Acme Packing Company: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Follow the @sbnation College Twitter List

All This Favre-Related Hullaballoo Has Got Me Up In a Tizzy

Do people use the term "tizzy" anymore?  Probably not.

Anyways, you'd have to be comatose to have missed the last few days' developments regarding Lord Favre: He's coming back I mean he's not I mean he is I mean he's really not.  No, seriously, he's staying retired.  Well, at least as of 2:00 PM, EST, and according to Rick Schwartz of Yahoo.com.

Of course, we need to wait for confirmation on this from Favre's agent (Bus Cook, who seems to attract offseason drama the last year or so) or from Favre himself.  But it looks like our neighbors to the north have avoided Favregeddon...for now.  Good luck explaining the last three days to T-Jack, Rosenfels, and Booty.  I also would love to invite a Vikings fan to explain why so many fans (specifically Daily Norseman commentors) got behind this move.  I mean, I thought 90% of you guys would be against going after Favre, but it was really more 50-50.  Perhaps things in Minnesota aren't as good as they seem.

This entire deviation from reality has made me angrier than reading anything written by Jemele Hill, and I'll be glad to put it to rest.  Before we continue on with our offseason, I would like to make a quick comment to all the Ted Thompson haters out there, especially the ones whose only gripe with the man is that he refused to bring Favre back.  Actually, I won't even make the comment, I'll let Deadspin.com's Dashiel Bennett do it for me:

Rachel Nichols (who is now officially a squatter according to Mississippi law) was reporting yesterday afternoon that former teammates were speculating that The Boy Who Cried Retirement was eager to "stick it" to the Packers GM, because Thompson didn't want to put his franchise in the hands of a 39-year-old quarterback with commitment issues. What a prick, right?

Can we get back to focusing on what's really important: the Green Bay Packers?

0 recs  |  Comment 31 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Blame TT

none of this mess would ever have happened, if TT had not treated Brett Favre like a wet sock from the day he took over as Packers GM !!

by Jarlsberg on May 7, 2009 3:58 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

ah, right on cue

I was wondering where you were the last few days.

"I'm so clean, cats think I sip Ajax."

by Mitchell_M on May 7, 2009 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1 again
Can we get back to focusing on what’s really important: the Green Bay Packers?

Unfortunately, for the Church of Favre people the Green Bay Packers = Brett Favre. Thompson’s sole mission in life is to destroy Brett Favre, and thus, destroy the Green Bay Packers. He’s like a cyborg sent from the future to destroy Brett Favre and everything he stands for. Keep an eye on your Wranglers!

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on May 7, 2009 8:19 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I don't get the simile Jarls,

He put Favre in a dryer? He wrung Favre out and slipped him back on his foot with a grimace?

It’s folks like you who lack the vision to stay competitive because you’re so shackled to the past. Ted Thompson is imperfect, but if we are going to enjoy a relatively successful transition from the Favre era into the next phase (as opposed to sinking into Siberia-like obscurity for two decades like the last time a great era came to an end), we need someone who does not share your impairment.

Sorry dude, but you’re on the wrong side of history.

by 400metres on May 7, 2009 7:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Honestly?

He’s an upgrade from either Jackson or Rosenfels.

As for an explanation:

“We had a chance to get a past his prime Hall of Fame QB, while you have been/should be a career backup.”

I had no problem with Sharper joining the Vikings as he’s a great player. And as much as I dislike the guy, Favre can handle pressure, and he’s better than what we have.

Things in Vikingland are pretty good for the most part. Our defense is still awesome. Our running backs are excellent. Our O-line is good. Our WR are average. And our QB and head coach are the bottom of the barrel.

Anyways, my two cents. Hope classes on the East Coast aren’t killing you.

When you go to somebody's house, you don't crap on their floor. Being a fan of one team does NOT give you license to be a dick to fans of another.

by Robert Rence on May 7, 2009 4:17 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Huh???

Please have Rich Eisen look into this one. You mean there really is a team that’s calling itself the “Green Bay Packers”? They must be pulling my leg…

by Elgar on May 7, 2009 4:37 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm just as sick of it as you guys.

As I said in my story yesterday on DN (thanks for the link btw), it would make me sick, but if it happened, I couldn’t just abandon my love for the Vikes. I think that was more of the general consensus from the DN commenters. Not so much “of course we’ll take him, Favre is awesome!”, but more “it would take a really long time to get used to, but I guess he’s better than what we have.”

