Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dan Marino Starting College For Developmentally Disabled

The Aftermath

09000d5d813da1fb_gallery_600_medium

Somehow I always kind of figured it would wind up like this.

10 years ago to the day, Mike Holmgren returned to Lambeau Field for the first time as coach of the Seattle Seahawks. The Seahawks easily disposed of the Packers that day. 

And today, a Packers hero that everyone had figured would spend his life in the green and gold trotted out onto the "frozen tundra" wearing the hated Vikings colors. Both of these Packers' heroes moved on because the team hadn't given them everything that they wanted.

But I think it's pretty obvious that this loss stung more.

What to say in the wake of such a loss? Well, subtracting out the larger interest story, the Packers played one half of football and still had the opportunity to drive down and win the game in the 4th quarter. You have to be pretty proud of that if you're a Packers fan. You also have to be proud of Aaron Rodgers - getting up after shot after shot, hobbling around on a clearly tender ankle, but still gutting it out and helping the Packers back into the game. 

Green Bay is sitting at 4-3 and is basically an "above average" team at this point. They can dominate lesser competition, play well against equal competition, but not quite get it done against elite teams. Two of their three losses were at the hands of the Vikings, whom they don't have to play anymore. It's obvious that they are only as strong as their weakest link - the offensive line. If the offensive line improves, they will probably make the playoffs and be a very dangerous team. 

Mike McCarthy has to get the penalties under control. There needs to be some semblance of a running game, although the lack thereof is probably due to offensive line struggles. And we need to have smarter special teams. Why kick the ball deep to Percy Harvin after several short kickoffs had succeeded? And in the offseason, Ted Thompson needs to bring in more talent on the offensive line.

Star-divide

09000d5d813e06da_gallery_600_mediumBut this game was about so much more. Brett got his revenge. And that is a bitter pill to swallow for Packers fans. To the casual observer, or intrigued NFL fan, this seems like a great story. Team disowns player. Player travels tough road. Player gets shot at old team. Player beats old team. But the story is so much more complicated than that, and Packers fans know the ugly details.

"I loved Brett as a Packer. I loved him as a person, and I never saw a better football player. And for him to be in a Viking uniform, (it) turns my heart cold. I think of him as a traitor. He let millions of Packer fans down. That's why it hurts. They are going to boo him and they are going to try to run him right off the field." said Fuzzy Thurston, former Packer great. (Source)

For years, the Packers had endured the will-Favre-retire questions after every season. To the rest of the NFL it was just a passing headline, a curiosity. It seemed like the typical situation with an aging NFL star. But the problem was that it happened for many seasons. And it impacted the Packers draft strategies, personnel movements, etc.

Brett Favre actually did retire on March 4, 2008 in a tearful press conference. He said that he had given it all he had and that he was done. Not surprisingly, this allowed the Packers to finally draft for the quarterback position, and they spent two 2008 draft choices on quarterbacks a month later (Brohm, Flynn). In the same time frame, Aaron Rodgers was named the starting quarterback and he started to bond with his team. The Packers were set at the quarterback position, they had planned for the future, and the team was coming together around Aaron Rodgers. This CBS Sports article summarizes a few points nicely:

We've already been here with Favre, remember. We were here last year, too. He announced after the 2006 season that he would decide shortly whether to retire or return in 2007. Shortly dragged on and on, getting in the way of the Packers' offseason plans. Finally Favre decided to return, but only after milking the process for every headline he could get.

It's sad, but it's predictable. He did it again after the 2007 season, saying a decision would come within days, and he was right on the money if by "days" he meant 46 of them. The Packers' season ended Jan. 20 in the NFC title game. He announced his retirement March 6. That means the entire month of February came and went without a decision from Favre -- and this was a leap year.

He must think that building a football team is as simple as looking onto the practice field in July and seeing who shows up. Never mind that the team has to build its offensive personnel, not to mention its entire payroll, around a roster that will, or won't, have a future Hall of Fame quarterback.

Right around the time the draft happened, rumors started swirling about Brett mulling a come back. Did he say anything to that effect to the Packers organization? 

When asked at the end of Wednesday's NFC coaches breakfast at the NFL meetings in Palm Beach, Fla., whether Favre might un-retire, Packers coach Mike McCarthy replied: "Time will tell. I don't think so. He's content with his decision. When I talked to him, he'd just gotten off a bulldozer moving trees. He definitely doesn't miss the offseason program.

So, at the beginning of April, Brett Favre had communicated no desire to return. The Packers drafted accordingly, and they were moving on. But then July came around, and things went downhill in a hurry. On July 2nd, reports started coming out that Brett wanted to return to the team. After missing all of the offseason conditioning, and watching the Packers make personnel moves to replace him, all while never indicating a desire to return, he decided that it was time to make a glorious return to Titletown. 

Of course, this put the Packers in a very difficult position. They could either go with the status quo and risk alienating a Packers' legend, or they could backtrack all of their offseason planning, bring Brett back, and alienate Aaron Rodgers, while likely having to cut one of their two quarterbacks that were drafted. In effect, the latter would be a waste of two quarterbacks, as one would be cut, and Aaron Rodgers probably would have wanted to move on.

Not surprisingly, Ted Thompson replied to Brett's July 11th letter asking for an unconditional release by denying the request and committing to Aaron Rodgers as the starting quarterback again. He made the smart decision, one that would have the least net negative impact on the entire team, and one that he still catches flak for today.

And this is the point at which Brett showed his colors. He went on "On The Record With Greta Van Susteren" from July 14th through July 15th. He accused the Packers of being dishonest, spoke of his disappointment with Packers management, and said that both parties should just move on.

Obviously we all know how this ends. The question for me has always been this:

If Brett Favre really cared about the Packers organization, if he really cared about them being successful in the present and in the future, why would he force their hand like this?

And I've never been able to answer that. It started with Brett getting the itch to play again. However, when he found out that the Packers' universe didn't revolve around him anymore, he became hell bent on getting revenge against the Packers leadership - the guys who, in his mind, "forced him out of town". Never mind that the Packers had patiently waited, as usual, for months, waiting for him to waffle back onto the team for another season.

Brett didn't care that his return would tear a huge gash in the Packers' relationship with Aaron Rodgers. He didn't care that it started a huge media circus around the team and the training camp, something that noticeably distracted players and coaches. He didn't care. It was all about him. First he wanted to play, and then he wanted to get even.

And this lack of caring for the organization who launched his career, the organization that loved him, the fans that loved him, and the teammates that loved him, is the betrayal. That is why this loss stings so much. He wanted to get his revenge, and didn't care if it was at the cost of tearing Packers Nation apart. He slogged through one year with the Jets, knowing that he was going to bide his time until he could get back into the NFC North Division. Even when he was with the Jets, he admitted that was where he wanted to go.

Even after the FOX News interview, the Packers tried to be accommodating. They even offered to let him come into camp and compete for the job. But Brett didn't want to have to compete for anything - not like the other guys out on the practice field who had already poured their hearts out with effort in training camp. He wanted the job to be handed to him. And one can't help but notice the same trend with how he joined the Vikings. He waited until the week after training camp had ended, before signing. He wanted to step in, on a good team, without having to go through the hard work like everyone else, and just play.

It was the same boyish attitude that made Favre so appealing and likeable early in his career. The guy just loved to play, and he had fun doing it. But the Packers needed a player who was committed to working as hard as everyone else, and showing up in the offseason just like everyone else. 

And so, here we are. The Packers - the organization that made the right moves and tried to accommodate Brett while still being faithful to promises made to Aaron Rodgers, and their offseason planning, lost the grudge match today on Lambeau Field; it was on the same field that Brett became a legend. And Brett, the player who returned to get even, well, got even. And somehow, the Packers will likely get made out to be the bad guys in all of this.

Let me close by sharing a little memory. In the 1997 season, I met Brett Favre after a game. The guy seemed carefree and just chatted with me for a couple of minutes about nothing in particular. He talked about how much he loved to play in Green Bay. I really admired his attitude and he was by far my favorite player in the NFL. I felt like I could relate to him, and at the same time I was in awe of the stuff that he could do on the field. I never thought that I'd see this day.

Brett, I've lost a lot of that respect. I thought that you were a guy who cared both about winning and about the organization. I thought that you cared more about the fans, and the Packers in general, than to seek revenge like this. I can't recall another player coming out of retirement to play for revenge - and to do it on the team that is the biggest rival of their former team. It was disgusting to watch you celebrate all over Lambeau Field, with that big grin on your face, while wearing Vikings purple.

I hope that you enjoyed that revenge. I hope that it is sweet enough to you to compensate for your soured reputation among millions of Packers fans. I hope that it was worth it to you. Because all of those fans will never look at you the same way. Packers fans bleed green and gold. Packers players have played for other teams, sure, but none of them have done it for the reasons that you did, or in the fashion that you did.

And I guess that makes you special.

That's what you wanted, right?

Comment 434 comments  |  7 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

very nice read..

I dont know if your new here or not, i havent ever seen your name around. But I hope you contribute more that was a very nice post.

by bizzle4 on Nov 1, 2009 11:48 PM CST reply actions  

I usually write for the OU Blog

But I’m a lifelong Packers’ fan…always have lots of opinions on the Pack, just usually don’t put the pen to the paper.

Thanks though, I appreciate it!

by dishingoutdimes on Nov 1, 2009 11:50 PM CST up reply actions  

agreed well done

battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm

by Michael M on Nov 2, 2009 12:04 AM CST up reply actions  

Ditto

This is exactly how it feels. Couldn’t have written my own feelings better myself.

by BlacknBlue11 on Nov 2, 2009 2:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Wow

Great post man. This really hits home for me, and I really feel the exact same about everything as you do. I would also love to see you contribute more to this sight.

by packallday555 on Nov 1, 2009 11:54 PM CST reply actions  

nice post, very well done!

keep coming back

Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok

by blackoutsox on Nov 1, 2009 11:57 PM CST reply actions  

I guess some of us always knew that Brett Favre (and every other football player) always plays for himself first. Not whatever team drafts him/trades for him/pays him the most in FA.

Some of us can still enjoy watching games and these players perform their incredible feats in them after comprehending that. And can understand how oldtimers like Fuzzy might have a different POV because it was a different era, players stuck with teams, there was no cap and no FA. But I can understand how others might not.

by puddnhead on Nov 2, 2009 12:33 AM CST reply actions  

revenge is a 3 step process. step 1 and 2 are completed. Part 3 comes in February.

by dsludo on Nov 2, 2009 12:41 AM CST reply actions  

I think Favre will do the gentleman thing when it comes to the Pro Bowl. After he’s selected to go to the Pro Bowl, he will withdraw, thus allowing the youngster Aaron Rodgers to showcase his skills with the majority of the Vikings offensive line.

by dsludo on Nov 2, 2009 2:15 AM CST up reply actions  

What a load of crap...

…this was, by far, the toughest loss that I’ve ever experienced as a fan. I live in Minnesota, in the Twin Cities to be exact, and I have to live with this crap all year now.

This makes me sick to my stomach. I really, really hate the guy now. Whats really sickening though, is all these damn Vikings fans who used to talk so much trash about the guy and how overrated and unskilled his play was, are now running around in purple number 4 jerseys. I can’t put into words how frustrating that is…

by StephanL on Nov 2, 2009 2:24 AM CST reply actions  

Maybe you can takeaq lesson from them

Don’t be so damned obsessed with where a guy USED to play.

If you’re just gonna cheer a team, you’re not gonna care where a player came from before he got there, and you’re not gonna obsess so much where he goes after you claim that you have supposedly “move on.”

by puddnhead on Nov 2, 2009 7:13 AM CST up reply actions  

To be fair

It’s hard to move past this stuff when the media won’t do it either. As much as some of us try to move on, when Kevin Seifert, John Clayton, and, well, just about everyone at ESPN doesn’t move on, we’re stuck with it day in and day out. Sure, we could cut ourselves off from ESPN, and I could stop going out into public to avoid getting H1N1 too.

But for a number of us, losing the division to our biggest rival halfway through the season is the biggest problem. The fact it came at the hands of a team lead by our old QB is salt in a wound, not the wound itself.

by Danwood on Nov 2, 2009 7:31 AM CST up reply actions  

But for a number of us, losing the division to our biggest rival halfway through the season is the biggest problem. The fact it came at the hands of a team lead by our old QB is salt in a wound, not the wound itself.

This sums it up perfectly. Nicely put

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 8:14 AM CST up reply actions  

Well if we need to take lessons on “moving on” thankfully we have you here to show us the way

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 9:00 PM CST up reply actions  

What’s even more sickening, is that now Packers fans are doing the exact same thing.

by dsludo on Nov 2, 2009 9:38 AM CST up reply actions  

Perhaps

but they’re a bit more qualified to do so, aren’t they?

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 10:16 AM CST up reply actions  

you can be the most qualified person in the world, but when you’re wrong it doesn’t make any bit of difference.

by dsludo on Nov 2, 2009 10:19 AM CST up reply actions  

So, Pack fans

are “wrong” to feel frustrated by a player they cheered for nearly two decades aggressively flouting their affection and loyalty by joining their most heated rival?

It’s wrong to disparage a player’s abilities simply because you don’t like him or her (i.e., some Vikings fans’ feelings about Favre prior to 2009). It is not wrong to disparage a player for acting like a jerk personally (i.e., Packers fans feelings about Favre this year), regardless of his or her ability.

Does that make sense?

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

hold on there……

What I’m talking about has nothing to do with all that you mentioned.

by dsludo on Nov 2, 2009 10:27 AM CST up reply actions  

it doesn't?

explain then

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 10:28 AM CST up reply actions  

well if you insist, or you could reread the posts....

StephenL posted:
“This makes me sick to my stomach. I really, really hate the guy now. Whats really sickening though, is all these damn Vikings fans who used to talk so much trash about the guy and how overrated and unskilled his play was, are now running around in purple number 4 jerseys. I can’t put into words how frustrating that is…”

Then I responded that whats even more sickening is now Packers fans are saying the same thing as what Vikings fans used to say. That’s all I was saying.

by dsludo on Nov 2, 2009 10:32 AM CST up reply actions  

So we are supposed to do what?

Cheer for him even when he’s on our rival? Or just boo the Vikings in general but cheer a specific member of the team because he spent time with us?

The sad truth of it is that Vikings fans of today can never know what situation we are in, cause the likelihood of the Vikings having a guy who has been a part of the franchise for 16 years isn’t very high

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 10:38 AM CST up reply actions  

that last paragraph isn't meant as a knock on the Vikes btw

there aren’t many teams that can have someone stay on the team for 16 years, let alone at the QB position. the situation at GB is unique simply because of that

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 10:40 AM CST up reply actions  

And so unique

it would be nice if folks would stop comparing the situation to that of every other star player the Packers have released or traded in the past.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 10:41 AM CST up reply actions  

Stop saying he’s overrated, unskilled, interception machine. Because right now he’s playing top notch football. So when you make statements like that you’re just wrong.

If he tailspins at the end of the season then obviously you could say those things, but at this point it makes you look like you have no idea what you’re talking about.

Just to be clear, verno, the comments aren’t directed at you. Just seen a lot of uneducated comments coming from packers fans in general, that just are blatantly false.

by dsludo on Nov 2, 2009 10:45 AM CST up reply actions  

Understood

but you have to admit its strange for us too to have fans that made the same type of claims that we are accused of for 16 years conveniently taking back all of those words and saying the opposite now. I understand its because he wears purple now, but it gets under our collective skin to have those former Favre-haters now lecturing us on how to treat their beloved hero (even if he is their hero for all of 3-4 months now)

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 12:22 PM CST up reply actions  

keep going….

then I responded that Pack fans who were acting like Vikes fans used to are a bit more qualified in their angst. To which you replied that both are wrong despite one side being more qualified. I then stated why I believe that Pack fans are not “wrong” in this situation, but that blind haters in the past were wrong.

You then said that you and I weren’t talking about the same thing.

I’m not trying to fuck with you or anything, because I actually think this point is important because I believe there is a real distinction between anti-Favrers of the past (based purely in resenting his being really good) and anti-Favre Pack fans now never denied his abilities but dislike him because he’s acted like a jerk since the summer of 2008, capped by the ultimate douchieness of joining our biggest rival.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 10:38 AM CST up reply actions  

Actually, on this website not a lot of people say he is unskilled and overrated. We watched the guy for 16 years, we know how good he is. I don’t think he is one bit overrated and he is definitely not “unskilled”. Do we talk about how he generally throws a lot of picks? Yes, we do, because like I said above we watched the guy for 16 years and saw him do it first hand. Is he throwing a lot of picks for you guys? No, he isn’t. He is playing like he did for us in 07’, and to tell you the truth I didn’t think he would be able too.

But it is frustrating when I read comments from Vikes fans on how “we should have handled the Favre situation”, or “how we’re bad fans”. Because to be frank, probably half of the Vikes fans who feel that “we handlded the situation wrong”, or thinks that “we’re a dispicable fan base” (to put it in the terms of one Vikings fan) wouldn’t feel that way if he wasn’t now their Qb.

The reason so many of us die hard Packers fans agree with this post, and can relate to this post is because we are and were Packers fans first and Favre fans second. If you look at the situation, and really read what dishingoutdimes wrote, there is no way to deny that Favre really didn’t handle the situation great.

I don’t feel “betrayed” that he is playing for the Vikes (though I don’t like it, understandably) because I understand that he still wanted to play football. It does bug me a bit that as soon as he found out we were really being honest about being committing to Rodgers, he instantly wanted to play for the Vikes but oh well.

Where I really feel “betrayed” or hurt by him is how he acted towards our team. He knew coming out and saying all the negative stuff he did about our organization would turn a large number of our fans against Rodgers, but he did it anyway. Did he not have any compassion for Rodgers? He had to have known that Rodgers just replacing him without all the drama that happened would have been very, very hard for Rodgers considering what Favre had done for us. So was it necessary for him to just pile that much more on?

Rodgers had “Packers fans” (really their were just Favre fans) booing him at training camp? Care to imagine yourself in that situation?

We gave Favre time in his decision, we really did. Like dishingoutdimes said in this article, MM talked to him around draft time to see where he was at, and the response he got from Favre, really kind of confirmed that he really was done. So we drafted accordingly, and went on without him. (Like we told him we were going too.)

For me I have always been a Packers fan first. But Favre was always my favorite player, and I looked up to him. I loved the way the guy played on the field. I really loved everything about the guy, and to see him treat our organization the way he did was astounding to me. Like I pointed out above it WAS made clear to him what our organizations plans were, whether he liked them or not.

He obviously felt that we would just discontinue those plans as soon as he came running back, but we didn’t. (Which is something that I respect TT for) When that happened a whole new side of Favre came out, and he really acted kind of immature. For that reason I lost a lot of respect I had for Favre (and trust me I had A LOT of respect for him).

And this isn’t direct at you dsludo, more so just to those who feel that “we’re bad fans” for doing what we did.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 11:31 AM CST up reply actions  

which side will you be on

when Farve is in a rocking chair and uncapable of playing?

Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok

by blackoutsox on Nov 2, 2009 6:45 PM CST up reply actions  

you mean

The NFL will continue after Favre retires? Why? What’s the point?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 6:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Isn't that the plot for the movie 2012?

Favre retires, the world comes to an end?

by Danwood on Nov 2, 2009 6:56 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

haha!

nice

Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok

by blackoutsox on Nov 2, 2009 7:03 PM CST up reply actions  

ZING!

Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge

by Bush League All Star on Nov 2, 2009 10:41 PM CST up reply actions  

I certainly don’t see any point for it too continue.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 8:38 PM CST up reply actions  

I don’t consider those “former Packers fans” real Packers fans. If your a true fan of a team then you don’t just up and decide that your no longer a fan because 1 player leaves.

Those people like R4F, for example, were Favre fans and as a result liked the Packers. Kind of like the only reason he is now a Vikes fan is because Favre is your Qb.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 8:37 PM CST up reply actions  

I was an amazingly prescient "Favre fan" I guess

Given that I watched most every game of the 15 years before Favre arrived on the scene, from Chester Marcol’s miracle blocked-FG-return-for-winning-touchdown (my earliest vivid memory) to Dickey’s Monday night shootout with the Redskins – though my mom made me go to bed :( – , to the Martin-MCmahon body slam, to Magic’s “upon further review, the Bears still suck” replay game.

I respect you packadaily555, but only if & when you give me respect in return. You cannot get away with, and I will not tolerate, you insinuating someone who has watched ~500 Packer games – the first couple hundred during an unbroken string of miserable losing seasons – was never a team fan. If, furthermore, you don’t even know who Chester Marcol is & the play I’m referring to, then let me go further and say STUFF IT with this crap about YOU being more of a fan than ME.

I’m sure you have an explanation for that too, or some other lazy way of blowing off someone who’s merely pointing out the obvious, THE PACKERS HAVE BIG PROBLEMS.

My god. Let me just stop tiptoeing around then, if I’m gonna just get blasted anyway: the Packers D is almost in MUTINY now, did you read what Jenkins said? And Woodson before him? And between the lines of what Kampman has NOT said? Yes, that’s right, even some Packers players are more frustrated where this team is going than I am.

Shoot the messenger if you want, but that doesn’t make the message itself vanish! You guys should venture out from your little cocoon here and venture out into the wider world, such as the Times 5th Down blog or USA Today. There are LOTS of probably-more-casual fans that were turned off by the pregame crap from the stands yesterday. Yes, some of the them Packers fans. THE FANBASE IS SPLITTING. I am just a canary in the coalmine. The more extreme you guys get, the more you turn the more moderate “silent majority” fans off (and the older ones like me as well, that don’t like to be associated with this kind of boorishness), and the bigger this rift gets. My mother and much of her card club, Wisconsin residents for 8 decades apiece, were cheering the Vikings yesterday! The foundations of the fanbase going all the way back to Lombardi are being eroded by how things are going down.

by puddnhead on Nov 2, 2009 11:12 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Fair enough

I respect you as well puddnhead, and never knew that you were once a Packers fan. I didn’t mean my response to you to come off as I’m more of a Packers fan then you once were.

I still do maintain though that I’m not sure how somebody can say their a fan of a team, and then not be one after 1 player leaves. Trust me I know what Favre meant to this organization but still from my perspective the teams comes first.

I know we have problems on our team. This isn’t the first negative thing Woodson has said this year, and Kampman made it pretty clear that he wasn’t to thrilled about the switch to the 3-4. Honestly, I didn’t really care so much about the switch to the 3-4 but rather just that we were getting a coordinator who wasn’t scared to bring some heat.

Capers had a long history of doing so, so I was fine with his hiring. But seeing what he has done so far with the defense is discouraging. The whole point of bringing him in was so our defense would be unpredictable, and I really see no difference from last year aside from us having 3 down lineman vs. 4 down lineman.

Like you pointed out it’s fairly obvious that the guys aren’t too fond of the new defense, and what’s really concerning is that it’s some of our better guys talking out against it.

