Draft Prospect - WR Michael Crabtree
A couple months ago, Texas Tech WR Michael Crabtree was expected to fall no further than Seattle with the 4th overall pick, but he was a disaster at the NFL combine back in February, showing up with a stress fracture in his foot (that required surgery) and two inches shorter than expected. He's still expected to be selected in the top 10, although I doubt there are many mock drafts that expect him to be available when the Packers select at No. 9. Still, the next Larry Fitzgerald has hit a speed bump.
But the Packers would have to consider someone who might be as good as Fitzgerald. That's a tall feat, considering how Fitzgerald destroyed every secondary he faced last season in the playoffs. But Crabtree is a great receiver and I would hope the Packers select him if he fell to them at No. 9. Wide receiver might not seem like a major need, but the Packers offense is built around it's receivers. The offense was good last season, but it can get better and improving the receiving core is one way to do it. They can find candidates at right tackle and run stuffers for the defensive line later in the draft, but they won't find anyone like Crabtree.
I'm bringing this up because I just read this great analysis of Crabtree over at Field Gulls. Since Seattle is frequently expected in mock drafts to select him with the 4th overall pick, John has a vested interest in making sure Crabs is the real deal. He was able to compare how Crabtree played against top defensive opponents and compare the results against 5 current NFL players (including the Packers WR Jordy Nelson) who went up against the same competition, and he outperformed them all. In conclusion, John says:
The completion percentage [69%] is especially interesting, because the biggest concern about Crabtree is his ability to get open. The offense he played in boosts that number, but, I guess you could say, that Crabtree was so often double-teamed probably cancels that out a bit.
Combine numbers be damned, I think Crabtree is special, and, not considering position, the best player in this draft. He's going to make some team's fans very happy, even if they'll have to resign themselves to the fact that Crabtree will never best Ashley Lelie in a footrace.
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
GB has quality depth at the WR position. The only WR I want in this draft is WR Ramses Barden from Cal Poly as he is 6’6 in height and is a suitable replacement for Ruvell Martin. GB needs a tall WR. Barden is projected as a late round draft pick. He’d be an excellent #4 or #5 WR for GB. with the #9 overall pick, GB should select an OT or OLB.
by Jabooty on Apr 9, 2009 8:38 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Crabtree
If he’s there, the Pack should definitely take him.
http://beersbratsandbtb.blogspot.com/2009/04/my-bid-for-taking-michael-crabtree-if.html
by BeersBratsandBeatingTheBears on Apr 9, 2009 9:11 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If and ONLY if
all 4 top offensive tackles, B.J. Raji, AND the 2 premier LB prospects are not available.
Crabtree will be a player, but with Jennings, Jones, and Nelson as the top 3 WR’s when Driver retires, will he be necessary?
"I'm so clean, cats think I sip Ajax."
by Mitchell_M on Apr 9, 2009 12:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Defense
We need to focus on defense this off-season without question. We have done well with mid draft picks at the WR position in years past we can keep that trend this year as well. Solution, draft a Linebacker in the first, Laurinitus, Hawks old teamate would work great in our new 3-4 next to Barnett, put Kampman back on the line where he belongs and focus the rest of the draft on corners.
by imbob78 on Apr 9, 2009 12:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Laurinitus would not be a good fit in Green Bay. Kampmann is way too undersized to play DE in the 3-4 defense. the 3-4 is a completely different philosophy then the 4-3. if we do get Laurinitus in the 2nd Round, I’d be up for putting AJ Hawk on the outside (for his speed) and put Laurinitus at MLB with Barnett. usually though, the OLB has to an undersized and versatile DE of the 4-3 scheme. players that fit this role are very difficult to find though. remember, Demarcus Ware was a 3rd Round draft pick. we can find someone to fit this position later in the draft. our OT situation is looking darker then most people realize though. i strongly consider Green Bay to draft an OT that can start immediately.
by Jabooty on Apr 9, 2009 1:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ware
DeMarcus Ware was NOT a 3rd rd pick…. HE was a FIRST!!! Laurenitis is a stiff, 2 down player at ILB!!! We have an abundance of guys that should be able to play ILB… Hawk would be a disaster as a 3/4 rush OLB. Just doesn’t have the tools to rush the QB consistently!
OT in the 2nd or 3rd would be a good idea. Beatty is a guy Kiper has the Pack taking in the 2nd. I would be fine w/ that pick. Raji and Beatty in the first two rounds would suit me fine. Don’t like his 3b pick or 4th rd though.
by Strohman on Apr 9, 2009 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Demarcus Ware was the 11th pick in the 1st round in 05. Not a 3rd rounder.
The only way I would draft Crabtree is if Jennings has told the Pack that he didn’t want to come back. I am pretty sure that is not the case so I would have to pass even if he is the best available. A #9 pick needs to come in and make an impact right away, not be 4th receiver.
by juggernaut400 on Apr 9, 2009 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know Teddy Thompson can shoot for “best available,” but we have immense needs on defense. It’d be incredibly dumb to go offense anything before defense, unless a high quality O-Line falls into our lap.
The Packers drafting Crabtree would be like creating a business, except the business decides before it creates a product, it’ll advertise the hell out of the business. Just wouldn’t make a lick of sense.
PensBurgh penalty - Lavender - 2 minutes for hijynxing.
by Lavender on Apr 9, 2009 1:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
We do need to draft D...
Laurinitus would be a suitable 2nd rounder. But I doubt we would draft two LBs in the first two rounds. Because I think we HAVE to draft DEFENSE with the #9 pick.
FYI Mel Kiper has Raji falling to us at #9… But he also has the Jags at #8 picking up Orakpo so either of them would be a very good option. I am strongly for drafting a defensive player maker for many reasons. Our front seven played poorly last season we need something fresh and someone that can make the immediate jump to being a NFL star. We wont find this later in the draft. A player later in the draft would have to be developed, thus not bringing an impact this season.
I understand our worries at OT; however, I still seeing TT resigning Tauscher to start if not all but most of the season. We can draft OT in the later rounds.
by bizzle4 on Apr 9, 2009 1:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
my bad on Ware. sorry. anyhow, Tauscher wouldn’t be expected to start until almost half way into the 09’ season and who knows how good he will be after his ACL injury. we’d have a backup OT starting for Tauscher for half the season if we don’t get a quality OT in the draft. considering all the penalties our OL had last season, i think we have to get an OT no later then the 3rd Round.
by Jabooty on Apr 10, 2009 3:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ware
No Problem… my bad on the other post. You do have a point about finding OLB in the later rounds is good though. NFL Defensive player of the YEar Harrison was an undrafted FA, and the Steelers have made a living drafting OLB in the mid to later rds. They have been doing it alot longer and know what they want and need! The thing is we need a rush OLB NOW… The Steelers take them and let them learn for a year or two before asking anything of them. Ware and Merriman are examples of guys who were drafted in the 1st rd and were effective starters from day 1! THats what we need…
by Strohman on Apr 10, 2009 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would be a waste to be drafting a receiver in the 1st round. The Packers have needs in other positions that are far more important. Such as getting a pass rusher. Anything else would be a huge mistake.
With the Bears getting Cutler, you don’t want him sitting back all day with no pressure.
Plus the whole defense has been revamped, and a new coach. Its only right that they get the player the defensive coach thinks he needs.
by TC93 on Apr 10, 2009 4:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Everette Brown
I haven’t seen much of the defensive players, but of the ones suggested on mock draft websites, and seeing the videos on youtube, Everette Brown to me looks the best.
by TC93 on Apr 10, 2009 4:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