Either way, if he does stay retired, I have absolutely no problem with it.

by ericj69 on May 7, 2009 4:46 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I don’t get the simile Jarls, He put Favre in a dryer? He wrung Favre out and slipped him back on his foot with a grimace?
It’s folks like you who lack the vision to stay competitive because you’re so shackled to the past. Ted Thompson is imperfect, but if we are going to enjoy a relatively successful transition from the Favre era into the next phase (as opposed to sinking into Siberia-like obscurity for two decades like the last time a great era came to an end), we need someone who does not share your impairment.
Sorry dude, but you’re on the wrong side of history.

Guess the saying didn’t translate very well into english. But anyway, what i ment, TT left Favre out to dry.

You’re saying I’m on the wrong side of history ???

Let’s make a quick recap of recent Packers history.
To begin with how theese guys handled the soap opera last offseason.
Brett Favre behaved childish, yes, but he has also admitted he did some wrong. TT on the other side, has been extremely quiet on the subject, maybe his only good decission in that saga, as he knew if he opened his mouth, he would get both feet stuck in there if he commented on his decissions.
And Brett Favre was not the first, nor the last player that TT treated in a bad way, and we can only wonder who’s next, Jennings?? Driver ??

Brett Favre had earned his right and then some to take his time pondering retirement in the offseason.

Then for the history lesson ! Who’s done what for the Packers.
In 1991 (and first games of 1992) the Packers stunk, then came Brett Favre. The rest is history, he took the sinking ship that was the once proud Green Bay Packers, and restorded them to Championship Glory ! not by him self, but he was the leader, and the likes of Reggie White and others wanted to play with him, because he was a winner on the field. Sure, the Packers struggled in the playoffs after the SB apperances. But hey, at least they got to go to the playoffs almost every year, and when they lost, most of the years it was to the team that ended up representing the NFC in SBs, and even winning them. Brett Favre threw some bad int’s yes, but for a lot of thoose years after 1998, he had a horrible supportcast, in depleeted wr corps and not very good defenses.
Put all of his on-field glory his miracle plays, his enthusiasm and competitiveness, he’s had such an enormous positive effect on the Packers, and the whole NFL. Then look at all the off field positives from his foundation and charity softball games. How much enthusiasm and positive effects he has created for the city of Green Bay it self, in fact, for the whole state of Wisconsin. a quote from Gov. Doyle, “Being Governor of Wisconsin is a whole lot easier when the Packers are winning, and with Brett Favre, they did a lot of winning!”

Now, what have TT done for the Packers, ok he’s drafted some good wr’s and LBs, but he’s been down right horrible with the foundation of the team, the offensive and defensive linemen. His personell policy has also been very bad. He has managed to drive a huge wedge between the Packers and one of it’s all-time greatest players, and even worse, he’s driven a wedge right in the middle of the Packer fans, that’s two birds you don’t want to kill with one stone.

So I say, fire TT now, before he does more wrong, so the Packers and Favre can put all this BS behind them, and the Packers can return to rebuilding the team to a winning one.

That being said, I’m very dissapointed that Favre has even been talking to the enemy, and if he, god forbid, should sign with them, I’ll put my Favre jersey very far back in the closet, and not take it out for many, many years.

by Jarlsberg on May 8, 2009 7:11 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Your quote from Governor Doyle is very telling

You’re absolutely right in recapping Favre’s impact on the team from 1992 on. Brett Favre was one of the main reasons for the Packer’s success from 93-07, and I love him for that.

Was.

As they say, all good things must come to an end, and it was coming to an end last offseason. Favre knew it, that’s why he retired. He can’t play forever; he even said, “I know I can still play…but I’m not sure I want to.”

So there you go. If you’re Ted Thompson, how can you not take that as a sign that it’s time to move on to the next phase of rebuilding the team (elevating Rodgers to the starting role)? And if Thompson immediately jumped ship the minute Favre decided he might want to return, how would that look? He would be a worse coddler than Mike Sherman was and would lose all credibility, not to mention the complete unravelling of the Packers’ relationship with Rodgers.

Was it a great situation? No. Could it have been handled better? Absolutely. But the most important question is this. Who’s going to have more wins in the next decade: Brett Favre or the Green Bay Packers? The Packers.

Nobody gets the right to dictate anything to management; that’s why management is hired to make decisions. Favre was a great player, but no player can take over the GM’s office, especially when the team is precariously balanced between mediocrity and success. The team is and always shall be more important to the player, no matter who the player is.

"I'm so clean, cats think I sip Ajax."

by Mitchell_M on May 8, 2009 8:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So I say, fire TT now, before he does more wrong, so the Packers and Favre can put all this BS behind them, and the Packers can return to rebuilding the team to a winning one.

