Brief Recap: Green Bay Packers Stunned By Bucs 38-28
There's plenty of blame to go around when you lose to the worst team in the NFL. The Packers got outplayed in a lot of ways. QB Aaron Rodgers had his worst game of the season. The offensive line still can't pass protect. And the defense can't make a stop in the red zone. Just a horrible day on special teams too.
Who played the worst in this game? My vote goes to the special teams because they were so badly outplayed.
0 recs |
80 comments
|
Comments
Agreed
Rodgers played like he always does. Regardless if he is a hit away from the IR. lol
It just seems like the players around him just don’t execute like he does.
Grant had a decent game however.
The Special teams were the culprit. And finally someone decided that A.Green shouldn’t be returning kicks!
by CrazyCollegian on Nov 8, 2009 3:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Ahman Green wasn’t bad as a backup RB.
There is one thing that gets me about Aaron Rodgers. He plays well enough. Maybe not so well today. Yet the thing that gets me is that when I watch him, I cannot help but wonder what would happen if we had another certain QB out there. Rodgers does not seem capable of winning games in the 4th quarter. For all his stats, he seems to lack something. There comes a time when it stops becoming “when” will he be good to he is what he is. He is an okay QB that fails when it counts the most. I like Rodgers and hope he does well. I suppose anyone might have trouble behind that line. So why doesn’t the coaching staff go to those quick slants and short passing game that were so effective in 2007 with Favre? Is it because Rodgers is not as good as the old man with those kind of quick reads? It is painfully obvious that he has to get rid of the ball sooner or he’s is going to end up on IR. Favre seemed to execute that game plan perfectly and got the exact same team to an NFC championship game. Maybe it was just Favre adjusting the calls at the line.
This of course brings me to the coaching failures and the GM failures that got this team to where it is today. Maybe Aaron Rodgers would be much better if we got rid of TT and MM. GB must look to the future. It is increasingly apparent that this team is not ready to win NOW. Maybe in a year, two or three. Yet we must get rid of what is blocking the team, the GM and staff.
by starmark on Nov 8, 2009 5:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Shut up
Get over yourself, Favre is gone, he was a traitor and is on the Vikings, I suggest you do the same. I am so sick and tired of hearing about how “if we had 4”, in my opinion they should give that damn jersey to the next rookie QB and end the damn Favre drama once and for all. i Know you’ll start in about how he was run out, I DON’T CARE, he was a damn TRAITOR, and he does not deserve to go inoto the hall with a Green Bay jersey on. Please don’t run your tired crap about how we owe him, or anything else, Favre made the decession after the trade to the Jets (now that could be debatable) to go to the Vikings. HE MADE THE CHOICE, he’s not here anymore, he’s gone, he left.
by ShawnH on Nov 8, 2009 5:26 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
whoa, settle down
I didn’t want to start a fight. I like Rodgers, like I said. I only made a few comments, and I mean them. As for whether or not Favre is a traitor, you’ll have to make up your own mind on that. I do not judge you for your opinion. Take care.
by starmark on Nov 8, 2009 6:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Get over it
You can’t get better until you admit where you are not good. QB is one of the problem areas. You can have the stats. I’ll take the wins.
And for the record, with a healthy Favre, and assuming he were happy becaus he hadn’t been treated like a piece of sh*t by our General Manager and by ingratious “fans” like you, we’d be undefeated.
by ktenreb on Nov 8, 2009 6:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh come one now!
With Favre they would be undefeated?!?!?! Are you kidding me? I can only assume that you are invited over to Thanksgiving at the Favre household after that comment
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Nov 8, 2009 7:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You are stretching it here
You take Rodgers and throw him in with the great o-line the vikes have and he would have them at 7-1 as well. Come on its not Farve that makes that team. Its the whole team….. lol
by whooya on Nov 8, 2009 7:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Farve did have a chance to finish a playoff with the Packers and messed up, Cant wait to see Farve play in the cold and then lets talk about how he is the one that is making the Vikes successful …
by whooya on Nov 8, 2009 7:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bravo
I agree 100% with you Shawn. Lets not even bring Farve into this . Its not Farve that is dragging this team down , he is gone. Its not Rodgers either….. How would you play if you were running for your life half of the time. If he likes to be a Viking let them retire his Jersey when he FINALLY can stick to a decision to retire!!!
by whooya on Nov 8, 2009 7:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
he does not deserve to go inoto the hall with a Green Bay jersey on
Seriously??? Do you guys really mean that? You hate him that bad that you’re willing to overlook his history? Cause I’d love to see Favre go in The Hall as a Viking. I know you recently had to grieve losing him as a player, but if you don’t want his legacy anymore either we’ll be glad to take that too.
by Jayrome007 on Nov 8, 2009 10:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You've been reading my poists from the past few weeks
I don’t care about stats. I care about winning games. Some people are winners, regardless of their stats. Others — not so much.
by ktenreb on Nov 8, 2009 6:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Last I checked
There are 10 other guys on the field at all times. I guess they would all be winners if not for the loser behind center. Right?
What was with Kendall's shaved head?....looks like a fist with eyes.
scsteve (Pirates fan)
Correction: Jason Kendall IS a fist with eyes.
Derek (Brewers fan)
by bluejazz04 on Nov 8, 2009 9:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah but
when Favre played he was so good that he didn’t even need the other 10 guys to be out there sometimes. And when they were out there they obviously cared more because of Brett Favre. I guess its that simple.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Nov 9, 2009 7:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Forget Favre
You continue to devalue the QB position by devaluing Favre. But let’s just forget about him for a mi8nute.
Did Rodgers win the game yesterday when he had a chance to do so? Or did he stink it up? Here’s a hint: P.U.
by ktenreb on Nov 9, 2009 8:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Some people are winners, regardless of their stats. Others — not so much.
You telling me this isn’t a Favre reference?