The only reason the defense was so poor last year was because Jenkins went down with an injury, and we traded Williams. That left our only effective guy (Kampman) to be double teamed every play. Obviously a bump n run scheme isn’t going to work under those circumstances because despite Woodson and Harris being excellent in this style of defense, you can’t expect them to be able to cover a guy for 6+ seconds nearly every play.

I guess what I’m trying to get at is I look at our defense now and can’t help but wonder what the point of a defensive change was. I see a healthy Jenkins. A healthy Barnett. A healthy Harris. A healthy Collins. And then to add on to that I see Raji, who has been slowed by an ankle injury but has still shown flashes of brilliance, and Matthews who looks like he is going to become a stud in this league.

I can’t help but imagine what the 4-3 defense would look like with Jenkins, Pickett, Raji (instead of Cole and Jolly), Kampman on the line and with Hawk (who has been an above average OLB for us in the past), Barnett, and Matthews (instead of Poppinga). Call me crazy but I think that front seven could be one of the better ones in football.

Haha wow, sorry I just rambled on and on, but what I am trying to get at is I know we have problems as a team, and I know the fan base isn’t what is once was before all the Favre stuff. I’m sorry if my comment above to you came off as arrogant or conceited. I really wasn’t trying to make you feel like a lesser fan then I am.

by packallday555 on Nov 3, 2009 1:12 AM CST up reply actions  

OK, thanks, and my apologies

I went outta line there, I really intended to stay positive here, outside of very focused comments about the “brain trust,” and if I couldn’t do that, to stay out. I never do anything but compliment Rodgers here (which he deserves, as – except for some small issues, which is true of all players — this has never been about him). Heck I even went out of my way to mildly congratulate Lang the other day, as you know. Which, lets be honest, was a stretch.

This has just been a really hard couple days. I knew it would be hard, but it maybe was harder than I thought. Beyond the whole respect & appreciation angle, I guess I’d just hoped that, whatever the outcome, the game Sunday would have at least been close. I don’t know if anyone here can understand this, but even though I made my choice in the preseason – I realized I could not be both a Packer and Viking fan this year – and even though the reason I am estranged is my disgust that Thompson has been running this team into the ground for years, I felt that way since way before Favre left, so it was good tht other fans who might not have felt that before are being woken up to it now … well, it was still hard to see how low things have gone, the season imploding before my eyes. And the guilt of knowing I was (half-heartedly) cheering for it to happen.. I discovered in my heart, I din’t want it to be so lopsided. Like I said, I understand if that is hard to comprehend.

Maybe understanding my POV is an age/experience thing. Maybe once you’ve had the experience (or watched others close to you have the experience) of being a good team player in your job, of being the one they count on to nail the big projects, the one they ask to go the extra mile to meet a deadline – after being that guy for years, being a key cog in your company – then one day you have new owners or upper management come in, people who want to put their own stamp on things just for sake of making it theirs, people who are actually frustrated that you have everything under control & make the customers happy, because they feel they are not doing their job unless they have the control, for whatever reason. And so they start fixing things that aren’t broke, and stop putting resources into areas that will break without attention, aprticularly areas you have been one of the ones making it click. But when you bring it to their attention, because you care and want your company to succeed, you are taken to be a troublemaker, to be out of line. And you get more and more frustrated, and yes, maybe start to behave erratically, because of that frustration. And finally the breaking point comes & you have to get out to reestablish what is important to you (winning, in whatever way that means for your job) somewhere else. And the new management lets you & others of your mind go, with not-so-well-disguised relief. Then after you get out, you watch your old company run aground, things fall apart, as the management who finally have “control” realize they never knew half of what you and other key people were doing for them in the first place. Because you know people still working there, even though you now work at a competing company, with a new group tht you feel you genuinely fit in with as a team, you still don’t enjoy watching this happen, in fact you feel guilt because you know if you were still there, you could be making it at least a little less bad.

I’m sorry for this long soliloquy, I’m saying way more than I should on just a football blog. But let’s just say, watching Favre choke up on the sidelines in the closing minutes of the game & in that interview with Pam Oliver, showing less happiness than I’ve ever seen him show after winning … I totally got it. Totally. And so, yeah, maybe seeing others totally NOT getting it, and dissing him for nothing more than going on to succeed just the same as he always has in a new place, after his old place clearly was happy to see him gone … in other words, doing the exact thing that made him valuable in the first place, showing up every day & delivering when his team (whoever it is) needs him … yeah, that pisses me off on levels that maybe its hard for others to comprehend.

by puddnhead on Nov 3, 2009 8:02 AM CST up reply actions  

OK, thanks for the reasonable reply, and my apologies

I went outta line there, I really intended to stay positive here, outside of very focused comments about the “brain trust,” and if I couldn’t do that, to stay out. I never do anything but compliment Rodgers here (which he deserves, as – except for some small issues, which is true of all players — this has never been about him). Heck I even went out of my way to mildly congratulate Lang the other day, as you know. Which, lets be honest, was a stretch.

This has just been a really hard couple days. I knew it would be hard, but it maybe was harder than I thought. Beyond the whole respect & appreciation angle, I guess I’d just hoped that, whatever the outcome, the game Sunday would have at least been close. I don’t know if anyone here can understand this, but even though I made my choice in the preseason – I realized I could not be both a Packer and Viking fan this year – and even though the reason I am estranged is my disgust that Thompson has been running this team into the ground for years, I felt that way since way before Favre left, so it was good tht other fans who might not have felt that before are being woken up to it now … well, it was still hard to see how low things have gone, the season imploding before my eyes. And the guilt of knowing I was (half-heartedly) cheering for it to happen.. I discovered in my heart, I din’t want it to be so lopsided. Like I said, I understand if that is hard to comprehend.

Maybe understanding my POV is an age/experience thing. Maybe once you’ve had the experience (or watched others close to you have the experience) of being a good team player in your job, of being the one they count on to nail the big projects, the one they ask to go the extra mile to meet a deadline – after being that guy for years, being a key cog in your company – then one day you have new owners or upper management come in, people who want to put their own stamp on things just for sake of making it theirs, people who are actually frustrated that you have everything under control & make the customers happy, because they feel they are not doing their job unless they have the control, for whatever reason. And so they start fixing things that aren’t broke, and stop putting resources into areas that will break without attention, aprticularly areas you have been one of the ones making it click. But when you bring it to their attention, because you care and want your company to succeed, you are taken to be a troublemaker, to be out of line. And you get more and more frustrated, and yes, maybe start to behave erratically, because of that frustration. And finally the breaking point comes & you have to get out to reestablish what is important to you (winning, in whatever way that means for your job) somewhere else. And the new management lets you & others of your mind go, with not-so-well-disguised relief. Then after you get out, you watch your old company run aground, things fall apart, as the management who finally have “control” realize they never knew half of what you and other key people were doing for them in the first place. Because you know people still working there, even though you now work at a competing company, with a new group tht you feel you genuinely fit in with as a team, you still don’t enjoy watching this happen, in fact you feel guilt because you know if you were still there, you could be making it at least a little less bad.

I’m sorry for this long soliloquy, I’m saying way more than I should on just a football blog. But let’s just say, watching Favre choke up on the sidelines in the closing minutes of the game & in that interview with Pam Oliver, showing less happiness than I’ve ever seen him show after winning … I totally got it. Totally. And so, yeah, maybe seeing others totally NOT getting it, and dissing him for nothing more than going on to succeed just the same as he always has in a new place, after his old place clearly was happy to see him gone … in other words, doing the exact thing that made him valuable in the first place, showing up every day & delivering when his team (whoever it is) needs him … yeah, that pisses me off on levels that maybe its hard for others to comprehend.

by puddnhead on Nov 3, 2009 8:04 AM CST up reply actions  

oops double post, did not look like it posted first time

paragraphing got scrambled too somehow, ugh.

Anyway, I need to stop being a troll here. Hopefully with this series done for the year, I’ve gotten this out of my system and can let you guys have your board back in peace.

Thanks to everyone who have been thoughtful in their replies to me, even when I have not always been to them. I hope you can at least understand and forgive that this is a hard, weird experience to go through, and yeah — a little like Favre himself — someone going through this agonizing of an experience and uprooting is gonna behave a bit irrationally and emotionally at times.

Please, I do get that Brett is “the enemy” now and you need to do what you need to do. But, when all that is done & in the past, try then to understand how hard this has clearly been for him too, and at that time, if not now, cut the guy some slack.

by puddnhead on Nov 3, 2009 8:11 AM CST up reply actions  

Thanks for the reply

Haha reading over our recent conversation it feels as though we had just endured a “Dr. Phil like moment”. But this is a touchy situation which is understandable when you look at Favre’s attachment to Green Bay for the 16 year period he was here.

I can see how it has been hard for him as well, and am able to see past what’s going on now with him.

by packallday555 on Nov 3, 2009 10:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah I know what you mean

Sometimes you do or say something & only later can you figure out why. I think I just went through that.

Anyway, be seeing you back at DN, perhaps?

by puddnhead on Nov 3, 2009 11:02 PM CST up reply actions  

no need...

to go over there lately. I think they are all over here posting lately!

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 11:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes

You sure will. I haven’t been going over there much since Sunday, because I can see me getting in some trouble when responding to some of the homers over there.

But ya, I’ll be back over there soon.

by packallday555 on Nov 3, 2009 11:09 PM CST up reply actions  

you are right...

I hear a lot of Packer fans trashing Favre with the same comments I used to hear from Viking fans. I try not to do that. I still think he’s one of the best to play the game but I do think a meltdown game is coming. He kind of had one against the Steelers but I’ll be the first to admit that he’s looked better than I anticipated. Better than MOST expected. I traded to get him in my FF league before the season started. I got him for Trent Edwards and Jamal Lewis for pete’s sake from a Vikings fan! The only reason I wanted him was so he could be my mascot (team name was Favre’s Waffle House). He’s a top 12 QB though and honestly I am impressed with how well he’s doing and how he’s been able to minimize the INTs. Make me wonder where THAT Favre was in earlier years. We had some GREAT Olines early in the decade and I never saw this Favre!!!

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 12:52 PM CST up reply actions  

I just want to say in advance

That this is NOT me posting under a different alias! (or the ones below)

This is an example of the NFL fan that I have been telling you about for weeks & more than a few of you came back at me, all cocky, and claimed “I talked to thousands of people and not one of them said anything like that.”

PuhLEASE.

I think I see how it could have happened though, to be honest. Those guys probably talk to hardcore football fans. I talk to people more casual about it, and more representative of the general NFL viewing population. It’d be like those guys talking to only Libertarians and John Birch members to get a feel of how people think of Obama.

I tried to tell you the Packers had a PR problem in how they traded Favre away, that TT squandered his remaining goodwill with Favre (however little there still was) by telling him one thing (he was being traded to Bucs) and then pulling a fast one (trading him to Jets, in the middle of the night while he slept).

All ostensibly for a slightly better draft pick in compensation, but in reality for TT’s personal gain, so (he thought) he would never have to see Favre again. Packers played Tampa IN TAMPA week five last year, but even that was less than TT could stomach, so he double-crossed Favre and Jon Gruden, because he thought he could. I tried to tell you that classy franchise GMs (Walsh with Montana, and yes Rams with Warner) don’t do that to guys that have been the face of their franchise. The trade of Favre is more like Detroit’s trade of Bobby Layne. It was done without the GM ever really caring how the player felt about doing it. You do that with Joe Blow, sure, but you don’t do that with Joe Montana, Kurt Warner (in StL or Arizona), Bobby Layne, and Brett Favre. Even the JETS are smart enough to know THAT (they released him after they decided to go with drafting Sanchez, instead of getting into a pissing match with him, like TT insisted on doing even after he decided he couldn’t be a Packer).

Let me repeat that one more time: Even the JETS showed more consideration and wisdom in how they handled Favre on the way out.

Yes, there are HARDCORE fans of other teams who see your fanatic Packer fan point of view. But I tell you the more general fan DOES NOT GET WHY PACKERS DID THAT. And yes that includes MANY Packer fans (heard on Z104 radio this morning on way to work that half the fans on their 6 buses that went to the game from Madison were wearing purple #4s!) The only way they would is if a trade went down that Favre said, “yeah I agreed to this, this is what we negotiated.” But TT, in one of his numerous bad judgments, decided a draft pick one round higher (although … did he even get that, since Jets did not make playoffs) was more important than creating a giant PR nightmare and motivating Favre to continue to pursue the Vikings instead of being contented where he was traded (Tampa). WAY TO GO TED!

by puddnhead on Nov 2, 2009 7:42 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Even the JETS showed more consideration and wisdom in how they handled Favre on the way out.

The Jets also had less of an emotional investment in Brent. There was no consideration and wisdom involved. Favre helped cost them a chance at the playoffs last year so when he phony retired again they had no problem cutting ties. They weren’t willing to put up with the drama that is involved with him.

And lastly, why on earth do I care what fans of other teams think about the situation? I don’t care if they are hardcore or general fans. Makes no difference to me. Should I ask them what they think of how I live my daily life, and make adjustments accordingly? Casual fans are just that, casual fans.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 8:29 AM CST up reply actions  

nono

Lets remember the fact that Farve wanted to come back once again after retirement and the whole off season to make the decision……to walk right back and be a starter, He is the one that said no way if he couldnt start without competing for the job he didnt want to come back and asked to be let go… Remember it all started cause he thought he could run the Packers and decide who to bring in as Coach and who to pick up as wide receiver.. Remember he cryed like a baby when we didnt bring in Mariouchi for coach and he cryed when we didnt bring on Randy Moss. Lets not forget the real reason he was so undecided whether to retire or not. I have been a fan for 50 years , what he did totally erases all of the good things that he did for the team. I dont like tt either but the stockholders are the ones that have to deal with getting him out of there. Ron Wolf I really miss you!

by whooya on Nov 3, 2009 1:40 PM CST up reply actions  

We cheer Kurt Warner when he comes back to STL. No disrespect for our Rams, it’s just that we appreciate what the man did for us.

Kurt Warner was an important member of the Rams for what, 4 years? And he was atrocious in his last year or two, or did you forget the fumbling?

Thanks for the lecture. Come visit again once you get off your high horse.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 8:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Ironic

Look the word up.

And maybe stop replying to others telling them to get off their high horses, and do the same yourself every now and then.

by puddnhead on Nov 2, 2009 8:54 AM CST up reply actions  

My point, if you care to look for it

was that to point out that its hard to compare a guy being a part of a team for 16 years and a guy who had 2 great seasons and 3 injury plagued seasons and using that to point out how we are bad fans because Rams fans cheer Warner on his return. Its really easy to tell someone how to act from the outside. Did the commenter not tell us all how awful we are for not rolling out a red carpet for Favre? If they have something to say besides, “Shame on you for not appreciating the wonder that is Brett Favre” I will take them seriously. But if you come by after a loss, and have never posted here before, to lecture us then I’ll tell them to get off their high horse. I didn’t say that to you because you are a regular and you have made your point using reasonable explanations. We disagree, but I respect your opinion. That’s different than a first timer

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 9:30 AM CST up reply actions  

Trust me verno, he doesn't care to look for it.

puddn’s mind is as monomanical and unchangeable on this Favre thing as (to use his own example) modern-day Birchers’ perspectives on President Obama.

No that’s irony.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 10:27 AM CST up reply actions  

Kurt Warner

You mean the guy who rose from obscurity to super stardom and then fell from it just as fast and then rose to it again? YOu mean the guy that was part of that team for a couple years who was a nobody before that?

Here are the facts:
Kurt Warner was released by St. Louis.
Kurt Warner was signed by the Giants (non rival)
Kurt Warner sucked as a Giant and had his job stolen by a rookie
Kurt Warner was AGAIN released
Kurt Warner was signed to a one year deal by the Cardinals (division rival, but not bitter rival)
Kurt Warner struggled to hang onto the starting job in his first season.

I could go on and on but the point is that his path looks NOTHING like Favres. Favre was the face of the Packers for 16 years. He was a very important piece of making GB relevant again (though Reggie is really the one that made GB pop up on the radar again…a black man CHOOSING to go to GB). Favre retired…Warner was cut. Favre unretired, Favre tried to force his will. Warner moved on. Favre was traded. Warner was cut again. Favre retired again. Favre unretired again. Favre signed with BITTER RIVAL. Favre was all over in the media spewing hatred toward GB managment. Warner signed with new team in same division who has no real history with old team. Honestly I don’t see ANY comparison between the stories.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 10:01 AM CST up reply actions  

What?!?

No response on this one.
I have another example…did you know Cowboy fans BOOED Emmitt Smith when he came back as a Cardinal? Yeah…Emmitt who basically left cause they said they were done with him. He went to a non rival and a TERRIBLE team. I don’t remember a hailstorm of criticism coming on Cowboy fans. I know the Red Sox fans booed the hell out of Johnny Damon when he went to the Yankees. I know the Twins fans boo the hell out of Piersynski when he comes into town. Montana never came BACK to Candlestick but I think he would have been booed, that was a similar deal there, though the Chiefs weren’t even a bitter rival.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 1:21 PM CST up reply actions  

good examples

I was forgetting about Emmitt Smith but thats probably because I hated him

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 2:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Torii Hunter

Received a standing ovation when he came back to the Dome. AJ has always been a deusch. Even when he was with the Twins he wasn’t a well liked player.

by Miidwest on Nov 2, 2009 3:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Torii

Torii left on good terms. The team wasn’t willing to pay him. TOTALLY different situation. I am a Twins fan, I know Torii’s situation. He didn’t speak out against the Twins or go to a bitter rival. I will be curious to see what happens with Mauer if he ends up leaving and signing with the Yankees. That COULD be a similar situation though Mauer won’t take it public like Favre did or say anything negative about the Twins…he’s a little classier that way (also has the good local boy image he’ll want to keep). Man I hope that doesn’t happen though.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 3:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Mauer should be a Brewer. :)

He is one of my favorite players in the game right now.

Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge

by Bush League All Star on Nov 2, 2009 3:54 PM CST up reply actions  

I live in MN and am a Twins fan as well, and Torii’s situation is completely different.

I agree Mauer going to the Yanks would be somewhat similar but he would still have to play for us for probably 10 more years for the situation to really be to the same degree as the Favre situation.

On a sidenote- I’m pretty sure you were one of the guys talking about KFAN, and was wondering if you heard any of the Common Man’s show today. He again stated his ridiculous theory, that Favre would win the SB with the Vikes this year, and then play for the Packers next year in order to “repair his image”.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 4:12 PM CST up reply actions  

I would never listen to KFAN by choice

and wouldn’t think of listening to it the day after a Favre led Vikings team beat the Packers at Lambeau.

by Charlie Kelly on Nov 2, 2009 4:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah

You make a valid point there but as you know probably know there is nothing else on the radio. Listening to music really isn’t an option for me seeing as how I no longer like listening to the same songs repeated over and over again.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 4:37 PM CST up reply actions  

101.3 KDWB

repeats the same songs over and over again!!!

It’s annoying!

by CrazyCollegian on Nov 2, 2009 7:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Haha

I know!! I hate it. And because of it I refuse to listen to it anymore.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 8:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Charlie,

gauging from your posts here, I’d predict you’d enjoy the Common Man immensely. He’s hysterical and in no way a Minnesota homer. In fact, if I remember right, he’s a Lions fan.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 7:44 PM CST up reply actions  

you are right

He is a Lions fan…and he’s HILARIOUS!!

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 9:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Well if you're a Lions fan

you’d better have a damned good sense of humour ;~)

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 9:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe I'll give it a shot

I don’t know if it’s the fact that I’ve had to listen to KTALK many times at work which has led me to detest any form of talk radio so much but I’ll have to listen to something because the Current is on it’s member drive and my CD player just broke.

by Charlie Kelly on Nov 2, 2009 9:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm a bit hesitant to promote Common too much

since I’ve been away from his show for close to a decade now. But when I lived there, he was required listening.

He’s like a Minnesota version of Jim Rome.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 9:08 PM CST up reply actions  

I was all for giving it a shot until you compared him to Jim Rome

Although I wouldn’t mind Rome if he wasn’t always trying to awkwardly use hip slang in his comments. Now I don’t know if that’s just part of his schtick or if he actually thinks he sound legitimate when he calls a play made by Ochocinco “dope” but it tends to bug the crap out of me. PHE NOMINAL, IN CREDIBLE, UN STOPPABLE

by Charlie Kelly on Nov 2, 2009 9:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Fair enough,

I use to find Rome insufferable too until I started listening recently and it just clicked. His show is really, really funny.

But like Common Man (or Seinfeld or Arrested Development or, well damn, prettymuch anything that’s funny), it’s very self-referential and requires regular listening.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 9:23 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Well, in all fairness I've never actually heard Rome's show, I've just seen bits of the TV show

I find the TV show unwatchable but seeing as how everything on ESPN is, maybe his radio show is worthwhile. Next time I’m sitting in traffic I’ll give Common Man a try.

by Charlie Kelly on Nov 2, 2009 9:29 PM CST up reply actions  

I love Rome too…in Mn you have to choose between the two though (Rome vs Common). YOu do have to listen for a while to both of them to really get them and they are kind of David Letterman like where they make a good one liner and then pound it into the ground until you BEG them to stop using it!

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 9:22 AM CST up reply actions  

why not? Its interesting to get the take from the other side. Its WAY better than listening to the music stations out there and their drivel about hollywood celebrities. Kill me now if THAT is what I have to listen to on my 45 min drive to work!!

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 8:59 PM CST up reply actions  

haha…yeah I heard that. HOnestly you can’t even take ANYTHING he says with any kind of seriousness. He is all about getting a rise and playing off of that. I don’t think Common even believes anything he says!

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 4:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Haha

Yeah I always think that too. I seem to always find myself questioning whether or not he really believes the things he says.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 4:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Do you find that people automatically assume you hate the Twins cause you are a Packer fan? I get that sometimes and I have to convince them that I could care less about the Brewers.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 4:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Haha yeah

I get that or how can you like a Minnesota baseball team and not the Minnesota football team. Another one of my favorites is, “you live in Minnesota how can you be a Packers fan?” And when I tell them that I’m originally from Wisconsin, and my whole family lives there, they still can’t seem to understand haha.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 4:42 PM CST up reply actions  

No

Its another example of fans that have booed a returning superstar. Come on, are you kidding with this one?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 5:26 PM CST up reply actions  

dude…give me a break. You tell us that real fans don’t behave this way…we provide you with NUMEROUS examples to show otherwise and then you come back with THAT. I am the one shuttering now.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 9:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Weren't you the guy telling people not to tell you what to think the other day?

And isn’t that exactly what you’re doing now?

Get over it, puddnhead. You’re too good for all this bitterness.

What begins in fear usually ends in folly.

by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Nov 2, 2009 9:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Of course a Rams' fan wouldn't forget the fumbling...

…like I didn’t forget the two SuperBowls/MVPs/Record-setting memories he gave us in that magical 3 year span. 2 Superbowls, 1 win, 2 MVPs. Does that sound like a certain person we’re discussing? Minus 1 MVP?

