Brent Farve is Cheap
So I know most of you watched the Vikings lose, which was a joy in itself. I also enjoyed watching Favre crying on the sideline, ala Jay Cutler, after he threw the game-losing interception. What I really enjoyed, but was also angered by, was Favre's pitiful attempt to cheat and slide-tackle Fox as he returned the interception for a touchdown. Watch again so you can see what I'm talking about:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZhS95PFMD4
Of course all the Favre apologist announcers haven't said a word about it, probably because he was too weak to even go through with the slide-tackle and ended up falling lamely instead. It sort of looked like some guy running down a road and a car driving by and opening the door into him. Anyways, I just wanted to point out that Favre tried and failed to be a dirty player, which to me is worse than being a dirty player.
131 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
lol
I had no idea what everyone was talking about when mentioning that
but now that I have seen it, that was a pathetic slide haha
Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok
I've been very critical of his effort on this play
but I don’t think it was a dirty attempt at a tackle but more an attempt to prevent himself from being hit on the play.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
It looked to me more like he was just trying to keep from getting pancaked...
… while still trying to get in the way. He knew, of course, that all 7 of those defenders were lining him up like a cue-ball, as they would with any QB on a turnover return like that. If it was an attempt to cheap-shot the guy, it was a pretty weak effort.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Oct 26, 2009 9:50 PM CDT up reply actions
I guess when you make up an imaginary person with an imaginary name, you can imagine anything you want about his imaginary motivations!
Sticking to reality myself, thanks anyway!
Oh, I've been paying attention all right
I live in Wisconsin, born and raised, and I have watched the Packers regularly since the days of Dickey, Lofton, and Jefferson (yes, predating Favre), so I’m kinda forced to pay attention.
It’s been downright embarassing, all this “Brent” and “Judas” crap, by the way. I travel a lot for work, and football fans outside the state (and some inside) are laughing at Wisconsin, I hope you realize (thanks for that!)
Maybe it was too subtle, but me saying this is an imaginary person with imaginary name and imaginary motiviations was supposed to be a form of pointing out that all the drama here stopped being about Favre a long LONG time ago — about a year ago — and has become purely about (and only about) some Packers fans inability to deal with and accept the real world, where football players are professional entertainers, who are allowed to work wherever they can find it (especially after their original employer has told them they have a new guy they want to squeeze them out for). And they are also human beings, who are allowed to continue to pursue their dreams (getting another Lombardi, for example) even after their old team (and many of its more ingrateful fans) tell them that they suck too much to be able to. Even though Aaron Rodgers was the right direction to go with (yes I agree with that), that does not mean Ted Thompson and so many fans had to go and be dicks in how they treated favre after that decison was made. Like I said, the last year + has been doingright embarassing for many of us Wisconsin football fans who aren’t always “preaching to the choir” who share our biases, but have to deal with the outside world.
Hopefully this second time is less subtle, so you pick it up.
If you have issues and/or want to keep trying to convince yourself that “team” means whoever ted thompson picks, it doesn’t matter who the actual guys on the field are, if Ted thompson says these are the guys you root for, then you jump to attention and say “Yes sir Mr Thompson, I will root for these collection of players who, for this year, you say I should be rooting for” … that’s fine. Just stop dragging Brett Favre into your issues. Brett is no longer Ted Thompson’s b%tch, so – because Ted tells you who you are supposed to like, in your world view – Brett’s not yours either
So, to confirm
You were rooting for T-Jack and Gus last year, and were prepared to root for T-Jack and/or Sage this year because you believed the were among the elite QBs in the league, or did you hope they’d fail because you didn’t think either were particularly good even if they were playing for the team you affiliated yourself with? Because, by that definition, it’d by hypocritical to cheer for them simply because they were Vikings…
I don't know about puddnhead,
but I was prepared to root for TJ and/or Sage and still am if Favre were to get injured/throw too many picks.
Right, and that makes sense to me
But puddnhead called out people for supporting the Packers team in whatever incarnation it exists. But that’s what nearly every fan does, regardless of team. I don’t fault anyone in Minnesota for defending T-Jack, Sage, or Booty prior to Favre coming on board, nor do I fault them for defending Favre now. It’s a team game, and most people thus root for the team and not individuals.
It's so much bigger than one man/player.
That’s why football is the ultimate team sport.
KC612,
When Favre leads the Vikings to a Victory in Super Bowl XLIV, then you will look back and say it was about ONE MAN/PLAYER!
That is a GUARANTEE!
by REVENGE4FAVRE on Oct 27, 2009 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions
The only thing guaranteed in life...
…is death to come. Favre can’t do it all by himself. He has to have a line to protect him and receivers to catch the ball.
If not for Favre the mention of a Super Bowl Victory would be for not!
That is a Fact!
by REVENGE4FAVRE on Oct 27, 2009 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions
Ladies and gentlemen
The reason I rarely post over at the DN anymore. I’m sure he’ll be here all week. Time to break out the tequila.
When you go to somebody's house, you don't crap on their floor. Being a fan of one team does NOT give you license to be a dick to fans of another.
Corollary: When people are visiting your house and behaving themselves, them being a fan of a different team is NOT a reason for you to piss in their beer.
Brought to you by Carl's Jr.
by Robert Rence on Oct 27, 2009 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Let him post more!
Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge
by Bush League All Star on Oct 27, 2009 9:35 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't agree with him though...
but he is harmless and usually off base. Humor allows you to get through the day.
Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge
by Bush League All Star on Oct 27, 2009 9:36 PM CDT up reply actions
I don’t find anything he says to be funny though. I love humor and will laugh at clever comments…just not seeing anything to laugh at there.
Expand the meaning of humor...
to include making fun of extremely stupid people. That is the type of humor I am more concerned with. I wasn’t going to expressly say it, but I just had to throw it out there! :P
Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge
by Bush League All Star on Oct 28, 2009 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions
He's not that dumb
He clearly stats as a “fact” that without Favre, the Vikings would not be SB contenders.
by PackaCracka on Oct 28, 2009 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions
So, to confirm You were rooting for T-Jack and Gus last year, and were prepared to root for T-Jack and/or Sage this year because you believed the were among the elite QBs in the league, or did you hope they’d fail because you didn’t think either were particularly good even if they were playing for the team you affiliated yourself with? Because, by that definition, it’d by hypocritical to cheer for them simply because they were Vikings…
Um … you seem to be completely missing my point. I just got done saying that the real world is not all about rigid associations that exist from birth til death (hate to break it to you dude, not only was Brett Favre not born a Packer, but Aaron Rodgers grew up a 49er fan!).
So you are responding to my statement that there are no rigid associations … by demanding that I tell you I do have a rigid association? Like I said … you are completely missing the point.
Great point...
That is what made Brent’s comment about how “real Packer fans” should feel about him even more insulting. He doesn’t have a CLUE what it means to be a Packer fan. Apparently he was merely here to earn a paycheck and set some records. Early in his career he was team oriented…later in his career he was Brett oriented.