And no, Rodgers did not win the game at the end when he had a chance to do so. Not denying that. But when the Bucs got a free 7 points on the blocked punt, had to go 10 yards for their first score (off a Rodgers pick) and scored following an 85 yard KO return I don’t think I can hang the loss solely on Rodgers. You don’t seem to have that problem.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Nov 9, 2009 8:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's one of the biggest BS statements I've read here
This isn’t baseball, just because the QB is the most important player on a team doesn’t mean he is the one solely determining whether a team wins or loses. Look at Grossman is 2006, the Bears went 13-3 and to the Superbowl despite Grossman throwing 23 TDs to 20 INTs. Now are you telling me that Grossman is the sole reason that the team got where they did? That he may not put up great stats but he wins games? Putting up great stats and winning games go hand in hand. If a QB throws four picks and no TDs but they still win the game, is it because of said QB?
by Charlie Kelly on Nov 9, 2009 7:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not following you here
Look at the game yesterday.
Yesterday, trailing by 5, a rookie QB on the worst team in the league put his team into the end zone to take the lead. He then converted the two-point conversion. Then, we get the ball back with 3 1/2 minutes or so, down by 3. Our QB, the guy with the best stats in the league, stinks it up. You can make all the excuses you want about how offensive linemen need to give him more than 8 seconds to find somebody open; the bottom line is he didn’t deliver. Again. The reason is that he lacks vision.
Small aside: I don’t mind the last interception. I was kind of glad to see it in a way, because it showed me that Rodgers WILL take a chance if he absolutely has to. Of course, I’d rather it not be on 4th-and-53, but at least he didn’t take the sack.
by ktenreb on Nov 9, 2009 7:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That rookie QB also got the help of an 85 yard kick return,
But how are you not seeing my point? You keep blaming losses solely on Rodgers talking about how it’s just stats. Wouldn’t putting up good stats help put your team in a position to win? If he throws for almost 400 yards and three TDs and the team loses, it’s his fault? I don’t get your logic here. Yesterday’s game for example. Rodgers didn’t play well at all, I’m not going to try and defend that but there were many errors by people not wearing a number 12 that attributed to this loss.
by Charlie Kelly on Nov 9, 2009 9:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Last post on this
Rodgers was one of many players/coaches who stunk yesterday. As bad as they ALL played, however, Rodgers had a chance to pull it out at the end. He didn’t even come close.
by ktenreb on Nov 9, 2009 9:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You still haven't answered my question about how stats mean nothing.
by Charlie Kelly on Nov 9, 2009 9:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And you won't get an answer
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Nov 9, 2009 9:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's there
Unless you just don’t want to acknowledge it. That, unfortunately, is the problem with too many of you “fans.” You aren’t REAL Packer fans, you are Rodgers and Thompson fans.
by ktenreb on Nov 9, 2009 9:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This isn't about Thompson ro Rodgers
I just don’t understand how you can say a QB wins or loses games. And you’ve done nothing to counter my argument other than posting the same tired thing over and over. If a QB throws for 400 yards and 3 TDs but the team still loses, is it fault? On the opposite spectrum, if a QB throws for 100 yards and three INTs, is he the reason they won. Stats are what show how a player contributed to the game. Sure, they can be deceiving as to how much a player actually contributed to the outcome of the game. But more often than not, they are a reflection of that player’s importance. But wins and losses should not be attributed to a QB. Just because they are the most important and often leaders of the team doesn’t mean they are the sole reason for victory and defeat.
by Charlie Kelly on Nov 9, 2009 10:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Look again
With the team down by 3 late in the game and with the ball, does the QB make the plays to win the game? Or are there a million excuses as to why he didn’t? At that point of the game, IT’S ON THE QUARTERBACK! It doesn’t matter if he’s already thrown four touchdown passes — when you need a score, you need your quarterback to step up. Stats mean squat.
Josh Freeman (I think that was his name, you know, the rookie QB for the Bucs yesterday) did what quarterbacks are supposed to do with the game on the line: He threw a touchdown pass. Again, make all the excuses you want about how he got the benefit of the big kickoff return or anything else, but in the end he did the job. I salute him, the mother $^%. I don’t salute Rodgers for his game .
The BUCS, for cripessake!
by ktenreb on Nov 9, 2009 10:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't deny
that Rodgers had an opportunity to win the game at the end and did not get the job done. That is plainly obvious. But the fact that Rodgers had to go 80+ yards and Freeman had to go 15+ yards is not an excuse, its the circumstances of the game. And whether you like it or not, it has to be considered. The truth of the matter is that stats do mean something. They are not the most important thing, that stat is wins, just like you say. But they give you an way to judge a particular player. As pointed out before, by your logic Rex Grossman and Kyle Orton are good QB’s. Is that your position?
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Nov 9, 2009 10:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, when Rodgers needed to, he didn't drive them down to win the game.
But that doesn’t mean stats are pointless. If a QB throws four TDs in a game, he is doing his best to put them in a position to win. Now if the defense and special teams give up five TDs, is it said QBs fault they lost?
And I like how you just throw out the kick return as meaningless solely because it doesn’t support your argument. But like verno said, there is a huge difference between driving 15 yards for the score and driving 80.
I will make no excuse for Rodgers as he played poorly that game. But to say that his stats are meaningless and that he isn’t a winner is ridiculous. And you still haven’t provided a counter argument for how wins and losses should be put solely on the QB.
by Charlie Kelly on Nov 9, 2009 10:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would understand your argument if and only if...
Our team was a clone of 22 AR’s on both sides of the ball and on special teams. Instead of looking at why Rodgers couldn’t win the game—which I do agree he sucked in that aspect—but why couldn’t one player make a tackle or be in position to make a tackle on the long kick off return? Or our defense make a stop on the last couple of TD’s by the Bucs? I understand it would have been nice to get an 80+ yard drive to win it, but there is a lot of burden of blame to go around.
Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge
by Bush League All Star on Nov 9, 2009 2:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Another certain QB?