Yeah, it’s 16 years to about 5, but more memories are made in the playoffs/SB than in many regular seasons.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 10:36 AM CST up reply actions  

But like you said it’s 16 years to 5 years. You didn’t have the guy come in when he was just a young guy, and watch him develop with your team for almost his entire career. The circumstances are much, much different.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 10:46 AM CST up reply actions  

But the love is the same for us Rams' fans...

…because it’s all about how he carried the TEAM to heights it had never reached before. Warner’s story is forever engraved in our hearts the same way Brett’s is in yours, no matter how long he was there. It meant so much, so even if the circumstances are different, the LOVE is the same.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 10:49 AM CST up reply actions  

Maybe

But the reason your love for him was so great was because like you said he won big games for you. That is part of why our love for Favre was so great but not all of it. Again he basically grew up before the city’s eyes. He was a lot more then a football player to many people in Green Bay.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 10:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Trojan, with all due respect to your opinion,

you don’t understand how many non-Packer fans have come over here to lecture us about how we should support Favre over the organisation because “X (player for their team in the past) was treated better by Y (the management of their team at the time) and look at how no one called their management out on the carpet. Fire TT now!!!!!”

The problem with all these comparisons is the simple and unalterable fact that Favre is unique. This situation in GB is unique. There’s nothing in the history of the NFL that comes remotely close other than maybe the Montana-49ers split (that also was bitter and protracted and created great media stir).

It’s not like Reggie White getting released to go and play with the non-divisional rival Panthers following a year of retirement. It’s not like Kurt Warner being released because he had suddenly become an ineffective qb.

Just because there’s some scant similarity does not equal a model for how this situation could have been handled better, no matter how desperately you argue it is.

And just releasing Favre so he could go and play with our greatest divisional rival would be colossally stupid. That perspective is just wholly indefensible.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 11:24 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

that says it perfectly

This is a very unique situation that really has no actual parallel yet people come here from all sorts of different teams and tell us how to feel by comparing it to their own situation wears on you

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 12:40 PM CST up reply actions  

I understand that playoffs generate more memories

but the difference between 16 years of playing and 5 years (only 3 of which were spent on the field playing and one of those was injury shortened) is too much to just be swept aside. And the memories that Favre made in the playoffs since the ‘98 season have to be factored in too. The wins against the 49ers (2001 playoffs), Seahawks (2003 playoffs), and Seahawks again (2007 playoffs) can’t be forgotten but neither can the losses to the Rams (2001 playoffs, 6 picks), Falcons (2002), Eagles (2003, inexcusable OT pick), Vikings (2004), and Giants (2007, another inexcusable pick in OT). Memories are just that, good or bad.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 10:49 AM CST up reply actions  

HUH?

I don’t get this take. So if a player wants to be released, a team should just release them? That is the take huh? Good luck running a team with that kind of take on things. The fact is that Brett was PROPERTY of the Packers. They invested HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of dollars into him and his family. Please don’t act like he was doing a charitble deed in playing for the Packers…have you SEEN his house? Its the size of the Playboy mansion. Please don’t give me the he did so much for the Packer or he put them on the map. He was part of what made the Packers what they were but he was paid for that. They had NO responsibility to release a player who RETIRED…and I would have been FLAMINGLY mad at management if they had. Why release someone who has value so he can go sign for your bitter rival? That is just shit poor managment. Sorry for the cursing guys but that is the take that just really pisses me off cause it doesn’t even make one OUNCE of logical sense. Football is a business. Favre is a player. He doesn’t own his own path when he signs a contract.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 9:51 AM CST up reply actions  

I know Trevor

This is the point that just drives me crazy – show me one professional sports team that would outright release a disgruntled star player so he could go and join up with your most heated rival as he plainly stated was his wish.

TT handled a no-win situation as well as could be expected. In other words, he lost as little as possible, but still lost. For that reason, I really feel for the guy.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 10:32 AM CST up reply actions  

But the real question is

Why did it get to that point? By the time Favre painted Thompson into a corner, there was no way out. Thompson is supposed to be the grwon up, but he is the one who allowed the situation to get to that point. It didn’t happen at the end of the 2007 season, it began to happen basically the day Thompson started.

by ktenreb on Nov 2, 2009 10:43 AM CST up reply actions  

To answer your question it got to that point because Favre waffling about his retirement had become a pretty regular thing. It wasn’t like they didn’t give Favre time to decide about his retirement. Both TT and MM said they put no timeline on Favre, and even Favre said that multiple times. But still Favre went and retired, which is fine. But in doing that he knew and was told that they were going to move on.

Then in July he decides he wants to come back. Just one month before the NFL season starts.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 10:52 AM CST up reply actions  

Favre was waffling on retirement before TT came

So I guess you’re right

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 12:41 PM CST up reply actions  

But that's the real underlying issue here -

that there’s no way that Thompson can “win” in this situation. Why does it matter how it got there? That sounds a lot like blaming the victim (i.e., the fans, the management, and the coaching staff) who had been held hostage by Favre for the prior few years regarding his desire to play.

- If he allows Favre back, it appears that this whole organisation hangs on the whim of one player
- If he releases or trades Favre to the Vikings, TT would literally require a Secret Service detail to appear in public in WI
- If he allows Favre back, there’s almost no chance that Arod is going to hang around and could be potentially leading the Vikings (or any other team in desperate need of solid free agent qb)

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 11:10 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Again, you focus on the wrong time period

By the summer of 2008, Thompson had been painted into a corner by a petulant, egomaniacal quarterback, who also happened to be a once-in-a-generation player. I fault Thompson for allowing himself to get into that spot. Favre’s pouting in the spring of 2008 is NOT when the feud started — it started basically the day that Thompson took over.

Look — it’s an old cliche that all players are equal and no player is bigger than the team. But it’s a cliche that didn’t apply to Willie Mays or Magic Johnson or Mickey Mantle. It also doesn’t apply to Brett Favre. Thompson’s mistake was not working with Favre from the moment he started. As big of a pain in the ass as he was, he was Brett Favre, and you have to factor that in to the equation. Signing Randy Moss would have been a good football move, and more importantly it would have helped Thompson and Favre find common ground. Thompson, of course, would have remained the GM, but a sop or two to his franchise quarterback was essential. Instead, he basically told Favre to shove it up his @ss, and while we all applaud “tough” stands against overpaid obnoxious athletes, we also have to recognize what is smart. Thompson’s first draft pick was Aaron Rodgers, and Favre thereafter viewed everything Thompson did as trying to shove him out the door. While I don’t know whether this was Thompson’s plan, he certainly did not take any steps to make it appear otherwise.

You are going to respond to the effect that no GM can ever allow a player to hold the franchise hostage, but I am not saying that. I am simply saying that Thompson should have gone out of his way to try to have a respectful, professional relationship with his franchise quarterback. By the end, Thompson had mismanaged the relationship so badly he was reduced to hiding behind Mark Murphy and his $10 million offer to Favre to stay retired. Favre could have acted like more of a grown up, but in the end it was Thompson who had to be the grown up in that relationship. As I see it, he wasn’t.

by ktenreb on Nov 2, 2009 11:52 AM CST up reply actions  

I’m so sick of the Randy Moss thing coming up. It really wasn’t known what Moss had left, if he did have anything. He was a trouble maker. He really didn’t always play hard. There were so many negatives surrounding Moss, and considering TT isn’t the type of GM who signs FA’s normally, was it really a surprise he didn’t sign Moss?

Just keep in mind there were a minimal amount of teams who wanted Moss. It wasn’t like every team was out there trying to sign him, he was in the majority as far as his attitude towards Moss went.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 12:00 PM CST up reply actions  

No mystery.

Moss in Oakland was a waste of everyone’s time. I wasn’t surprised that he had that great year with the Pats. The asking price wasn’t even that high. Kudos to the Pats for seeing through the bullshit.

by uglyfatpimplynerd on Nov 2, 2009 12:30 PM CST up reply actions  

"Thompson should have gone out of his way to try to have a respectful, professional relationship with his franchise quarterback."

But what evidence do you have that Thompson didn’t do this? Because he didn’t trade for Randy Moss? Really?

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 12:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Exactly

People act like him drafting Rodgers, cutting some long time Packers players, and him not getting Moss means he was treating Favre poorly, but really he was just doing his job. He had legit reasons to do or not do every one of those things I listed above.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 3:35 PM CST up reply actions  

agreed

Understanding that the Packers would continue to exist as a franchise after Favre retired eventually does not equal shoving a great out the door so that the team would be all his. People always claim that TT is an egomaniac and wants the team to be his and ignore Favre’s ego.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 5:10 PM CST up reply actions  

In ktenreb's defense,

I do think it’s fair to say the team-building philosophy of Thompson is antithetical to that of Favre’s and not coincidentally the Minnesota Vikings.

After reading Andrew Brandt’s great retrospective on Thompson and Favre, I’ve been moved to see the fact that Brett needed to go in order to realize his philosophy on winning championships: drafting well along with signing big-time free agents like Moss or Hutchenson in MN.

Favre handled his exit badly, but I can see why he was frustrated by what he perceived as a timidity on the part of Thompson to take a risk in the free agent market in order to push the Pack over the top.

But that perspective is not the fault of Ted Thompson or McCarthy. It became an irreconciable difference, but that doesn’t mean one side was right and the other was wrong.

And it certainly doesn’t mean that Thompson acted less like a “grown-up” because he insisted on sticking to his philosophy of team development despite Favre’s growing displeasure.

The bottom line is Favre is really happy in Minnesota because he’s in a situation that he believes gives him the best chance to win a championship – i.e. strong in-house player development + bold free agent signings. If the Vikings win a championship (which I don’t think they will with that defense), it cannot be denied that Favre’s perspective is vindicated.

However, if the Packers continue to develop behind Rodgers and the defense gets more comfortable in the 3-4 and they win a championship in the next decade or are in the mix at least for the next decade, it will be because Thompson’s patience and keen eye for talent paid off in the long run.

In other words, Thompson and Favre have conflicting visions which are, individually, just as likely to be successful in the modern NFL, but that difference killed their ability to work together anymore.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 8:09 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

HOLY CRAP!!!!!!

After all of your usual sniping and know-it-all attitude in regards to the Favre/Packers debacle, you decide NOW to drop something that is even-handed and makes perfect sense?!

NOW??!!!

I don’t feel so good.

"Remember kids......... petty and cheap shot-ish doesn't make you a true fan, it just makes you petty and cheap shot-ish."

by Themanthemyththelegend on Nov 2, 2009 8:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Puh-leeze

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 8:38 PM CST up reply actions  

PACKER MAN!!!!!!!!!!

It’s never a conversation about Brett Favre until you get here and says something vaguely sarcastic, not particularly witty and in blind defense of eveything Packers!

Where have you been? Making sure the remaining Viking victory stragglers made their way out of Cheese Land?

"Remember kids......... petty and cheap shot-ish doesn't make you a true fan, it just makes you petty and cheap shot-ish."

by Themanthemyththelegend on Nov 2, 2009 8:42 PM CST up reply actions  

TROLL!!!!!!!!

We have been missing your uninformed, never witty and in blind defense of everything Favre comments around here lately.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 8:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Well,

so much for my earnest observations, let’s get down to some serious flame-waring!!!!!!!

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 8:51 PM CST up reply actions  

+1

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 8:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Awww, really?

I don’t really care about Packer Man. He rarely has anything original to say. Essentially he spews out the same rhetoric he reads from other people’s comments as his own. He’sthe prototypical “yes man”.

But you? You’ve always got something interesting to say! I thought we had something good going!

"Remember kids......... petty and cheap shot-ish doesn't make you a true fan, it just makes you petty and cheap shot-ish."

by Themanthemyththelegend on Nov 2, 2009 8:49 PM CST up reply actions  

I’ll admit I can’t come up with gems like you do but I pride myself on my ability to mindlessly regurgitate comments on I read on sports blogs and pass them off as my own. Its my one true talent.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 8:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, we've all gotta have something, right?

"Remember kids......... petty and cheap shot-ish doesn't make you a true fan, it just makes you petty and cheap shot-ish."

by Themanthemyththelegend on Nov 2, 2009 9:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Cool story...

Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge

by Bush League All Star on Nov 2, 2009 10:43 PM CST up reply actions  

bingo

Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok

by blackoutsox on Nov 2, 2009 8:37 PM CST up reply actions  

conflicted

Your entire post is conflicted. In sentence one you tell us that the problem was that Thompson allowed Favre to become a egomaniacal but then in paragraph two you talk about how he should have listened to Favre about Moss. WHAT?

First, HE WENT AFTER MOSS!!!!! Moss was coming off two completely bull#%!% seasons where he quit on his team. EXACTLY two teams were interested in him, the packer and the patriots. One team was willing to give up a little more to take a chance and the rest is history. The Moss deal could have split the fanbase just as much as this favre thing has. If he ends up continuing down the same path…TT is casterated for being an idiot.

You can’t have it both ways though.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 12:31 PM CST up reply actions  

grown up?

Favre is 40. He’s not a 20 year old college kid! haha

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 12:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Also, I believe you brought up emotional investment...

…so where was that love/emotion when he decided to trade BF to the Jets? You’re going to sit there and tell me that you treat a legend like a trading chip at the tail end of his career after everything he’s done? Is that how the Packers organization handles their business? OUCH. I really thought my Rams were bad, but at least when we saw Bulger’s potential, we told Warner straight up, “we’re sorry, it’s not working, but thank you and I wish you well wherever you go.”

If the Packers were so confident in Aaron Rodgers, which they damn well should be since he’s playing at Pro-Bowl form, they shouldn’t have cared if Brett went to the Vikings. Instead they pissed him off, and look at what he did to you twice this year. You guys had it coming, and you can blame your GM. Hats off to the Packer fans (the few) that politely clapped when he came into the stadium. THAT’S class, because he has shown nothing but class when speaking of the Packer FANS. His beef is with Thompson and McCarthy, and not realizing that is an embarrassing mistake on behalf of Packer Nation.

I think it’s sad, and I honestly think it could have easily been avoided if you would’ve released him like he asked and DESERVED to. He was the Packers’ property you say? Well, I guess after yesterday’s passing display you guys should check who REALLY owns who.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 10:47 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I really thought my Rams were bad, but at least when we saw Bulger’s potential, we told Warner straight up, "we’re sorry, it’s not working, but thank you and I wish you well wherever you go."

This is another aspect where our situations are totally different. Warner had been playing poorly so you decided to move on. Completely different from Favre, who was playing great, but decided to retire. Our staff went to meat with Favre in May, because it was thought that he wanted to come back, but as soon as they got down there, he decided he was going to stay retired. So at that point, we told him we are committing to Rodgers now, just like your staff did with Bugler.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 10:55 AM CST up reply actions  

So why not release him?

That’s all I’m wondering, and that’s where I think the Packers lose this whole debate. I mean, for crying out loud look at how exceptional Aaron Rodgers is playing behind a poor line! You think Favre would be playing with this much fire lit under his ass were it not for the way things ended in Green Bay? I don’t think he would. This story would have been dead. You have a young stud QB, you want to give him the reins. That’s perfectly fine with pretty much ANY NFL fan you’ll talk to because it happens all the time. So if you’re at the point where Brett just isn’t the starter anymore, whether because he waffled around and was indecisive or because Rodgers was simply better, just let him go. I mean really, how hard could that have been? If I recall correctly, you guys got a 3rd or 4th rounder for him? Come on, is it really worth this mess? Were he released on good terms, yeah, you guys would still be pissed at him in Vikings purple, but then HE would look like the jackass for deciding to go there. Not the Packers, and as I stated above, I would totally be on your side of the whole spectrum/media orgasm. Bottom line, the Packers were either scared of what Favre could do in Minnesota (which is now happening anyway, and with more motivation), or t hey weren’t fully confident in Rodgers. Big mistake all around if you ask me.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 11:04 AM CST up reply actions  

Dude,

Brett, despite being traded by the Packers, still “decided to go there.” As in there = the Minnesota Vikings.

That’s the point – he still looks like a jerk for joining up with the Packers biggest divisional rival regardless if he took a year to get there because the Packers organisation smartly traded Favre out of the division.

I don’t understand these demands for respect for Favre, but no converse demand that Favre ever show any respect for the Packers as an organsation, or for its fans that cheered for him for 16 years.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 11:30 AM CST up reply actions  

Except he has shown you guys every bit of respect you deserve...

…and unless you’re deaf, he has said nothing but good things about Packer fans. I really think the beef is between him and TT/McCarthy, which is why I was actually shocked when I heard the boos because I thought you guys would see it that way too. I think every well-wish he has for Packer fans is genuine, and I sincerely think any ire is directed at your GM/Coach. I don’t even think he has beef with Rodgers, who is the true victim in this mess. I have an infinite amount of respect for how well he has handled this whole situation, and I really wish him the best throughout his career. I just think the basic PR mistakes by the Packers have made this ordeal so much harder on both Packer fans and Brett Favre than this had to be. Not to mention the rest of us around the country that are force-fed this charade.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 11:36 AM CST up reply actions  

That is good and dandy...

Why would you expect fans not to boo? Green Bay is a different football town than almost all other places. You act like fans wanted this to happen which is wrong. I don’t like Ted Thompson and I don’t like what Favre did. I guess Packers fans value loyalty more than a lot of other traits. If you watched the former Packers on ESPN before the game, you would have seen a similar emotion held by them.

Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge

by Bush League All Star on Nov 2, 2009 11:43 AM CST up reply actions  

TO

What did Philly fans do when TO came back? He helped bring them to a super bowl!! There is a ying to the Warner yang.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 12:38 PM CST up reply actions  

So, he only openly attacks our management

and you are shocked that fans of that management booed him? Huh?

And to flip it over, there is not one instance where MM or TT ever said a bad thing about Favre. They’ve handled the situation as well as they could considering the fact that there was no way they’ll ever come out looking like winners.

Favre is a great, great football player and I will always respect his abilities as a player and his contribution to making the Packers a force in the NFL again. But as a person, he’s an immature jerk and I have no respect for his decision to “retire” again in order to achieve his release from the Jets and go to our most hated rival.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 11:46 AM CST up reply actions  

Because your management made a huge mistake...

…that is crucifiable in this instance. I disagree, they COULD have come out as winners. That mistake has cost them in the PR department and in the W-L column in the division.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 11:52 AM CST up reply actions  

Any decision made would have hurt us in the PR department. There was a lose-lose situation in every aspect.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 11:54 AM CST up reply actions  

How, how, how

could the management be “winners” by outright releasing Favre to the Vikings in the summer of 2008 so he could go and do what he’s doing to the Packers now a year early?

Are you being deliberately obtuse or what?

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 11:55 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Because as I mentioned...

…this guy’s motor is unstoppable right now. If he’d gone to the Vikes last year, he would have had that Jets breakdown LAST YEAR and you guys could have beat him. Instead, you looked like you were scared of what he could do and not confident in your QBs ability to win, which is sad because he’s a great QB.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 12:01 PM CST up reply actions  

You can't assume he gets injured last year if he's on the Vikings

Nor can you assume he makes it through the year this year uninjured. None of this talk now means a damn until the 2009 season is over and the dust settles. Until then, it’s purely your opinion on if it was a good move or not.

by Danwood on Nov 2, 2009 12:04 PM CST up reply actions  

But you've set up shop in conjecture-land

You have no idea what’s going to happen this year and you’re predicting how things would’ve happened in an alternate universe where Favre was released to sign with the Vikings.

I’d rather talk about what has really happened and how the Packers management reacted to the actual facts.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 12:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Er,

or as Danwood said 2 minutes before me. :-)

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 12:07 PM CST up reply actions  

I realize there's a lot of "if's" in what I said, but...

…the story would have had SO much less steam than it does now, and even if you’d lost to him last year and he’d had a great year, that trainwreck would have started to halt LAST YEAR. He would be deteriorating even more by now because his passion for the game would wane, and your QB now would only be getting further and further away from all this BS by now and on his way to having a great career. Instead it happens THIS year, and Rodgers has had to deal with it all season. I don’t know how that guy keeps his sanity, and that might be more amazing than the fact that he isn’t on IR yet behind that line.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 12:11 PM CST up reply actions  

BS

His name is still Brett Favre and ESPN still is in love with him so if you think the story would lose steam then you aren’t paying attention.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 12:50 PM CST up reply actions  

I guess his motor...

…just didn’t start in time for training camp, huh?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 9:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Imagine if we keep Favre and we have to let Rodgers go...

He signs with the Vikings and we suffer the same fate to them. I could see Favre turning around possibly the Bengals game. But I would expect a Vikings Rodgers to equally tear us apart and the outcoumes would have been the same.

Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge

by Bush League All Star on Nov 2, 2009 12:02 PM CST up reply actions  

You don't keep Favre!

By all means, this is a brilliant move by the Packers football-wise. As good as Favre still is, there’s no way you leave Aaron Rodgers on the bench more than he has been. He looks like a franchise QB for years to come. So as far as the Qb situation was concerned, they were spot on. All the had to do was ditch Favre and start rebuilding. Even if he had beat you guys twice last year, it wouldn’t have had nearly the amount of sting because chances are it would have been settled under slightly better terms, AND he would have been the diva in the eyes of the rest of the country because HE decided to go to Minnesota. Instead you guys look like the Greek Gods making him travel the seas like Odysseus, except it was called the Mangini river of stupid at the Meadowlands.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 12:08 PM CST up reply actions  

more BS
All the had to do was ditch Favre and start rebuilding.

So “ditching” Favre would have brought them no PR problems, huh?

Even if he had beat you guys twice last year, it wouldn’t have had nearly the amount of sting because chances are it would have been settled under slightly better terms

This statement alone is proof that you don’t understand the situation. I don’t mean that as an insult. But if you think that losing two games to the Vikings being led by Brett Favre wouldn’t sting you truly have no understanding of the rivalry. And if you think that Brett would have been all lovey-dovey with the Packers if they had done everything he wished last year you are also not knowledgeable of Brett Favre. From the time he made his first retirement phony he had no intention of coming back to the Packers and was dead set on personal revenge, at the expense of his fans of over 16+ years. To think that all of this could have been avoided if the Packers had blindly cowtowed to whatever Favre’s wishes were at the moment is just ignorant of the situation.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

how exactly?

Favre was set on exacting revenge on TT/MM and was oblivious to the fact that him getting his revenge on those two also entailed exacting revenge on the Packers. He failed to understand that he would also be hurting the same fans who had supported him and his family over 16 years. But thankfully for him, he still has some people like you who will blindly worship him at every turn.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 5, 2009 11:13 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I really don’t understand the staunch defense of TT/MM. These are the same guys that knowingly went in to the season with an offensive line that wouldn’t start for the Lions. Doesn’t seem all that “smart” if you ask me.

by Miidwest on Nov 2, 2009 3:31 PM CST up reply actions  

This isn’t really about their personnel decisions, more so about the way they both handled the Favre situation. From that aspect I agree with what they did and how both of them handled the situation.