Does this mean that we bring back Brett Favre to be our QB? Or will he now be the GM? I’m just curious how “putting all this BS behind them” leads to the Packers rebuilding the team to a winning one. Please explain.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on May 8, 2009 7:48 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Who was better??

Who was a better QB last year, Rodgers or Favre?? Any questions on if TT made the correct move??

by Graham H on May 8, 2009 8:26 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

As they say, all good things must come to an end, and it was coming to an end last offseason. Favre knew it, that’s why he retired. He can’t play forever; he even said, "I know I can still play…but I’m not sure I want to."
So there you go. If you’re Ted Thompson, how can you not take that as a sign that it’s time to move on to the next phase of rebuilding the team (elevating Rodgers to the starting role)?

yes, all good things must come to an end, but maybe if TT had made some serious moves in FA, to please both Favre, Harris, Woodson and the fans.
Make a serious run at winning one last SB with Favre, and then Favre could have retired as champion and we wouldn’t have this mess.

Now, we’re at a serious risk that players don’t want to come to Green Bay because of the way TT treats the players.

by Jarlsberg on May 8, 2009 8:30 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Now, we’re at a serious risk that players don’t want to come to Green Bay because of the way TT treats the players.

Ridiculous. B.J. Raji and Clay Matthews seem happy about being here. Players who perform well get good money in Green Bay, and good players will go where the money is. Charles Woodson got a nice contract. Aaron Kampman got a deserved extension. Ryan Grant got himself a contract, even if he has fallen off. Hell, Brady Poppinga got a somewhat undeserved extension. And you can bet that Jennings and Collins will be getting their extensions in time.

Plus, is Favre the only player that deserves consideration? How about the way he treated Rodgers? Thompson stood by him, supported him, and stuck with him throughout the whole mess. What about Koren Robinson, who Thompson was willing to take a risk on, and was only let go when the WR corps weren’t improved by his presence?

Thompson lets go of players that are past their prime and can’t perform at the level the coaches need. Rivera, Wahle, KGB, etc. are all examples of this. You think that players won’t want to come here because management keeps them accountable? I disagree; real players that want to win will come here because management will keep them accountable. And if you want the players to run the team, then you can be sure that the team will be going nowhere fast.

"I'm so clean, cats think I sip Ajax."

by Mitchell_M on May 8, 2009 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Make a serious run at winning one last SB with Favre, and then Favre could have retired as champion and we wouldn’t have this mess.

Well…what about 2007? The team was built for the both the future and the present and we made it to the NFC Championship game and Brett threw it all away with an inexcusable pass.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on May 8, 2009 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I also enjoy

how guys like Jarlsberg just throw out “go and get some all-star talent to make that super bowl run” like it’s just that simple.

If we learned anything from comparing the managment of Ron Wolf vs. Mike Sherman, it is that building a super bowl contender takes patience and an eye for talent that can contribute within the team’s philosophy. Athletes are not interchangeable parts that can just be plugged into a team and make them a champion. If that were the case, the Yankees and the Cowboys would win every year.

Ted Thompson has that patience and that eye for the right talent which I believe is going to make the Packers a contender.

That being said, I don’t like when either side of the Ted vs. Brett argument focuses on one mistake – e.g., Ted drafted Justin Harrell or Brett throw that horrible pass in the 07 NFC Championship. A person is the sum of their efforts – not just one great or one terrible moment of bad judgment. That’s why, overall, I think Brett is one of the finest football players I’ll ever see in my lifetime while still thinking he’s been painfully inept when the stakes where the highest. All I ask of the Jarlsbergs of the world is to just try and extend the same perspective to Ted Thompson. Overall, you cannot deny that Ted has taken a team that was as decrepit as any in the history of the franchise (the 2005 team) and made them as young and promising as any in the history of the franchise.

by 400metres on May 8, 2009 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It works for the Yankees

Just last offseason, they committed to around $400 million in new contracts, and they currently stand at 14-15. Hmm…maybe that didn’t work out so well.

At least they got Pay-Rod back. And he hasn’t been slapped with a 50 game steriod suspension.

by Brandon on May 8, 2009 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

re: who was better ??

Who was a better QB last year, Rodgers or Favre?? Any questions on if TT made the correct move??

Yes, I got several questions.
If you look blindly at passer rating, Rodgers had a better season than Favre. But then the Jets won more games, they were only one win away from playoffs.
The Packers lost 8 games by less than one score, Rodgers wasn’t able to come up with a single comeback win. Don’t come an tell me Brett Favre would not have won at least 4 of those close games, if he was with the Packers. You can’t possible blame all the 8 close games on the injuries on defense.