I cheer for the packers. I guess since Brett is no longer a Packer I am not going to cheer for him…I don’t understand how we are supposed to push that aside to worship a player. I loved him when he was a packer, I don’t when he is elsewhere…why is that so hard to understand?!!?
I loved him when he was a packer, I don’t when he is elsewhere…why is that so hard to understand?!!?
It shouldn’t be, but somehow it is. As far as the “real Packers fans” garbage from him. I repeat what I said before. A true Packer player would understand why we are upset.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
I can see your POV
And I know most fans do it. But, I don’t know, maybe I’ve developed a more complex relationship with the packers ironically because maybe I lived closer, in the Fox Valley. My kids grew up with wonderful individuals like LeRoy Butler coming to their schools & doing outreach stuff, I personally saw Favre in the bars back in the day, and Reggie, Brett, and Winters did a Make a Wish fulfillment for my sister’s nephew when he had Leukemia. These weren’t just guys I only saw on TV Sunday.
So maybe over time I started seeing less the uniforms on Sundays, and more the guys that wore them. And I had connections to players on other teams, for example a friend worked as marshall faulk’s nanny, and my nephew’s buddy made it to the NFL (briefly).
It’s not right or wrong, it’s just me. Please don’t think I’m am trying to tell you you must think that way too. I am not, and never did, no matter how much other people claim. I’m just trying to explain a different POV, one which for all I care you can accept or reject. I have no missionary zeal to convert you. I’m just telling you, maybe because I’m not such a “bleeds green and gold” guy, that maybe people come up to me and say things that they might not sya to you, things like “What’s up withthe Judas stuff? Are they really burning his jerseys? Why?” A few of those come from CA friends, who maybe are particularly fasicinated becasue of the whole Montana to the Chiefs thing, and simply cannot comprehend why we collectively appear to have our undies in such a bundle over this.
this makes perfect sense to me
and I have no problem with that position at all.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
The Fox Valley?
You’re my damn neighbor with the Vikings flag aren’t you?
I am SO hitting your garbage can with my car tomorrow.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Oct 27, 2009 8:40 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
ya hey pass the cheese neighbor
THOMPSON IS A MORON
by 4 where-ever on Oct 28, 2009 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions
Every time I see your post
with your sig I want to punch a deer in the face
by PackaCracka on Oct 28, 2009 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I get it. I understand about that stuff. I grew up in Appleton. I’ve been to training camp. I stood inside the fence chatting with Ryan Longwell one day for a practice. I’ve got autographs (signed in person) from Favre, Reggie, Koonce, Holmgren, Tyrone Williams, Newsome, etc. I haven’t destroyed any of my Favre stuff but its not displayed right now. It doesn’t help that NOW I live in Minnesota and i have to listen to my friends (who trashed Favre any chance they could) now cheer for him and argue with me about how he’s the best thing since sliced bread.
Thanks for sharing a little more though…
If you have issues and/or want to keep trying to convince yourself that "team" means whoever ted thompson picks, it doesn’t matter who the actual guys on the field are, if Ted thompson says these are the guys you root for, then you jump to attention and say "Yes sir Mr Thompson, I will root for these collection of players who, for this year, you say I should be rooting for" … that’s fine. Just stop dragging Brett Favre into your issues. Brett is no longer Ted Thompson’s b%tch, so – because Ted tells you who you are supposed to like, in your world view – Brett’s not yours either
Why is everything with this issue always either COMPLETELY black or COMPLETELY white and nothing in between is possible at all? What you just described is the exact situation that every other team is in as well. The GM assembles a team and the fans cheer for those guys. Like Seinfeld said, we’re cheering for laundry. The fact is the NFL is not like the NBA. In the NFL we cheer for teams. In the NBA we cheer for players and the team they are on is secondary to that. So if a player leaves a team in the NFL and intentionally goes to a rival everyone doesn’t just turn in their jerseys and start supporting the rival. If that’s what you are looking for go watch the NBA. For now TT is the GM of the Packers and he determines who is on the team and who isn’t. But if in the future TT is not the GM and we have someone else assembling the team I will still cheer for whoever that GM assembles as my team. That’s how supporting a team over a player works.
If you are so concerned with how the entire state of Wisconsin is judged by people you encounter on your travels in regards to how Packer fans welcome Brett Favre in his return to Lambeau then I don’t know what to tell you. I don’t live in Wisconsin anymore and haven’t for over 13 years now but will remain a fan of the Packers, Brewers, etc till the day I die. I don’t know if that means that I am a part of that “outside world” or not but I can tell you this, booing a player who has given me justification to boo him by his actions towards my team (real or perceived) makes more sense to me than booing a player simply because he is wearing the opposing color.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Oct 27, 2009 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
right back at ya
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Oct 27, 2009 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
you've got to love that response btw
considering it came after a long diatribe telling others how to think
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Oct 27, 2009 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Umm
I never told you how to think. I just attempted to describe how you think. You are the only one telling others how to think, by telling me I must (have no choice but to) “cheer for laundry.” While simultaneously, weirdly also telling me that this rule of yours only applies to the NFL, it does not apply to the NBA. Seriously, WTF was THAT about?
You will cheear for whatever players Ted Thompson puts on Lambeau field in 2010 in Green Bay Packers jerseys (asuming Ted is still here). True or False? If you answered true, then I described how you think correctly. I did not tell you to think that way, and I did not tell you not to.
huh?
You can think how you want! Who is telling you how to think? You came in here telling us how stupid we are and look for thinking the way we do…you WERE telling us how to think.
We cheer for the packers…PERIOD. You think we are going to stop cause some QB leaves the team? I really don’t understand how you think!
Slowly now
I am not telling you how to think
I never told you how to think.
The post you just replied to has ABOSLUTELY NO INSTRUCTIONS about what or how you should think.
The only thing I would ask you to do, is READ. Not think. though that would be nice too ;)
specifically
You SPECIFICALLY told us that we shouldn’t be mad at Favre because he chose to “work” for the Vikings.
By the way…referring to your post above…what does “team” mean to you? If team is anything more than the guys on the field, wouldn’t Favre be retired because he would be Packer for life then? Just because we cheer for a team loyally doesn’t mean we support every decision but people who come back and forth on a team because they don’t like the direction have a name: Fair weather. I would expect a viking fan to think that is what a fan is supposed to be like but honestly its not!
You have me there
Yes. Although I never told you you have to cheer Favre, yes I did say that calling him a traitor or Judas because he signed as a free agent with another team was silly.
Let me try to flip the situation for you to show you why this does not make sense. Favre going to Vikings is no different than Reggie to Packers (yeah, yeah, divisional rival and all that stuff, but that just means a matter of degree, not a totally different situation) Were you mad at Reggie White? Because , you know, he was a “traitor” at the level of Reggie White (the Eagles’ “Judas”).
If your answer is gong to be it’s different becasue it was Eagles not Pack that he “betrayed,” then I have to ask: something that’s wrong for me to do to you, it’s ok & acceptable for me to do to someone else? really?