He would be getting killed behind that line.
by Bratwurst on Nov 8, 2009 9:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you may be right
Favre has been sacked quite a bit this year too if I’m not mistaken. I think something like 18 or 19 times. I haven’t checked the stats so I could be wrong. Yet from what I read it isn’t the number of times he has been sacked, it is also the hits he has taken. Favre has lost some of his famous elusiveness that he was always known for. My point was that he knows how to get rid of the ball to avoid the sack. Sometimes that has led to INTs. One thing that has also done is kept him healthy for an incredible amount of time. Yet if he has indeed lost a step, then he might be getting sacked a lot more just like Rodgers, IF he played behind the same line that AR has to play behind.
Nothing is for certain unless we actually see it for real. Everything else is just conjecture.
This is why I blame those at the top who are supposed to put people out there to protect the QB. I also blame the coach for not making adjustments. Maybe a young, agile QB could get rid of the ball faster. I don’t know. But most of the blame goes to TT and MM. Favre was only a secondary thought in my post, just a comparison and nothing more. If some people read more into what I wrote, then perhaps I need to adjust how I write. Either that or some people need to relax whenever they see or hear the name Favre. He’s gone for now. Get over it, if it bothers you so much. Personally, I don’t see the problem. I am a Packer fan.
by starmark on Nov 8, 2009 10:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it was just Favre adjusting the calls at the line.
this is my opinion also for why McCarthy was so successful in 2007
id rather have a 24 year old (human years) dog that has advanced parkinson’s batting for our team than vlad.
-BoeJouma
by blackoutsox on Nov 8, 2009 10:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He made it look easy sometimes
I think that is because he had such a good relationship with Driver. That is not to say that the other WRs did not benefit. I remember when Favre broke the record for most TDs against Minnesota. Sharper bragged how he would get INTs or something. Yet Favre came in and just picked them apart. That play to Jennings for the record was great. There are so many fantastic memories Favre gave us.
In any case, like some others said, this isn’t about Favre. I’m reminiscing about an athlete that is playing for another team right now. The problems are with the Packers and that is where we should keep our focus.
Yes, Favre probably made McCarthy look good. I don’t think he is much of a coach and hasn’t done much since Favre left. Yet there were injuries. Still, yet again, when I watch the games, I don’t see a lot of adjustments or the kind of things I would like to see from a head coach to make me feel comfortable about Green Bay’s situation. Too many penalties and such. 3 Packers recently got fined by the NFL. Lack of discipline points directly to the coaching.
by starmark on Nov 8, 2009 11:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You're Right !
For all the tallent Rodgers has, he is missing the savyness that Favre always has showed.
Rogders has a great arm, all the throws in the book, he can also run the ball when needed, but the way he plays… He’ll end up on IR. Ok, every QB will have a bad game once in a while, that’s human nature, but the way Rodgers played yesterday was beyond bad.
the main reason for the loss to the Bucs was Rodgers inability to make a decission and throw the ball! ALL, and I do mean ALL of the 6 sacks yesterday was a direct result of Rodgers holding the ball too long.
The offenisve line did not play great yesterday, but they played way better than earlier this year, Rodgers had a lot of time yesterday, this is the kind of play I would have expected for the first part of last season, by now he should have learned that unless you have great proteciton, you need to get rid of the ball within 3 seconds after the snap. Rodgers is far away from being a rookie, he spent 3 years as an understudy to one of the greatest QBs in NFL history, and is now in the middle of his second season as a starter, and he’s still makeing that crutial rookie mistake of holding on to the ball! Josh Freeman, who started his first game did the excact oposite for most of the game ! I don’t know what Rodgers see coverage wise during the play, but in the NFL, you can not wait for your guy to get open all the time, you’ve got to anticipate were he gets open, and throw the ball before his break, Rodgers has the arm and accuracy, he needs to trust it and throw!
Rodgers also need to make better pre snap reads, I remember one play in particular from yesterday, it was in the first half, to his left, the cb is about 8! yds of, that’s a gimme quickslant or quick out, I did not see if Rodgers looked left before that snap, but after the snap, he takes a 3-step drop, looking to his right all the way, and throws the ball over his doublecovered receiver and oob.
There is also a major problem with playcalling ! The WCO is based on short safe passes and then taking the occational shot down field when oportunity knocks, not the other way around. McCarthy seems to want a TD on every play. This is the same mistake they made in the Cowboys game in 2007, when they started out with deep passes to strech the defense, when Favre got knocket out, they went back to the short passes, and Rodgers almost made it a comeback win. However that was a completely different scenario, they were 10-1 faceing a 10-1 opponent on the road, and with a veteran QB, they could afford to have a gutsy gameplan, unfortuneatly, the protection fell appart on two key plays in that game. Now, they were 4-3 faceing an 0 -7 opponent on the road, they have struggled with protection all year, then you go back to the basic short passing game, 1 and 3 step drops or shotgun, short routs, get rid of the ball, and then when the defense adjust, you go deep.
The key factor why the horrible playcalling did not show up as a problem before 2008 is now wearing purple, much thanks too TT and MM.
Sure, the defense did not play great in this one, special teams were bad, that blocked punt was horrible, but the Packers were still up by 11 after that. The defense got put in a though spot with bad field position most of the time, caused by an offence who can’t convert on 3rd down.
Packers are now 4-4, the playoff chances is fadeing rapidly, especially if you look at the upcoming schedule. Mike McCarthys seat should be redhot by now (and TTs …) It was easy for MM and TT to look good when they had an offesive coordinator on the field, who lead a team nobody saw as a contender in august to the NFC Championship game.
Rodgers, what do we have in him? he has great stats, and a lot of tallent, but he’s not winning football games, he’s still makeing to many rookie mistakes, if he does not end up on IR, forcing the situation, once the playoff hopes goes down the drain, it might be smart to see what we have in Matt Flynn….