With that being said, I really don’t agree with many of the personnel decisions they have made. And I wonder just like you how they could go into the year with as bad an o-line as we have. I guess they either actually thought that the o-line was good, or they were just hoping Rodgers and the wr corps would hide the problem, which are both bad.

I think we were under the salary cap by like $21 million, and I think that number might even be higher. Considering that our team has the talent to be a very good one right now, wouldn’t you think spending $5-12 million would have been well worth it? Especially when you consider that there really were some really good lineman available in FA?

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 3:48 PM CST up reply actions  

The Oline looked great in the preseason…I think they felt it was a decent group. I am sure they didn’t think it was going to be pro bowl group but if you recall, Rodgers wasn’t sacked in the first three games of the preseason. Anyway, clearly something needs to be done for next year.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 3:51 PM CST up reply actions  

If they thought trotting that group of players out was acceptable I would seriously worry about their ability to evaluate personnel.

Preseason games are useful for a few things, judging the quality of your starting offensive line, not one of them. Anyone with half a brain knows this.

by Miidwest on Nov 2, 2009 11:35 PM CST up reply actions  

That is a RIDICULOUS statement. If the preseason was useless for a team to judge its talent, coaches wouldn’t do it. You took this a step too far in the “preseason is pointless” argument.

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 9:24 AM CST up reply actions  

Read carefully and respond accordingly. If you are trying to determine if you have enough talent for your STARTING offensive line as late as the preseason, your effed.

Add in the fact that you get very few blitz looks or complex pressure packages and yeah, it’s a pretty useless tool for determining how your starting o-line will hold up in the regular season.

by Miidwest on Nov 3, 2009 10:20 AM CST up reply actions  

For me

I just can’t comprehend how Barbre was named the starting RT. It wasn’t like he was going against some no name guy. In fact he was doing the complete opposite of that in going up against Kampman. I guess I don’t see how Kampman didn’t absolutely abuse the guy nearly every play but I can’t say for sure because I never went to training camp.

I’m really hoping Tauscher will be playing soon. I know Tauscher is coming off a major surgery, but he was still pretty effective before his injury so I’m hoping he’ll be able to be somewhere near the same level he was in 08’.

by packallday555 on Nov 3, 2009 10:16 PM CST up reply actions  

probably because Kampman was in coverage so much

because you know, thats what he does so well

FIRE GREG WALKER NOW!!!!!!!!!

by blackoutsox on Nov 3, 2009 10:31 PM CST up reply actions  

have you been listening?

He has gone after packer management numerous times and has gone out of his way to speak to the press about this and he doesn’t say rosey things. He didn’t start saying good things until the last few weeks. I think he finally made peace about it now but he was VERY bitter about things early on.

When Brett retires for good and goes to the hall of fame, I will cheer by butt off for him, but right now he is the enemy. I know the rams really don’t have a rivalry like this so maybe you don’t understand…that must be it. So in the meantime, PLEASE stop telling us how we should feel about a situation you have NO clue about and go back to your Rams board! You are brining NOTHING good to this conversation.

Man I wish we could stop talking about Favre!!!! I want to let this die but idiots keep coming from other boards and lighting a fire. Go away and guess what, we won’t bring it up!!

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 12:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Really? You want to stop talking about Favre? Do you understand the type of post you are willingly commenting on? I mean really? It was an entire post devoted to Favre. Guess what, we didn’t write it or hop on immediately to congratulate it. That’s on you folks.

by Miidwest on Nov 2, 2009 3:33 PM CST up reply actions  

YES please. Of course THIS week we expected Favre talk…but the people that keep showing up and bringing him into EVERY conversation are getting AMAZINGLY annoying.

We talk about the Oline, some idiot brings up Favre. IT doesn’t matter the topic…someone always goes there. He’s gone for two years now, we are past it. If only the media could be.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 3:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Right

And I guess I viewed dishingoutdimes post as more of a coming to peace with the whole thing, not so much a big debate about who was right and wrong. But as it always seems to happen people had to come on here and tell us how we’re poor fans.

Obviously we’re going to defend ourselves about the whole Favre thing. But what it really comes down to is unless your a true Packers fans, and weren’t just a Favre fan who also liked the Packers consequently, your not going to see this situation in the same light as us.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 4:04 PM CST up reply actions  

yeah

it was kind of a final vent on the topic so I could clear my mind of Favre.

This team has bigger fish to fry, but all of that had been eating away at me for awhile.

by dishingoutdimes on Nov 2, 2009 8:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Totally understand

And again thanks for writing this post.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 8:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Ditto here

I think this comment thread is working as a collective “final vent on the topic” :-)

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 8:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Fair enough but complaining about Favre talk on a post about Favre seemed a bit contradictory.

by Miidwest on Nov 2, 2009 11:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Wasn’t complaining about FAvre talk on THIS thread…go back and read it. The comment was that EVERY conversation in here gets brought back to him. We talk about the Oline someone brings up Favre. We talk about playing the Bears, someone brings up Favre. I could go on and on.

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 9:25 AM CST up reply actions  

Miidwest,

You won’t get any argument from me on that point. But try and understand how much of a live nerve Pack fans like Trevor are right now and combine that reality with the fact that we’ve been talking about Favre incessantly for the last year and a half.

Something’s bound to give eventually.

by 400metres on Nov 3, 2009 9:34 AM CST up reply actions  

its just old

I just want to talk about the team that is out there. I expect Favre talk in a week when we play him…NOT in a week where we play the Rams or the Steelers or whoever. I just want to talk about THIS team, the guys that ARE here. He’s gone now, its been 2 seasons since he’s played here. I understand everyone THINKS we want to talk about him but if he didn’t come up again until the playoffs, I would be thrilled!

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 9:37 AM CST up reply actions  

You’re going to sit there and tell me that you treat a legend like a trading chip at the tail end of his career after everything he’s done? Is that how the Packers organization handles their business? OUCH.

And releasing him is dignified?

He was the Packers’ property you say?

Being under contract makes him our property. That’s the way the league works. If Steven Jackson demanded his release so he could play for a better team do you just grant his wish because he is a good player who DESERVES to play on a good team?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 11:06 AM CST up reply actions  

Is Steven the starting runningback?

Are we trying to replace him with a younger player? Yes, and no. Do I think he’s happy with the Rams? Kind of, because we’re making some (slow) progress, and he still has hope in what they can do in the future. Does Steven deserve to be on a better team? Sure, as much as it pains me to say that. But he knows his value as well, so he’d ask for a trade first and foremost. Difference is he’s entering his prime, and Favre by all accounts is closer to Torry Holt, who now plays for the Jacksonville Jaguars after he asked for a release. Arguably the greatest Ram of all time (no kidding), still has talent, but knows we’re not in a position to contend. It broke my heart, but I knew it was the right thing to let him go, and the guy has been nothing but a class act. I’m sure if Jacksonville had visited us, we’d welcome him warmly because there was no BS in how we treated him/how he treated us. He asked for a release when we could have possibly gotten a 3rd or 4th rounder for him like you guys did for Favre, but he deserved to have that request granted based on his contributions. Even rookie coach Spagnuolo, and 2nd year GM Billy Devaney understood that and they didn’t even have that long relationship with him. You can argue that it makes it easier, but I disagree. I think if you’re not emotionally connected with the guy, you’d be more prone to use him as said bargaining chip. Which is why this whole Green Bay/Favre situation baffles me in how poorly it was managed. Favre isn’t absolved at all, he certainly deserves a lot of blame, but the whole thing could have been solved by the Packers with relative ease if you ask me.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 11:15 AM CST up reply actions  

I don’t recall Holt going to the media and creating hoopla.
I don’t recall Holt retiring and then unretiring after all the training camps and stuff happened.
I don’t recall Holt holding the team hostage.
I don’t recall Holt bashing the management and having a 2 hour interview with Greta whats her name from Fox.

I am sorry but you are going to be HARD pressed to find a similar comparison. If Marshall Faulk had retired and you had moved onto James at that point and then Faulk unretired and demanded to get his job back or be traded to a team you guys have a HUGE rivalry with…THAT would be a comparison. Sorry but its hard to create a comparison using your team…you don’t have the history or the border closeness that we have here. MN and WI are HUGE rivals in everything…lots of bad blood.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 12:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Huh?

Torry Holt knew that the Rams weren’t able to contend right now so he asked for his release…so he could play with the Jaguars?!?!?! That was a step in the right direction? I’m not trying to bad mouth Holt cause I think he has been a great receiver over his career, but he isn’t the same player he used to be. There is NO WAY anybody gives you guys a 3rd, 4th, hell even a 7th rd pick for him. And if there was someone crazy enough to do it, shame on the Rams for not taking them up on it. They need all the help they can get. Seriously, the Jaguars?!?!

but the whole thing could have been solved by the Packers with relative ease if you ask me.

Then I wish we had the foresight to have consulted you at the time. You could have solved everything and told anyone who was upset with the move that they were wrong. Simple as that.

Funny how you never made your way over here during the week that the Packers were, you know, playing the Rams.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 9:48 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

So I guess Ted Thompson writes under "dishingoutdimes" here at SBN...

…because only he could have ignored the whole “let’s release him, make him look like an ass for going to the Vikes, and then kick his ass on the Vikes with our stud QB” plan that could have easily swayed every football fan into the Packer corner of this debate. Honestly, it was that simple.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 11:40 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

The Packers simply never said anything like that

or close to that, ever. They were respectful of Favre in all of their comments through the entire process.

The fact of the matter is, he backed them into a corner, they gave him what he said he wanted (to play on another team), and then he found a way to get revenge.

If the Packers did want to make him look like an ass, they would have done just what you were suggesting, because everyone knew he wanted to go to the Vikings. But they didn’t.

Find me an instance of the Packers going into the media and trashing Favre. I don’t think it ever happened, but I could be wrong.

Favre DID go on national TV though. There’s probably still Youtube clips of it.

by dishingoutdimes on Nov 2, 2009 11:44 AM CST up reply actions  

Listen, I'm not saying Favre went about it the right way...

…but the Packers had the ball in their court. I know they never said that, I simply said that that’s what their approach should have been. To let him go. If he chose Minnesota, he would look like a douche and everyone in America would be rooting for the Packers to serve him. It simply didn’t matter where he decided to go. If he pushed you guys into a corner, push back. Release him. If he goes to a team like, idk, the Browns? Nothing! Dead story! If he goes to the Vikings, he’s a douche and you guys look like the respectable management/organization that was slighted by Favre. Not the other way around.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 11:50 AM CST up reply actions  

No

The ball was really in Favre’s court. It was his decision whether or not he wanted to come back for the 08’ season and he retired. We even really gave him all the way up until May, to say he wanted to come back, but he againt told us he wanted to stay retired.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 11:53 AM CST up reply actions  

Dude

If you have anything of substance, that is football related, I don’t think anyone would have a problem engaging you in conversation. But if you’re gonna come here and arrogantly tell us that YOU have all of the answers that would have made this situation uneventful and non-newsworthy, then please leave. To say all this could have been wrapped up “simple as that” is just flat out ignorant.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 1:04 PM CST up reply actions  

The point is

The Packers never wanted to make Favre look like an ass. He brought that upon himself through this whole two year ordeal.

by dishingoutdimes on Nov 2, 2009 11:50 AM CST up reply actions  

"Honestly, it was that simple."

Only a true outsider who hasn’t suffered through this ridiculous drama-fest created and perpetuated by Favre could ever say this.

You really think that TT would not have been completely vilified if he granted Favre his release so he could go and play with the Vikings? You honestly think that would have been the best way to handle this situation? Because that’s insane.

This thing with Favre is not simple because Favre is not a straight-shooter. He’s a drama queen who also happens to be an amazing football player, so everyone tolerates his lack of candor and his desperate need for attention.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 11:51 AM CST up reply actions  

Then expose him for the drama queen that he is...

…don’t force him to play in New York for a draft pick! Come On! INVITE HIM TO PLAY ON THE VIKINGS. Make HIM look like the douche for going to that team. Because to an outsider, it looks like Brett SHOULD BE in Minnesota getting said revenge for how he was “treated.” I know both sides of the story, and honestly don’t think either is right, but given the circumstances I think the Packers could have come out on top. For one, he wouldn’t have had the same lit-fuse that he has now when he’s pissed. Two, it looks like you guys had a better chance of beating them (even with Favre) last year. This would be dead by now. Instead it lingered and now it blew up big time as he marched up and down the field on your secondary throwing darts at anyone in a white jersey. So yeah, it was that simple, and I’m sticking by that statement.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 11:58 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

You are obviously not someone who is involved is big $$$ business

You don’t make decisions willy nilly to make people look bad, even if they are. TT’s job is to do what’s best for the Packer organization. A conditional draft pick is better for the organization than letting a guy walk away. You’re a fool if you believe otherwise.

by Danwood on Nov 2, 2009 12:06 PM CST up reply actions  

I think we're are just a point of irreconcilability here

Because you seem to think that letting what Favre did on his own this year would somehow be acceptable if the Packers had let it happen last year.

The Packers are a religion here and if TT had outright released Favre to sign with the Vikings he would have been shot. Seriously.

So, despite your hindsight strategy, there’s just no way that could have happened in reality.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 12:10 PM CST up reply actions  

I respect that the Packers are a religion,

and I feel that the Rams fans need a sip of whatever you’re sipping in Wisconsin, but all that happened now is that this whole charade was delayed an entire year. Also, it’s not really hindsight. I felt like it was a stupid decision back then to not let him go. If I’m a fan, I say “BRING IT ON BRETT.” Get it over with so your QB can get on with his SuperBowl/Pro-Bowl dreams. AND your management doesn’t look nearly as bad, because they were banking on Favre failing and retiring elsewhere, and it’s obvious he wasn’t going away until he got what he got yesterday, a little retribution.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 12:16 PM CST up reply actions  

I get your point,

but we’re just talking past each other now, repeating the same argument, ad nauseum.

Let’s just call it an impasse, otay?

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 12:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Yarr...

…I see that too. Good luck the rest of the year guys, and I really mean that because I think Aaron Rodgers is going to be great, but you guys need an OT in the worst possible way.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Nov 2, 2009 12:21 PM CST up reply actions  

"I think Aaron Rodgers is going to be great, but you guys need an OT in the worst possible way."

There’s no impasse on that point. Take care and good luck to you and yours as well.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 12:30 PM CST up reply actions  

So yeah, it was that simple, and I’m sticking by that statement.

Then you’re a moron. There is NO WAY that this situation could have been simple in any way shape or form. Period!

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 1:06 PM CST up reply actions  

I would tend to disagree with this assessment.

Dishingoutdimes has a ton more personality than TT. TT cannot show emotion (I guess this could be a positive in some aspects of management).

Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge

by Bush League All Star on Nov 2, 2009 12:00 PM CST up reply actions  

And I'm amazed that Brett Favre writes under the name "TrojanRam"

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 9:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Favre wanted to go to USC and play for the Rams?

The picture is becoming clearer by the day. Everyone…GRAB…YOUR…HATS!!!

Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge

by Bush League All Star on Nov 2, 2009 10:45 PM CST up reply actions  

I’m glad someone brought up the 25 million he was offered to stay retired. That was the craziest part of the whole thing to me. As Packer Fans I would think it would be obvious to you folks how that offer would be received.

by Miidwest on Nov 2, 2009 3:37 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

The marketing deal

is a fairly common practice for retiring greats, particularly QB’s. Guys like Marino, Elway, etc. have had them as a way of keeping them involved with the franchise and compensating them for going to events to satisfy the fans’ desire to meet and greet with them. It was painted as a bribe by the Favre camp to help discredit the Packers. You’ll note that the fact that the Packers said the offer would be on the table whether he played last year or not was largely ignored by the mainstream media because it didn’t fit with the story they were telling.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 4:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Bullsh*t

The $10 million, increased to $25 million, was to pay him off so he wouldn’t “unretire.” Think they’d pay it now?

by ktenreb on Nov 2, 2009 6:16 PM CST up reply actions  

way to dispell that argument

Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok

by blackoutsox on Nov 2, 2009 6:46 PM CST up reply actions  

well

you would be familiar with bullsh*t. Things have changed since then. Going to play for the biggest rival makes it a little hard for him to just retire (for real this time) and then show up at Packer functions a few months later to promote the Pack. We’ll see if he ever ends up back at Packer functions but my guess is it will be some time before anything like that is discussed again. Haven’t the Packers earned the right to change their mind?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 6:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Actually there was a deal on the table before all of that unretirement started but that said, if they did try to BRIBE him back into retirement, who cares…what does THAT prove?

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 9:04 PM CST up reply actions  

thumbs up

I agree totally. What you said here is what the bad fans acusers dont understand and they have no idea cause they are not Packer fans.

by whooya on Nov 3, 2009 1:49 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't know what else to say but

You & 400meters keep going on & on in reply to me about how the Pack should not have released them, when I never said that they should in the first place. What I said is that TT should have stuck with the agreement to send him ot the Bucs, similiar to how 49ers sent Montana to Chiefs.

It’s hard to reply to you in any meaningful way, when you are not replying to me in any meaningful way.

by puddnhead on Nov 2, 2009 5:03 PM CST up reply actions  

that post wasnt a reply to you

it was to someone else who said we should’ve released Farve after 2007

Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok

by blackoutsox on Nov 2, 2009 6:47 PM CST up reply actions  

ok sorry my bad

(to both you and 4400m) I misread the threading. Damn it’s hard to see the reply chains in the is interface.

by puddnhead on Nov 3, 2009 11:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Puddn c'mon

I always reply to your points in a meaningful way.

I don’t agree with your assessment that TT did Favre dirty on the deal to the Jets. I’ve posted several journo sources in support for my perspective while you continue to stick to your tired narrative without presenting a shred of factual support.

I would never accuse you of saying something you haven’t. I always strive to argue in good faith. My posts on this thread dealing with releasing Favre are in response to TrojanRam, who’s whole thesis is that the Packers would have been wise to grant Favre his release back in July of 2008 so he could go to the Vikings. That discussion has nothing to do with you, okay?

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 8:20 PM CST up reply actions  

As heartfelt and well articulated as this post is, and as pained as you guys must feel, it ignores the fact that the Packers’ management didn’t grant Favre the release that could have saved face for them. I would completely be on your side if they’d done that, but they didn’t want to lose the competitive edge in the division, at the expense of slighting one of the greatest quarterbacks the game has ever seen and forcing him to play in New York for a season. THAT’S where you guys lose this argument, and honestly, I’m happy he was able to stick it to Thompson/McCarthy, as well as Packer Nation, because at the end of the day, you booed him.

But this is a business. Packer nation isn’t stupid, and neither is TT. We all knew damn well that him going to the Vikings would make them a damn good team. Not too mention all the flak TT would have taken if he had just simply released him so he could go play for the Vikes. Your kidding yourself if you think ANY other NFL owner wouldn’t have done the same thing that TT under the exact same circumstanes.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 11:01 AM CST up reply actions  

We have all just forgotten

that normal NFL rules don’t apply to Brett Favre. If he chooses to play in Wranglers then everybody should just accept it and move on

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 11:03 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

TrojanRam

Well said. I found a whole new respect for Aaron Rodgers watching him play aginst the Vikings twice this season. He handled all the Favre distractions extremely well, and played at a very high level in doing so. He has also proven to be one tough son of a gun while taking a beating, and getting off the mat to come back for more. Aaron is pretty special.

What you said about the Packers missing the chance to win over public opinion by doing the right thing with Favre after they made their decision to change direction was spot on. Forget Favre changing his mind. I will never have any problem with a player changing their mind to play in a league so heavily weighted in the owners and their franchises favor. The Packers first offered Brett $20 million to stay retired. When that didn’t work they tried to limit his ability to move to potentially the highest bidding team with the now famous poison pill trade to the Jets. I don’t care what Fuzzy Thurston says. Unless this happened to him (it didn’t) he has no frame of reference.

I was sickened by the persecuted GB fans who chose to boo one of the guys responsible for bringing the Packers out of the obscurity they lived in for 20 years, and back into prominance in the NFL. I loved watching Favre after the game as much as I did during the game. He was the picture of class after some Packer fans chose to act absolutely classless. I can only hope that their behavior changes. If it doesn’t, who could blame Favre should he choose to enter the HOF as a Viking? The thing about Favre is he won’t do that. He is classy enough to ignore the booing and the organization’s behavior, and do the right thing in spite of it.

by Belarus on Nov 2, 2009 6:40 PM CST up reply actions  

The thing about Favre is he won’t do that. He is classy enough to ignore the booing and the organization’s behavior, and do the right thing in spite of it.

I guess his infallibility helps him with that. Us mere mortals aren’t blessed with his superpowers.

I don’t care what Fuzzy Thurston says. Unless this happened to him (it didn’t) he has no frame of reference.

Funny. I was about to say the same thing to you.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 9:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Get over it

Trojan Ram has it right. I thought Packers fans had more class. This guy gave you great Sundays for 16 years and a Super Bowl; two things you wouldn’t have had with out him. Some of you are proof of why small towns shouldn’t have sports teams. Here in New York, some people would be annoyed if Derek Jeter showed up at Yankee stadium in a Red Sox uniform, but as there are other things to do in larger cities, we don’t let our sports teams become our lives. Get over Favre, and hope you can compete with the Vikes next year and in the future.

by randomwalk on Nov 3, 2009 11:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Get over Favre, and hope you can compete with the Vikes next year and in the future.

Well unless they find a franchise Qb as soon as Favre retires, I don’t see us having much of a problem.

Here in New York, some people would be annoyed if Derek Jeter showed up at Yankee stadium in a Red Sox uniform, but as there are other things to do in larger cities, we don’t let our sports teams become our lives.

Haha maybe you take this method when viewing sports but from my experiences of being to New York, and hearing stories, people certainly take their sports there VERY serious. Annoyed? I think both you and I know the reaction would be much worse then that. And even with that being said, baseball and football aren’t very comparable sports, and the circumstances are different.

by packallday555 on Nov 3, 2009 11:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Of course

I certainly don’t remember Yankee fans booing Jeter a couple of years ago when he had a particularly bad start to the season. May I suggest you take a randomwalk on to another site?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 4, 2009 6:55 AM CST up reply actions  

Haha seriously

For God’s sake, they boo their own players. To say they would be annoyed if Jeter went to the Yankees is an understatement if I’ve ever seen one.

by packallday555 on Nov 4, 2009 11:04 AM CST up reply actions  

That is COMPLETE BULLSHIT!

You big city “folk” are the biggest babies in the world when it comes to your sports teams. Get out of here with your big city bullshit dude. If Jeter left for the Red Sox you guy would boo the hell out of him just like the Red Sox booed Damon. Give me a break. The big city fans are the ones that invented booing! Philly, Dallas, Chicago, and most of all New York!

This last post should be nominated for most preposterous post EVER.

by TrevorR on Nov 4, 2009 9:14 AM CST up reply actions  

Ingle Martin?

Not even mentioned in a post about TT QBs that have not worked out. Ouch.

by uglyfatpimplynerd on Nov 2, 2009 10:23 AM CST up reply actions  

Oh yeah

Wow, now I definitely think TT should go! I mean when you miss with a 5th rd pick on QB then you obviously have no clue what you are doing, amirite?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 10:31 AM CST up reply actions  

Well . . .

