Leroy Butler's suggestions for Favre's return
by verno329 on Oct 27, 2009 4:51 PM CDT
62 comments
Be sure to check out the point of view of another former Packer about the return of Favre to Lambeau (h/t to Packergeeks). His 5 Questions is one of my favorite things to check out from JS.com. Always wondered why he's never ended up coaching somewhere. He seems to have a wealth of knowledge and I'd love to see him brought into the fold with the Packers some time. Highlight after the jump.
Q. What do you think the fan reaction to Brett Favre should be at Lambeau Field this Sunday and what do you think it actually will be?
A. The reaction should be 100% about Aaron Rodgers. When Aaron Rodgers comes out there you should give Aaron Rodgers a standing ovation because he’s our guy for the next 10 years. When Brett comes out you do like any other opposing quarterback, you boo him. If you don’t want to boo him, don’t say anything. But if you’re going to stand up wearing Packer clothing or a Packer uniform and cheer when Brett Favre comes out, you should bring a bag and put it over your head. You don’t cheer for somebody to beat your team, I don’t care who it is. You don’t cheer for another quarterback. If you want to cheer Brett, just bring a bag, put it over your head and you can cheer, and no one will hear you and that’s fine. This is Aaron Rodgers’ show. Don’t let somebody come into your back yard and cheer against you. You don’t cheer for another guy to beat your team. I hope I’m crystal clear with these fans who say they love to see Brett Favre. Well, Brett Favre is gone. It’s Aaron Rodgers’ show. He’s the No. 1-rated quarterback in the NFC, including Brett Favre. I’m happy we’ll be good for the next 10 years. I hope they’ll cheer Aaron and boo Brett. If they don’t want to boo him, that’s their right. But any other quarterback they’d boo, what makes him so special? I mean, wait until he has his number retired, you can cheer him then. You can applaud him all you want. You can’t do that the day of the game, and want your team to win. That’s standing on the fence. You’re either a Packer fan or a Brett fan. If you’re a Brett fan, go buy some purple and wear purple. I have a strong feeling on this, this is my team. I played 12 years for this team. Anybody who comes into that stadium, I want them to lose. If it were me coming back, I wouldn’t expect anyone to cheer for me when I’m going to destroy your team. Of course not.
1 recs |
62 comments
Email
Print
Comments
I agree 150%
It’s nice to hear someone speak his mind instead of beating around the bush. We don’t want feed Favre’s ego and have him beat us in our own back yard. We were to nice to him at Minnesota. After he retires we can cheer.
Good for LeRoy Butler
by cheddarhead on Oct 27, 2009 6:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
I share the 150% agreement with you!
Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge
by Bush League All Star on Oct 27, 2009 9:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i still find it crazy
that there is even a fence on this topic. I would be booing the hell out of him if I were a packer fan.
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
by Joe_D on Oct 27, 2009 7:58 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
most of those are Viking/Farve fans
who for some reason feel its their right to tell a fan of another team that they should cheer for a former player, ex-face of franchise
Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok
by blackoutsox on Oct 27, 2009 8:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Well said.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
by jobe on Oct 27, 2009 8:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Most of those thinking there are other fans ordring them what to do
are people with chips on their shoulder
by puddnhead on Oct 27, 2009 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
what did you think of what Butler said though? interested to hear your opinion
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Oct 27, 2009 9:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It makes sense
You have to be either a Packer fan or a Brett fan. You can’t be both. Same thing I’ve come to terms with, forced myself to, hard as it is.
Note though he’s not saying it isn’t OK to be a Brett fan. He’s just saying don’t do it while wearing a Packer jersey, at a Packer game. That makes sense to me.
The only thing I maybe disagree with him on, is that it would still be OK even for a pure Packer fan to give him some applause when he firs comes out for warmups, before the game starts. There’sa sportswriter in MIL that wrote something like that — applaud once before game starts, then boo. I think that would actually show some class, not be a bad things. That’s the precedent set by Oakland fans in that 2003 MNF game, which I think was well played by raiders fans.
I say I “maybe” disagree with LeRoy because it isn’t really clear whether or not he’s just talking about during the game, and that he maybe wouldnt’ say too that his rules only apply when the game is on.
by puddnhead on Oct 28, 2009 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think necessarily
that you can’t be a fan of both. You can still like and respect Favre if you choose as a Packer fan, but he plays on our rival and you just can’t root for the rival against the Packers simply because Favre plays for them and still call yourself a Packers fan. That, to me, is the issue.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Oct 28, 2009 6:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That thing in 2003 was a completely different scenario
It was shortly after the death of his dad and even then, Favre and the Packers aren’t even close to rivals of the Raiders (Seeing as we play them once every five or so years).
by Charlie Kelly on Oct 28, 2009 9:45 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't think you get it
What the Raiders fans did wasn’t about if they were are close rivals or not. What the Raiders fans did was actually totally outside the game that was played last night, and who it was played against.