Mark Murphy needs to make a phonecall … if he wonders who to call, he need to walk less than a qtr mile east of Lambeau and look at a street sign ! TT is not smart enough, and he surly want make that call either, since then, someone deserving would get the credit for getting the team back on track !
by Jarlsberg on Nov 9, 2009 3:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh
Are you really suggesting that we bench Rodgers in favor of Matt Flynn, just to kill time until we can somehow convince Favre to come back? Did Rodgers play great yesterday? No way. Was the O-line shameful in pass-protection again? No doubt. Was playcalling rather suspect at times? Thats a big yes. The one that stuck out to me was with around 8 min left in the game. They gave Ahman Green back to back carries with 8 min left in order to get him the franchise rushing record and ended up trying a screen on 3rd down that failed. With a 5 point lead I thought that was a very bad decision. I am glad Green got the record but couldn’t he have been given the chance later on in the drive after we have picked up a few more first downs?
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Nov 9, 2009 8:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Benching ?
No, not benching Rodgers, but giving Flynn some playing time, this might also give Rodgers an incent to improving himself, if he see that his job is challenged.
by Jarlsberg on Nov 11, 2009 9:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Favre and retirement
Okay, let’s play out a little ficticious scenario here. Let’s say the Vikings go to the SB. Win or lose Favre would have accomplished his goal/hopes. That would leave the possibility of one last season for Favre (given he is still healthy). Remember, as his arm is now he is throwing bullets!
Now, as said I am a Vikings fan, but, nothing would warm my football fan heart more than seeing Farve go back to Green Bay for his final season, nothing. what a special homecoming it would be for you and for him. But, could this even be possible? NOPE! Read this article from Jason Whitlock from Fox Sports.
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/10325372/It’s-the-Truth:-Favre’s-proving-Thompson-wr
I didn’t realize all of what had actually occured over that period. As long as TT and MM are there this is a stupid discussion. But, if your executive committe finally has enough and dumps them both…then…hired someone like Mariucci (sp?) I actually could see this as a possibility. And I’ll tell you what, the Vikings would let him go home!
The problem? What about Rogers? He is the Packer future. Could they team up together? (and this time Rogers might learn something) I’ll even bet Favre would love the arrangment. Possible? I doubt it. there are just too any egos involved and it could push Rogers out the door. You don’t want or need that.
Still, that could be the ultimate mentor program. And what about beyond his retirement, do you think Favre could contribute as a QB coach? Maybe even Head Coach down the line???
Man, wouldn’t it be a beautiful thing?
by tehar on Nov 9, 2009 12:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I appreciate your candor
regarding your view as coming from a Vikings fan perspective. The article by Fatlock is his typical drivel. I’m amazed he actually wrote about the situation at all considering that race can’t be factored into the equation.
It would be an extremely cold day in hell before Favre actually suited up for the Packers again. Not saying that he couldn’t be back at some point for a jersey retirement, Packers HOF induction, etc. but there is simply no way that he could come back as a player. Regardless of whether or not TT/MM are still there (certainly up for debate) there is no way that Favre could team up with anyone at the QB position and be happy. Favre would (and did) HATE the arrangement. He has absolutely no interest in mentoring anyone and went out of his way to prove that by freezing out Rodgers for 2 years. He would also make a horrible QB coach or Head Coach, imo, because his fundamentals have never been his strong suit. To his credit it rarely, if ever, affected his play in a negative fashion, but its not what anyone would recommend to an up and coming QB. Historically there have been very few superstars in any sport that turn out to be good Head Coaches, so that’s not a knock on Favre. Besides, just imagine the scenario when the Head Coach wants to wait until after training camp is over to make up his mind about whether or not he will coach this season. That would be a doozy.
I’m not trying to be argumentative here, just letting you know that Fatlock is not the best source for information on this subject. There are plenty of “local” writers who can give you proper information from either point of view on this discussion.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Nov 9, 2009 1:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"For all the tallent Rodgers has, he is missing the savyness that Favre always has showed."
For some perspective, lets go back to Favre’s first 24 starts. Rodger’s has better stats than Favre did at this point, but lets leave those aside, since they are “meaningless.” Did Favre exhibit the same “savvyness” then that he does now? Of course not. He got sacked quite a few times himself, threw more INTs, and struggled too. I think a lot of you people forget that Favre was once a young QB too, making plenty of his own mistakes. Much like Rodgers, he showed lots of potential, and he wasn’t a Hall-Of-Famer, or even a Future Hall-Of-Famer yet. The difference is, Favre didn’t have to constantly put up with living in anyone else’s shadows, and have fans constantly draw comparisons.
I’m not saying Rodgers is destined for the HOF. But have some perspective and cut the guy some slack. Would you prefer to have a guy like Anderson, T-Jack, or Russel? Consider yourself lucky we even have a guy like Rodgers instead of those guys.
What was with Kendall's shaved head?....looks like a fist with eyes.
scsteve (Pirates fan)
Correction: Jason Kendall IS a fist with eyes.
Derek (Brewers fan)
by bluejazz04 on Nov 10, 2009 12:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Did Favre exhibit the same "savvyness" then that he does now? Of course not. He got sacked quite a few times himself, threw more INTs, and struggled too. I think a lot of you people forget that Favre was once a young QB too, making plenty of his own mistakes. Much like Rodgers, he showed lots of potential, and he wasn’t a Hall-Of-Famer, or even a Future Hall-Of-Famer yet. The difference is, Favre didn’t have to constantly put up with living in anyone else’s shadows, and have fans constantly draw comparisons.
This is an excellent point. Check out Favre’s stats from the first two seasons and you’ll see he took 34 and 30 sacks in his first two seasons. The first year he had an 18-13 TD-INT ratio but that went to 19-24 in year two. But the Packers had been SO BAD for SO LONG that Favre didn’t have anything to live up to. I don’t recall people clamoring for the return of the Majik Man. They were patient and allowed him to develop, which apparently is a luxury that Rodgers should not be afforded.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Nov 10, 2009 7:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, you can compare stats all you want. how about comparing GAMES WON !
Brett Favre throwing ints ?? no shit, yes he has quite a few. he has the record both for TDs and INTs, not excatly news.
Favre has also been sacked more than average (I guess) with the most 40 sacks in 1996 (now how did the ‘96 season for the Packers ??)
Rodgers has so far this year, been sacked 37 ! times, in 8 games ! he’s actually on pace for beating David Carrs single season “record” that’s actually realistic, if you look at the Packers schedule.