Favre going to Vikings is no different than Reggie to Packers (yeah, yeah, divisional rival and all that stuff, but that just means a matter of degree, not a totally different situation)
Its a hell of a lot different and you know it. The Eagles and Packers have no longstanding rivalry. Reggie never said he wanted to play for the Packers to “stick it” to the Eagles. You can try to brush off the whole divisional thing all you want but that is the crux of the whole argument. If Favre had come out of phony retirement again to sign with the 49ers, or Seahawks, or Titans, or Browns would we see the same type of hatred coming from Packers fans? No way in hell. If he had come out wearing 49er colors in a few weeks I doubt he would get booed at Lambeau. Do you think he would have? You can’t just brush aside the main point of the entire argument.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
Huge. /clap
Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge
by Bush League All Star on Oct 27, 2009 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions
Reggie had no reason to want revenge on the GM of the Eagles, because Reggie was never told by the Eagles “we don’t want you anymore, but we will handcuff you from playing for teams that are good enough that they might be a threat to us.” So, to throw your own words back at you, “Its a hell of a lot different and you know it..”
By the way, there are actually some Eagles fans that do think that way anyway. One actually posted at DN earlier this season, saying he was enjoying that Packers were finding the same taste in their mouths from Favre to Vikes that he felt with Reggie to Pack (his comparison, not mine).
And, as I know you know well. Brett never said he wanted to “stick it to the Eagles.” He said he wanted to stick it to Ted Thompson.
Reggie had no reason to want revenge on the GM of the Eagles, because Reggie was never told by the Eagles "we don’t want you anymore, but we will handcuff you from playing for teams that are good enough that they might be a threat to us."
Right, because Reggie White was a free agent and under no team control. Brett Favre was under contract to the Green Bay Packers. Those are two completely different scenarios. A guy who is under contract to a team does not get to determine freely where he goes. It has been that way since the beginning of free agency. The same rules apply to everyone, whether they have won a Super Bowl and 3 MVP’s or if they are the last guy on the roster. So to throw my own words back at myself:
Its a hell of a lot different and you know it.
Brett never said he wanted to "stick it to the Eagles." He said he wanted to stick it to Ted Thompson.
And he never understood (or did understand and just didn’t care) that by “sticking it” to Ted Thompson he was also “sticking it” to the fans who had supported him and his family over 16 years. You and Favre seem to be under the mistaken conclusion that the Green Bay Packers = Ted Thompson. They do not. Not anymore than the Green Bay Packers = Brett Favre. Sticking it to Ted Thompson via the Green Bay Packers = sticking it to the fans that supported him and his family over the years, whether he wants to admit it or not.
By the way, there are actually some Eagles fans that do think that way anyway. One actually posted at DN earlier this season, saying he was enjoying that Packers were finding the same taste in their mouths from Favre to Vikes that he felt with Reggie to Pack (his comparison, not mine).
And people say we need to let it go? Sheesh
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
The difference of course being...
… that Favre retired and Reggie didn’t. Not that it didn’t still sting, I’m sure, especially then, when the concept of simply losing a player to another team without compensation and against your will was brand new. I’m not sure why Favre’s supporters always regard as unimportant the fact that Favre left. He wasn’t forced out of anywhere. He left, and the team moved on. He only came to think of himself as the jilted QB once he realized someone was actually going to treat him like an adult and hold him to a decision.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Oct 27, 2009 10:47 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
exactly
Imagine if all you had to do to become a free agent (or renegotiate a contract) was to Favretire? Ochocinco would have Favretired at least 3 times by now. The entire Raiders team would collectively Favretire just to be free of that shipwreck of a franchise.
I’m not sure why Favre’s supporters always regard as unimportant the fact that Favre left. He wasn’t forced out of anywhere. He left, and the team moved on.
To hear the Favrophiles tell it, TT did everything but slash Favre’s tires to get him to leave. They also ignore the part in his teary-eyed press conference at his first phony retirement that Ted and Mike had NOTHING to do with this decision, “and that’s from the heart.” That the Packers mgmt forced Brett into retirement, like he suggested in his softball toss with Greta Van Whoever. They ignore the fact that he either lied at his phony retirement press conference or he lied during his “interview” with Greta Van Shareholder. It’s one or the other, you can’t have it both ways.
The one that always bugs the hell out of me is when people say that the Packers didn’t make Brett feel wanted. I guess a $12 million contract isn’t enough evidence of being wanted. And, out of curiosity, since when is it common practice for a GM to be required to show a player on his team that he is wanted every off-season? Does TT have to show AJ Hawk that he is wanted? Donald Driver? Aaron Kampman? Al Harris? Charles Woodson?
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
Actually, I hope so
Any good boss, in any field, should be showing that he appreciates his key personnel. Has nothing to do with football specificly.
well
Yes it is good for the boss to let his key personnel know that they are appreciated, but does that extend to having to convince that personnel every year that they are wanted? Brett wasn’t looking for a pat on the back and “job well done” talk, he needed to be convinced that the team really truly wanted him back, cuz its common practice for teams to give $12 million a year to a guy who they wish would just go away.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
Actually
Since you broght it up … didn’t Reggie retire from the packers, then later go to the Panthers, without Packers getting any compensation?
Yep, found it
White actually did have to get out of his contract with Packers to play for Carolina. Thanks for making me look for it, I never would have otherwise. It’s not exactly hidden, it’s right on packers.com:
White retired again after the 1998 season and took a year off from football. After the Packers allowed him out of his contract, White returned to the Panthers last season and played for $1 million.
But that was a kindler, gentler time in packers history, with a more hands-on GM. Ron Wolf was smart enough to follow the model the 49ers used with Montana too: There are some players that deserve extra consideration in how you handle them. Bill Bellicheck did the same (on a smaller scale) with Doug Flutie.
Hold on puddn --
You clearly don’t know wtf you’re talking about if you are presenting the Montana-49ers split as the model of an amicable divorce between a sports franchise and a HoF quarterback.
Please read about the 49ers split and its fallout covered great detail by the Sporting News and please stop telling all of us how uniquely bad the way the Packers-Favre split was handled.
Plus, to clarify your point, are you presuming that had Reggie White demanded a trade to the Minnesota Vikings after coming out of retirement in 2000, Ron Wolf would have (in his “more hands-on” and “kinder, gentler” manner) granted Reggie his wish out of “extra consideration” for his HoF status?
If so, you are officially high as a kite.
Umm, try to catch up with me`
The point was that, once having decided to go with YOung (agina, note that I have never faulted the decision to go with Rodgers), the 49ers WORKED WITH MONTANA to find a place to trade him to, that he wanted to be in. They made the decison togetehr.
The Packers and Favre made a decisoin together too. It was that Favre would be traded to the Bucs. Brett Favre went to bed on August 7, 2008 having been told that he was being traded to the Bucs. It’s clearly documented in interviews with Jon Gruden and Mike Tannenbaum, not just Favre.
Dude, you're wrong
You keep propagating this myth (absent any supporting evidence) and I keep responding with facts. Like this (from 8/30/08, 23 days after The Trade):
Favre says he’s having a “blast” with the Jets, and the organization has done everything to make him comfortable. He said he knew coming to the Jets would be a big challenge because of the their offensive system. He said the Tampa Bay Buccaneers were his second choice, in part, because he knew their offense and coach Jon Gruden.
