so they are both going to play somewhere. The big change for Kampman might be moving to the right side. He’s been at left defensive end, over the right tackle, his entire career. Now he’ll probably move to the right side, so he can rush against the left tackle and Hawk will stay on the strong side where he would be better in coverage against the tight end.
by Brandon on Jan 19, 2009 11:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I do like that switch
switching Kamp to the right with Jenks on the right line! On blitz plays that would be a dangerous combination for any QB!
I still find it hard to think Poppinga as a starter anymore. Hes not good enough agaisnt the pass and not big enough to go up against the guards in the middle.
I think I would definitely keep Hawk outside and put a DT on his end hopefully filling bodies and let Hawks LB speed do his work. The speed of a LB not a DE on one side and the power of the DE on the other side of the LBs could work to our advantage.
by bizzle4 on Jan 19, 2009 11:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if Hawk on the Outside does work
I can’t think of a 3-4 defense that does have a non DE-type player at OLB. ‘Course, event though he has a number in the nineties, you could make the argument that James Harrison was never a DE-type. But while AJ is very strong pound for pound, I don’t know if he’s James Harrison strong.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
by jobe on Jan 20, 2009 12:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 