How about looking a bit behind those stats, the background of these players.
Favre came out of Southern Miss, Rodgers from Cal, not really hard to see Rodgers has an advandtage, the Cal program is a lot more suited for preparing a QB for the NFL.
Favre spent his first season as the Falcons 3rd QB, running the scout team in practice, that virtually made him a rookie when he came to Green Bay, he then got tossed in to action in the third game, which turned him into an instant hero with a comeback win, then beating the Steelers the next week in his first start.
Favre had no pressure, he didn’t replace a ledgend, but his knowledge of the offense and expericence was virtualy none.
Rodgers spent 3 seasons with the Packers as an understudy to Favre, he was much better prepared when he took over.
He also took over a 13-3 team… Favre took over a 2-14 team. … how thoose teams compare tallentwise would probably show a lot more tallent around Rodgers than Favre had around him back in ’92
Fact is, Rodgers is a game manager, who can make big plays, when everything around him works well. Favre is a gamebreaker, he can take a broken play and turn it into a BIG play, he can take a team after a troubled start and win the game.
Sure, he can also loose a game with a bonehead int, but fact is, Packers won a of games for the Packers, with his imporvisation skills.
by Jarlsberg on Nov 11, 2009 9:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What's Up guys?
Why do you kill threads????
by Some other guy who does not care on Nov 8, 2009 3:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I said it earlier on another thread
Can we PLEASE fire McCarthy. He was out coached today, and he does not motivate his players!!!!!!
by ShawnH on Nov 8, 2009 4:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm also now convinced
that this team is badly coached. Yes, we’re still short a little talent (especially on the OL) and some of our talent could mature some.
But MM and his staff has to go.
Best game I ever attended was the 163rd game last year.
by NorthSidePaulie on Nov 8, 2009 7:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
wishing
I sure wish there was a way for all us Packer fans to get the point across to the big boys to get rid of MM.. Its frustrating cause there is nothing we can do about it. Sad to have to watch a good team go down because of MM.. So Sad!! Been here before though in longer stretches with the Packers losing..being a fan for 45 years or better. I will support my Packers though through it all once again….
by whooya on Nov 8, 2009 7:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and by the way
Why is it for the last 2 years EVERYONE on the PACKERS gets injured. Were is are strengthing coach.
by ShawnH on Nov 8, 2009 4:17 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
We got out coached
No fire, no determination. They thought they had the game won through the entire game.
by ShawnH on Nov 8, 2009 4:28 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
4-12
If the packers keep playing like this, perhaps they should so the joke of coaching is ejected and a draft pick can revive this pathetic show we all saw today.
by tkiller314 on Nov 8, 2009 4:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Remind me of early 2000's Vikings
Terrible defense. A fat dumb coach. An offense that can score quickly in the passing game but can also go dormant for long periods of time. A qb who can scramble and put up big yardage numbers but can’t score in the clutch to win. Rodgers is like a white daunte culpepper with bigger hands. And most of all this uncanny ability to either obliterate the opponent or lose a competitive game. They get blown out about as rarely as they win a game in the 4th quarter. Once or twice a season. Horrifically bad special teams. Penalties called on them constantly.
I am a Vikings fan primarily and can say that these Packers really, really remind me of so many somewhat bad to average to pretty decent Culpepper led teams. It seems like they have all the potential in the world to do great things but they consistently don’t get the desired result on game day.
Bummer. The post Favre era isn’t quite going as planned. But this game today was hard fought and was closer than the final score indicated. I wouldn’t quite call it a moral victory but the Pack did hang pretty tough at a hard stadium to play in. They’ll get ’em next time.
by Sand0 on Nov 8, 2009 7:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the pep talk
I doubt most of us feel like being cheered up. But for a Viking fan, I at least appreciate your candor. You are courteous. Good luck to your team…sort of. (I’d rather we catch up and win, but I know that is not likely at this point.)
by starmark on Nov 8, 2009 11:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rodgers and hanging onto the ball.....
Rodgers hangs onto the ball wayyy to long.Maybe he’s dellusions of grandeur,and thinks the football is his Academy award!!
AS for Fats McCarthy,he needs a lifetime membership to Jenny Craig.I’ve had it with his fat spare tire of a tummy….
And Thompson.Well we all know why he is in the press box by himself…
HE’S GETTING LITTLE TEDDY BLOWN!!!!!!!!
I was a Packer fan,under Thompson did an unpardonable sin,and traded Brett away.
(Thompson may you smoke a turd in hell)
by brettfavre4ever on Nov 8, 2009 8:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
yikes
TT is responsible for Justin Harrell and the o-line. MM is responsible for the penalties. But the special teams? two weeks in a row – say what you want about Favre and Freeman, but the kick off returns last week and the kickoff and punt returns this week doomed Green Bay. The Pack had a chance to make it 28-14 at the end of the first half and could not move the ball. Why? I guess this is just not a particularly good team that is not particularly well-coached.
by cubmanbudfan on Nov 8, 2009 8:56 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
"Special" Teams
When you have a punt blocked for a TD and then let a guy run 85 yards after you should have put the game out of reach – thats a problem.
Also the O-line is pretty poor
by Bratwurst on Nov 8, 2009 9:48 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Somebody may get fired this week
Slocum or Campen – take your pick
by Bratwurst on Nov 8, 2009 9:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Slocum and Campen
Can I get a brief refresher on who these two are again? I’ve heard their name mentioned before (in a negative light) but I always thought it was someones horrible spelling of Campman and some irrelevant special teamer I wouldnt recognize anyways. Help a Viking fan better understand your team by explaining who they are and why they deserve hate.
by Jayrome007 on Nov 8, 2009 10:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Special Teams coaches
id rather have a 24 year old (human years) dog that has advanced parkinson’s batting for our team than vlad.
-BoeJouma
by blackoutsox on Nov 8, 2009 10:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Special teams and O-line coaches
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Nov 9, 2009 8:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rodgers, Over and OUT!