Jets general manager Mike Tannenbaum, Favre said, won him over, selling him on the Jets’ offseason moves, their receiving corps, the team’s new complex in Florham Park and its surrounding countryside.
“Mike called me on the phone, I couldn’t get him to shut up,” said Favre, smiling. “He sold me.”
Or this (From the day of the trade):
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are saying they never made a serious effort to trade for Brett Favre.
Favre is telling another story.
When talking this evening about the sales job that Jets General Manger Mike Tannenbaum did to convince him to play in New York, Favre mentioned the conversations that he’d had with Buccaneers Coach Jon Gruden, who’d once worked with Favre as a Packers assistant.
“Jon Gruden, I tip my hat to him, too,” Favre said. “It was a long time ago when we were working together. But he sold me as well.”
Perhaps the Buccaneers’ attempts to minimize their efforts to trade for Favre are an effort to repair their relationship with Jeff Garcia, who would have been supplanted as the starting quarterback in Tampa if Favre had gone there instead.
Hmmmm, seems Favre not only was fine with going to the Jets, but he even was an integral part of the final decision.
Huh.
Judge how the Packers handled the divorce all you want, but once it was final, Favre and his agent were full and active participants in the bidding war between the Jets and the Bucs. You need to drop this fairy tale that Favre was so terribly mistreated by the Packers in how they traded him if you want to be taken seriously. You’re bordering on flat-earther territory.
And, by the way, Puddn, I’m still trying to “catch up” with your response to my counter to your Reggie White comparisons. I don’t see it any where on the horizon, am I getting close?
Favre's word
isn’t really worth much, imo, but if you want to trust him at his word then 400 has presented good evidence
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
My last comment
You do realize that even your own “evidence” states that Favre had to be “won over” and “sold on” the Jets, and it says point blank that they were not his first choice, right? right?
I have no idea why you think that would be, except for what I said being true — that at the time the trade happened, he wanted to go to Bucs.
Huh?
read:
He said the Tampa Bay Buccaneers were his second choice, in part, because he knew their offense and coach Jon Gruden.
You’re just so obsessed with this false narrative that you only see what you want to see. The fact is that Brett was not some innocent rube in the whole process of being traded. He’s a grown man and a professional athlete. He was just as much a part of the negotiations for his services as TT and the respective GMs of TB and NY.
REGGIE
couple differences:
1. Reggie didn’t force his way out. He asked, they felt he was done and they granted it
2. Reggie actually retired for a season and didn’t demand that the Packers start him or release him
3. Reggie didn’t go in the division
4. Reggie didn’t use the media to manipulate the team and the fans
5. Reggie should have stayed retired…he looked terrible in his last year
sums it up nicely
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
As for Brett wanting to stick it to Ted Thompson, not the Packers.
How do you think he would have to go about doing that? By beating and sticking it to the team Ted Thompson is GM of.
by Charlie Kelly on Oct 28, 2009 5:50 AM CDT up reply actions
I agree verno329
If Favre had gone to any other team the media wouldn’t care as much and Favre wouldn’t have made such an impact. The only way to make splash is to go to the enemy. Thats if you want to get back at somebody drag their name through the mud on national TV.
by cheddarhead on Oct 27, 2009 10:23 PM CDT up reply actions
Reggie White left as free agent, he didn't pull some elaborate retirement scheme to get here
Also, I don’t know much about Reggie’s days in Philly but I would assume he wasn’t as big there as Favre is here mainly because Philly is a huge sports cities with a wide variety of athletes whereas Green Bay is not. Also, like you said yourself, Reggie did not go to a hated rival. Do you think Eagles fans would care if he went to Dallas or Washington?
by Charlie Kelly on Oct 28, 2009 5:48 AM CDT up reply actions
backstory
If Favre was a FA and we chose to not resign him or lowball him and he moved onto a different team, I wouldn’t care. I didn’t care Sharper left…or Longwell for that matter. The Packers clearly decided to go another direction (which was probably the wrong move based on how well they played..esp Longwell). Sure I didn’t like seeing them in purple but I don’t hold it against them. Favre’s situation was totally different.
You mention Longwell...
Remember when he came back to GB for the first time? He had pretty much every fan there booing him. Not going to say everyone should do it to Favre, but I am going to BOO him like I would every other Vikings, Bears, or NFL QB.
Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge
by Bush League All Star on Oct 28, 2009 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
So you pissed at Regie too for going to Carolina while still under contract to us?
See my post about 5 posts up
I never told you how to think. I just attempted to describe how you think.
Um, I was trying to describe what I think. That’s how responses work.
You are the only one telling others how to think, by telling me I must (have no choice but to) "cheer for laundry."
Please show me where I said that you have no choice but to “cheer for laundry.” If you are a fan of a particular team regardless of who is on the team then you are cheering for laundry. If you are a fan of particular team because your favorite player happens to play for them that is also fine. Just admit that your loyalty is to the player and not to the team.
While simultaneously, weirdly also telling me that this rule of yours only applies to the NFL, it does not apply to the NBA. Seriously, WTF was THAT about?
This was in regards to reality as it exists. This was not a rule that always only applied to the NFL and not the NBA. The NBA made a conscious decision many years ago to market the player above marketing the team. It worked like a charm when you had players like MJ, Magic and Bird. The NBA as it exists now is a player driven league where many people (not all, by any means, but most) are fans of the Cavs because Lebron is there, the Lakers because of Kobe, the Magic because of Dwight Howard, etc. When Lebron signs elsewhere once his contract is up how many Cavs fans will there still be? That is why so many teams are struggling in the NBA. If they don’t have a marquee player (like the team closest to me, the Bobcats) then they have absolutely no draw. The NFL is not like this. The team is marketed above the player. Favre is the first player I have seen to challenge this structure.
You will cheear for whatever players Ted Thompson puts on Lambeau field in 2010 in Green Bay Packers jerseys (asuming Ted is still here). True or False? If you answered true, then I described how you think correctly
The question you asked is flawed, imo. Remove TT from the question so that it reads:
You will cheer for whatever players march onto Lambeau field in 2010 in Green Bay Packers jerseys. True or False?
And my answer is a resounding TRUE!
In a comment further down here you mention your history with the Packers as a fan, specifically mentioning rooting for the Packers to lose in the 80’s so that Forrestt Gregg would be fired. I also was a fan of the team back then, though I was growing up and didn’t have access to the type of information you were referencing. I COMPLETELY understand your point and I have no argument against that, if that is how you feel. I think its a little early to take on that kind of a position myself, but I can certainly respect that position. However,
Today: the Green Bay Packers are Ted Thompsons’ team. Not yours, not mine.
This does not make sense to me. Every GM puts his stamp on a team, if he’s a good GM. This team is no more the Green Bay Thompson’s than the Patriots are the New England Belicheck’s, or the Giants are the New York Coughlin’s or the Steelers were the Pittsburgh Cowher’s. Should every personnel decision be put up to a vote by the stockholders? That would make it closer to yours and my team, but is that what we want?
