Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Converting to the 3-4

NFL.com is starting an occassional series looking at the Packers' conversion to a 3-4 defense. Here's Pat Kirwan's take:

  • He says the nose tackle has to be a big guy that commands a double team, and NT Ryan Pickett "should be more than adequate." I don't know about that; Pickett didn't have a good 2008 season.
  • He says Aaron Kampman will be fine with the move to linebacker and compares it to the move made by Greg Ellis in Dallas. He brings up a very good point; they need a more dynamic pass rusher at the opposite outside linebacker spot. LBs Brady Poppinga and LB Brandon Chillar aren't going to remind anyone of LB DeMarcus Ware. I agree.
  • He says they need another true 3-4 defensive end to play and/or compete against DE Cullen Jenkins and DE Michael Montgomery. Jobe has been all over the Igor Olshansky bandwagon and Kirwan climbs on board:

    "This year's free-agency class has two proven 5-technique players: the Cowboys' Chris Canty and the Chargers' Igor Olshansky. The Packers would benefit from signing at least one of these men for their front."

  • LB Nick Barnett and LB A.J. Hawk should be solid inside linebackers, but they'll only succeed if the defensive lineman get the job done.

Steve Wyche had an article too. He didn't break down the roster like Kirwan but instead focused on the general problems teams have with the transition. Especially at outside linebacker where Kampman has a lot to learn. Because of that, we can still expect to see the 4-3 at times:

The micromanagement when playing outside linebacker is why Capers said he'll maintain a lot of the 4-3 principles the Packers have used while making the transition.

Comment 3 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think we'd be

better off drafting Matthews out of USC. We at least know he can drop into coverage.

Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey

by jobe on Feb 11, 2009 11:51 AM CST up reply actions  

I honestly think we should sign Olshansky

but I admit i’m also a little biased because he’s Jewish.

Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey

by jobe on Feb 11, 2009 11:52 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Acme Packing Company, the SBNation blog for fans of the Green Bay Packers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gassertaylor_small
APC Open Thread #33: Ron Dayne Thread? Why Not?
Packer_brewer_badger_logo_small
The APC Helmet Logo Bracket Tournament: Sweet Sixteen

Recent FanPosts

Small
When And Why
Small
Where were you?
Ukcat_small
How about a little love for Cobb!!!
Jordy_nelson_small
MVP baby!
Football-funny-pic_small
NFL could add two new teams
Ukcat_small
Nike taking over Jerseys
Small
Free Agency Opinions
Small
NFL needs to fix its playoff system...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Acmepackingco_small Brandon

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Ayrton_senna_1988_canada_small Vermont Cubs Fan

Texbucky_small texwestern

Gassertaylor_small OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Img00243_small Kevin McCauley