That’s it! No more talk about Aaron Rodgers is this next great Packer QB of all time. Yes the O-Line is not what it used to be and early this season what downright ugly….however, the O-Line is actually doing better as evidenced by the facts that the ground gain is now getting 100+ yards per game (and even per rusher, per game) and that the number of outright, “jailbreak” rush to the QB, plays have dropped dramatically. The O-Line is giving Rodgers some, reasonable time, to make a quick decision and get rid of the ball…bottom line…he isn’t…and THAT more than anything is the cause of the majority of the sacks.
I know that SOME wanna-be fans are making this WHOLE SEASON about Brett vs Ted…and yeah, I get it…I have my side that I have choosen in that battle too. But can we put that aside for ONE SECOND and just look at this team (and each piece of it) in completely honest eyes for a momment?
Does Aaron have a crazy big and accruate arm? Yes. Does that make an NFL QB? No! He can read a defense, but he doesn’t seem to be able to do more than call what the defense is…no ability to visualize a play as it forms against that defense to give him an idea of where to look right away for the open men in his checks. He also is younger and is very moble…he can rush the ball if need be. However, he doesn’t move in the pocket well, he doesn’t have that peripheral sense to know where to and not to step, and so mostly…he just doesn’t stay in the pocket. He drops to the top of the pocket and then rolls to either side when it starts to break down because he holds on to the ball too long, which puts the linemen in a bad situation to either let thier guy go or hold. Not recognizing these truths is in NO WAY helping Rodgers develop. If we, as fans, continue to gloss over these facts (since obviously the coaching staff seems to be), then there will be no pressure to get those corrections made and the longer that goes…the harder and harder it will be to re-train him.
Another thing…and I’ll bring Favre into this point…I think Aaron lacks the heart of a winner, like the one that Brett has and other QB’s have. When I watch Aaron play, I see Aaron making the best passes that will work out the best for Aaron…not necessarily the team. What I mean by that is, when we had Brett we all knew Brett was going to throw some interceptions. It’s not that Brett liked throwing picks, he was just willing to throw a pass up for grabs to make a play to advance the drive or get the score. Aaron isn’t willing to do the same. So while it most certainly helps Aarons stats (like the all encompassing Passer Rating…UGH!), it’s also showing up on the stat that means the most…wins and losses. Sure, the Pack died on Bretts arm, but the Pack also lived on Bretts arm and it lived to win alot more than it lost. I would rather watch a team or a player, roll the dice to win the game, then play it safe as so not to lose a game.
by Alphapotent on Nov 8, 2009 10:15 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
its the guys second season
starting. He doesnt have the experience of Farve and is able to shred the slightest defensive mistake. Farve is probably the only QB (maybe peyton too) that can do that because he has played for so long. That is why he is so effective now. Farve wasnt that great early on either. Look at Rodgers now, he just needs to read the defense and make the throws every week until he learns whats what. Look at the second half of the second Vikings game, the oline didn’t gell, he just started understanding the defense after fighting them the first half. We just need to stick with Rodgers and give him the experience and Oline needed and in a year or two the fireworks and wins will be back in Green Bay.
In all fairness, being tutored by Farve probably gave us a little too high expectations for Rodgers.
I think Aaron lacks the heart of a winner
really? way to overanalyze and bail out on him early
id rather have a 24 year old (human years) dog that has advanced parkinson’s batting for our team than vlad.
-BoeJouma
by blackoutsox on Nov 8, 2009 10:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"I think Aaron lacks the heart of a winner"
Yes…because only stat-focused losers who don’t care make TD-saving SOLO tackles after they throw an INT. Where the hell do you people get this stuff?
What was with Kendall's shaved head?....looks like a fist with eyes.
scsteve (Pirates fan)
Correction: Jason Kendall IS a fist with eyes.
Derek (Brewers fan)
by bluejazz04 on Nov 10, 2009 12:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He was just trying to improve his tackle totals. Doesn’t that factor into the QB rating? I mean, why else would he do it?
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Nov 10, 2009 8:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No...it's the guys 5TH SEASON
Yeah, sorry, but when you give a rookie QB that is the hope for the future of a franchise a year to sit, watch and learn and see those results on the field vs those QB’s that had to play their first year…no…sorry…the “it’s his second season!” argument doesn’t hold water at all. Now…I will give you that I don’t know what more sitting for a second and third season adds to a QB that just playing ball does, so I will conceed a bit to the point that, he really isn’t the five seasons that his resume shows…but he’s not a second season QB either…so let’s split the difference and call him a 3rd year QB.
Next, the whole point I am making is that NO ONE is talking about Aaron’s defiencies at QB, which are most definately there. You have an absolute point about Brett when he was younger and still a rough colt…but the difference is that…the fans KNEW IT! We would boo him for making dumb throws! But everyone knew that we didn’t do it out of ill will or spite…but because we, as fans…were also trying to teach him about being a QB. We would also cheer him when he would throw a ball away! Just to show him, that is was ok to do so! Packer fans used to be the most intelligent football fans in the country…bar none! Now…no so much.
So I took this opportunity, while making this point to highlight every single place and piece of Arrons game that needs improvement in the hopes that, maybe the Packer fans who were just as much of a part of the maturation process of Brett Favre, will remember that time and what roll we played and do the same for Aaron. Because the coaching staff, flat out isn’t.
by Alphapotent on Nov 8, 2009 11:07 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I like this post
Especially the part about the fans cheering a throw away. Very relevant. Favre would throw into triple coverage and get picked, Aaron holds the ball and gets sacked.
Aaron is not beyond criticism. He did not have a great game yesterday. I think he will be fine as he matures, if he gets a decent line in front of him. And a competent coaching staff that can mold and direct young talent into a winner. Those are the biggest deficiencies right now.