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
Thanks for the reply
I appreciate the time you took to compose it, and the thought you put into it. I know my POV is probably confusing to most. Probably should have just continued to keep it to myself, as I had been.
But don’t let the other guy in this thread claiming he’s talked to hundreds of people and there is no in WIsconsin (or elsewhwhere) thinking remotely like me fool you. I am hardly an isolated case. There is still a lot of discontent in Packerdom right now about how things have been going down recently, and it’s not just because of more frequent losses.
your POV makes sense to me
I might not agree with it completely, but it makes sense once you’ve explained it and that’s all that matters to me. I also get tons of questions about Favre regularly because people know that I am a huge Packers fan, and frankly, it makes for easy small talk for them. Some have tried to tell me I’m wrong for thinking like I do and some have agreed with me wholeheartedly. So I know what you are talking about, but I’ve never had anyone say they think less of the state as a whole for their treatment of Favre.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
Not to beat this to death
But I’m not saying that. What I’m saying is the jersey burning & Judas jersey stuff is reinforcing some stereotypes of so called ’sconnies with people I know on the coasts, stereotypes that we are odd and obsessive about things which no one else gets why its so important. Things that they get from places like the TV show “Picket Fences.” Stereotypes that are not very flattering. I kinda wish real life would not be reinforcing those.
Then again, maybe I should be considering if it’s just mere coincidence that weird, bizarre places on TV seem to almost always be set in Maine, Alaska, or Wisconsin :)
yeah well
people on the coasts are too preoccupied with how great life is there and can’t understand why anyone would willingly live in those fly-over states anyway. i wouldn’t worry about them too much
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
I am sorry but have you ever been to Oakland for a game? How about Philly? Kansas City? NY? Packer fans are TAME on this compared to what fans in some of the more dramatic cities would be doing. Are you trying to tell me that the Oakland fans wouldn’t show up with Favre dolls hanging from a rope or something liek that? That Philly fans wouldn’t be throwing bottles of beer at him on the field? This is not some crazy reaction. I think your small town life has affected your perception on this. While I haven’t burned anything of mine that has his name on it (nor do I know anyone that has) those people are going to be out there in EVERY market. Don’t take the minority and mistake it for the majority.
If we are reduced to arguing that at least we're no worse than Black Hole fans
… then the battle has already been lost :)
[clapping]
Exactly. Give me a break…embarrassed about living in WI…then move already. If you are embarrassed about a state because of how they feel about a football player that is pretty stupid. Football isn’t reality…sure it happens but its nothing more than a game, entertainment. That is like saying you are embarrassed for a state because they didn’t sell out a concert that sold out everywhere else. If you want to be embarrassed for a state, make it about something that actually matters…not a game.
I'm not embarassed to live in Wisconsin
I’m just embarassed by the behavior of some fellow residents.
gotcha
its going to be like that everywhere you go though man…there will always be fans that you are embarrassed to be associated with. That said, you are NOT a Packer fan you just live in that state just like I am not a Viking fan though I live in their state. I am OFTEN embarrassed by how some Viking fans talk about their team. I listen to KFAN all the time and am MIND BOGGLED at PA and the people that call into his show who don’t have ANY sense of reality aside from blind loyalty.
Management makes decisions I don’t like sometimes. It doesn’t stop me from cheering for my team…and booing those who play on the enemy’s team!
I’m gonna take a guess I’m older than you, and have been following the Packers longer than you, so maybe I have some experiences from the 1980s that you do not, experience that definitely drove this more complex relationship. I was a Packer fan when Forrest Gregg was coach. That was a horrible time to be a Packer fan, not only bad football on the field, but some really bad character issues off the field on those teams. I share Ditka’s POV on this (and I shared it even before I knew he felt that way too): Gregg tolerated & in many ways even encouraged bad personal behavioiur on those teams, playing favorites to by protecting and sheltering some players when they had criminal charges filed against them, and hanging out to dry (cutting) others when they merely had accusations made agianst them (accusations which were later dropped by DA because there were serious discrepancies with them). So, I’ve had the experience of having to go to a very difficult place to go as a fan of a football team, that maybe you’ve never had to deal with … to realize there was a poison in the highest level of the team (Forrest Gregg) that had transformed it into something I no longer wanted to be associated with any more. So, you might say, in order to save the team, I had to wish for it to fail. Yes, I started hoping that the Packers would lose, just so Judge Parrins would hurry up already and FIRE FORREST GREGG. I guess, having gone through that difficult process once before, it’s easier, and clearer, what to do the next time.
Today: the Green Bay Packers are Ted Thompsons’ team. Not yours, not mine. Let’s just I would like to see the Packers purged of Ted Thompson, and since it may take some pain to see that happen, like it did with Forrest Gregg … so be it.
I don’t expect many (any?) of you to understand this, but, well, I tried. Call me a bandwagon fan if you want, even though I’m gonna take a guess I’ve watched more Packers games than most here (probably close to 500?). If that means I have a brain, and I make choices, I don’t just blindly follow routine or “laundry” as you call it, then … thank you very much for the compliment.
ahh...
the truth comes out…you are a TT hater posing as something else.
Yeah I was around in the 80s. I don’t remember everything about them then, but I was a fan then and am today.
Honestly, if you come and go you aren’t a true fan. A true fan weathers the tough times. You don’t have to like every decision but you stick with your team.
I don’t like all TT decisions but the people that hate him have a blind hatred and it all started showing up when Brett was shown the door. Admit it. The faction that didn’t TT then was TINY…barely even noticable. In fact he won exec of the year shortly before it from the NFL. What lead to his down fall with the fans, him souring on Brett and Brett souring on him.
I understand your analogy, I don’t think this situation is even close to the situation that Gregg put the team through. This is a talented team with some weak spots (O line, maybe running back, and 2 aging corners). They don’t have discipline issues off the field or really on it either. They have a decent coach…not great but far from terrible. Teams have down cycles. Look at San Fran. They were great in the 90’s. It can’t last forever you have to retool and sometimes you have to move on from a legend to do so I guess. Sucks but that is life.
"The truth comes out?"
Uh … there are MANY anti-TT posts in these forums from me, from long before today. I’ve never “posed” that I wasn’t.
And … 3, 2, 1 …there you go again telling me if I am a true fan. I get it, your way or the highway. You are a card carrying member of the Wisconsin NFL fan thought police.
The explanation that I am not a “true fan” because I do not weather “tough times” is amusing. There have been VERY long stretches of MUCH togher times than this. And anyway when I finally found the courage to “leave,” the weather was not tough, but sunny and warm. Everyone and their dog was saying the Pack were a fovorite to go to super bowl. Is that your definition of “tough times?”
Finally, to be clear, my isues with TT predate Favre’s departure. I think what Favre’s departure meant was more 1) less counterbalance to my frustration over TT, 2) what came out as that went down intensified the feeling about TT. it took most of last year for that feeling to gel.