He also missed on a first rounder, and a second rounder, and a couple of third rounders . . . . and a punter. . . and some offensive linemen . . . a few defensive linemen . . . some running backs . . . defensive coaches . . . .

by ktenreb on Nov 2, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions  

well...

He also hit on QB (Rodgers), a safety in the second round (Collins), a LB in the first (Hawk is debatable, true), a stud WR in the second(Jennings), a return specialist in the fourth(Blackmon) , a starting Dlineman in the sixth (Jolly), a good 3rd WR in the 3rd (Jones), another good WR/KR in the second (Nelson), a starting TE in the third (Finley), a starting G in the 4th (Sitton), and two solid selections in the first this year that we’ll have to see if they continue to pan out (Raji, Matthews). But that’s neither here nor there I guess

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 10:55 AM CST up reply actions  

well, well ....

He also hit on QB (Rodgers),

Yes, he hit on Rodgers, but even a blind chicken will find some corn ! Rodgers was a prodjected #1 overall pick, the Packers had been looking for a QB to eventually replace Favre some day for years, to find a prodjected #1 pick fall all the way to #24, the Packers (and TT ) were extremly lucky that he fell that far, to pick him was a no-brainer, they could have him as a understudy behind Favre, if not taking over (like he did) he would post a great trade value.
That being said, Rodgers still has things to learn, and experience to gain, before can considered a great QB.
Also, the Packers were lucky many years ago too, when Favre fell to the 2nd round, if the Jets had picked him, he never would have ended in Green Bay.

And if you read my first post, I do acknowledge that TT has made some good picks with receivers as well. But with the O-line/D-line and RBs he’s been horrible.

by Jarlsberg on Nov 4, 2009 12:08 PM CST up reply actions  

True but

Ron Wolf was with the Jets then and wanted to take Favre but Atlanta picked him first. When Wolf got to GB and had a chance to get him he went for it. I think Jarls is saying that if the Jets had gotten Favre Wolf wouldn’t have been able to pry him away from them. Correct me if I’m wrong, Jarls.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 4, 2009 2:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh ok nevermind then

I was under the assumption he meant the Packers drafted him before the Jets could.

by Charlie Kelly on Nov 4, 2009 2:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Come on now Jarls, you’re arguing quite a few different sides now. TT got lucky having Rodgers fall to us at #24 (true) but you’ve argued many times before that drafting Rodgers was TT’s way of pushing Favre out the door. The Packers could groom Rodgers behind Favre, yet Favre wanted nothing to do with mentoring Rodgers (understandably I guess). I’ve heard so many times (not just from you) that Rodgers was drafted because TT’s ego is the size of Texas and he was dead set on replacing Favre before his nameplate was even on the door to his office.

And yes, Rodgers still has plenty to learn and experience to gain but if you remember Brett favre wasn’t an MVP in his first two seasons either. Personally, I’m holding no expectations that Rodgers will be as good as/better than Favre because that is asking way too much. We are talking about a possible top 5 all time QB and definite top 10 of all time, so demanding that he be better than Favre or else he is a bum (not suggesting that is what you are saying) is unrealistic. How long have the Dolphins been trying to replace Marino? The Broncos trying to replace Elway? The 49’ers trying to replace Young (went much better trying to replace Montana)? And how long did it take the Packers to replace Bart Starr?

I’ll agree with you completely on O-line drafting, partially on RB’s (he hasn’t drafted enough imo to consider him bad at that) but disagree with you on D-line. Jolly has done well overall (even if he is a bonehead at times) and Raji looks solid. Harrell is a bust but other than that have there been any busts?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 4, 2009 2:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Which is especially frustrating

because the other 31 GMs in the NFL never miss on any of their draft picks, particularly high ones.

TT, welcome to GB, where your only job description is to be perfect.

Good luck! You’re bound to succeed.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 10:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Post was about Martin, but since you want to go that way.

TT is not the best in the first rounds.

“Oh, everyone misses a few. Look at Wolf. Next thing you know you’ll be bringing up the Harrell pick. It’s so predictable.”

(Yeah, look at Wolf.)

Ingle Martin was so bad that he’s forgotten even in a discussion of bad QBs.

“He was only a 5th rounder anyway”

Heads you win, tails i lose.

by uglyfatpimplynerd on Nov 3, 2009 10:37 AM CST up reply actions  

You're a snide little troll

Ingle Martin was a 6’2 220 ls QB who could punt. He was an athlete and worth a gamble at the 5th round. BTW other teams have had Martin on their squad, so what the heck are you talking about winning ?

Thompson drafted Shaun Alexander. What has your guy done?

"Are we doing everything we can to win games, or are we doing everything we can to run a certain thing that we want to run? I want to win, and I want to do whatever it takes to win. At some point you have to take the handcuffs off and let the boys play." - Cullen Jenkins 11/01/09

by PackaCracka on Nov 5, 2009 7:09 AM CST up reply actions  

We can look at Wolf's history

He drafted from ‘92 thru ’00 I believe. Wolf did a spectacular job at drafting but he was not without a few busts too. LeShon Jonshon, Derrick Mayes, Chris Darkins, Antwan Edwards, and Steve Warren are some examples. He also had a hit and miss record with RB’s (one of TT’s criticisms). And, funny but he also drafted some QB’s but was never accused of trying to run Brett Favre out of town by drafting Mark Brunell in 1993, Matt Hasselback in 1998, and Aaron Brooks in 1999. But TT drafts Rodgers and he’s plainly pushing a legend out of town as fast as he possibly can.

The point of this is not to discredit Wolf, who I think is one of the best GM’s I’ve ever seen, but to point out that no one is without some busts on their resume`. I do wonder what would have happened if Holmgren had been patient enough to wait for Wolf to retire to take on the GM duties. He left after the ‘98 season, we went through the season that I’ve blocked from my memory with Ray Rhodes, Sherman was hired in ‘00 and Wolf retired before the ’01 season and the position was handed to Sherman with no qualifications. In retrospect, Holmgren’s GM record leaves a lot to be desired but if he could have continued coaching Favre who knows what would have happened.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 5, 2009 11:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Yep

the Packers “brought it on them self” by sticking by a HoF qb, giving him until the NFL Draft at the end of April (i.e., 4 months after the loss to the Giants in the NFC Championship game) to make up his mind.

Favre instead rushed himself into a decision that Packers management encouraged him to take time to consider and made his tearful (for him as well as us fans) retirement announcement.

The Pack moved on and began to build for the AF era only to have him send out feelers that he might be reconsidering his retirement. McCarthy and Thompson contacted Favre as to these rumours and Favre denied them and said he’s happily retired.

Finally, in July, Favre shows up for work, out of shape but enthused, demanding to be given the starting position or be traded/released to the Vikings.

Yep, the Packers really brought this on themselves. No doubt about it.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 10:49 AM CST up reply actions  

O line not weakest link

Rodgers in general had plenty of time to throw. He held the ball. He was clearly nervous, especially in the first half.

The defense gave up 38 points. 4 TD passes and a rushing TD. This is the most the Vikings offense has put up all season, and it was done at Lambeau.

I’d say the defense in general is the weakest link. It played relatively poorly in their three losses. Tough to win when you give up 38.

by Sand0 on Nov 2, 2009 9:38 AM CST reply actions  

this game

Most of those sacks fall on Rodgers in my book. This was his worst game yet (in the first half at least) for hanging onto the ball. He was NOT making quick reads and had plenty of time to throw early on. Other games I blame the Oline, but this one is on Rodgers!

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 10:02 AM CST up reply actions  

There's plenty of blame to go around

The Oline gave up some sacks, Rodgers did too. There were penalties on special teams, the Oline, the defense, stupid penalties, you name it. Like I said, when they are making enough mistakes as a whole that we can separate the mistakes to specific units, and those totals are too big for an entire team, we have no one to blame but ourselves.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 10:34 AM CST up reply actions  

yeah...

its not ALL on him but I was watching specifically for how long he would take to make a throw and it was pretty bad this time. He rarely took 3-5 steps and threw. It was 5 steps stop, step up, step out, then throw. He still didn’t throw it away at all. They HAVE to teach him its okay to throw it away sometimes. He isn’t going to survive if he doesn’t. I really want him to take that next step in his progression and become GREAT, not just really good but the Oline and not releasing sooner are going to get him killed.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 12:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Agreed

He does need to learn to throw the ball away better. As well as taking off and running a lot more.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 3:31 PM CST up reply actions  

It wasn’t that he wasn’t making “quick reads”, it was that he had no one to throw too. Didn’t you hear Aikman talking about that? On at least 2 of his first half sacks he only had 2 options to throw to, and both were covered. Now I don’t think he should take a sack, like he did do, but in those instances he only lost 2-3 yards taking a sack.

It’s almost like there is a lack of effort out there from our o-line sometimes. There was one particular play, which we lined up in a shotgun, with Grant to the left of Rodgers. Rodgers faked the handoff to Grant, and no more then 1 second later he was thrown to the ground by Pat Williams (I am pretty sure. I always get him and Kevin confused.) When this play was going on I honestly thought that it was blown dead or something because 4 of our 5 o-lineman were standing straight up, and Grant just watched Williams run by him as he sacked Rodgers.

I really feel bad for Rodgers but respect the hell out of him. He got little to no blocking all game, and took some very hard hits. But he got up, time after time, and still led us on a great comeback. I honestly couldn’t be happier that this guy is our starting Qb, and am also praying that TT will sign some a real LG and RT in the offseason.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions  

then its still not the Oline's fault

Then its the receivers fault. I am not trying to make excuses for the Oline but their job is to give him like 3-5 seconds to find an open receiver. If they give him that time (which on many of the sacks they did) and he isn’t getting it to someone his internal clock needs to say “get rid of it”. The receivers MUST get open more quickly. ON top of that, I am sure playcalling is part of it too. They all get some blame but I Think we are putting a little TOO much on the line now.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 12:59 PM CST up reply actions  

humbug

He had a great game and his numbers showed it , Right before his last sack,, (thanks to the offensive line once again.) He was less then a point below farve for the
QB rating for the game. I dont blame Rodgers for this loss at all.. I blame the stupid Penalties that gave them the ball half the distance to the goal line TWICE… and the coaching staff for not putting the players where they play the best. Just ask the players they will tell you how frustrating this all is that they are not put where they should be and can play the best. At least Rodgers shows some smarts not to just throw it anyways and get interceptions. He is a young quarterback and given a line where the players are allowed to play and not held back,, He will is and will be an awesome QB..

by whooya on Nov 3, 2009 1:56 PM CST up reply actions  

It’s awfully easy to score the way you guys did when you started in our territory a lot of the game and had multiple chances to score a couple of times in the redzone because of stupid penalties.

Rodgers was absolutely fine in the first half, but had NO time to throw. He had time in the second half, and well, look what he did with it…

I’m sorry but if you truly feel our defense is the weakest part of our team you might be delusional. The o-line is FAR worse, and even our special teams is worse then our defense.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 10:36 AM CST up reply actions  

What a great debate

Which is the worst part of our team? Everybody has great points.

And that’s pretty sad.

by ktenreb on Nov 2, 2009 12:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Well

Our defense really isn’t poor at all. I don’t think their as good as the numbers would indicate they are, but they do have talent, and the 3-4 is generally a defense that takes more then 1 year to transition too. I think right now their right around average. Anyone who has watched our games this year would know that the defense really isn’t a major concern.

It’s just unforunate because last year we were an average defense away from a 10+ win season. We have the average defense this year, and now it appears that we’re an average o-line away from a 10+ win season.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 3:58 PM CST up reply actions  

How can you say that?

The Lions, Browns and Rams just plain suck. Shutting them down, or out, doesn’t tell you anything about the defense.

The Packers have played exactly two teams with good offenses: The Bengals and the Vikings (twice). Both times the defense was overwhelmed. The big difference this week (you claimed) was that Clay Matthews and Atari Bigby would be around to prevent Favre from throwing three TD passes again.

by ktenreb on Nov 2, 2009 6:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Bears?

You can’t look at our personnel on defense, and not think that it is not at least average.

With that being said I don’t think the scheme and coaching play to our players strengths. The one series Capers actually does bring some pressure (like he told everyone he was going to do with us) we pressured Favre twice and had two good opportunities for an INT.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 8:48 PM CST up reply actions  

All I heard about the Pack D before the year and in the preseason was how good they would be in their first year. All you folks pointed out how much of an improvement Capers made in all of his other “first years”.

Every decent offensive team you have played has pretty much lit it up haven’t they?

by Miidwest on Nov 2, 2009 11:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Do you actually research ANYTHING you say?

Okay NOW you are getting really really annoying dude. Can you PLEASE look things up before you open your mouth?

Passing yards against: 1288, 7th best in the league
Rushing yards against: 696, 8th best in the league
Total yards against: 1984, 3rd best in the league
Points against: 134, 9th best in the league
INTs: 11, 4th best in the league

The one place they are not succeeding is in pressure on the QB, they are very low in sack totals and really just pressure in general. This is the one area that is keeping this D from being a top D right now. So next time you have something to ADD to the conversation come on in but if you are going to just blow smoke up our asses, then we really don’t need you!

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 9:31 AM CST up reply actions  

Again, read the post you’re responding to. You’ll see I posed a question, not a statement.

I asked IF the teams you have played with an above average offensive have “lit it up”.

by Miidwest on Nov 3, 2009 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

I guess that comes down to a matter of perception. What is “decent” and what is “above average”. You also have to look at how most teams play against “above average” offenses. If you play the Colts for example, you aren’t going to shut them down no matter how good you are. Honestly has anyone really shut the Vikings down yet? Not many teams have shut the Bengals down either.

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 10:29 AM CST up reply actions  

Analysis on the teams with "above average offenses"

The Bengals game was close…had a chance to win it. Benson had a HUGE game but Palmer was held very much in check (185 yards to be exact). He threw 3 TDs but also 2 INTs. It was an okay game but they by NO means shredded the defense. In fact outside of the Ocho, their WRs did NOTHING. About 330 total yards against the D which is about what our offense put up.

The first Viking game they put up very similar totals with around 330 yards too. Peterson was shut down (55 yds) but Favre threw for about 270. No picks but 3 TDs so it was a very strong effort from Favre in a game where it was clear that the goal was to shut down AP and force Favre to make some errors but there was NO pressure and as a result no errors. A poorly executed gameplan I guess

The second Viking game, they got about 360 yards on us…yardage wise easily our lousiest performance, still no 300 yard passers and only two 100 yard rushers against them all season.

I really don’t know what you consider to be an above average offense but one might make that argument for Chicago and they were completely dismantled by the Packers in week 1. I guess I just don’t see teams dismantling the D. They good teams are winning but I wouldn’t say its all on the D. They aren’t giving up huge numbers. They are shutting down the really bad teams (some other good teams seem to let them hang around)…but they still have a LONG way to go. I didn’t expect them to be a top 10 D this year but statistically they have been so far.

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 2:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah

Really the only games we have struggled on defense is the two against the Vikes. I don’t think allowing a big game to the NFL’s leading rusher is worthy of saying we performed poorly defensively.

We actually looked much better on defense against the Vikes this last game then we did in the first. And when we actually did look good, it was when we were bringing pressure. (Problem with that is, we only did it like 30% of the time.) The Vikes really should have only gotten 3 points their first drive, and were given a gift by Jolly’s dumbass. And on many of their scoring drives they started in our own territory.

They had favorable field position the whole game, and that isn’t ideal for a defense facing a very good offense.

Too say the defense is weak is really ridiculous. Like so many Vikings fans told us after our week 4 game against them, “Stats can be misleading”. If you sat down and watched all of our games this year, it would be evident that the defense really isn’t a concern.

by packallday555 on Nov 3, 2009 10:28 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

WRONG!
Rodgers was absolutely fine in the first half, but had NO time to throw. He had time in the second half, and well, look what he did with it…

He had time to throw. This game for the first time of the year, I put the sacks on Rodgers. He held the ball WAY too long. He cleaned that up in the second half and things started clicking on offense.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 12:53 PM CST up reply actions  

yep.

Arod looked like two different qbs between the two halves of yesterday’s game. Not running for the first down on that 3rd and 5 really set an early tone of timidity that plays right into the hands of a tough-minded veteran team like the Vikings.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 12:56 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Yes

I noticed that play too and couldn’t believe he didn’t take off. He definitely needs to use his legs a bit more. Him taking off for long runs like he did yesterday is another thing that could help slow down the pass rush a bit.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 3:15 PM CST up reply actions  

No

He really didn’t. Right before halftime they showed the Qb pressures stats, and there had only been like 6 times where Rodgers had dropped back and not been pressured.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 3:29 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't care where Favre plays, I started losing more and more respect for him starting around 2004 when I began to see the real Favre

The man who talked so much about his love of the game but since 2003, he hasn’t been able to figure out if he wants to play till a few months after the season. The guy who has proven to be one of the toughest players to ever throw on helmet continued to show each year that although his body seemed to be made of steel, his psyche appeared to be made of glass.

This was made no more evident than in 2004 when the Packers drafted Aaron Rodgers. Now, anyone with half a brain knows this is a must make move by a GM because you’ve got an aging QB who was contemplating retirement only a year before and you’ve got a chance to snag up a possibly number one overall player with the 24th pick. But Brett sees this as they’re trying to push him out the door, even though there is a chance they don’t make this move if Brett doesn’t waffle post 2003.

Now Brett could be the big man here and make the best out of what has occurred, but instead he privately pouts like a child and says he doesn’t plan on helping with Rodgers development. Which is fine, that’s not part of Favre’s contract. But if Favre truly cared about the team, not number four, he would’ve at least made some effort.

Then came Brett’s worst season in 2005 and when I believe the true rift between Favre and Thompson developed. Thompson fired Sherman and didn’t hire Favre’s ol’ buddy Mariucci. He also cut Wahle, Rivera, Sharper, and Green because of how bad our cap situation was. Once again, Favre due to his fragile psyche saw this as an insult to him. After all, who did Thompson think he was not bowing down and obeying everything Lord Favre said like everyone else had done since Holmgren left?

Then before the 2007 season after Thompson dismissed another Favre request to get Randy Moss, Favre had publicly demanded a trade, although he quickly rescinded that demand as Favre didn’t want to look bad. Then, after falling short of a title one last time due to an ill advised throw, the following off season the Packers had another chance at landing Moss and Thompson refused, this was the last straw for Favre and him. Favre finally retired, and this is where my primary issue with Favre begins. I completely believe that the 2008 retirement was a complete hoax so he could come back later and try to force the Packers hand in releasing him.

He already despised Thompson, because unlike other Packers management, he refused to cater to Favre’s ego. So he wanted his revenge. He went through an entire season in New York and another fake retirement all so he could get to where he was yesterday.

And that is why I’ve lost respect for Favre and I honestly don’t want him to retire a Packer. He seemed like this heroic figure during my childhood, never getting injured and always playing for fun and for the team. But as I’ve grown older, I’ve seen the real Brett emerge. The one whose ego is so inflated, he thinks that not only should he be the QB of his team, he should also manage the personnel (Remember when he criticized Javon Walker and McKenzie’s contract disputes?) He has proven how petty he is that he will go through everything he did just to get back at a man who didn’t do anything wrong other than not kissing the ground he walked on. He has proven that he cares very little for the people who worshipped him and made him a very wealthy man.

And this is why I will never be a fan of a player. I was a dumb kid back then and made the mistake many kids do in idolizing sports players. I’ve realized now that players come and go, but the only thing that remains constant is the team. Ten years from now when Favre finally retires, he’ll become an afterthought only to be brought up from time to time on ESPN and as a topic of conversation during John Madden, Peter King, and John Gruden circle jerks, but the Packers will always be here so I hope Brett enjoys the purple as I don’t see him in green and gold anymore.

by Charlie Kelly on Nov 2, 2009 12:43 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

In hindsight you have to admit that Favre was right to want to get Moss. (and for dirt cheap) I mean that move right there could have been the difference between losing in the NFC championship game to the Giants and going to the super bowl.

by dsludo on Nov 2, 2009 1:16 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Disagree strongly

Our WR group in 2007 was not an issue and bringing in Moss would have forced Greg Jennings to the 3rd WR spot which would have stunted his growth. It also would have encouraged Favre to return to his “heave it and hope for the best” days since he would have had a guy to go for jump balls. Moss had a great 2007, no doubt. But he wouldn’t have made us 14-2 or 15-1 instead of 13-3 and don’t think he would have changed anything in the NFC Title game either. To say he would have is pure speculation.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 2:05 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm not talking about development! I'm talking about a super bowl championship

no one said the WR group was an issue. In fact it is very good. However you can’t honestly say that adding Moss into the equation..again for dirt cheap…wouldn’t have made the team better. Driver, Moss, and Jennings would have been leaps and bounds above any other team in the NFL. Defenses would be totally clueless as to how to stop the offense.

by dsludo on Nov 2, 2009 5:09 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Actually, yes I can

Here is my explanation (copied from a comment I made on a different thread)

Oh I know what kind of year Moss had in 2007. I also know what kind of year our receivers had that year too. He may have put up good stats with us that year but would he have made us 14-2? 15-1? 16-0? I doubt it. Would he have been able to prevent Favre from throwing that inexcusable pick in OT against the Giants? I doubt it.

It also would have made Greg Jennings the 3rd WR which would have stunted his development as well. Moss certainly did have a better statistical season than any one of our receivers that year but I don’t think he would have added wins. The WR position in 2007 was not one that needed an upgrade (in retrospect, of course…at the time it wasn’t a ridiculous idea cause we didn’t know what we had in Jennings or Jones).

And while you might be right about Moss’s ability to go for jump balls, increasing the number of times that Favre just heaved the ball in the air and prayed his guy would get it would also likely have increased his INT total. Favre’s willingness to be more restrained and less reckless with the ball in 2007 was as big a factor in our record that year as any other. Encouraging him to go back to his gunslinging ways would have more likely resulted in less wins rather than more. There were 5 wins in 2007 by 7 or less points, all early in the season. In those 5 wins Favre threw a total of 3 picks (2 in the Wash. game which we could have easily lost if it weren’t for Corey Williams and Charles Woodson combining for the fumble recovery for a TD). His completion % in those games was .628. If he had reverted back to his old heave it and hope for the best days, we easily could have lost a couple of those games. In the only really close game that we lost during the regular season (first Bears game) he threw two picks, though one of them was on the last play essentially on a Hail Mary which can be easily excused. The first pick however was a backbreaker, a 3rd and 5 pick that gave them the ball on our 19. They scored on the next play and we lost by 7. We had 4 3 & outs on the next 4 series and never recovered. That’s the type of thing that he did a great job of avoiding during the 2007 season and that I don’t think would have happened with Moss there.
Sorry for not clarifying why I think this was important. Early on in that season we still had no idea how good we were. Remember those post-game press conferences with Favre? "Are we as good as our record? I don’t know. Will our luck continue as the season goes on? Tough to say. Will I continue to ask my own questions and answer them? Seems likely but you never can tell."