There has been talk about a lack of a winner’s mindset in Rodgers. How about the same for the defense? Rodgers may not eventually develop into a HOF QB, but how many teams go years before finding a QB of quality? Crapshoots in the draft that don’t pan? Rex Grossmans and Tavaris Jacksons? Hell Trent Dilfer won a Super Bowl…
Best game I ever attended was the 163rd game last year.
by NorthSidePaulie on Nov 9, 2009 7:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How many times can you say that
Sure, leave your new QB already. And then maybe Favre will somehow change his mind, and break his contract and come back. It does not matter how much he tries, you Favre lovers will always say he sucks. So he had a bad game, #4 never did that. Address the real problem, the coach. Somebody stated, well it was special teams, but who is OVER ALL responsible for everything on the team, maybe the HEAD COACH. There is no fire, no sense of urgency in every game. I see the post were someone stated Rogers lacks the heart of a winner, Ok…. I guess I can see that, although the 12 yard touchdown run seemed to suggest other wise, but if thats what you feel, I can kind of see it. But the COACH should be the one who is getting everyone motivated, helping them want to win.
by ShawnH on Nov 9, 2009 12:58 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Just a thought
But it seems to me that this is not just a one time deal. I know I maybe wrong here, I have not checked my facts, but have we just seem to be playing half the games since about 1999. We lost Holgrem (and gave what he wanted to Sherman when he came to town) Rhodes never really got a chance, and we floundered under Sherman for what seemed like an eternity. McCarthy had one lucky season, and then disaster. So what has been missing for 10 years or so? What did Mike H. have that the other 3 didn’t? I think, really, the ability to stand up to thier players and COACH them. Not trying to be thier friend, make them accountable. Will some body please bring in a Bill Cowher, or the Tuna, a hard knocks football coach that would get in someones face when they fall apart. Someone who maybe take Rogers aside and say, “3 seconds kid, that’s what I give you, 3 seconds and get rid of the ball, or I find someone else!” (That is not a knock on Rogers, I think he’s going to be a monster when/if he’s coached right). Someone who understands that even if your going to a 3-4 maybe, just maybe the leagues second best pass rusher (Kampman) should be doing just that (RUSHING THE PASSER). And how about MAYBE, JUST MAYBE a coach that would do something to a player that causes one stupid penalty after another. Can anyone say stopping a TRAITOR on 3rd and whatever on the what 11 yard line, to force them to stick to a field goal, and somebody ……. oh I don’t know ……. what could be something that NO ONE would ever do in that instance, wait how about head butt one of the opposing players!!!!!
by ShawnH on Nov 9, 2009 1:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Up and down Green Bay fans
I don’t really agree with any of you. I’m a Viking fan and watched Brett carve us to shreds for many years. I’ve always admired his leadership and the way your franchise, the fans and Favre have played with such pride. It’s just not there right now and this is a leadership issue. So my perspective on Rogers’ talents are different then yours.
Look, you guys have a good squad! Plenty good to be 5-3 or 6-2. The problem (I’m sorry) is Rogers. Watch the film he won’t throw the ball if he doesn’t have an easy advantage and he never looks off his primary targets, especially deep (great for stats). Watch todays Inteceptions closely. Today he threw into triple coverage on both that I saw. Neither time was the receiver in a good position to make a play on the ball. What bothered me most was there were, on both, 2 receivers right at the 1st down markers standing wide open. Now you tell us why he won’t throw under the coverage?
My take is that he is selfish. You’ve got the top rated quarterback and he’s lost how many games he should of had a chance to win? Critcize Favre for his INT’s but when the game was on the line you could be sure he was going for it! Rogers won’t allow his “stats” to be damaged. That’s pathetic and it surely doesn’t indicate he’s in it for the team and surely not for you…his fans. There was 3:45 left in the game when MN scored the last TD, did you watch how Rogers threw the ball after that? It was pathetic. Favre would have gotten you at least one more TD and likely would have been fighting for the game winner by the end. Boys, this is about character.
Also, your comments on the O-line I do NOT agree with. Go look at the tapes. Rogers is getting how many seconds per throw? I didn’t count but it is easily between 3 to 5 seconds. Sorry gang but that is darn good. He can’t find a target with that much time…GEES. The fact is he can’t find a target HE wants.
You are also enduring some terrible coverage issues in the secondary and they’re looking worse every game. Boys, it aint your players. They’re good. Just watch the film (over and over). They look like they’re not sure what their assignments are. This one is without a doubt coaching.
I heard one announcer and many of you here blaming the offensive line. Now, not to bring up Favre but how much time would he need? He’s been like that since his first year in GB. This one you either got…or you don’t. Pocket awareness? How “aware” do you have to be around the 6 second mark. Heck, you’re going to get clobbered!
You guys need to start really watching the films and I mean NOT where the ball is. You’re going to see a whole different problem. You’ve got a good group that’s totally being lead in the wrong way.
Hang in there something has to change. It will.
by tehar on Nov 9, 2009 1:51 AM CST reply actions 3 recs
Thqt's what I've been saying for the past three weeks
But you said it much better. I gave you a “rec.”
by ktenreb on Nov 9, 2009 7:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"Almost" +1
Rec’d anyway. I’m not quite buying “selfish” and “good OL”, but I have seen the open receivers on occasoion. The bad throws on the 3:57 left drive after the Vikings last TD. And the lousy secondary coverage (I think the safeties more than the corners although I have some issues with Harris sometimes).
Some of the sacks have been WAY less than “3-5 sec” (some not). Perhaps some “personal stats” thinking on Rodgers part. I’ve seen some bad but also VG pocket awareness too, BTW.
I’m with you that that there’s talent on the team, possibly including some raw talent in some areas of the OL, and possible deficiencies in the secondary (I think Woodson is fine, albeit probably near the window closing time). I think it’s (almost) entirely about the coaching now.
Best game I ever attended was the 163rd game last year.
by NorthSidePaulie on Nov 9, 2009 8:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess
that 76 yd TD to Jones on the first drive was an easy advantage, huh? Rodgers is not without fault (unlike some others) but to say that he is a selfish player who is only concerned with his stats is unfair. That Bucs had 14 points on a blocked punt and an easy score off a 85 KO return. What did Rodgers have to do with that?