You seem to be suggesting that the only reason the cheered Favre was because they didn’t play him that often? Really? That seems COMPLETELY tone deaf to what was really going on. They were showing their condolences for his pain at that moment. It’s not unl,ike cheering a guy whose been down a long time, then is taken off the field. It had NOTHING to do with who he played for. Wow. You really didn’t see that, did you?
by puddnhead on Oct 29, 2009 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, puddn, I don't think you get it
There’s no way any reasonable person can read what Charlie wrote abive and reach this conclusion:
“You seem to be suggesting that the only reason the cheered Favre was because they didn’t play him that often?”
He plainly stated that he felt the comparison to the Raiders very classy reaction to Favre taking the field in 2003 was inapt, MAINLY because:
“It was shortly after the death of his dad”
And then, in a clear transition to a secondary argument (noted by the use of “and even then…”, he also pointed out the fact that:
“Favre and the Packers aren’t even close to rivals of the Raiders.”
Puddn, if anyone is “tone deaf” here it’s you, as evidenced by your reading of Charlie’s comment.
To put is simply, presented were two counterpoints to your argument that Packers fans should model their behavior after the Raiders fans’ reception of Favre when he played a MNF game in Oakland the day after his father died:
1. His freaking dad had died (which requires no further explanation as to why that is unique and inapplicable to the upcoming Nov. 1st game); and
2. Regardless of #1, the Oakland Raiders are not a team which Favre led for the better part of two decades prior to his appearance, in their stadium, and in their most heated rival’s uniform.
by 400metres on Oct 30, 2009 12:56 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Thank you
I would say more but I think you’ve explained quite adequately why they are two completely different scenarios.
by Charlie Kelly on Oct 30, 2009 5:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank goodness
we have the completely un-chipped puddnhead to diagnose all of us terribly bitter Packer fans who don’t resist his constant hectoring regarding our need to exhibit unquestioning adulation for Brett Favre, who we, um, celebrated for nearly two decades before he decided to become the leader of our most heated rival.
Boy, we are an extremely unreasonable lot, aren’t we?
by 400metres on Oct 28, 2009 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
don’t
This massive chip on my shoulder sometimes causes me to neglect coherence.
by 400metres on Oct 28, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I thought the Bears
were your most heated rival?
by KC612 on Oct 28, 2009 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nope
They are our longest rival but since at least the mid-90’s I would say that the Vikings are our most heated rival. When the Bears have success it doesn’t burn me up like it does when the Vikings do. Thankfully the Vikings haven’t had too much success for me to worry about.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Oct 28, 2009 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Historically, perhaps.
But in the modern era? No way, imo.
I’m sure some will disagree, but in my perception, Vikings week is consistently more compelling than Bears week, mainly because the Pack and Bears have rarely been evenly matched in the last two or three decades. In other words, when the Bears are great, the Pack sucks, and vice versa.
On the other hand, the Packers and the Vikings are consistently fighting for first place; not every year, but often enough in recent history that the rivalry has eclipsed the meaningfulness of the Bears-Packers tilts.
For example, during the Favre Era, the Pack utterly dominated the Bears, whereas the Vikings often frustrated Favre and the Packers. That’s just bound to create more passion about the latter at the expense of the former.
by 400metres on Oct 28, 2009 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Case in point.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Nov 1, 2009 7:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
THANK YOU!!!
The Favre lovers and Thompson haters are trying to paint us as idiots for not weaping and moaning about Favre being gone and about him coming here. There is NO WAY in hell that fans on the east coast would cheer for Favre if he was there guy and went to their rival. Favre would probably have death threats on him out there and people would throw stuff at him. He is the QB for the enemy. I don’t care who the QB is, he is on the wrong team therefore he gets BOOED.
by TrevorR on Oct 28, 2009 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will join you in the BOO'ing!!!
I will take boo’ing over lips firmly placed on butt cheeks! I kid, I kid!!!
Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge
by Bush League All Star on Oct 28, 2009 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I created an account
Just so I could comment on this thread. These are words of passion from a true Packer and I don’t see how any real Packer fan could not agree. Favre playing for the Jets is one thing—he was still in green for one and didn’t look unnatural in purple unis. More importantly he was in another conference in a division that wouldn’t be matched up against GB any time soon. Playing for our rival is, while entirely his choice, just a bit disloyal it seems. Brett is his own man and can sign a contract to play for whatever team he likes, the NFL is a business first and foremost (which somewhat saddens me, but it also guarantees football isn’t going anywhere)—and in business loyalty does not get you very far. That being said, no one should cheer this disloyalty; but instead we as fans, whether at the hallowed grounds or at home watching on tv should 100% cheer for Rodgers and all our other Packers. LeRoy is right, let’s bring the pain and put the purple ones on their heels out of Green Bay.
The o-line needs to be playing with some pride as well. Last game was completely unacceptable. At least Lang looked good (albeit against JV squads). No sacks, Pack! Let’s keep Rodgers upright.
by Illinois Cheesehead on Oct 28, 2009 10:36 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I totally disagree.
Booing is classless-plain and simple. It is to be expected from the fans out in new york and philly but I would like to think we in the Midwest have more class than that.
Plus what do you boo-birds expect to achieve with your booing? You won’t change the outcome of the game in any positive way. If anything you’ll fire Brett up and he’ll want it worse than ever. How many times do you hear an athlete say that the booing motivates him? Some of these guys actually prefer it.
Instead of booing the best possible reaction would be deafening silence. You tell me that wouldn’t be more meaningful.
by Sealord on Oct 28, 2009 10:51 AM CDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
"...the best possible reaction would be deafening silence. You tell me that wouldn’t be more meaningful."
That would be really cool, so it has almost no chance of occurring.
by 400metres on Oct 28, 2009 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess we shouldn't even go to the games
since we don’t impact the games at all. Booing is classless? Who cares…people boo in every stadium in the world!!!!!!!!! Its part of sports. The Vikings used to boo FAvre…we didn’t call that classless. ITs part of the game, please don’t make this into something more than it is!!
Deafening silence is the dumbest idea ever. Have you been to a Viking Packer game? Half the stadium is filled with fans from the other team. If Packer fans just do nothing he comes out to a roar. Honestly its not going to matter cause he’ll be announced with the entire offense and they WILL be boo’ed like every other time they have come here.
by TrevorR on Oct 28, 2009 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
Maybe every crowd should act like a golf or tennis crowd and anyone who makes a noise above a sneeze will be booted from the facility. Favre is far from the first player to (potentially) ever be booed at Lambeau and he won’t be the last.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Oct 28, 2009 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have you been to a Packer game ever?
No Packer game is half filled with other teams fans.
by PackaCracka on Oct 28, 2009 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've been to MANY Viking games at Lambeau
and the crowd has a very strong Viking influence to it. YOu can’t tell me that if you have tickets that you wouldn’t look at this game and realize you could pay for your entire season by selling just the one game that you wouldn’t do it. There are always lots of Viking fans at Lambeau…its not 50%, I exaggerated but I think this one will have more than the average due to the profit margins and people not wanting to look at Favre in purple.
by TrevorR on Oct 28, 2009 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I went to this game...
November 14, 2004 34-31 Win against the Vikings
Was my first game at Lambeau for a birthday present. Was a good day!
Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge
by Bush League All Star on Oct 28, 2009 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mine to
Was’nt it like 7 below zero at game time.
by cheddarhead on Oct 28, 2009 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Classless?
I beg to differ. Booing your own team is classless. Booing the opposing team is a way of showing your dislike and distaste for them, and expressing that you want to see them perform poorly. How does silence get this message across? I’d much rather have fans that will express their support for their team equally to their dislike for the other instead of fans that are quiet. I’d bet this fires up the home team as much, if not more, than the visitors to know that their fans are intensely into the game, rather than being quiet and giving off the “meh” vibe.
Also, I haven’t been to an NFL game for a few years, but I would put money on it that every team’s home fans boos the opposition when they take the field. Lord knows we give it to the visiting teams in Camp Randall.
"Career highlights? I had two. I got an intentional walk from Sandy Koufax and I got out of a rundown against the Mets." - Bob Uecker
by texwestern on Oct 28, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Hardly Classless
Booing is classless-plain and simple.
Throwing something onto the field is classless. Booing is an honest expression of emotion that paying fans have a right to give. Being too polite to boo does not change the underlying emotion… it is simply pretending to feel differently than you do.