(As a side note, that was always my favorite part about Favre’s press conferences. There really never needed to be a single reporter in the room to ask questions. Just tape recorders to hear him ask himself questions and answer them)

But if early in the season during that developmental part where we were finding our identity we had lost some of those close games instead of winning we wouldn’t have had the confidence and the momentum that were so important to that team.

Did I make myself clearer? I hope so. Will this be the end of all discussions regarding Brett Favre and his time with the Packers? I doubt it. Will I continue doing in this in every post from now on? I’ll try not to, but nothing is guaranteed. And sorry for quoting myself.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 5:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I understand that the focus is on winning the SB

I just don’t think that it’s as easy as taking a 13-3 team that was in the NFC Title game and adding Moss automatically means they are a better team. Thats not how things work in the real world. In the fantasy football world, yes. In the real world, no.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 5:33 PM CST up reply actions  

You're right

The way to take a 13 – 3 team that in in the NFC Title game and to make it better is to trade its pro bowl quarterback.

by ktenreb on Nov 2, 2009 6:22 PM CST up reply actions  

And this relates to the Moss discussion how?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 6:45 PM CST up reply actions  

It doesn't

ktenreb is just one of those Favre lovers who feels the guy can and never has done any wrong.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 8:49 PM CST up reply actions  

So let me get this straight:
The 13 – 3 team was a play away from the Super Bowl, and the team’s needs were obvious and attainable. The general manager allowed the offseason to turn into a circus, and wound up with a PR disaster that caused him to have to essentially go into exile. The predictable result, of course, was that the Super Bowl contender did not improve, but instead regressed significantly.

But, the “play away from the Super Bowl” was a terrible pass by an aging qb who clearly cannot physically handle playing in the extreme conditions presented by Lambeau Field in January.

The Packers did improve that position by replacing Brett with Rodgers.

The bottom line with that 2007 team was that it basically returned in 2008 intact but psychically damaged by the drama created by Brett Favre. Furthermore, the injuries on defense decimated a unit that started 2008 out above average. In other words, 2008 did not unfold the way it did simply because Thompson didn’t go and sign Randy Moss or pursue whatever FA you think was going push the Pack over the edge. Instead, it was a combination of youth (which, as you say, could have been addressed a bit by signing a few veteran FAs perhaps) and predominately devastating injuries on defense to key personnel. Recall, ktenreb, how game after game last year it became a dark comedy of errors, or “how the hell is our defense going to collapse in the last minute to give a victory away”?

Rodgers now is in his fifth year (he’s not a second year quarterback as a lot of you seem to want to think). He has had some terrific statistical games, but his record is 10 -13 as a starter, and that’s against a pretty soft schedule.

Huh? Rodgers is a second-year starter. No one is saying he wasn’t drafted in 2005, so yes he’s technically entering his 5th year in the NFL, but he’s only been a starter for 2 years. I have no idea what you are talking about here.

And the Packers did not play a “soft schedule”. A team that won 13 games the season prior is not going to play a soft schedule. The Packers in 2008 played 6 eventual playoff teams and went 2-4 against them, including heartbreaking losses to Minnesota, Atlanta, and Tennessee where the units not under Rodgers’ command failed to either hold a lead (ATL and TEN) or kick a field goal (MIN).

So far, I see a quarterback who does not win games. The difference was obvious in the last game: With the Packers down by 5 in the fourth quarter, Rodgers got the ball on the 20 and did nothing. the Packers punted, and when the Vikings took over Favre threw a touchdown pass to put the game out of reach. Rodgers may develop into a good quarterback, but right now he is playing good enough to lose.

How is it completely Rodgers’ fault that the Packers haven’t won games during his tenure as a starting qb? Did he throw a back-breaking interception or fumble a snap in the waning minutes of a close game? Why are you lashing out at one of the few undeniably positive aspects of this team?

And you’re just flat-out wrong about Rodgers performance when he took over with the Pack down by 5 points:

Green Bay Packers at 8:13 MIN GNB
1st and 10 at GNB 19 A.Rodgers pass short middle to J.Kuhn to GB 33 for 14 yards (C.Griffin).
1st and 10 at GNB 33 (Shotgun) A.Rodgers Aborted. S.Wells FUMBLES at GB 27, recovered by GB-A.Rodgers at GB 27. A.Rodgers pass deep left to D.Driver to 50 for 17 yards (A.Allen) [R.Edwards]. GB-D.Driver was injured during the play. PENALTY on MIN-R.Edwards, Roughing the Passer, 15 yards, enforced at 50.
1st and 10 at MIN 35 (Shotgun) A.Rodgers pass short right to G.Jennings to MIN 28 for 7 yards (T.Johnson).
2nd and 3 at MIN 28 (Shotgun) A.Rodgers sacked at MIN 33 for -5 yards (J.Allen).
3rd and 8 at MIN 33 (Shotgun) A.Rodgers pass incomplete deep left to D.Driver (B.Sapp).
4th and 8 at MIN 33 M.Crosby 51 yard field goal is No Good, Wide Right, Center-B.Goode, Holder-M.Flynn.
DRIVE TOTALS: MIN 31, GNB 26, 6 plays, 31 yards, 2:35 elapsed

So Rodgers took over the offense at the Packers 19 yard line with 8:13 minutes remaining, down by 5 points and marched the team down into scoring position and his special teams failed (again). That’s the complete opposite of “doing nothing”.

Yes, Favre then took the Vikings down the field to score the game-clinching TD, but that’s hardly the fault of Rodgers. Tip your cap to Favre (and particularly AP for opening the series by turning a short screen pass into a 44 yard back-breaker), but attacking Rodgers because his team’s defense and special teams caved (again!) after he brought them within 5 points of beating a Super Bowl contender is just plain ridiculous.

by 400metres on Nov 3, 2009 10:15 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

You certainly have a way of missing the plays that went very well for AR when he had time to get them off…. You are all nuts if you think for one moment that this is not a pass protection issue… geezzzzz

by whooya on Nov 3, 2009 2:05 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think you meant to reply to me whooya

cuz we’re on the same side on this issue.

Special Teams, Defensive Line, and Offensive Line. Those are the chief issues holding the Pack back from being able to beat the above average squads like the Vikings.

Certainly not Aaron Rodgers.

by 400metres on Nov 3, 2009 11:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Yep

It’s obvious ktenreb didn’t do much homework in his post above.

It definitely is Rodgers fault that our defense and special teams could never seem to finish off games in 08’…..oh wait, what’s that your telling me? Rodger’s has NO control over how our defense and special teams..Never mind then I guess.

by packallday555 on Nov 3, 2009 10:49 PM CST up reply actions  

vikings fans

"Are we doing everything we can to win games, or are we doing everything we can to run a certain thing that we want to run? I want to win, and I want to do whatever it takes to win. At some point you have to take the handcuffs off and let the boys play." - Cullen Jenkins 11/01/09

by PackaCracka on Nov 5, 2009 7:21 AM CST up reply actions  

Haha

Yeah, it’s beyond me that anyone would recommend that post. It was filled with dishonest information, and basically just a sad attempt to point out how Rodgers really “isn’t that good of a Qb”.

by packallday555 on Nov 5, 2009 10:48 PM CST up reply actions  

That's because you are close minded

You drank the Kool Aid. You refuse to acknowledge a 10-13 record. You make excuses for five safeties.

Rodgers certainly isn’t the biggest problem on this team, and in the NFL world of starting QBs, he ranks very well. My point is that stats don’t mean anything when they aren’t accompanied by wins. When Rodgers starts winning games, then you can call him an elite quarterback. Until then, he looks like a stat machine who doesn’t win.

After all, your knock on Favre was that he didn’t win enough playoff games, wasn’t it? I’d rather lose the playoff game, however, than not be in the playoff game.

by ktenreb on Nov 6, 2009 8:53 AM CST up reply actions  

After all, your knock on Favre was that he didn’t win enough playoff games, wasn’t it? I’d rather lose the playoff game, however, than not be in the playoff game.

I don’t and didn’t really have a knock on Favre as far as his play went. My problem with him is how he acted in the offseason of 07’.

I understand what your saying and I agree. He needs to win games to be considered an elite Qb. I guess I would say he is an elite Qb based off of his skill and physical abilites. But as you know and I know that’s not all it’s about.

I’ve never argued that all those safties aren’t his fault. I think a few of them are more on the o-line, but he does need to work on throwing the ball away better.

And I get that he has a 10-13 record, but when watching our games that record is really not at his expense. Like a couple of us have been trying to tell you, it’s pretty hard to win games when the other units around you fail.

But I ultimately agree with you. Rodgers needs to start winning games to be mentioned with Brees and Manning.

by packallday555 on Nov 6, 2009 6:57 PM CST up reply actions  

completely agree

that Rodgers needs the wins to be considered anywhere near the elite QB’s in the league right now, but he has the skill set to do that. i think that is the point

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 7, 2009 2:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Wins aren't a QB stat

This isn’t baseball or hockey. Much more goes into winning or losing than the QB can control. Was Rex Grossman an elite QB in 2006 because the Bears went 13-3 and to the Superbowl?

by Charlie Kelly on Nov 7, 2009 10:42 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

“Gets to pad his stats” by falling behind and having to come back? Also, at my company I’m covered with medical, dental, and I got some stock options. No way a sack can be construed as a “benefit.”

CGB: Resisting Hope Since 2007

by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 3, 2009 12:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Try again

If he would throw the ball away, or take a chance, his stats wouldn’t be as pretty, but the team would be better off.

by ktenreb on Nov 6, 2009 9:39 AM CST up reply actions  

do you really think

that Rodgers is taking sacks so that he can avoid incompletions?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 7, 2009 2:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Remember though Rodgers does not get to call the plays.. Key point you are forgetting by saying he didnt do anything, Where was the line on that play also… come on now! Stop dissing Rodgers! You are not a true fan if you do!

by whooya on Nov 3, 2009 2:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Haha

I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree then.

And your pretty far off on your evaluation of Rodgers. So because he has had favorable situations in his career we’re going to say that, that is why he has been good? His record is largely a result of his 24th ranked defense is 08’. If you would care to go and look he put up nearly IDENTICAL numbers to Favre in 08’. The offense had NO drop off from 07’-08’, but the defense certainly did.

Blaming Rodgers for the record is and has been an easy cop out for Favre lovers to point at when trying to downplay how good he really is.

The difference was obvious in the last game: With the Packers down by 5 in the fourth quarter, Rodgers got the ball on the 20 and did nothing. the Packers punted, and when the Vikings took over Favre threw a touchdown pass to put the game out of reach.

Did you watch the game? Rodgers got the ball on our own 19 with 8:13 left. He led us down to the Vikings 35. On 1st and 10 he passed to Jennings for 7 yards. Then on 2nd and 3, Allen went UNTOUCHED and sacked Rodgers, making it 3rd and 10. On this play he was flushed out of the pocket, and had to try and make a difficult throw running to his left as a result. The pass fell incomplete, and then Crosby went on to miss a 51 yard field goal.

I’m not exactly sure if I would blame us not getting any points on Rodgers. But rather the o-line, who seems to not like to give their very, very talented Qb time to make plays.

And not to take away from Favre’s last TD pass, but it helps when you can throw a pass to a RB behing the line of scrimmage, and have him run for 44 yards. Ultimately, giving you very, very favorable field position. And while the TD thrown by Favre was a good read and throw, it certainly did help that we overrload blitzed from the spot which was where Favre’s primary read on that particular play was.

by packallday555 on Nov 3, 2009 10:43 PM CST up reply actions  

It's the same every week

Check out the Journal Sentinel this morning — great article about how the Packers roll up yards on their first offensive possessions of each half (great for stats) but no points.

Make all the excuses you want, but Rodgers got no points (setting up a field goal kicker for a 51-yarder when down by 5?) when he needed to deliver 7. 10 – 13 for a fifth year quarterback is not a good record. Somebody wants to dismiss the losses against last year’s playoff teams, apparently because they’re too hard to win; by the same logic, let’s dismiss the 3 wins against the Lions and the2 against the Browns and the Rams because they’re too easy.

Right now, I see a stat machine who doesn’t win games. Let’s analyze that a bit more: Favre drove everybody nuts by throwing interceptions. He tried to force passes when plays needed to be made. This, of course, is a gamble, but if you don’t take the risk, you don’t get the reward. I’m not saying that every interception Favre threw was a good decision gone bad; I am saying that when you are down by 5 late in the game and you get the ball, you need to try to force the issue. If it doesn’t work and you get picked, so what? You’re beat already anyway. I will take somebody who is willing to take a shot at winning every time over somebody who is trying to keep from losing. You can have the stats — I’d rather enjoy the game of football.

by ktenreb on Nov 4, 2009 6:50 AM CST up reply actions  

Again
Make all the excuses you want, but Rodgers got no points (setting up a field goal kicker for a 51-yarder when down by 5?) when he needed to deliver 7. 10 – 13 for a fifth year quarterback is not a good record. Somebody wants to dismiss the losses against last year’s playoff teams, apparently because they’re too hard to win; by the same logic, let’s dismiss the 3 wins against the Lions and the2 against the Browns and the Rams because they’re too easy.

Honestly how can we blame this on Rodgers? We had a 2nd and 3. We were in shotgun, and somehow Allen doesn’t even get touched coming off the line. What is Rodgers supposed to do? Any Qb in the league short of Vick or Young are going to be sacked by Allen every single time. The question that arises for me is why not run the ball? And then again on 3rd and long, Rodgers had no time to throw the ball and had to attempt a pass while throwing acrossed his body.

Anyone who isn’t rooting for Rodgers to fail because of what happened to Favre is able to see that the least of our concerns is Rodgers, and that in most cases he is making the best out of what he is given.


Right now, I see a stat machine who doesn’t win games. Let’s analyze that a bit more: Favre drove everybody nuts by throwing interceptions. He tried to force passes when plays needed to be made. This, of course, is a gamble, but if you don’t take the risk, you don’t get the reward. I’m not saying that every interception Favre threw was a good decision gone bad; I am saying that when you are down by 5 late in the game and you get the ball, you need to try to force the issue. If it doesn’t work and you get picked, so what? You’re beat already anyway. I will take somebody who is willing to take a shot at winning every time over somebody who is trying to keep from losing.

I see a stat machine, who has constantly had other units around him failing. Like I pointed out to you from 07’ to 08’ the offenses looked nearly identical. What did look identical though was our defensive stats. Rodgers cannot help that our defense and special teams seemed to constantly fail.

A perfect example of this was the game against Carolina last season. We were tied 31 a piece in the 4th quarter with around 12 minutes left. Rodgers orchestrated a 80 yard drive, while taking about 10 minutes off the clock. He got us the lead, and then with around 2:40 left, we just had to hope the defense could hold up. But on the ensuing kickoff our special teams allowed a return out to our 49 yard line (sound familiar?). Then in just 2 plays, the Panthers score a TD, ultimately leaving us down by 4, with around 1:00 to go, with no timeouts.

Pretty much ALL of our losses seemed to go this why aside from the ass whooping the Saints handed us.

If it doesn’t work and you get picked so what? That might be one of the dumber things I’ve heard. Of course 7 points is the ideal, but with the swiss cheese line we have it’s awfully difficult for us to sustain a long drive. Coming away with 3 points is not the end of the world. It would have left us down by 2, with around 4 minutes left in the game and with 2 timeouts. But too our surprise another unit which Rodgers has no control over messed up, and then that was followed by our defensive unit allowing the Vikes to put it out of reach.

You must really be jealous of Rodgers and must really want him to fail, considering some of the “theories” you have cooked up.

by packallday555 on Nov 4, 2009 11:22 AM CST up reply actions  

"Somebody wants to dismiss the losses against last year’s playoff teams, apparently because they’re too hard to win;"

That’s not apparent to anyone but a goofball like you. Seriously, that’s about the opposite of what I’ve (and others) have said.

But then when you won’t just admit that you were being nonsensically hyperbolic in claim that Rodgers “did nothing” with the ball when the Pack took over on offense down by five points, I guess you’re comfortable being completely wrong.

The reality is that we are countering your inexplicably assault on Rodgers, as an individual player, for the woes of the GB Packers over the last couple of years.

Go ahead, explain how exactly Rodgers is suppose to control the Special Teams from missing game winning field goals, poorly cover kick-offs and punts, and kicking short punts. Or how he’s responsible for the defense continuously collapsing exactly at the point that the team needs a big stop (e.g., letting Favre and Co. march down the field for the game clinching TD) or committing idiotic penalties that give the team another shot at a TD (see: Johnny Jolly).

No one here has said that the games were “too hard to win”; what we did say was that the games were not lost due to some mistake or failure on the part of Rodgers.

But go ahead and keep arguing with the your imaginary opponent making these imaginary counters to your claims that are (surprise!) really stupid and make you look smart. And continue to ignore all the obvious flaws that we pointed out.

by 400metres on Nov 4, 2009 11:31 AM CST up reply actions  

I guess

until you’ve “earned the right” to skip mini-camps, take forever to make decisions, and change your mind with no recourse you are responsible for all aspects of the teams performance. i mean, he at least controls the kickoffs, right?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 4, 2009 12:41 PM CST up reply actions  

There's nothing quite as unintentionally hilarious

than someone who’s zealously convinced of his righteousness while being so demonstrably wrong.

Upholding Favre as the paragon of winning? Sure, he’s been a part of a boatload of regular season victories (an eye-popping 176 over 17 seasons), but what separates the all-time great qbs (e.g., Montana, Starr, Brady) from those that are “only” just above average is their playoff and championship record. That’s were Favre falls back to pack:

After beating the San Francisco 49ers in the 1997 NFC Championship Game, Favre won just three of his last 10 playoff games. Eli Manning had more postseason wins in a 29-day span this past season than Favre had in his last decade with the Green Bay Packers.

Yes, Favre won a Super Bowl — 11 years ago! But as his career arc spiraled downward, the blind adulation only got worse.

Favre’s passer rating in his last 12 postseason games was a pedestrian 77.8. In his last five wild-card games, he went 2-3 with more interceptions (nine) than touchdown passes (seven). In his last three divisional playoff games, he went 1-2 with seven TDs and seven interceptions. That’s a 3-5 record with 14 touchdown passes and 16 picks.

In two of his last four postseason appearances, Favre threw two of the most unthinkable playoff interceptions in NFL history, both in overtime — to Brian Dawkins of the Philadelphia Eagles in 2003 and to Corey Webster of the New York Giants in January. In fact, Favre is the only quarterback in NFL history to throw overtime interceptions in two playoff games. In his last nine playoff games, Favre threw 18 interceptions.

In the first 81 years of the Green Bay franchise, the most hallowed in all of pro football, the Packers were 13-0 at home in the postseason. But since 2002, the Packers have gone 2-3 in playoff games at Lambeau Field, with Favre losing to three not-quite Hall of Fame quarterbacks: Michael Vick, Daunte Culpepper and Manning.

If Manning had a decade like that, he’d be run out of New York. If Philip Rivers kept chucking ridiculous overtime interceptions in the postseason, he would be branded a first-round bust. If Drew Brees came up short in three out of five home playoff games, he’d be mocked.

But no matter how many dumb passes he threw and how many playoff games he lost, Favre remains immune to criticism.

So that’s what’s so crazy to me about ktenreb’s out-of-left-field assault on the credibility of Aaron Rodgers, simply based on his win-loss record. Again, Rodgers can hardly be blamed for consistently leading his offense to 20-30 points in losing efforts.

Nevertheless, ktenreb would have us believe that Favre is the greatest winner ever when he can clearly be blamed for the Packers losing several playoff games since 1997. Not all of those losses can be blamed completely on Favre, but a undeniably he’s to blame for a good portion.

And ask the Jets fans how much they appreciated having such a “winner” as Favre leading their team last year.

I think what’s great is we know that Favre is the ultimate Heartbreak Kid, whereas we have no idea what Rodgers will do for this team once he has better Defense and Special Teams units.

by 400metres on Nov 4, 2009 2:32 PM CST up reply actions  

You are opening your mind

I applaud you for moving from your position that rodgers is a terrific quarterback to admitting that you don’t know how he would be if he had better players.

by ktenreb on Nov 4, 2009 9:09 PM CST up reply actions  

now if we could get you to open your mind

that would be a real accomplishment

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 5, 2009 11:29 AM CST up reply actions  

From your perspective as a Vikes fan, yes. But not from a Packers fans perspective. Because we knew our wr core was very talented, and you don’t normally sign players where their not needed, unless, their a big upgrade. And I know you might say well Moss would have been and I agree, but it didn’t seem like he would be before the 07’ year.

We ended up having what was arguably the best wr corps in the league in 07’, and still have one of the better ones now.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 3:20 PM CST up reply actions  

The tallest packers receiver on the 2007 team was 6', and none were jump ball type guys

I’ve made this pont before. That is what made Moss something new, not just more of the same. Tht’s why favre wanted him. I believe he said it that way at one point, point blank.

by puddnhead on Nov 2, 2009 5:08 PM CST up reply actions  

LOl

Is that how determing player ability is done by you? lol

Not to blow your mind or anything, but … you do know the Packers beat the Giants in 2007, right? Ratehr convincingly.

by puddnhead on Nov 2, 2009 5:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Yea, before they had gotten on a roll

You talk about how Moss would’ve helped them, but would Moss have covered Plaxico Burress? Would Moss have stopped the Giants relentless pass rush? Would Moss have made the 2007 Packers Superbowl champs? I don’t know, you don’t know. There is no way to know but I’m guessing if the season played out exactly as it did all the way to the NFC Championship and you put Moss in that lineup, I don’t think he makes a difference, especially not in that weather.

by Charlie Kelly on Nov 2, 2009 5:22 PM CST up reply actions  

and your player determing ability is how tall they are and how high they jump?

and if the Packers beat the Giants without him, they should’ve been able to do it again

Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok

by blackoutsox on Nov 2, 2009 6:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Well

It turned out in the 07’ that we didn’t need a tall receiver to be very successful.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 8:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Because

In 2007 we had Brett Favre.

by ktenreb on Nov 3, 2009 6:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Cognitive dissonance

is not a strong suit of the True Believer.

by 400metres on Nov 3, 2009 10:24 AM CST up reply actions  

Would not have won that game with Rodgers either

The Packers lost to a better team that night. They got pushed around in the trenches, even downfield. Favre became the scapegoat, but the problems that the Giants exposed are still there.

by uglyfatpimplynerd on Nov 3, 2009 10:46 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I guess now we are treading on the same speculation that is going on with the “would the packers be better right now with Favre”. The facts are that we won’t know. Could Rodgers have beat the Giants there? Maybe. Would the Packers have even been there with Rodgers? Maybe. We won’t know and its stupid to even speculate that.

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 11:45 AM CST up reply actions  

You're missing the point

The issues in 2007 was never Brett or Aaron — well, ignoring the fact that Aaron broke his foot after playing just two quarters, and was lost for the year, that obviously would have been a killer if it was just Aaron. The issue is with what was/wasn’t done at all the other positions.

