Mike McCarthy's Monday Press Conference
The players don't report back until Tuesday morning, so not much news about the Green Bay Packers on Monday. It's nice that the team has an 11 day break between the Lions and Ravens games, following a tough 3 game stretch that began against the Cowboys (11/15) and ending on Thanksgiving (11/26).
Some players, like LB Nick Barnett, used the time off to spend Sunday in Middleton, WI. (Really?) While RB Ryan Grant retweeted Ravens RB Ray Rice.
Meanwhile, Mike McCarthy had a press conference. The following is some excerpts from it:
(Do you anticipate anybody else missing practice time this week?)
I think Chad [Clifton] is really my only concern. I think Jordy Nelson is going to be OK. Allen Barbre, Ahman Green and Brandon Underwood all worked out, so I think they definitely have a chance. These decisions will be made tomorrow, but those are the five guys that have a chance to possibly miss practice.
Clifton, Nelson, and Underwood were the only players hurt on Thanksgiving that did not return to the game. Barbre and Green have missed the past 2 games. No surprises on the injury front.
Keep reading after the jump.
(Did you watch the game [Steelers at Ravens] last night with two teams you play in the next few weeks?)
I watched it last night. I watched it into the fourth quarter, and then I was actually watching Pittsburgh's offense versus Baltimore's defense before I came in here today.
(Did anything stand out to you watching them?)
It's always interesting to watch teams in the same division. It's something that you have to put a lot of credence in as far as game-planning, because both those teams know each other very well. They played each other three times last year, and this was obviously a big game in their division last night. There's definitely a lot you can take away from the game.
Good point.
(Has Jones showed enough to stay in that role?)
Yes. I thought Brad did a nice job. I thought he played well. But I also liked the fact that Brady and Jeremy were able to get 10-15 reps in there also. I really like the mix we had there at the outside linebacker position, because obviously that's a big void with Aaron Kampman out.
The 3 player rotation, led by rookie LB Brad Jones, is still in effect to replace Kampman.
(The special teams coverage units rank near the bottom. Why so many struggles and can that get turned around?)
The coverage units are something that have played at a very high level, and it's the one or two that break out a game, and that obviously shows up in the statistics. If you look at the last three games, and that's kind of where it gives your team a truer sense of where you are, I thought the Dallas game we played extremely well. I thought San Francisco we played very well, except for the one that came out. Then we did some things in the Detroit game that you cannot do. We'll correct that, but we have the people here to do it. I'm very confident in our scheme and how we approach it, and our special teams will be a big factor going down the stretch here.
It's not exactly a grilling, but it's the most he's said about coverage in a while. The game against the Cowboys was the best special teams game of the season, but that was a low bar to clear. "Very well" against the 49ers? The 49ers haven't gotten anything from their return game this season, but WR Josh Morgan had a 76 yard return against them in the 4th quarter, which was a big part of their comeback. The special teams was a festival of penalties in the 1st quarter against the Lions. Playing at a "very high level" except for the 1 or 2 per game that kill you? McCarthy may be confident in their scheme, but I won't say anything good about their kick coverage until they play well in consecutive games.
(These next four games you could call the winter part of the schedule. Is there anything that tells you how effective you might be in the conditions?)
Well, running the football and stopping the run, practicing outside definitely helps. This is Green Bay Packer football. It's playing in December. We feel we're talented on the perimeter but it starts up front. This is the time of the year where people have to run the football and stop the run and be productive with all of the aspects of the game that come off of stopping the run and running the football, so that will be our focus.
He might slip after a poor game against the awful Lions run defense, but RB Ryan Grant had moved up to No. 4 overall according to Football Outsiders, behind only RB Steven Jackson, RB Chris Johnson, and RB DeAngelo Williams. With the exception of week 2, when RB Cedric Benson had a very good game against them, the run defense has fantastic. The running game, on both side of the ball, should be a big advantage for them down the stretch.
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
After quite a lot of complaining due to Ryan Grant's slow start this year (me inluded),
he has really come on strong these past 6-8 games. He is very quietly having the best season of his short career.
Green and Gold / Black and White
by OznCoop on Dec 1, 2009 8:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
He has come along in the past couple games, but I’m still not sold on him yet. He racked up most of his yards in the 4th Quarter of most games. I would much rather have a RB that can rack it up consistently. However, the Offensive Line has gelled recently, so that helped Grant. I’m beginning to get more confident in him though. Hopefully that carries into the Playoffs if we get there.
by Jabooty on Dec 1, 2009 11:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He racked up most of his yards in the 4th Quarter of most games.
Does McCarthy’s ultra conservative “sit on a lead and try not to lose” 4th quarter approach have anything to do with this? It seems Grant only gets his carries in the 4th qtr because in the first 3, the offense is playing aggressively and trying to put points on the board.
"I agree but dont agree"
by juggernaut400 on Dec 1, 2009 2:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
Your pretty much spot on. This was the case against the 49ers.
by packallday555 on Dec 1, 2009 2:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I’ve been EXTREMELY critical of Grant but he has been playing well the past 5-6 weeks. I think it’s pretty clear when our o-line is actually able to open some things up for Grant, he is able to show some good ability.
by packallday555 on Dec 1, 2009 2:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would add
I strongly agree, and would only add that has been doing a much better job of breaking tackles and making that second push.