I originally thought that the silence idea was unworkable, but interesting, as an expression of indifference. I now think that even if we were able to pull off the incredible task of getting every fan to remain silent, the effort it would take to pull that off would hardly be an expression of indifference. Did you boo Cunningham? Did you boo Culpepper? Did you boo Tarkenton? Brett is now one of them… and if we are truly indifferent to him now we should treat him no differently than we would treat any of those other Viking QBs.
Just my $0.02 worth…
by NYCPac on Oct 29, 2009 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good thing the Minnesota fans never boo AJ Pierzynski!
by TrevorR on Oct 29, 2009 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously I'm in the minority
who think it in bad taste to boo a man who was the face of the franchise for 20 years. He always competed hard and put Green Bay back on the map. I have no desire to see him succeed now or in the future especially as a Viking. But to boo him is IMHO classless and not becoming of a Packer fan. Again-I know I’m in the minority here.
Also, booing started as a way to judge performances NOT to heckle the competitors.
Would you boo Brett to his face if you were on the field this coming Sunday? I promise none of you would have the balls to look him in the eyes and do it.
Go Pack Go.
by Sealord on Oct 28, 2009 2:57 PM CDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Would you boo Brett to his face if you were on the field this coming Sunday? I promise none of you would have the balls to look him in the eyes and do it.
I most certainly would, without hesitation. Not even a question. Then he could tell me I’m not a true Packer fan all he wants.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Oct 28, 2009 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't help it but I still get annoyed when people say Favre single handidly put the Packers back on the map.
He was only one part of that, there are others. Also, it was a very mutually beneficial relationship as Favre would’ve partied his way out of the league if not for Holmgren’s discipline. But anyways, Favre doesn’t care about anything the Packers and their fans have done for him, so why should we care about anything he did for us? The only real way to react here is a silent indifference to him coming here in purple (Which would never happen) or very loud booing.
by Charlie Kelly on Oct 28, 2009 9:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone ever hear of...
Ron Wolf?
Mike Holmgren?
Reggie White?
Brett Favre was important to the 90’s teams, but he was hardly alone…
by NYCPac on Oct 29, 2009 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Brett put forth effort
But to try to make that sound like some sort of altruistic act is bunk. What he did over his time in Green Bay is no more noble than any of us who put forth the effort to be good at our jobs/careers.
Did Favre have an extraordinary work ethic? Yes. Did he have extraordinary talent as Packer QB? Yes. Should he be viewed any different than a top employee who moves from Microsoft to Apple (or vise versa) would be treated? Nope, not in my opinion. He is now on the other team. He should be treated accordingly, at least on Sunday.
by NYCPac on Oct 29, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You promise
none of us would have the balls to boo him to his face? Bet? First off I’m bigger and taller than the guy and played the position (DE) that sacks guys like him (QB’s). I would probably pay a good chunk of change just to be on the field before the game to boo him to his face. I would rather do it to Jarred Allen but Favre would suffice.
Booing is not classless, it’s what fans do, quit acting high and mighty. Like someone else mentioned, it’s not like people are talking about throwing crap at him or running on to the field and tackling the guy. I think if everyone in the crowd could be dead silent that that would be cool but it won’t happen with 70,000 and a lot of them being Favre or Viking fans.
by GGGamer on Oct 29, 2009 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am thin and not even that tall and I would boo him to his face. What is he going to do? Punch me in the face? Give me a break. I’d love it if he did…what a great story that would make!
Booing the opposing team is not classless, you need to let that one go man.
by TrevorR on Oct 30, 2009 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with Leroy Totally
Bravo Leroy Butler you hit it right on the head!. I know i will be booing him when he comes out on the field. He is just an opposing team quarterback to me and a spoiled one at that. Go Pack Go Go A-Rod Go. Rip those Vikings heads off !…..
by whooya on Oct 28, 2009 3:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I could
I could boo him to his face, I met the man face to face at a special after game party in the basement of his Greenbay Home. I could tell him exactly how I feel about his going to the Vikes for revenge. Like Leroy says you are either a Packer fan or a Brett Fan. Im a 45 year Packer fan, yet I would boo him if I was at the game. Absolutely!!!!!!
by whooya on Oct 28, 2009 3:57 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Booing Favre
I think every Packer fan should boo Favre when He runs on the field. He’s not going to come out by himself and take a bow. He’s going to run out of the tunnel with the rest of the team. So cheering for Favre means your cheering for the Vikings. Jees its bad enough we give them all are players we should make them feel right at home too!!
Why don’t we get out the red carpet a cigar and a bottle of champagne for the man while we are at it. If you want to cheer him do it at warm ups or at his retirement party.