Packers are spoiled by having had a top rank franchise QB for so long, and so reliably week in and week out, first with Brett & now Aaron. Look at the rest of the NFC North for starters. I think there are many that think the Packers, not realizing how special this is, have squandered opportunities for more Lombardis over the years by not being more aggressive since the late 90s in building the supporting cast around their field general. As Ron Wolf famously said, the Packers ended up not becoming a dynasty but “a fart in the wind.”

by puddnhead on Nov 3, 2009 12:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Actually you just CHANGED the point

I missed the point? HUH? I just responded to the claim that the packers wouldn’t have won with Aaron either. MY point was merely not to get caught up in ridiculous hypotheticals. You just took it off in a completely different direction than the post I was responding about man. YOUR point had nothing to do with this thread even if I agree with some of what you are saying! Lets keep the discussion on track…

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 1:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Pud's right.

The problems with the team that were exposed in the Giants game are still there. Not only that, they are bigger problems than either Rodgers or Favre can make up for. I don’t think Peyton Manning or Tom Brady or Joe Montana would do it, either, so it’s not a knock on either QB. This team still does not have the supporting cast around the QB.

by uglyfatpimplynerd on Nov 3, 2009 5:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Well

In 08’ our wr corps and offense was just as effective. Care to explain?

by packallday555 on Nov 3, 2009 10:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Great post
And that is why I’ve lost respect for Favre and I honestly don’t want him to retire a Packer. He seemed like this heroic figure during my childhood, never getting injured and always playing for fun and for the team. But as I’ve grown older, I’ve seen the real Brett emerge. The one whose ego is so inflated, he thinks that not only should he be the QB of his team, he should also manage the personnel (Remember when he criticized Javon Walker and McKenzie’s contract disputes?) He has proven how petty he is that he will go through everything he did just to get back at a man who didn’t do anything wrong other than not kissing the ground he walked on. He has proven that he cares very little for the people who worshipped him and made him a very wealthy man.

Though I agree 100% with everything else you wrote, this particular paragraph for me sums up my exact feelings on the situation.

This was a very well written post. I couldn’t have done it any better myself.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 3:27 PM CST up reply actions  

explain this ego thing to me. He always seems so humble and not wanting to take credit for anything every time I hear him speak. not once have I said to myself, man that’s one cocky qb with a huge ego.

In fact, I would argue for someone who has accomplished what he has, you would think they would be a little more cocky and have a bigger ego.

by dsludo on Nov 2, 2009 5:13 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I explained it in the post

A big ego doesn’t necessarily have to come out like say TO, with a cocky attitude and public displays of said attitude. With Brett, it came in how he behaved off the field, thinking he was more than the QB of the team but apparently the GM as well. That this team should sit and wait on him to decide his future until he’s damn well ready. He may give off the “Aww shucks, I just like me some pigskin” attitude but there is more to Favre than that.

by Charlie Kelly on Nov 2, 2009 5:17 PM CST up reply actions  

But what if his criticisms of the GM's actions were valid?

I dunno, I complain about MY boss a lot more than I ever heard Favre do.

by puddnhead on Nov 2, 2009 5:22 PM CST up reply actions  

We've gone over this many times before

you know how I stand on Thompsons moves and I know how you stand. I’d rather not reiterate on that. That being said, I thought Favre’s public criticisms of Thompson to be an even bigger showing of the real Favre and how classless he really is. As much as you dislike Thompson, even you have to admit he took the high road in the handling of this by never publicly bashing Favre.

by Charlie Kelly on Nov 2, 2009 5:27 PM CST up reply actions  

If you don't have anything good to say

don’t say anything at all. Haven’t you heard that one before?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 6:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Good point

And they very well could have been. But Favre publically criticized TT many times knowing very well that he would know about it.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 8:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Do you complain about your boss in public? Do you use instances where your suggestion was clearly wrong to back up how you are right and he/she is wrong?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 10:11 PM CST up reply actions  

He may give off the "Aww shucks, I just like me some pigskin" attitude but there is more to Favre than that.

Exactly. This is where being a fan of the guy for 16 years, and watching him grow up in front of your eyes comes in to play.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 8:53 PM CST up reply actions  

You've already said that. MANY, MANY times over. Seriously.

Look, just because you’ve “watched him grow up in front of your eyes” doesn’t really mean squat. It’s really interesting how disgruntled Packer fans NOW suddenly have found out all of this interesting information about how Brett Favre REALLY is. You know… since he’s not with the team and all.

And I’ll bet you’re still wondering why other people besides Packer fans are flooding this site? Maybe because hipocracy, frustration and hurt feelings are always interesting.

"Remember kids......... petty and cheap shot-ish doesn't make you a true fan, it just makes you petty and cheap shot-ish."

by Themanthemyththelegend on Nov 2, 2009 9:01 PM CST up reply actions  

It’s really interesting how disgruntled Packer fans NOW suddenly have found out all of this interesting information about how Brett Favre REALLY is. You know… since he’s not with the team and all.

I started to find out what Favre was really like off the field FAR before he left our team. And yes it does mean squat, because when a player like Favre plays for the team you love for 16 years you there comes an emotional attachment to him.

And I keep repeating this because it’s evident to me that some people will just never understand this whole situation like some of us Packers fans do.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 9:10 PM CST up reply actions  

We all know you've never repeated yourself
Look, just because you’ve "watched him grow up in front of your eyes" doesn’t really mean squat.

Yeah! People who have been following this spectacle for the past couple of months have WAY more insight than people who have been following it for years.

Maybe because hipocracy, frustration and hurt feelings are always interesting.

I’m gonna assume you’re talking about hypocrisy and not some new hip-hop form of government that will be sweeping the nation soon. Do you hang out around courthouses to make fun of the divorced couples coming out of court too?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 9:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Funny how

TMTMTL was wrong about verno’s ability to say anything original and hilarious considering how right he is about every other topic he weighs in on over here.

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 9:20 PM CST up reply actions  

[sniff]

He is our friend, isn’t he?

by 400metres on Nov 2, 2009 9:28 PM CST up reply actions  

I am like a friend and brother.....

I just have a different point of view. And just like family, I’m going to point out the shortcoming, incorrect assumptions and out and out lunacy of my brethren.

You can get mad if you want. Anything you write about me makes me smile. Just like the smile I had all day Sunday. Just like the smile Brett Favre had that the camera showed he was wearing when he was going through warm-ups before the game.

You know…. the good kind of smile!

"Remember kids......... petty and cheap shot-ish doesn't make you a true fan, it just makes you petty and cheap shot-ish."

by Themanthemyththelegend on Nov 2, 2009 10:05 PM CST up reply actions  

The smile that says

“I have no idea what is going on at all, but I’m glad to be here!”

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 10:15 PM CST up reply actions  

No.......

I’m pretty sure he knew EXACTLY what was going on and what he was doing there.

Me too!

"Remember kids......... petty and cheap shot-ish doesn't make you a true fan, it just makes you petty and cheap shot-ish."

by Themanthemyththelegend on Nov 2, 2009 10:19 PM CST up reply actions  

And the troll misses the point again

We can at least rely on you for something, huh?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 10:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Who's missing the point? Me or you?

"Remember kids......... petty and cheap shot-ish doesn't make you a true fan, it just makes you petty and cheap shot-ish."

by Themanthemyththelegend on Nov 2, 2009 10:22 PM CST up reply actions  

You...

It is pretty easy to see how badly you take things out of context and argue on pure conjecture. It’s fine. Like you said, we are family, yes? no? We can love you like the redheaded step-child.

Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge

by Bush League All Star on Nov 2, 2009 10:49 PM CST up reply actions  

TMTMTL,

I think your irony detector is broken.

Or maybe yours never showed up in the mail?

by 400metres on Nov 3, 2009 10:39 AM CST up reply actions  

thanks guys

truth is I just wait for you guys to type something I like and then enter it into my “re-phrasinator” so I can look like I have something original to say.

I couldn’t do it without you guys!

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 10:18 PM CST up reply actions  

All this info, btw

is in my “Prototypical Yes Man” manual. Send me your address if you want your own copy.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 10:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Wow.

I didn’t mean to hurt your feeling or get in to your head so badly.

I’m sorry.

Do you need a hug?

Some tissue?

"Remember kids......... petty and cheap shot-ish doesn't make you a true fan, it just makes you petty and cheap shot-ish."

by Themanthemyththelegend on Nov 2, 2009 10:21 PM CST up reply actions  

The guy who has proven to be one of the toughest players to ever throw on helmet continued to show each year that although his body seemed to be made of steel, his psyche appeared to be made of glass.

Wow, wish I had said that.

Remember when he criticized Javon Walker and McKenzie’s contract disputes?

You mean like when he said that Javon should get in here and honor his contract? I guess demanding that a contract be torn up is something that only Favre is allowed to do?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 1:13 PM CST reply actions  

Great Perspective

Ok…I’ll start by coming clean on being a life-long Viking fan. One of the things that I’ve told people throughout my life is the unique rivalry in the NFC North. Unlike other NFL rivalries like Eagles/Giants, Miami/Buffalo etc, the NFC North is as close to pure football as you can get. I want to beat the Packers every time we play them, but if they are the last NFC North team standing, I’ll cheer for them all the way to the a Super bowl victory (something I hope someday to do as a Vikings fan).

With that backdrop, I have to admit I hadn’t spent a lot of time looking at the Favre drama from a Packer fan perspective. I viewed it as a great signing that might…just might give us the last piece of the puzzle to make a serious push for our first championship. This week was obviously great for us, but watching Aaron Rogers I couldn’t help but think we won this battle, but he will get more than his share of victory laps at our expense over the next 10-12 years. He has handled this entire situation for the last several years with uncommon class. I used his situation as an example when I was training soldiers for and in Afghanistan. Leadership isn’t always the guy that is the loudest…quite professionalism, dignity and being a team player are significantly more important.

The Packers need a couple offensive linemen, go back to the 4 -3 or change your personnel up front and upgrade at Safety. I’m willing to bet you can do that faster than we can find a franchise quarterback as good as Rogers. But, it’s a win now league so you can’t blame us for taking a shot.

I hope Brett helps us win a championship and when his career is over, he goes into the Hall of Fame as a Packer and things go back to being "normal".

by Vikings Fan on Nov 2, 2009 2:08 PM CST reply actions  

good comment
This week was obviously great for us, but watching Aaron Rogers I couldn’t help but think we won this battle, but he will get more than his share of victory laps at our expense over the next 10-12 years.

I sincerely hope that Rodgers survives that long to have the chance at taking victory laps.

"Brandon Jennings needs a nickname before he gives himself one. Oh wait, Young Money, he already did."

by Mitchell Maurer on Nov 2, 2009 2:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Well said Vikings Fan
He has handled this entire situation for the last several years with uncommon class. I used his situation as an example when I was training soldiers for and in Afghanistan. Leadership isn’t always the guy that is the loudest…quite professionalism, dignity and being a team player are significantly more important.

Aaron Rodgers has handled this whole situation about as well as anyone could have ever dreamed.

by dishingoutdimes on Nov 2, 2009 3:07 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I think that is ini general agreement across the spectrum

Well, except for R4F of course. But that is a whole other wavelength ;)

And, ironcially, still some Packer fans. It’s a little ironic that there is more cynicism about Rodgers still coming from the packer lines, and hardly any from Vikings’ Cutler sometimes gets trashed and ridiculed over at DN, but Rodgers almost always is given respect.

by puddnhead on Nov 2, 2009 5:12 PM CST up reply actions  

well said

and I agree

Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok

by blackoutsox on Nov 2, 2009 3:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Thank you

for providing an honest assessment from a Vikings fan.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 5:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Aaron Rodgers is going to better than Favre ever was

I’m completely sold on him in his second year.

All the Favre discussion, and you’re missing the nugget right under your noses. Next year, maybe the year after, #4 is gone.

We need to keep A-Rod for a long time, cuz he’s going to lead us to many playoff appearances and SB games.

But we need to shore up that damned O-line first.

by Daggs on Nov 2, 2009 3:46 PM CST reply actions  

You’ll probably take a lot of heat for saying that he is going to be better then Favre, but it really honestly could happen. I mean look at what he has done with a bottom 5 o-line in the league. The guy really has all the tools to be a great Qb. We just need to put the right pieces around him. (O-line)

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 3:51 PM CST up reply actions  

All he has to do is start winning big games. Once he does, then let the Favre comparisons begin. Until then, let’s just let him be himself and continue to develop. I think he definitely will be a top 33 percent quarterback, Part of that will be recognizing when to play it safe and when to take a chance.

by ktenreb on Nov 4, 2009 9:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Complete agreement with you here

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 5, 2009 11:30 AM CST up reply actions  

I am with you

He needs to start winning these games…it comes with experience for most QBs. Favre wasn’t doing this in his first year and really not much in his second either. It will come, he needs support from the D which he didn’t get last year. This year its been better so now its time to see it happen.

by TrevorR on Nov 6, 2009 10:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Yes he was

Favre won his first game with a last minute touchdown pass. But you are going where we shouldn’t go — let’s not compare the two.

by ktenreb on Nov 6, 2009 2:45 PM CST up reply actions  

eh…the first game he played in, he took the second half of a 17-0 half time deficit and ended up losing 31-3. The NEXT game Majic got hurt and Favre came in and fumbled FOUR times…FOUR. Yet the team somehow stuck in there and he was able to come back and win the game. People were chanting for Detmer at that game…I remember it. Lets not pretend it was some game of the ages here! haha But stripped down to the root of the argument, yet he did engineer the comeback drive somehow despite such a terrible game.

My point wasn’t that he NEVER did it, but that he grew into what he was during his prime. He didn’t come out and play perfectly from the start. It did take Rodgers almost a year to do what Favre did in his second game though.

by TrevorR on Nov 6, 2009 4:34 PM CST up reply actions  

WAAAY too early to say that

I wouldn’t go there yet…its year two man. He’s got to survive for a LOT longer to even think about that. I don’t think you realize how elite Favre’s numbers are. He could do it and I hope he does, but lets have that talk in 5 years or so.

by TrevorR on Nov 2, 2009 3:58 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think he should be compared to Favre at all

He’s Aaron Rodgers, that’s who he needs to be. Brett Favre is gone and this is who we have, for better or worse. I think Rodgers will have a solid career as long as he stays healthy. He has proven he has all the tools to become one, he has shown me at least he has the toughness to play the position. Now like any second year QB, he has plenty of things to work on, but as long as he continues to do so, I don’t see how he can’t be one of the greats.

by Charlie Kelly on Nov 2, 2009 4:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Viking fan sounding off here - don't kill me. LOL

I think this article raises some fair points but it does err on the side of extreme fan devotion when interpreting the facts. Back when this all happened, I followed the story out of interest, too, as I’ve always enjoyed watching Favre play the game – despite playing for our hated rivals. I think you’re leaving out the fact that he has his own career to care about – yes, he was tied to and with the Packers for several great years and yes, a team isn’t just one player. BUT when it comes to the QB, they can really make and break a team, success-wise, and Favre was no exception.

I think any football fan can appreciate the average Packer fan’s enthusiasm while still staying clear of the fog that fanatical devotion brings (I use that term with no offense intended – it is, what it is). Favre should’ve had a right to play for his team, even after waiting a while. Perhaps GB fans expected him to find it an easy decision? I don’t know but I do know that it’s the kind of decision that could potentially take someone a while to figure out. In this blog post, it seems that’s precisely what has angered some GB fans and I’m not sure it really is a “just” and fairly directed anger.

I guess the problem is in whether or not you care about the fact that individual players create a team and that they have their own careers to focus on at times. Sure it’s great when certain players are loyal beyond the business or personal side of the game and stick with their long-running teams – I’d prefer that, it’s nicer, friendlier even, but the reality is that each player has to gauge what’s best for them and in this case, once Favre pushed to play again, Ted T. and Mike M. decided he wasn’t good enough to get his starting position back and had to compete for it. Not only would that be insulting to a player without whom the Packers might have been fairly mediocre for several years. That seems disrespectful AND unappreciative to me and I imagine Brett saw it that way too.

What I never understood and never will, is that if Brett wasn’t good enough to inherit his starting role back at that point, why offer him a $20 million bribe to NOT play? Why insert the infamous “poison pill” in his contract to the Jets? To me that was completely antithetical to the message Ted and Coach McCarthy were telling Favre by insisting that he had to compete for his starting job with Rodgers (that he wasn’t good enough). Yet they must have thought him good enough to NOT want to trade him to division rivals and to offer him a $20 million bribe to go away. :(

It was just a shady, crappy situation all around from an outsider’s perspective.

by Wytefang on Nov 2, 2009 5:27 PM CST reply actions  

One other thing...

For the record, you have a GREAT, GREAT replacment QB in Aaron Rodgers – man I like him too! But Shhh…don’t tell anyone, I’m not supposed to like your QB…you ARE our hated rivals after all. LOL

by Wytefang on Nov 2, 2009 5:29 PM CST up reply actions  

The thing about that is, McCarthy and Thompson never told Favre he wasn't good enough

Favre retired, all they did was hold him to his decision like he was an adult. Then when they moved forward and he wanted back in, they stuck with their decision with Rodgers. As for releasing him, that move like many have said would’ve gotten them both instantly kicked out of town. But the common misconception people seem to have is that McCarthy and Thompson pushed Favre out, they didn’t, he retired.

by Charlie Kelly on Nov 2, 2009 5:32 PM CST up reply actions  

I disagree – he was, in effect, forced out simply because they informed him that he would have to “try out” for the QB position. Considering his importance to the success of GB for so many years, I could see how he would feel upset and possibly offended also…and I wouldn’t blame him. I think the bigger issue, though, is that he just wanted to play, period. And the Packers didn’t seem to want to allow that at all, which had to be frustrating, especially if he still felt capable. They (the Packers Upper Management) ended up just appearing cowardly and disrespectful, instead. :(

I won’t say it was an easy situation but it just felt like somehow GB’s management managed to entirely bungle it. The only good part was that Rodgers came out in pretty good shape as the professional that he is.

by Wytefang on Nov 2, 2009 5:37 PM CST up reply actions  

I think the bigger issue, though, is that he just wanted to play, period.

People always point this out as if its some kind of revelation. If all he wanted to do was play why did he retire? If all he wanted to do was play why did he retire again with the Jets? If he all wanted to do was play why didn’t he un-retire with the Jets? If all he wanted to do was play why did he wait until training camp was over to come to that realization? Every older player in the league would love to keep playing if they were allowed to miss training camp and skip all of the hard work involved.

I won’t say it was an easy situation but it just felt like somehow GB’s management managed to entirely bungle it. The only good part was that Rodgers came out in pretty good shape as the professional that he is.

This was a lose-lose situation for everyone involved from the moment he cried as he pretended to retire. If the Packers had handled it differently it just would have been different people upset and complaining. But there is no way this would been resolved and had all parties happy. There’s just no way. And yes, Rodgers did come out of it in pretty good shape. At least there was one positive in all this.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 6:00 PM CST up reply actions  

I disagree – he was, in effect, forced out simply because they informed him that he would have to "try out" for the QB position.

This was far after they had already told Favre they were moving on in a new direction.

I think the bigger issue, though, is that he just wanted to play, period. And the Packers didn’t seem to want to allow that at all, which had to be frustrating, especially if he still felt capable. They (the Packers Upper Management) ended up just appearing cowardly and disrespectful, instead. :(

I’m sorry but Favre retired on his OWN. The only time that Favre was told that he wouldn’t be the Packers starting Qb was AFTER he had ALREADY been told that the organization was moving on. Is it TT and MM’s fault that Favre chose not to believe them?

It seems to me you really only followed this whole fiasco when Favre had decided he was going to come back in July. What happened in the months of March, April, and May really determined what Favre’s future was going to be. It seems like your arguing your side despite only knowing half of the story.

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2009 9:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Lets not forget how many times he said he was retiring and came back. Once I can see, and he was given time the other times he retired and talked about retiring and he was given his starting job back… time after time!!! What coaching staff wouldnt take him at his word and start building a team without him …Tell me that????

by whooya on Nov 3, 2009 2:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks for the well thought out comment

Here is my counter to some of your points

Perhaps GB fans expected him to find it an easy decision? I don’t know but I do know that it’s the kind of decision that could potentially take someone a while to figure out. In this blog post, it seems that’s precisely what has angered some GB fans and I’m not sure it really is a "just" and fairly directed anger.

I can understand that it would be a difficult decision to make (though he certainly had practice making that decision), but every other player in the league has a similar decision to make. They just aren’t allowed the luxury of waiting till training camp to figure out whether or not they want to continue playing. And if this was the first time he was making such a decision he would have been cut some slack. I think the previous 4 years are proof of that. But every year it took longer and longer and at some point the team needs to know what to do. Personally I don’t think he will ever get more than 60/40 on the retirement issue until he’s like 50. He’s just incapable of making such a decision.

Why insert the infamous "poison pill" in his contract to the Jets?

Personally I thought the “poison pill” part of the contract was fairly unnecessary as it was highly unlikely that the Jets would trade for Favre and then turn around and trade him to the Vikings before the season even started. The Jets weren’t gonna allow themselves just to be pawns in Favre’s grand scheme to go to the Vikings so blatantly. They would have lost credibility as a trading partner and with their fans.

To me that was completely antithetical to the message Ted and Coach McCarthy were telling Favre by insisting that he had to compete for his starting job with Rodgers (that he wasn’t good enough). Yet they must have thought him good enough to NOT want to trade him to division rivals and to offer him a $20 million bribe to go away. :(

He had to compete for his job because what kind of a message does that send to Aaron Rodgers and the team as a whole if he is allowed to just cruise in and retake his starting position because now he feels like playing again. It has nothing to do with thinking that he wasn’t good enough. If that was the case then why did they tell him to make sure he wanted to retire before his first phony press conference? Why did they go see him to see if he had changed his mind?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 5:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Well you definitely seem to have your mind made up – as an outsider to the situation, I guess I just see it differently. ::: shrugs::: It’s hard to imagine Favre sitting around twiddling a mustache while planning out some elaborate scheme to get to the Vikings. I suppose it just depends on the filter you have in place to view this kind of situation. I’m a bit more able (or willing, I suppose) to see him in a less conspiratorial or dastardly light. And that’s not because he’s helping my team a lot (because he certainly is!) but simply because when things like this happen, the explanation is usually best-provided by the Occam’s Razor analogy – the simplest explanation is usually the most accurate. He wanted to play, they wanted to move on but were afraid for him to go anywhere else and the situation got acrimonious at that point.

We’ll have to agree to disagree. I know it’s probably worse for a Packer fan with him torching them in these two games, too. :(

by Wytefang on Nov 2, 2009 7:14 PM CST up reply actions  

I like this guy

not to keep this going but I personally think he played it out from the gut, no elaborate scheme. He wanted to be a Packer when he came back to Lambeau, but for obvious reasons, he did force TT and MM to commit without him before coming back and so they trade him (maybe that was messed up to if he wanted to go to the Bucs) and he got his playing time for the Jets. However, the joining the Vikings was more revenge based, because of the accumulation of events in the summer of 2008.

Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok

by blackoutsox on Nov 2, 2009 7:22 PM CST up reply actions  

I can agree to disagree

Thanks for replying honestly and with reason. The biggest problem I have with some Vikings fans is when they blast us for treating the guy poorly when they have spent the past 16 years doing the same thing. That is not the case with you. Thanks for the discussion.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 8:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Please explain how he was pushed out, if he retired first?

If I quit my job tomorrow, then a few months later I want my job back and they tell me I’ll have to apply and interview again against numerous other applicants, am I being pushed out of my job. And if he wanted to play so bad, then why retire? See, I don’t believe in any of Favre’s “retirements” I think he only used them as a means to get to where he wanted to be, which is in Minnesota (This is especially evident in the second one as he asked for his release shortly after the retirement) I don’t think Packers management handled as well as it could have been but it was a very difficult situation to be put into.

by Charlie Kelly on Nov 2, 2009 5:42 PM CST reply actions  

See, I don’t believe in any of Favre’s "retirements" I think he only used them as a means to get to where he wanted to be, which is in Minnesota (This is especially evident in the second one as he asked for his release shortly after the retirement)

I have come to the same conclusion. He saw the reaction to when he demanded a trade after Moss was traded to the Pats before the 2007 season (before he quickly recanted and claimed he never said such a thing) and figured he couldn’t ask for a trade following the 2007 season, so it was easier to just retire. And then after his retirement he figured he could change his mind whenever he felt like it and ride in on his white horse and issue his “start me or release me” demand. He wanted to be in MN when he came back. I don’t think he had any ideas about coming back to GB.

And yes, the phony retirement with the Jets was as obvious as you can be. Why else demand your release right away? It’s the Brett Favre way!

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 6:09 PM CST reply actions  

LOL well 214 comments later...

I can see I stirred the pot quite a bit. Anyways, I think that this was such a publicized issue and a football icon that everyone has formed their own opinions either way, and I don’t think that I could convince many Favre supporters to see things my way.

All of those thoughts had been boiling up in my head over the past year or so, and I decided to write them all out on here and see what other Packers fans thought, and to try and put the whole debacle behind me.

Hopefully re-hashing everything one final time will help bring some closure to everyone! At the very least it has spurred some good discussion.

Finally, I’m sure that when Brett gets into the Hall of Fame I’ll forgive him a little bit, and find a way to remember all of the good that he did for the Packers. Part of me won’t forget these last two years, but I can’t also just sweep it under the rug that he helped turn around the Packers franchise, and bring us a championship.

Also, I take some solace in the fact that the Vikings historically find some way to choke either right before, or during, the playoffs, and I’m banking on this happening this year so I can maintain some sanity :)

by dishingoutdimes on Nov 2, 2009 8:15 PM CST reply actions  

Something I don't see mentioned here

Favre revealed information about the Packers to the Lions before our first game last year. That really sold it for me. How can anyone say it wasn’t about revenge? I could see maybe giving info to his future team, but to the opponent of your old team?

by Welzy on Nov 2, 2009 8:25 PM CST reply actions  

Yeah, but it's the thought that counts.

Favre denied actually volunteering any usable info, but he did confirm the circumstances surrounding said implication. He also said the Vikings weren’t tampering back then. Do you really believe that?

by Welzy on Nov 2, 2009 8:34 PM CST up reply actions  

There's enough conflicting stories out there that it's really hard to believe anyone

I have my own opinions, but at the end of the day, we have what we have. I’m done with the Favre pissing contests because they are pointless. I care much more about what the Packers are doing now than what Favre might’ve done sometime in the past.

by Danwood on Nov 2, 2009 8:48 PM CST up reply actions  

This message brought to you by the Green Bay Packer "I'm a REAL fan and you're not, na na na na naaaah naaaah!" Defense Council.

Sheesh.

"Remember kids......... petty and cheap shot-ish doesn't make you a true fan, it just makes you petty and cheap shot-ish."

by Themanthemyththelegend on Nov 2, 2009 10:09 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

It's not Sheesh

It’s Puh-leeze! How can you have forgotten your own catchphrase? It’s like Urkel coming out and saying “Am I responsible for that?” Come on now, you’re better than that

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 2, 2009 10:32 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 9:34 AM CST up reply actions  

that's a rec

battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm

by Michael M on Nov 3, 2009 12:39 AM CST up reply actions  

Um

Is one a “frontrunner” if one made the (very difficult) decison in the preseason, when Childress was oh-so-clearly “desperate” & had lost all credibility with his “schismed” team, and the undefeated-in-preseason Packers were being anointed the next Superbowl champions? That, err, screws up your whole “frontrunner” premise, does it not?

It is especially bemusing to me to hear that this can never again be “my” team, given that I own a share of it stock.

Nice try anyway. Funny how folks claiming others are telling them how to think, are claiming that they can say how I & othersdo think. The “if you don’t swear fealty to my beliefs, then I’m locking the clubhouse door” act is the final refuge of those who know they have no other leg to stand on.

by puddnhead on Nov 3, 2009 7:12 AM CST up reply actions  

Speaking of nice tries...

… I guess I missed the Packers being annointed the Superbowl champions in preseason. People were excited, of course, and I know some folks made comments to that effect, but there were jut as many people crushing hard on the Vikes.

Besides, I didn’t say you were front runner for rooting for the Vikings now if that decision was based on a distaste for the way GB handled the Favre situation or a dislike of Thompson. I said you’d be a frontrunner if you come back to the Packers once Favre retired and the Packers looked like the better team than the Vikes.

Before you get all dismissive and righteously outraged, try reading what I said instead of imagining a more easily defeated argument.

What begins in fear usually ends in folly.

by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Nov 3, 2009 6:38 PM CST up reply actions  

They were a lot of people’s sleeper type pick but not many really thought or predicted a super bowl. People that are notoriously Packer lovers (Adam Schein) were riding the Packers jocks but most had them competing with Minny and Chicago for a title in the division with a fairly even split between all of them on who wins. The packers were usually more of the Cinderella.

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 11:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Very good take! you get a rec for that one.

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 11:46 AM CST up reply actions  

agreed

I’ll give a rec for that too

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 3, 2009 12:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Finally something we all agree on

Now if I could just convince you all, that be conceding that, there shouldn’t be any room for “hate” just because of where the “entertainer” does his gig now, or used to do it “then” ;)

by puddnhead on Nov 3, 2009 12:56 PM CST up reply actions  

ugh…MUST you always circle it back…you really want to re-open this wound that we already closed a week ago. geez.

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 1:37 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree that there are many ways to follow sports

The way that I choose does not allow for a guy who was the face of the franchise for 16 years to go play for our biggest rival because he has an easily bruised ego and just shrug it off and say oh well I still think you are perfect. There is no problem with “sports hate.” Thats the way I enjoy sports.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 3, 2009 5:35 PM CST up reply actions  

WAIT! I thought you WEREN’T trying to tell us how we should think or act?? I guess you were!

by TrevorR on Nov 5, 2009 10:27 AM CST up reply actions  

haha

exactly how I felt when I ready your post!

by TrevorR on Nov 6, 2009 10:18 AM CST up reply actions  

Feelin' the love

Gosh guys, umm… I luv you guys, too.

This is embarassing.

by uglyfatpimplynerd on Nov 3, 2009 5:41 PM CST up reply actions  

True.

But I was addressing those who watch sports by picking a team and backing them rather than those who back players or watch for fun. If you’re the former, and you switched allegiances this season (or last), that’s cool, I just think they’re frontrunners if they come back when things aren’t so rosy in the land of the purple. You’re right there’s no one true way to watch sports, but if they’re violating their own previously set rules when they became a fan, I can think less of them for it.

What begins in fear usually ends in folly.

by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Nov 3, 2009 6:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Well if it makes you feel better, I imagine when I “come back” if ever, it will be after TT is canned. And it’s hard to imagine a scenario in which those will be “good times” in Packerland.

by puddnhead on Nov 3, 2009 11:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Eh

You might be surprised. I obviously can’t speak for all current Packers fans, but as far as the ones on this sight go, many of us aren’t huge fans of the things TT has done with the team, which includes myself.

Your probably right though. It would be hard to imagine those being good times.

by packallday555 on Nov 3, 2009 11:19 PM CST up reply actions  

When the time comes that TT is no longer with the Packers

whether that is next year, five years from now, or ten years from now, I will still be a fan of the Packers. Mike Sherman was a horrible GM but that didn’t mean that I didn’t love the Packers anymore. I started loving the Packers when I moved to WI in ’85 as an 8 year old. They were god-awful then but I still loved them (granted I was hardly blasting the GM on blogs back then, but still). If you are imagining that there are people here who would be so brokenhearted when/if TT is fired that they no longer want to stay Packer fans then you are mistaken. You act like this blog would have a black ribbon hanging on the front page so we could all mourn the loss.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 4, 2009 7:03 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I don't get how people can

just hop from team to team either. I won’t say I’m the “realer” fan or fault them for it because I’ve got plenty of other stuff to worry about.

by KC612 on Nov 4, 2009 7:25 AM CST up reply actions  

I am right with packallday and verno. I started cheering for the Packers when I was a kid in the mid 80s. Really rough times. Luckily Favre showed up for my teen years and by the time I moved to MN for college, the Packers were in Super Bowl form. They won the super bowl in my freshman year, it was GREAT being in MN that year. I don’t see how someone can stop being a fan of a team because they don’t like something that is going on…but really once you leave you really can’t come back…it makes you look really bad. If you want to move on, move on, but don’t come back cause times get better. Where is the loyalty? How can you expect a franchise to be loyal to a player when you aren’t loyal to a the team? Seems like a double standard.

I won’t be sad if/when TT goes. If that happens it will probably be warranted. It probably means we’ve had a few years of underperforming though. My guess is McCarthy goes for for Thompson though, he’ll be his scapegoat to buy him about 2 more years here to prove he can do it.

by TrevorR on Nov 4, 2009 9:19 AM CST up reply actions  

How can you expect a franchise to be loyal to a player when you aren’t loyal to a the team?

Forgive my french, but that post hat makes no ’effing sense. And here we go again on the “High Priests” declaring what the rest of the unwashed heathan are and are not allowed to do. Sigh.

How the hell does how loyal fans are have ANYTING to do with how a franchise should treat its players?

I watch the team on Sundays. I didn’t invest my professional career and heart and sould and (literally) blood and guts into it. So yeah there is (should be) more of a relationship between franchise and player than franchise and any given fan. Uh … DOH.

You got to let go of this obsession that your unqestioning loyalty to this organization somehow makes you special, above everyone else, giving you some inalienable right to tell them they are wrong and decree their disenfranchisement if they don’t see things the same way as you about it. It does not, and all that haughtiness is cloying.

by puddnhead on Nov 5, 2009 12:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Don't argue with him

His name used to be “FavreSucks.” Just to give you a frame of reference.

by ktenreb on Nov 5, 2009 6:38 AM CST up reply actions  

wrong

Reply fail. Thanks for playing.

by TrevorR on Nov 5, 2009 10:26 AM CST up reply actions  

It has to do with YOU not the team. I am saying how can YOU come down on a team for not being loyal when you yourself aren’t loyal…its like the pot calling the kettle black. It makes complete effing sense. You read that completely wrong man.

I don’t give the team the benefit of the doubt on everything. I have made dozens of comments questioning decisions in here. I can dislike decisions and not quit being a fan of them. I thought it was a terrible decision when they let Holmgren go cause he wanted more power and then two years later gave an unproven Mike Sherman exactly what Holmgren wanted. I screamed to high heaven when they drafted Harrell. I thought they made a few poor roster decisions at the cuts this year. Still though they are my team. Period. A rough patch doesn’t send me running to the door…I guess it does for you and that is fine but your haughiness about it is getting annoying. If you don’t want to be associated with the team stop visiting our message boards then.

by TrevorR on Nov 5, 2009 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

You read that completely wrong man.

In their defense, it can be tough to read sometimes through those Favre-colored glasses.

But you are spot on in that second paragraph. We choose to follow a team through thick and thin and not cheer for our rival because they now have one of our former players, even if that player is a legendary type of player.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 5, 2009 11:36 AM CST up reply actions  

wow

you weren’t a total dick here. I’ll rec

"Are we doing everything we can to win games, or are we doing everything we can to run a certain thing that we want to run? I want to win, and I want to do whatever it takes to win. At some point you have to take the handcuffs off and let the boys play." - Cullen Jenkins 11/01/09

by PackaCracka on Nov 5, 2009 7:32 AM CST up reply actions  

Bravo you betcha!! Well said TSSC

by whooya on Nov 3, 2009 2:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Favre returning to Green Bay...

Ya know, dishingoutdimes comments are absurd. To assume that you know what goes through Favre’s mind, and his motivation for returning makes you what? Able to leap tall buidings in a single bound?

Your drivel throughout reminds me of a spoiled little kid that can’t get his way. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa….

Favre gave everything he had for your team for 16 years. Never once missing a game. I have been a Packer fan since 1961 and can tell you that he has done more for the Packers than anybody…

He holds every imaginable record for QB’s and has a passes thrown vs interception percentage that is better than all but a handful of players ALL TIME!!!

The facts are that Favre should have been handed the job without question. Everybody knows that now…Aaron will never be a winner like Favre. Statistics are one thing, winning is every-thing. Favre knows how to do that.

To actually boo Favre upon his return shows a lack of class and made GB look like crap to the world.

You people need to grow up. Favre has been good to you, the community, and still speaks highly of you even after being boo’d.

I burned my cheesehead, and now follow the Vikings or wherever else Favre happens to go.

You spoiled GB fans have made yourselves look moronic.

by wingn on Nov 2, 2009 11:42 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

I could careless...

BYE!

Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge

by Bush League All Star on Nov 3, 2009 1:34 AM CST up reply actions  

BYE!

By the way…we don’t miss you. Go to the Vikings chatroom now, they love fans that bail on the team when times are down. You’ll fit in nicely!

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 9:41 AM CST up reply actions  

"Are we doing everything we can to win games, or are we doing everything we can to run a certain thing that we want to run? I want to win, and I want to do whatever it takes to win. At some point you have to take the handcuffs off and let the boys play." - Cullen Jenkins 11/01/09

by PackaCracka on Nov 5, 2009 7:39 AM CST up reply actions  

That's cool.

Just remember to not come back when things change. You’re not wanted, anyway.

What begins in fear usually ends in folly.

by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Nov 6, 2009 11:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Did YOU ACTUALLY WRITE ..."But Brett didn't want to have to compete for anything - not like the other guys out on the practice field who had already poured their hearts out with effort in training camp. He wanted the job to be handed to him."?

Of course he wanted it to be handed to him you moron. He’s fucking Brett fucking Favre!

Ron Wolf DECIDED HE was the best player he’d ever seen.
Favre is the reason Reggie White came – and the subsequent roster.
He’s the reason The PACKERS WERE GOOD AGAIN.
He’s one of the TOP 5 QB’s of ALL FUCKING TIME!!

The readers on this website consist of a greater, more diverse collection than middle school football players, so GET HIRE AN EDITOR or RETIRE!

by m b on Nov 2, 2009 11:54 PM CST reply actions  

"He’s one of the TOP 5 QB’s of ALL FUCKING TIME!!"

I’ll admit, I laughed at this pretty hard. Fan or no fan, anyone who looks at this logically would put him around nine or ten. His records are all based on the law of averages. Peyton Manning will break the touchdown record in fewer games but with about 120 less INTs. He can rest easy though, nobody will touch that record (Unless Delhomme gets to start another ten years) His playoff stats and record is very below average since 1999. He’s had six seasons with 23 or more INTs. Realistically, Favre is a great QB and his biggest strength is his toughness (But you could say the painkiller abuse had something to do with that) But he is far, far, far, far from the greatest and I look forward to the day Peyton breaks his TD record.

by Charlie Kelly on Nov 3, 2009 5:24 AM CST up reply actions  

I still put him in my top 5. Probably at 5 though.

Some guys that get put in there only get put in because of Super Bowl accomplishments which really don’t do it for me. Sure its the ultimate goal but that is a team accomplishment. I want to see someone who plays the position at a REALLY high level for a really long time…a la Marino. Just cause someone doesn’t have the team around them to win a SB doesn’t mean they should be penalized.

by TrevorR on Nov 3, 2009 9:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Same. He will be a top 5 QB...probably at 5.

He is good statistically. With age, he fizzled out at the end of seasons and really was not the clutch QB he was early on.

Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge

by Bush League All Star on Nov 3, 2009 11:10 AM CST up reply actions  

jane fonda

and jane fonda was good looking but lots of people can’t get past she sat on an anti aircraft gun for a photo op in hanoi during the viet nam war, the only reason he wasn’t hung is it is only a game

by daldog on Nov 4, 2009 1:35 PM CST up reply actions  

so GET HIRE AN EDITOR or RETIRE!

This was my favorite line. Of course, if whoever he’s suggesting to retire actually retires they can always change their mind, right?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 3, 2009 8:28 AM CST up reply actions  

get hire an editor?

insult fail

"Are we doing everything we can to win games, or are we doing everything we can to run a certain thing that we want to run? I want to win, and I want to do whatever it takes to win. At some point you have to take the handcuffs off and let the boys play." - Cullen Jenkins 11/01/09

by PackaCracka on Nov 5, 2009 7:35 AM CST up reply actions  

My two cents.

Not that anyone cares, but I could care less how you treat or feel about Brett Favre. I like him as the QB of the Vikes because he has proven to be our best option, but it’s not like he’s my family or close friend so love him or hate him for all I care.

by KC612 on Nov 3, 2009 10:54 AM CST reply actions  

By the way...

What is with all this new traffic? I understand it is good if these are new members. New traffic is welcome if it is truly new.

But…
A lot of these new posters have just joined and basically post here for their first post. If you need to make a new account to post, then why even bother? I understand this is not at all the case for each and every JOIN TODAY, POST TODAY, and NEVER POST AGAIN person, but man up.

Sorry to hijack this! But this is trolling in poor taste. We need consistent trolls! Its much easier to discredit them!

Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge

by Bush League All Star on Nov 3, 2009 11:15 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

What is with all this new traffic? I understand it is good if these are new members. New traffic is welcome if it is truly new.

I was THINKING the same thing (haven’t really posted here, but I do read here often and I know that APC’s comment numbers are generally quite low) until I came into this thread and realized that it is basically 10 guys arguing back and forth amongst each other. Who are all these trolls you’re talking about?

If you can't laugh at yourself... Who can you laugh at?
The Packers, that’s who.
-- The almighty Manimal

by TheViking83 on Nov 3, 2009 1:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Just go through some of the names here and look for those who have fairly low post counts.

You have no need to worry with your 1000+ :P

I run other forums. One thing that sticks out are the people who will flame another but not realize that your IP address is attached to the post. So they believe that making another name instead of their normal Post ID will put them in the clear.

Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge

by Bush League All Star on Nov 3, 2009 10:02 PM CST up reply actions  

I've posted here before.

Not that you care. :D I just think this whole thing has been so overblown by the media. There’s no loyalty in sports anymore (ask Marcus Robinson and Bobby Wade) because it’s more of a business than it used to be. The Almighty $$$ has hijacked the games we love.

by KC612 on Nov 3, 2009 12:29 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

Heh I have seen you post before!

I am talking about the people who have 1 post who recently joined and posted on the same day. :P You have nothing to worry about.

Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge

by Bush League All Star on Nov 3, 2009 9:59 PM CST up reply actions  

And

KC612 always seems to say stuff that is understandable (at least that I can remember). Just cause we don’t see eye to eye doesn’t mean someone is a troll. Legitimate discussion is appreciated and you seem to do that.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 4, 2009 7:06 AM CST up reply actions  

I read the whole dang thread

Get a life Packer lovers/Brett haters.
Football is a business just like every other sport.
People move on.
I’ve been reading all about how Brett’s arm is crap and he’ll throw all of these INT’s and then it was he has no legs ,but after that block where he had to run like 30 yrds for his reciever that stopped.
Next….the Vikes have not played anybody.
I doubt ,but if we do go to the SB and win….then what’s it gonna be?
With the rhetoric that’s been floating around I’m glad to have at least had our two games as wins.
It’s just gotta suck to be on the loosing end!
It’s also gotta suck to know that GB is an average team. Poor O-line to start….you guys better do something against Chi-Town or you’ll really look bad….
Naw…that won’t help either….Life is good as a Viking fan right about now.

by PalisadeKid on Nov 3, 2009 4:16 PM CST reply actions  

Thanks for your opinion
It’s just gotta suck to be on the loosing end!

A Vikings fan would have enough experience to know this, that’s for sure.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 3, 2009 5:37 PM CST up reply actions  

And it sucks

Believe me. We’ve been so close so many times, but just can’t seem to get it done. I’m used to let down. It doesn’t bother me like it used to and if it happens again this year there’s always ice fishin’. :D

by KC612 on Nov 4, 2009 7:20 AM CST up reply actions  

if it happens again this year there’s always ice fishin’. :D

hahahaha, now that’s classic

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Nov 4, 2009 8:30 AM CST up reply actions  

It's obvious..

 That Favre has accomplished one thing he has caused fans to bicker amoung themselves. We are Packer fans regardless of our opinions. We know Favre manipulated the media and definatly got into the heads of our players and coaches alike. He’s as good at reading other people as he is defences. Its funny how crappy teams find away to get to Favre but we can’t even register one lousy sack. I feel he would have to fall down to get one. The Vikes behind Favre got into our heads , just check out the helmet butt penalty. This a man who thrives on adreneline. I’ve seen him go to the side line puke up blood and come in and throw a touchdown. I’ve seen him take on DE’s. I’ve seen him throw a TD with a concusion. When he commits himself he’s almost invinsible. Right now he is motivated by revenge which is a huge adreneline rush to him. He has beaten TT’s Packers twice, next feather in his cap is a SB to complete the cycle. Revenge is a dish best served cold and Favre is on the third and final course. And as far The Queens go I don’t know which would be more entertaining them losing in the playoffs or a fifth SB. HaHa!!

by cheddarhead on Nov 3, 2009 6:43 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Acme Packing Company, the SBNation blog for fans of the Green Bay Packers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gassertaylor_small
APC Open Thread #33: Ron Dayne Thread? Why Not?
Packer_brewer_badger_logo_small
The APC Helmet Logo Bracket Tournament: Sweet Sixteen

Recent FanPosts

Small
When And Why
Small
Where were you?
Ukcat_small
How about a little love for Cobb!!!
Jordy_nelson_small
MVP baby!
Football-funny-pic_small
NFL could add two new teams
Ukcat_small
Nike taking over Jerseys
Small
Free Agency Opinions
Small
NFL needs to fix its playoff system...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Acmepackingco_small Brandon

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Ayrton_senna_1988_canada_small Vermont Cubs Fan

Texbucky_small texwestern

Gassertaylor_small OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Img00243_small Kevin McCauley