Moving Aaron Kampman
When they hired Dom Capers to run the defense, I said:
I think it really comes down to whether DE Aaron Kampman can become an outside linebacker. If Capers believes Kampman can become an outside linebacker, like OLB/DE hybrid Terrell Suggs, then they'll switch to a 3-4. It will be interesting to see what Capers says when he's introduced at a press conference.
After DE Cullen Jenkins was lost for the season in week 4, Kampman was the pass rush. His 10 sacks led the team. CB Charles Woodson and LB A.J. Hawk were rarely asked to rush the QB, but they were tied for 2nd on the team with 3 sacks apiece.
Now their top pass rusher is moving to a new position:
Change will start with perhaps the Packers' best defensive player, Aaron Kampman. After putting up 37 sacks the last three seasons - third-most in the league during that stretch - playing at left end, Kampman will move to outside linebacker in the new scheme.
Although he'll be playing outside linebacker, expect to see him lining up in a 3 point stance just as often as he drops back in coverage. If you watched Pittsburgh this year in the playoffs and saw LB LaMarr Woodley terrorize the opposing QB, then you know that Kampman can still be an effective pass rusher.
But everytime I've seen Kampman in space, on the rare occasion he did drop back in coverage on a zone blitz type play, he never seemed useful out there. He seemed like a defensive lineman trying to drop back. Also, he's very good against the run. It seems like a poor use of a great two way lineman to turn him into a linebacker.
Kampman is one of the least selfish guys in the NFL I can think of. When his hometown was hit by a tornado, he went to help with the cleanup but got back in plenty of time for a May minicamp. He's not going to put himself ahead of the team. Which is important because a lot of players would resent moving from defensive end, the only position he's every played in the NFL, to outside linebacker because he's not going to make as much money as an outside linebacker as he would have as a defensive end. And he's supposed to hit free agency after 2009. A lot of players wouldn't be excited about making a position change that might not work out right as they are looking for their next contract.
This is more of the same thing we were talking about yesterday. Why are the Packers rushing to make the switch to a 3-4? I'm not in favor of moving Kampman from a position where he's great to one where he might struggle whenever he's asked to do anything except rush the QB. I'm all in favor of change along the defensive front seven, but this seems wrong.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Kampman
I think Kamp is just a great, all around defensive football player. If he’s able to rush the passer as well as stuff the run, who’s to say he can’t adjust to playing some zone coverage or shadowing a TE? And hey, look at it this way… he can’t be any worse than Poppinga.
I'm not sure...
Plenty of potential for it to work out well. I’m not familiar at all with the 3-4, I’ve been a Packers fan always and I only watch other teams, I don’t pay attention to what they’re doing like with the Packers. And they’ve never had a 3-4 in my lifetime. It’ll be interesting anyway.
Hit by a tornado
doesn’t do what happened to Aplington-Parkersburg justice. The southern 1/2 of that town was completely destryod by an F5, including the high school. All four of A-P’s NFL alumni came back to help.
voted hate, but could love
i voted that i hated this move, because i don’t think our line can handle losing Kampman as is. i thnk he will be solid as a linebacker.
There's a price for everything
I agree that Kampman is likely always going to be better rushing the passer than dropping into coverage, but that’s the price one has to pay for adopting a defense that includes elements of confusion and deception. A number of fans have been complaining for the last couple of years over Sanders’ vanilla scheme. Well there’s a reason why some defensive coordinators run vanilla schemes— it allows their players to focus on what they do best. I’m not saying that either is better than the other, just that there are pros and cons to each. There are Steeler fans who aren’t happy when Woodley is asked to drop into coverage, and this is after watching their team play the same style of defense for nearly two decades.
Agreed
Pittsburgh defense wasn’t great because Woodley would drop into coverage. Although some linebackers, like New England’s DE/OLB Adalius Thomas, are great at dropping in coverage and rushing the passer, guys like Thomas are the exception.
After 3 seasons of Bob Sanders and the vanilla defense, which did work a lot of the time, Mike McCarthy was ready for some confusion and deception. Letting a big guy like Kampman take away the quick slant route, when he’s not coming up to stop the run or rush the QB, is one thing, but I don’t want to see them get too cute with it either. But I’m not expecting Dom Capers to get too cute.
yes but..
Do you really think the Pack will let go of Kamp after this season (09)???? Not to any of my understading! They will pay him enough OLB or DE wise to stay a GB Packer!!!

by 


