It’s always a hard part for me to explain, but let me say this for the 501st time on the SB forums: I think keeping Rodgers and trading Favre was actually the correct thing to do. that actually is not my issue. Thta is counterintuitive to some, I know. My issues are thigns which predate that trade, combined with how Thompson conducted teh trade. The decisoin to trade itself was not an issue for me. It was the right move to make Aaron Rodgers the QB of the Green Bay Packers. It’s just too bad more respect could not have been shown his predecessor.
that is a JOKE
I don’t know who YOU are talking to but I travel a LOT for work too and most of the people I talk to are SO sick of Favre that they can’t stand to hear more about him. They typically agree with the people in Wisconsin that he is clearly an attention hog.
Football player can do what they want and the people who go see their games can think what they want. You really come off like a real prick in this email man. Let people feel how they want to feel about it why is it any of your business if someone decides they don’t want to cheer for a guy they loved who went to play for the team they hate. You would do the same exact thing if AP decided to say, Screw you Vikes, I am going to Packers and if you don’t let it happen I will manipulate things until I get it.
I happen to live in MN so I don’t see things from the WI bubble. Before Favre started to make this MN thing a reality you damn Viking fans were saying the EXACT same thing that everyone I talk to is saying. You were sick of Favre and you wished he would go away. Most Viking fans I talk to couldn’t stand to mention that they thought he was even a great QB…now they can’t stop talking about it. You want to talk about people looking bad its the double talking coming out of MN. Jared Allen is amazing. I love the way AP runs I can totally admit when the Vikings have a great player. But at least 75% of my friends wouldn’t even acknowledge that he was one of the better QBs of our time (I am in my 30s) which is total BS. So yeah, I really don’t give a lot of credit to Viking fans coming in here and telling us how we should feel about our HOF QB manipulating his way to play for my arch enemy. Thanks for trying though.
Agreed
I travel a lot as well, and since the summer of 2008 have had literally hundreds of conversations with people from coast-to-coast on this subject. In that time, I’ve met three people out of hundreds who – from the outside in – took Favre’s side in the debacle. They were:
1) A guy who did some work in Kiln, Mississippi after Hurricane Katrina so he felt some sort of kinship with the Favre family (though I don’t think he ever met them)…
2) A guy who didn’t realize that Favre was the one who made the personal decision to retire. He thought Favre had been benched or released for poor play…
3) A guy who straight up told me that Favre’s legacy is shot at this point anyway, so he wanted Favre to keep playing as long as he could basically for the funny experiment in seeing how long his body would hold together before literally disintegrating on the field.
Apart from that, I can’t remember one person I’ve talked with (including multiple Vikings fans) who aren’t sick of Brett Favre and who believe a word that comes out of his mouth. They view him as a drama queen who needs to have ESPN talking about him to secure his own self-worth. Almost universally, people I speak with are very impressed with Aaron Rodgers as well and think the Packers made the right decision…. And, I’ve never heard anybody make fun of Wisconsin because of the way the Packers handled the Favre situation. I’m not being argumentative. I’m just saying it has never happened.
by ThirdStringSafety on Oct 27, 2009 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions
I would be curious
to hear your explanation of why CBS switched to more Jets games in Wisconsin (and elsewhere) last year, and the ratings for those games were so high when they did.
maybe you do not have an acurate pulse of America or Wisconsin after all?
LOL, I think your claim that even Vikings fans don’t like Favre kinda ices it. Really? LOL. Soo … what the heck, I’ll bite: who’s buying all those purple #4 jerseys then?
Sir, you explained what everybody you’ve spoken with has said, and I – in turn – am sharing what those I’ve spoken with have said. I’m not questioning your sincerity or honesty on this, nor do you have any reason to question mine. I have explained the three people I’ve spoken with who have been pro-Favre in this situation. In my travels to the Charlotte, N.C. area I spoke with a Vikings fan who has hated Brett Favre for more than a decade and told me word-for-word “I would rather lose every game this season than win with Brett Favre as our quarterback.” My cousin – a Vikings fan from birth – brought a copy of the Pioneer Press to a get-together and burned it on the camp fire. I’m not fabricating this, nor would I have any reason to. Both of these conversations were after he was signed, but before the season began, so I can’t tell you if they’ve changed their tune since the season began. You can choose to believe me if you want, and if you choose not to, that’s fine as well. Have a pleasant evening.
by ThirdStringSafety on Oct 27, 2009 6:24 PM CDT up reply actions
viking fans take notice
I spoke with a Vikings fan who has hated Brett Favre for more than a decade and told me word-for-word "I would rather lose every game this season than win with Brett Favre as our quarterback.
this is a real team fan
Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok
Is that sarcasm?
Because … well, it violates BIG TIME what others have defined as a team fan here. It actually sounds closer to me, ironically — someone with a franchise that you despise enough that you are willing to see the team suffer in order to rid itself of him. Only in my case its the Pack and ted Thompson, not the Vikes and Favre.
I find it more than a little amusing that you are obliquely slamming my position in other threads, yet you are (sincerely it appears) praising as a great fan someone that isn’t that unlike me, in his own way.
actually, I disagreed with you on Raji and Mathews
no sarcasm, but now Im confused
can you tell me in like one sentence your opinion on farve/thompson?
You seem to be in between and thats ok but I can’t quite tell from your posts
Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok
by blackoutsox on Oct 27, 2009 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions
First, I think you are confusing me with someone else. I don’t recall saying much about Raji or Mathews on any of these boards.
But, to answer your Q, I’ll do my best: Although the decision to go with Rodgers over Favre was defensible, and I actually even agree with it as a football decison, the way he handled it, and more particularly the aftermath of it, was reprehensible.
The really bad part was telling Favre he was going to be traded to Bucs, even seeking his agreement with it, striking the terms of the deal with the Bucs, then … trading him to the Jets without giving him any input or even warning. And that includes never giving the Bucs a chance to sweeten their offer. Thompson did purely what was best for him personally, seeing Favre in the AFC, not what maybe a player the stature of Favre deserves. It was a total power play by Thompson that, I can’t help it, I would enjoy immensely watching see come back and bit him in the ass. It didn’t have to be this way, if Favre had gone to Bucs, I bet he would have never been a Viking. Thompson brought this weird nightmare upon himself, and upon the Packers, by jacking Favre around while pretending he would work with him to resolve it.
Thompson did purely what was best for him personally, seeing Favre in the AFC, not what maybe a player the stature of Favre deserves … Thompson brought this weird nightmare upon himself, and upon the Packers, by jacking Favre around while pretending he would work with him to resolve it.
Listen, you can feel anyway you want to about Ted, etc., but this statement is pure conjecture. You have nothing to support your belief that Ted traded Brett to the Jets (whom Brett was aware was one of the chief bidders for his services and was happy to play for), for any reason other than that was the best offer made. Read Peter King’s blow-by-blow coverage of events following the Packers’ decision to put Favre on the trading block. It refutes pretty much everything you believe to be true.
