The Return of The Hair
You know who I'm talking about.
Even though Mel Kiper Jr. hasn't updated his hairstyle since sometime between the the Boston Tea Party and the Cuban Missile Crisis, the guy is ESPN's go-to-guy between February and April. He's a full-fledged draft guru, and he's released his four-round mock draft this morning. Unfortunately, you can't access the article without Insider status, and I'm not about to cut/paste it and risk the wrath of tWWL.
I will, however, offer up who he projects to join the Packers. After the jump, of course.
R1-P9: B.J. Raji, DT (Boston College)
Raji (6'1", 337) has been mentioned on this site as a potential star at NT. I, however, don't like it. Green Bay's biggest needs are OT and 3-4 OLB. Ryan Pickett is big enough and talented enough to play over center for a while yet. If Aaron Maybin, Everrette Brown, and/or Michael Oher are still on the board (as Kiper says they will be), I want them to be considered. Besides, if Raji really is the second coming of the "QB Killa" Warren Sapp, why would he fall out of the top-5? I'll tell you why: character issues. The academic ineligibility in 2007, altercations with other players in 2006, and testing positive at the Combine in 2009 are three big red flags. And I'm not comfortable drafting someone with three big red flags in the top-10.
R2-P41: William Beatty, OT (Connecticut)
From what I've read, he seems to be a solid football player with only above-average lineman skills. Beatty (6'6", 306) is a strong LT who earned first team All Big East honors. He's considered the 6th best tackle prospect in the draft, which is positively loaded at OT. In a normal year (i.e. one that doesn't have three OT's drafted before the 9th pick), he'd be a mid-first rounder. I would be comfortable with him joining the o-line rotation, but I'm somewhat doubtful as to whether or not he'll be available at pick 41. If Thompson trades down from the 9th spot to later in the first round, don't be surprised if the Pack takes Beatty at picks 20-35.
R3-P73: Cody Brown, OLB (Connecticut)
Kiper must think that Thompson is a Huskie at heart. Brown (6'2", 244) had excellent production at UConn over his four years, and became a team captain in 2008. As an NFL linebacker, he projects to be just average against both the run and the pass, but he will play primarily as a pass-rushing OLB. Can a slightly undersized linebacker produce as a pass rusher? If Brown's 18.5 sacks over the last two years are any indication, the answer is yes. Providing Thompson doesn't fill this need earlier in the draft, Brown is an excellent pick early in the third round.
R3-P83: Tony Fiammetta, FB (Syracuse)
Come again? Fiammetta (6'0", 245) is ranked as the best FB in the draft. He is an above-average blocker and can catch passes in the flats. He was a captain in 2008, and is an all-around solid football player. But...really? I was under the impression that Korey Hall and John Kuhn already filled these roles. Maybe Thompson doesn't want to resign Kuhn? I am scratching my head at this point. Why does Kiper think Green Bay needs a fullback?
R4-P109: Zach Follett, LB (California)
In the middle rounds is where Thompson earns his keep. I'll admit, I'd never heard of Follett (6'1", 236), and ESPN.com doesn't have a write-up on him. However, given the state of the 3-4 transition and the lack of depth, linebackers like Follett are infinitely valuable. Follett is an impressive athlete who excels in run support. He has also shown some pass rush ability, averaging 4 sacks over 4 years. He does not, however, shine in pass coverage, which limits his usefulness as an every-down linebacker. Follett is a classic "upside" pick; a player that might develop into a high-level starter.
So that's who Kiper thinks we'll end up with after 4 rounds, and you've got what I think. What do you guys think?
0 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
I am with you Mitchell...
I saw Kipers first round picks and I am really hoping Orakpo and Raji switch.. Kiper has Orakpo slotted going 8th to the Jags. I dont believe our need for the NT is as great as the need for an OLB.
The second pick of Beatty would be somewhat of a steal. Even if Beatty is not there I do agree TT will go OT in the second round.
I dont think we need a FB but if the guy can be the next William Henderson I would be ok with that pick!!
Risk vs. Reward
I don’t want any part of Raji. Any time you see a “character issue” nod in some kind of a draft guide, you kind of brush it off. Raji’s making headlines for pot use at the combine, any interview he’s conducted has been ill tempered, and, within the first 10 picks, you should have to ask ‘risk vs. reward’ you should know who your guy is.
I’d like a Brian Orakpo, but I don’t know if we’ll have to trade up to snag him or not.
PensBurgh penalty - Lavender - 2 minutes for hijynxing.
