Cornerbacks: Charles Woodson and Mike McKenzie

And Florio hasn’t proven to be the most reliable source of information.

No, indeed he has not. Funny thing is, he’s a lawyer. You’d think a lawyer would be better at relying on the facts and avoiding over-speculation… NOPE. Not Foolio.

He can write a story without citing a single source! He can make statements like “rumors are flying around that [player name] is in very serious talks with [team name],” because once Foolio creates the rumor and puts it on the internet, it will begin to fly around.

He can say things like “most people agree that [insert absurd opinion here]” without ever explaining who “most people” are because he is JUST THAT DUDE.

And to think NBC gave that asshat a contract…

Why is it so hard to believe that the Packers and Thompson pursued McKenzie? I don’t get it… Face it McKenzie would have been much like Harris. He is a tough, physical CB who excels in press coverage, just like Harris! Thompson has already brought back Tausch and Green to help in the stretch run, McKenzie would be in much the same position as them. He would allow Capers to continue to play Woodson in multiple roles too…

And, even though alot of fans assume it was Thompson that McKenzie had his trouble with, it was actually Sherman. The Sherman/McKenzie situation is WHY Harlan decided to go back to seperate GM and HC!!! Its not like McKenzie had ANY problems w/ THompson!

McKenzie signed w/ the team he had been playing the past 5 years, who happen to be the best shot at McKenzie getting a ring!!!

Of course they need depth in the secondary. It would be foolish for the Packers not to pursue someone with experience.

I am still frustrated with the switch to 3-4. Imagine how much better the Packers defense might be if they did not switch? Then again, injuries were always the issue with this team. It may not have made much difference when I think about it. The biggest problems were on the offense (specifically the O-line). Yet, injuries in the secondary were probably the second biggest problem. That is what killed the Packers last year as well, too many injuries on defense.

While losing Harris may not be as terrible as some people might think, Green Bay cannot afford to lose anyone else. They need depth, and they need it bad. If the Packers lose another safety or CB, then it could cost the Packers a game or two and that could mean Green Bay missing the playoffs again!

I am impressed by how the Packers have turned their season around. I was wrong when I predicted they would fall apart. This next week’s game is crucial.

I don’t think he’d even consider playing for us. Didn’t he absolutely hate the packers organization when he demanded that trade? I understand that most of the pieces have changed, but I would have been shocked if we got him

Our defense this year is far, far better than last year————- boring numbers from NFL.com : Total Def - 2008 :20th 2009 : 1st Pass Def—- 2008 :12th 2009 : 6th Rush Def - 2008 : 26th 2009 : 4th. You would have to be seriously smoking some good stuff to think that the 4-3 would be better for our team. We had basically the same players from last year with the exception of clay mathews being an impact player. Keep in mind we STILL, yes still have the youngest team in the NFL. What is killing us this year (just my opinion) is special teams. I think aging CB issues and OL issues will be addressed in next years draft or free agency. I don’t believe that signing players who have a year or 2 in em is the answer either so I can’t say I am disappointed in not signing McKenzie.