Finally, are you completely absolving Favre of any responsibility for his divorce from the Pack? You truly believe that the split was all the result of one man (Ted Thompson) and his evil plan to rule the Packers without anymore interference from Brett?
I don't know
I was firmly against the Packers trying to get Randy Moss because of who he played with in his earlier years. He may have helped the team (in hindsight he wouldn’t have helped the team) but I was not prepared to have a former Viking on the team to achieve that goal.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
?
You do know what kind of year Moss had in 2007, right? Set all sorts of NFL records. Packers had great receiving corp that year, don’t get me wrong. But Moss outplayed them all that year. Brady to Moss was a big factor behond “sixteen and oh”
When the Packers play the Vikings this weekend, watch for a few plays from Favre to Sidney Rice. Rice is a player in the mold of Moss, though obviously less accomplished so far, and definitely less annoying. He’s 6’4" and has a great vertical leap, like Moss. None of the fine recievers the packers had in 2007 fit that mold. I may be mistaken, but none of them were taller than 6’?
On Sunday Favre will likely just throw a ball or tow or three or ten up for grabs in Rice’s direction, on purpose, and count on Rice to go up and win the battle. It’s worked pretty well so far — it just went for a 63 yard completion in the game against Ravens, to set up the go ahead score at the two minute warning. If that happens, after Sunday come back here and tell me that the ability to go for plays like that would not have helped in 2007.
Oh I know what kind of year Moss had in 2007. I also know what kind of year our receivers had that year too. He may have put up good stats with us that year but would he have made us 14-2? 15-1? 16-0? I doubt it. Would he have been able to prevent Favre from throwing that inexcusable pick in OT against the Giants? I doubt it.
It also wold have made Greg Jennings the 3rd WR which would have stunted his development as well. Moss certainly did have a better statistical season than any one of our receivers that year but I don’t think he would have added wins. The WR position in 2007 was not one that needed an upgrade (in retrospect, of course…at the time it wasn’t a ridiculous idea cause we didn’t know what we had in Jennings or Jones).
And while you might be right about Moss’s ability to go for jump balls, increasing the number of times that Favre just heaved the ball in the air and prayed his guy would get it would also likely have increased his INT total. Favre’s willingness to be more restrained and less reckless with the ball in 2007 was as big a factor in our record that year as any other. Encouraging him to go back to his gunslinging ways would have more likely resulted in less wins rather than more. There were 5 wins in 2007 by 7 or less points, all early in the season. In those 5 wins Favre threw a total of 3 picks (2 in the Wash. game which we could have easily lost if it weren’t for Corey Williams and Charles Woodson combining for the fumble recovery for a TD). His completion % in those games was .628. If he had reverted back to his old heave it and hope for the best days, we easily could have lost a couple of those games. In the only really close game that we lost during the regular season (first Bears game) he threw two picks, though one of them was on the last play essentially on a Hail Mary which can be easily excused. The first pick however was a backbreaker, a 3rd and 5 pick that gave them the ball on our 19. They scored on the next play and we lost by 7. We had 4 3 & outs on the next 4 series and never recovered. That’s the type of thing that he did a great job of avoiding during the 2007 season and that I don’t think would have happened with Moss there.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
There were 5 wins in 2007 by 7 or less points, all early in the season.
Sorry for not clarifying why I think this was important. Early on in that season we still had no idea how good we were. Remember those post-game press conferences with Favre? “Are we as good as our record? I don’t know. Will our luck continue as the season goes on? Tough to say. Will I continue to ask my own questions and answer them? Seems likely but you never can tell.”
(As a side note, that was always my favorite part about Favre’s press conferences. There really never needed to be a single reporter in the room to ask questions. Just tape recorders to hear him ask himself questions and answer them)
But if early in the season during that developmental part where we were finding our identity we had lost some of those close games instead of winning we wouldn’t have had the confidence and the momentum that were so important to that team.
Did I make myself clearer? I hope so. Will this be the end of all discussions regarding Brett Favre and his time with the Packers? I doubt it. Will I continue doing in this in every post from now on? I’ll try not to, but nothing is guaranteed. And sorry for quoting myself.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
well turnovers are important
and I was complimenting Favre on his ability to keep the turnovers under control in 2007 and trying to point out that if he had a guy who was good at jump balls that would only encourage him to go back to his wild ways. Favre did an excellent job in 2007 at controlling the turnovers. And in the first Bears game his turnover hurt us (not the only reason we lost by any means though) and that was used as an example of how turnovers can hurt us in close games.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
"who's buying all those purple #4 jerseys then?"
Bitter, ex-Packer fans who hate Thompson; i.e., all of my siblings.
Dammit.
I remember the Gregg years too, and I completely agree with your read on the organization then. I was glad to see him go, as I was Starr, Infante, Rhodes and Sherman (though for different reasons). I don’t see the comparison between Gregg and Thompson at all, if you were intending to make one.
I respect you, puddnhead. You’ve got enough thoughtfulness to your comments that I can respect you regardless of whether I agree with you. But I can’t abide a bandwagon jumper or a front-runner, and while you’re thoughtful one, I think that’s exactly what you are. I saw the same crap you did in the 80’s (and before; my fandom goes back to 75), but I realized then and now that the Packers didn’t belong to Gregg or Favre, and they don’t belong to Thompson or Rodgers.
They’re mine. Sounds corny, I know, but it’s true. In today’s NFL the only constant is the past and the fans. The past because it can’t be changed and the fans because they won’t be (if they choose not to). Thompson’s just a caretaker. My son and I (God willing) will be rooting for the Packers long after Thompson’s gone, no matter how much success he has. It was true of the bad coaches and GM’s in my lifetime (Starr, Gregg, Infante, Rhodes, Tom Braatz, Sherman-GM) and it was true of the good ones too (Holmgren, Sherman-HC, Wolf). If I don’t like what’s going on, I just wait for it to be over, and I don’t go root for another team. I might lose some passion while the team is run by someone I don’t respect, but I don’t forget that I’m the constant in the equation, and they’re not, and I wait them out.
That’s the choice I made, and while I respect the right of others to make other decisions given the same input, even if I don’t completely understand it.
Anyway, cheers.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Oct 27, 2009 8:55 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Although I too was shocked to see that purple #4 was the top selling NFL jersey in Wisconsin in the latest sales figures, I guess I still think it is more than “bitter ex packer fans” buying all them. Especially those selling in states like Minnesota :)
Yeah I know Thompson is not as bad as Gregg. It is completely different actually – although I have heard from “friends of friends of friends” that Thompson is a bit of an A-hole, not a fun guy to be around, still that certainly is not in the class that Gregg was. And who knows, maybe that got distorted by homophobia somewhere along the way, and maybe isn’t so bad, But its what I have to go on.
I guess I was more citing that as explaining how I have a precedent in my life for going off like this, and how that makes it easier to do it this time.