Favre needs to feel like he’s in a hostile enviroment not a going away party. So show him your respects later not during game time.
by cheddarhead on Oct 28, 2009 4:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I totally agree with LeRoy!
When Brett was a Packer, I loved him. When he was Brett the Jet, I didn’t care. Now that he’s Brett the Viqueer, if he was on fire, I wouldn’t cross the street to piss on him and put him out, and I totally mean that. I feel that way about all the Viqueers. If it was Jared Allen, i would cross the street to kick him in the balls while he’s on fire. I hope that AJ Hawk get’s in the back field and breaks Favre’s leg in 3 places and tells that old man to retire once and for all. I do think the Packers will get a pass rush on, especially if the let Aaron Kampman get into a 3 point stance and the refs call a hold when Aaron is down on the ground and a Viqueer offensive lineman is sitting on him like happened Monday night. I only hope that Aikman calls this game like he called the other Packer games he has in the past…with venom dripping from his mouth for Favre!
I go to Beef O’Brady’s to see the games and 2 women are there who root for the Packers, the Vikings to lose, but want Brett to do well! I don’t I want him sacked hard and often, intercepted, and knocked on his ass!
by biggun33 on Oct 28, 2009 5:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
biggun 33 I like your style
BF had his chances and he passed them up. It’s impossible to want BF to do well and root for the Queens to lose at the same time.
by cheddarhead on Oct 28, 2009 7:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
When Brett was a Packer, I loved him. When he was Brett the Jet, I didn’t care. Now that he’s Brett the Viqueer, if he was on fire, I wouldn’t cross the street to piss on him and put him out, and I totally mean that.
It’s actually been this stuff more than anythign thta’;s made it hard to remain a Packer fan.
I’m seriously starting to think I was much better off, enjoyed football much more, before there were internet chat boards. Before that time, the beauty and joy and excitement of the game itself (yes, I just emphasized the word game) didn’t get sullied and distorted by having to read pathetic comments like this.
I know I know, maybe I’m taking it too sersiously, but that doesnt’ change that these are pathetic things to say.
by puddnhead on Oct 29, 2009 10:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You Are
Taking it too seriously that is. The guy was joking and if he is legitimately serious, why should it change the way you feel about rooting for the Packers? I love the Packers no matter how stupid some fans can be and nothing will change that. Every team has dumb fans and I’d like to think that the Bears and the Vikings have a lot more than the Packers. Take a breath and chill out.
by GGGamer on Oct 29, 2009 11:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
why should it change the way you feel about rooting for the Packers?
Because what defines the Packers (or any team) are the fans. In modern era, everything else — coaches, players, owners, heck sometimes even city — changes every 5 years.
Call me silly but once upon a time I bought into that whole “fan owned team” concept for Packers, and it seemed cool at the time.
by puddnhead on Nov 2, 2009 12:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nobody is forcing you to come here and read our "pathetic "comments.
And like Gamer said, you’ll find dumb fans in every single sports fanbase. You act like the internet has given you your first encounter with this. I take it you never have attended a game or been to some sort of sports bar?
by Charlie Kelly on Oct 30, 2009 5:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Favre will hear me booing
all the way from Virginia!
by VAPackerfan on Oct 28, 2009 6:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Brents former teamates continue to turn on him
Tight end Mark Chmura was more specific. "[I]t all starts with Brett — Brett’s not as good as he was. . . . They have Adrian Peterson, but I think Chester Taylor is a guy. . . . Our quarterback was 10 times better, our receivers were better, our special teams were much better.
“I mean, you’re talking about the No. 1 defense in the league at that time, maybe one of the best defenses ever to play the game. . . . When we played back then, teams feared us. I don’t know if teams fear the Minnesota Vikings today.”
I bet Reggie White is rolling in his grave right now
Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok
by blackoutsox on Oct 28, 2009 7:43 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Then there was the screen play
Teams knew it was coming but they could’nt stop it, hell we would run it 2 times in a row with great success. Other teams feared it.
by cheddarhead on Oct 28, 2009 7:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow
I buy GB tickets to see the packers, cheer for them and to see them win. If I wanted to just go see Favre I would buy queens tickets. The community supports GB and GB supports the community so why would I cheer for another team?? I respect alot of players in the NFL, but I don’t jump on a bandwagon of another team. In 2005 When GB was 4-12 did I turn into a Patriots fan??? Simple answer : NO I support my team , my state and my community. I will be cheering when Rogers throws a TD and I will be Cheering when Woodson intercepts Favre.
by turd on Oct 29, 2009 1:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Acme Packing Company
Related FanShots on Acme Packing Company
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