I loved watching him disappear into the scrum, thinking he went down, only to see him bounce outside and break free for a 10+ yard gain.
by WisconsInExile on Dec 1, 2009 5:26 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
what stands out to me
is something that I’ve been saying since year one. Although being the “sexiest” back in the league, Adrian Peterson is nothing more than average. Taylor puts up comparable numbers in that offense, especially when you consider the line they run behind. I see Adrian as no better than Grant. Adrian can make that unbelievable play at anytime, but there is a price to pay to get so many negative carries and leading the league in fumbles every year… not to mention being not being able to catch the ball or consistently pick up a blitz. Grant is good at everything, but not great at anything… and that’s alright with me. He doesn’t fumble, runs hard, and doesn’t take too many negative carries and that’s the back we need to compliment this high powered passing offense.
Think of what the Vikings could get for AP if they traded him and they really wouldn’t be losing much as far as an on field result (they’ll be torched by the press and their “fans”). They could be a force for years, cause right now their defense is pretty mediocre and their offense good when they have the lead, but they haven’t had to play from behind or in a tight game. When they have, their offense has looked horrible (remember the Steelers game or the 2nd half of the Ravens or when the Packers had it close? Their offense is 3 and out only to be saved if they get a big play if you can put pressure on them to score)
by uofmike on Dec 1, 2009 1:42 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Adrian Peterson is over-rated, but not average
There’s no better back in the league when he has a good hole in front of him. He’s not the best back in the league as the press portrays him, but Ryan Grant isn’t close to being as goos as him. I’d rather have Grant bad at one thing and great in another (namely playmaking ability and vision), ‘cause we can compensate on a bad blitz pickup by spelling him with a back that does it better, or send in another back in a pass situation if he can’t catch. But what we miss with him is the ability to run for big yards. Get this – he has 5 touchdowns this season, and that’s how many yards he ran on each of them: 1, 4, 1, 2, 1. I wish we had a back that scored from beyond the 5 yard line.
Why do we bake cookies & cook bacon?
by A-Rodge12 on Dec 1, 2009 2:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
FWIW
According to Footbal Outsiders, Grant is ranked in 4th place rushing in the NFL among backs with 96+ rushes. AD is ranked 8th.
Among backs who caught a minimum of 18 passes, AD ranks 14th and Grant 24th. In this regard, AD is 18% above average, and Grant is 12%.
Is this because coaches spend more time game-planning AD, because Grant is hitting his stride, or because the O-line improved with Tauscher and Clifton’s return? Perhaps all three…
by WisconsInExile on Dec 1, 2009 6:19 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
ok
I guess I wasn’t too clear with my wording. AP isn’t average, he’s above average, but I would put him out of the top 5 in the league… so I meant he’s average in teams of good NFL running backs, if that makes sense.
AP gets the big play, but when your team schemes every week for that big play and lives on it, it’s not too much different than other teams planning to stop him for 1 week. I would love Grant to break off the runs he was his rookie year, we’d be unstoppable. But if AP was on the Packers with our O-Line and equal carries as he does in MN, he would have 700 yards tops and 700 fumbles,
A lot of AP’s yards off completions are on wide open passes to the flat because teams don’t really fear him in the passing game
by uofmike on Dec 1, 2009 7:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would still say AP is the best RB in the league and not overated. The guy is a freak. However, for some reason we always play AP really well. Which is probably why some of us think he is not as good as he is. The reason we lost to them twice this year is farve, and our O-line could not handle their D-Line.
Im surprised by Grant as well. Im happy because we need a running game to keep AR from the ground and get some balance esp with Dec and the Frozen Tundra arriving…
by ajgraham on Dec 1, 2009 10:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't ask for one huge play per game like AP or Chris Johnson
I simply ask for one huge play per YEAR. Ryan Grant had enough holes in the O-line this year to break at least a couple of big ones, but he only have a 37-yarder as a 30+ run this year. Our O-line isn’t as bad in the run game as it is the pass.
I don’t know about FO rankings, all I know is that Grant is at 4.3 yds/a, which ranks him T-23th, and even that is thanks to two big games against SF and Cleveland that skewed the average. That’s your average RB.
Until I see him post up solid numbers consistently, he is still a question mark for me. I don’t mind him running for 4.3 yards per attempt each game for the entire season, but having 9 games of 3-point-somethings and then two flukes of 6 yds/a isn’t good enough if you want to win, specially in this time of the season.
Why do we bake cookies & cook bacon?
by A-Rodge12 on Dec 1, 2009 8:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
oops, ment it to be reply to uofmike
nevermind
Why do we bake cookies & cook bacon?
by A-Rodge12 on Dec 1, 2009 8:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
like him, but...
while he seems to be getting stronger and running a little bit angrier, I still don’t see the Ray Rice, Chris Johnson, Stephen Jackson fiery.
Those guys FORCE you to tackle them.
Grant still seems to fall down by easy tackles.
Run angry son.
by Acme on Dec 1, 2009 10:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if I would say Johnson or Rice run angry.
Johnson and Rice make people miss in space to create their yards. Very rarely do either one of them run with fire and be the aggressor. I think Grant finishes runs better than either of them but doesn’t have the shiftiness to make as many people miss or the speed to run away from everyone like Johnson has.
by Dogg Pound on Dec 1, 2009 10:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
that Grants big play numbers are pathetic and how far out his TDs are from are a little ridiculous. However, I still put more of that on Rodgers being effiecent enough to throw it in the red zone a lot and not turn it over and the poor O-Line than Grant.
Grant still needs to step it up more, especially in the next 3 weeks, but if the line can open the holes, I have faith
by uofmike on Dec 2, 2009 1:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