Maybe it’s just that, like some of you got sick of hearing how great Favre was, I got sick of reading in local Wisconsin sports pages how brilliant Ted Thompson is. My irritation was already reaching crescendo even before Favre retired, all those guys were giving him newsprint fellatio for what a great job he’d done putting the 2007 team together, all I found myself thinking was "damn, how much further would we have gotten if he’d gotten off his butt and made a trade or FA signing or two. I felt he was just waiting for Favre to retire to make any moves, and wasted that shot at wining it all. Then when Favre did leave, TT signed Grant to that big contract - after he got 26 total yards in the NFC championship game! — that solidified to me that he was an idiot, and will destroy the team if given enough time. I do not believe the Packers will go all the way while he is still here. Not unless he totally changes his ways. In the meantime, why not let the Vikings have their turn. And let Favre go back to Mississippi and lie in peace, instead of feeling compelled to haunt the Packers like a ghost.
I don’t know the last team that won it all just based on drafting. Certainly not the 1996 Packers. If Ron Wolf was still GM, I believe strongly that Packers would have been in the superbowl again two years ago.
In the meantime, why not let the Vikings have their turn.
Because I can’t stand the Vikings, that’s why. Just because they might not win the title this year (or in the near future, as you predict) does not mean, in any way shape or form, that I would be happy letting the Vikings have their turn. That is pure non-sense to me. Pulling for your team to do poorly in order to fire the GM or coach is one thing, but deciding that, in the meantime, it wouldn’t be so bad to cheer for that team’s biggest rival is completely another story.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
OK, understood
I actually didn’t mind seeignthe Bears in the superbowl a few years back, even though I am not and have never been a fan. And I actually would be happy seeing the Lions get there once, god knows how those fans have suffered, they deserve somethign to make up for it. And yes, I even cheered for Vikings to win in playoffs last year, along with my brother (who lived jsut north of Minneapolis).
I think we’ve already established that we’re different, and that will just have to be the way it is. I just don’t have that “hate” gene for other teams that many football fans do. Hating a prefessional football franchise, with players some of whom may have played for your favorite francise in the past, and others may play for you in the future, just seems weird and artificial. You’re not hating them so much for who they are, how they act, your just hating them because it seems like the thing to do?
I’m genuinely surprised that you think cheering another team in the playoffs, one that your team is not playing, is something that is less shocking than cheering for “your” tema to lose. I would have guessed the exact opposite ranking.
yeah I think we can agree to disagree on this
I personally can’t fathom rooting for a rival at any point. When the Bears were in the Super Bowl I wasn’t pulling for them but I also wasn’t pulling for the Colts either. Just an innocent bystander who would have been disappointed that either team won.
I live in NC and this type of debate goes on all the time in college basketball and football. There is a contingent that says that when you’re team is eliminated you pull for your conference and there is a contingent that says that no matter what I could never pull for my bitter rival. I fall into the second camp and it sounds like you would fall into the first. As a Tar Heel fan it would be inconceivable for me to pull for Duke even if they were somehow playing a team representing Al Qaeda.
I’m genuinely surprised that you think cheering another team in the playoffs, one that your team is not playing, is something that is less shocking than cheering for "your" tema to lose. I would have guessed the exact opposite ranking.
If you are still devoted to your team, just unhappy with the current power structure and you know the only way that they will leave is through their own failure, that is less shocking to me than pulling for a rival simply because your team has been eliminated. Different strokes I guess.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
Yeah, well...
… as you’ve probably already guessed, that outlook is about 180 degrees from the way I see things. But live and let live, right?
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Oct 27, 2009 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Do you really think that's what I was talking about?
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Oct 28, 2009 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions
Mr. Puddnhead, I don’t know where these football fans all over the country you have been talking to are located, but I can guarantee they aren’t in Berkeley, California. We can’t stand the way Favre tried to mess with Aaron Rodgers. Retire, don’t retire, whatever. But don’t try to mess with the next guy’s career. Thankfully, Aaron Rodgers has proven to have character and class that Favre can’t even imagine. Go Bears! Oops, I mean, Go Packers!
Oh my god
Reed is a disgrace. Haha his job is to force Harvin back inside, and Harvin juked that way and he took it away!! I was pretty ticked.
by packallday555 on Oct 27, 2009 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions
In his defense, he is a kicker
and was probably still recovering from a massive hangover.
by Charlie Kelly on Oct 27, 2009 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions
Being a kicker doesn’t matter, he should still try.
If I had a Nickel for every time I watched Chris Kluwe flail about in the air as he tried to dive at a returner, I would have enough money to buy myself a copy of Guitar Hero.
Seriously, he could have at least taken a “fighting stance” to try to scare Percy inside.
by Bjorno on Oct 27, 2009 10:22 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
But what did you think about Favre’s lay down job on the INT return?
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
I think he thought they were going to cut inside, and tried to take out the blocker.
Basically, it thought it looked like a 40 year old man trying to stop two 25 year old men from stealing his wifes purse.
If he were young, and someone who actually tackles people for a living, then I would mock him for his attempt.
Sorry
I must have forgotten that a place kickers job is to tackle people. Don’t know how I could have forgotten that.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
A Kick off specialist is paid to redirect the returner inside should he break containment and get to that point. Reed didn’t even try.
Returners are generally smaller, WR’s/DB’s, so it is expected of a kick off specialist to be able to at the very least redirect.
That is much different than expecting an old man to run down a linebacker who has a blocker in front of them.
You are comparing apples to oranges and it is a very weak attempt to goad me.
Not trying to goad anyone
I asked a simple question. You answered. I responded.
Jeff Reed is not a kickoff specialist, he’s their place kicker. He is paid to handle all of the Steelers kicking duties, and yes, that does sometimes mean redirecting or tackling a returner if he breaks contain. He made a pathetic “effort.” Never denied that.
From what I can tell from your responses Reed’s crime in this situation is that he made a pathetic effort while being somewhat youthful. If John Kasay for the Panthers had made a similar attempt he would be in the clear because he is almost 40. Is that right?
That is much different than expecting an old man to run down a linebacker who has a blocker in front of them.
Anything else he should be excused from doing since he’s old…besides training camp of course
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
I was using “KOS” as a generic term for the person assigned to kick the kickoffs. That is their designation in Madden and therefore shall be so says the football gods.
I am saying that expecting an aging quarterback to run down and tackle a 260 lb linebacker who has a blocker is completely different than expecting a kicker to be able to at least put a hit on a 185 pound returner.
Favre is not excused from trying, but he is not expected to succeed.
Reed is not excused from trying, and he is expected to be somewhat successful because it is a hell of a lot easier to do what is expected from him than to do what Favre made a feeble attempt at.
Again, two different scenarios and apples to oranges.
he was shuffling his feet
and getting into position to make a play, it just looked like to me, he kind of took himself out of the play by just falling down.
by PackaCracka on Oct 27, 2009 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions
If he hadn’t dropped his walker back at the line of scrimmage, he might have been able to keep himself from falling down.
Next time, he will keep his “Life Alert” pendant nearby.
by Bjorno on Oct 28, 2009 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Help!
I’ve fallen and I can’t get up!
by Bjorno on Oct 28, 2009 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
excellent
Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok
by blackoutsox on Oct 28, 2009 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions


