Latest is that the RUMOR about Raji’s positive test is just that… A bad rumor!!! Nothing substantive about it. His suspension from school for a year was due to a miscalculation / misunderstanding about credits needed, not grades. Bad advise and not enough personal attention. I wouldn’t make as much of that, especially since he used the time off to his advantage both as a student and as a football player!!!
Other than that he hit an opponent on the field… GOOD, I want an aggressive player at NT!!!
Are you going to sacrafice the best player available to REACH for a need! Especially since not many Rush OLB develop as well as hoped?!
NOt me… Give me Raji!!!
I've heard the same things about the drug test
His camp is claiming that it’s all just rumors. And I think you have to err on the side of caution until the NFL comes out and reports it.
Could Pickett move to DE?
I looked on his wikipedia page and he only weighed 294 when he came out of college. If he could lose 20 pounds or so, he’s a relatively quick guy for a defensive lineman…I’m just saying, it might fill a need. And we certainly do need some help on the line with Kampman moving to LB.
I would still rather have Oher than Raji, though.
Oher?
The NYT bio on Oher was amazing. Sounds like the kind of guy who would do well in a small town like GB. Most drafts have him later. Can any one say why?
by 50 years and Counting on Apr 9, 2009 8:56 PM CDT reply actions
the biggest knock on Oher
is that he sometimes loses concentration and isn’t consistent. He has the tools to dominate, but against lesser opponents, he lets himself get lazy.
"I'm so clean, cats think I sip Ajax."
Great year for tackles
Oher was way a top draft boards coming into the 2008 college season, but he’s slipped because Jason Smith, Andre Smith, and Eugene Monroe are ranked higher. That said, after reading The Blind Side, I would prefer Oher over any of those three. He does lose his focus, as Mitchell says, but he has had to do a lot of growing up fast since he turned 14. The desire to work hard, and the talent, is there. I think the focus will come as he becomes an adult.
That’s an amazing thing about all these kids entering the draft. I was a complete, directionless kid until after my 20th birthday. I was drifting through life. How many of these fantastic athletes have just been coasting on their talent? How many of them will work hard to make themselves better, and who will never bother and drift off into an NFL neverbeen? It’s impossible to know for sure.
We Need Raji!!!!!!
If Pickett couldn’t be a beast as DT in the 4-3 defense, he ain’t gonna be at least a decent NT in the 3-4. the NT position is THE MOST important position in the 3-4 defense. as for Pickett being moved to DE, i’m in full support. more speed and energy would be nice from him though. last year, the only guys on our DL i saw that actually pushed the offensive linemen were DE’s Cullen Jenkins (before getting injured) and Aaron Kampmann. that is one reason why our run D was atrocious last year. considering that, what makes some of you think Pickett would do better as a NT given he’s going to have more bodies blocking him now? the rumors about Raji were reported to be false just a couple weeks ago. we can get an OLB later in the draft. we have a high 2nd round pick (DE/OLB Michael Johnson from GT) or the best available Offensive Tackle would be perfect. then we have two 3rd round picks to get an OLB or OT depending upon how our 2nd Round pick went. i think the DE position is not as big of a need as many think. although it would be nice, i think one of our DT’s from last year will do just fine. i actually (for some reason) think that Justin Harrell will prosper as a DE in the 3-4 defense given his athleticism. that is of course if he finally gets healthy. i know Jolly is the projected starter as LE, but i think Harrell can beat him out for that position.
You brought up some very good points...
I also think Harrell can be good if he stays healthy. I think the 3-4 DE would fit his play perfectly.
However, I have to disagree with you on Pickett. You pointed out how he struggles with double teams. Which is ok. The NT is important but not too really make plays. In the 3-4 the inside backers are your playmakers on the run. Pickett just has to comsume linemen and let the backers get the RB. His size is exactly what is needed.
With that said about the backers I believe a OLB should be the first priority in the draft. I am strongly for Orakpo, so I think we should do whatever we can to get him.
.
About Raji
I agree that the most important job of the NT is to eat up two blockers inside, which Pickett does have the ability to do, but why would we stop at that? If we had a NT that could not only eat up a double team, but get through it and make some big plays in the backfield, why wouldn’t we try to get that? I’ve been clamoring for Raji for a couple months now. Sporting News compared him to Jamal Williams, who may be the second most important player on the Chargers defense. A huge play-maker like that is too much to pass up. OLB can be groomed, but finding a dominant NT is next to impossible.
I think that Weldon has an interesting idea about moving Pickett to DE, but in reality why wouldn’t we shuffle the two of them so that they stay fresh throughout the game, especially since rookies tend to hit a wall around week 12 or so, when we are (hopefully) in the thick of the play-off chase.

by 



