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Nov 9, 2009 8:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed from another Vikes fan
I find myself mostly agreeing with Tehar – the only 2 things I don’t quite agree with is that I think the current O-line is pretty crummy but I do agree that it’s very possible that a lot of the issues are Rodgers himself, in specific situations. The other thing I don’t agree with is that the Secondary issues are coaching – I think it’s just an older group of guys and eventually, you lose a bit of the luster on your skills. Al Harris, while stile the same ol’ cheapshot some folks love and some folks hate, seems much more susceptible to being targeted 1v1. Woodson has held up better but he’s hardly been perfect, either. Maybe it’s time for an infusion of new blood into that Secondary?
Sucks to lose a game like this, that’s for sure. No one wants to get beat by a win-less squad. :(
by Wytefang on Nov 9, 2009 7:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Although I Tend to disagree
I don’t stand with your earlier comments. I think Rogers is good, as good as Favre, I know you won’t see that so we dissagree. The problems that you raise are good ones, and are all easily fixed by having a coach with some mental strenght in him to teach his young QB what he’s not doing right. I think MM got spoiled by coming in and having Favre on his team. He is not up to bringing along a young QB. This is were we agree. Our coaching is suspect and it is proven day in and day out every single week.
by ShawnH on Nov 9, 2009 2:30 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Emotions
If I had written some long recap right after the game, it would have been something along the lines of start firing and releasing people. That’s why the first thing I posted was brief. When coaches are feeling job pressure from week-to-week, you get an awful situation like the one unfolding with the Redskins. Consistency is a much better solution, although my blood was sure up right after the game.
And as good as Favre is playing this season, he’d be killed behind the Packers lousy pass protection. He was great at escaping the rush, several years ago, but that is clearly the one thing he doesn’t do well anymore. He can’t escape the rush, and credit to the Vikings o-line for getting better as the season has gone on at protecting him, though they did get off to a rough start allowing several sacks in their first 3 games.
by Brandon on Nov 9, 2009 2:51 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Fire MM
Will someone please FIRE Mike McCarthy! This loss is unacceptable. He better not be back next year. Next home game we should start a protest. Hold up your signs and start screaming “FIRE MM”
by Sniper_m4 on Nov 9, 2009 5:46 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Stats and more
I agree about the special teams issues mentioned above but those too are coaching. They teach these guys “lane containment”, now they’re either not getting it or not applying it. I guess you guys will have to decide that. A missed assignment up the middle on a punt block…no excuse!
But, I don’t agree how Favre would fare. He would do lots of play action and roll to create time. He does that al lot here. I think our O-line is getting too much credit. Just look at AP’s numbers. Plus, it’s a lot easier for Favre here when they put 8 in the box all the time. He’s got it made either way. Notice all the slants we’re running? What’s that? 3 step drop and fire. But, he has thrown the ball hard, is decisive and is deadly accurate , even in a crowd. You need to give him some credit.
If in GB, he’d have to be rolling out all the time (which he’s VERY good at) and throwing short and you guys KNOW he’d be doing that. He’d also be successful too. This one I don’t understand…when you got Rogers, who can run, why not run more play action? Gees, it’s obvious (well it is to me). As for the Jones TD it was low risk. One on one. No matter how you look at it, it’s an offensive advantage. Rogers threw it well and out beyond trouble so it’s either incomplete or it’s a TD. 80 yds, a TD, early in the game…yeah that’s great for stats.
As for why I say he’s selfish is that SO often you see “under” receivers wide open and he doesn’t even try. Moving the chains is good for the team and the fans. It’s not good for a QB’s numbers. Heck, to me it doesn’t even look like he’s trying to win. So you tell me…why?
And by the way, Grant is getting better all the time. You don’t thik he’s doing it alone do you? As for the secondary, it does have to be mentioned they’re on the field A LOT. so to be fair they just might be getting tired. BUT, the touchdown where the guy was standing wide open at the middle/back of the end zone, 3 packers were with one/two yards. Watch it again, they just looked confused. That IS coaching.
Have some faith guys. The coaches need to watch more films of the packers, NOT the other teams. I think they’ll respond. Try to be patient.
by tehar on Nov 9, 2009 10:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
We do run play action all the time but that doesn’t make a difference if the D is not afraid of the running game. Running a PA fake to Adrian Peterson is gonna get a different result than a PA fake to Ryan Grant. Its obvious.
As for why I say he’s selfish is that SO often you see "under" receivers wide open and he doesn’t even try. Moving the chains is good for the team and the fans. It’s not good for a QB’s numbers. Heck, to me it doesn’t even look like he’s trying to win. So you tell me…why?
This is so ridiculous it almost doesn’t warrant a response, but here you go. If you think that Rodgers is intentionally avoiding throwing to the short receivers because it doesn’t “pad his stats” then you are crazy. How can completing passes not be good for QB numbers? Picking up first downs isn’t important to him, even though that would give him more opportunities to “pad his stats?” Isn’t trying to win? Come on.
As for Grant, I wouldn’t say he’s getting better all the time unless you have a different understanding of the word “better” than I do. And I assume you know that there is a difference between run blocking and pass blocking? Just because a team is able to run the ball consistently doesn’t mean they can pass block to save their lives. Those are two different things. Grant is what he is. He’s nothing special. He can get the job done when the O-line is helping him but he is not the type of back that strikes fear into a defense.
Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb
by verno329 on Nov 9, 2009 3:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Padding Stats
I wonder if these same people would accuse Peyton Manning of “padding stats” because he’s a good statistical QB too. Or Drew Brees. Or Brett Favre continuing to start after he KNEW he was injured last year, thus maintaining his Iron Man creditials and screwing the Jets over. But no…Favre is beyond that kind of criticism, because well, he isn’t Aaron Rodgers. And those other guys are winners, unlike Aaron Rodgers.
What was with Kendall's shaved head?....looks like a fist with eyes.
scsteve (Pirates fan)
Correction: Jason Kendall IS a fist with eyes.
Derek (Brewers fan)
by bluejazz04 on Nov 10, 2009 12:54 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 

