As for supportcast, the running game for the Jets and Packers were pretty even. But for the passing game, Rodgers had the help of one of the very best wr corps in the league, Favre had to struggle with his below average wrs in New York. In addition, Favre had to learn a totally new and different system as he went along.Rodgers had 3 years to learn the system, and learn it from the very best. And if not for having a torn biceps tendon for the last 6 – 7 games of the season, Favre would probably have led the Jets deep into the playoffs.

by Jarlsberg on May 8, 2009 9:48 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I would take issue with this analysis

First, Aaron did make comebacks and the defense blew it as time expired. Remember? Carolina? Tennessee? Jacksonville? Houston? How about Minnesota, when the kicker missed the field goal? Or how about earlier in that MN game when Rodgers put them up by 10 points with 5 minutes remaining only to have the touchdown called back due to a penalty? This is a team sport, not one quarterback vs. another.

Secondly, I’ll take your advice and not tell you that Brett would never had led any of those teams to a last second comeback victory, but I certainly wouldn’t guarantee he would either. You’re in the land of speculation and conjecture – who know what would have happened? The bottom line for me is that I see the forest for the trees, and we have a promising young talent at the most important position of the game, and I’ll wait and judge him against a hall-of-fame quarterback when he’s played at least more than one freaking season.

Finally, no one of those games were lost solely because Rodgers played horrible for the entire game. I watched that last game the Jets played against the Dolphins with the season on the line and Brett was the sole reason they lost the game and a opening round home playoff game. And believe me, I was rooting for Brett and take no enjoyment in that fact. And if it was due to his injuries, then Brett should do the right thing and sit down. Because no one gets credit for playing hurt when the injury was so severe that the player was an actual detriment on the field.

by 400metres on May 8, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude,

Bart Starr was an absolute legend for the Packers at the QB position. What if, and it’s a big what if I’ll grant you, Bart Starr decides he wants to return and be the quarterback for the Green Bay Packers? Let’s just say that during a commercial for the Rawhide Boys Ranch he starts to feel that “itch” again. What should Thompson do then? I mean, Starr has earned the right to play QB in the NFL, and the Packers orginization and the city of Green Bay owe him an awful lot. How should that be handled?

The only logical answer to that illogical question is for Ted to say something like, “Bart, I appreciate everything you’ve done. I have no doubt that you still posses the ability and drive to be an elite QB in this league. However, acting in the interest of the Green Bay Packers, a job I have been hired to and will some day be fired from doing, we are going to move in another direction.”

That’s how it would be handled, and I challenge you to find a Packer or Thompson quote to the media that is anything but respectful to Brett. At some point, and this point is already like 9 months ago by the way, you are going to have to let Brett go. It’s Rodgers’ time. It just is. Maybe Rodgers won’t amount to anything. Maybe Thompson will fail to build a good team and be fired in the process. Maybe Brett has 10 years of good football left in him with 8 Pro Bowl selections mixed in. Maybe. I don’t know. What I do know is, Brett is gone, he’s not coming back, he had a questionable commitment level to playing football in Green Bay, he might play elsewhere, Rodgers is here for the foreseeable future, and without getting into a “who’s better” debate I’d say it’s fairly reasonable to suggest that both Favre & Rodgers posses comparable talent today on 5/8/09. Fair? I think so.

I never understood the fascination with the Favre backers out there in so much as to hate Thompson. He’s not Fidel Castro. He’s not Stalin for Christ’s sake. He isn’t holding Lambeau Filed and the city of Green Bay hostage and ruling as a mad dictator. He’s been hired to do a job, he’s doing it as he sees fit, and if the B. of D. don’t like the results he will be looking for work at some point.

I just wonder: If Thompson would be fired today, what cross would the Favre crowd carry then? Who to blame?

Suppan, who has seen his ERA rise from 4.12 in his final year in St. Louis to 4.62 in 2007 and 4.96 last year, isn't an option in fantasy leagues - Rotoworld

by Adam P on May 8, 2009 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Easy Answer-Mike McCarthy

I love Favre and it seemed wrong the first time I saw him play for the Jets. But Rodgers outplayed the hell out of Favre last season. My biggest concern with not letting Brett return last season was that I wasn’t sold on Rodgers, but he proved himself. 2008 might have even been a Pro Bowl season for him if RB Ryan Grant had managed to repeat his fantastic 2007 season.

I can’t stand that argument that the QB who’s team wins the most games is the better QB. Although the QB is the single most important player on the team, It’s still 11 teammates playing at a time.

by Brandon on May 8, 2009 11:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The run games were far from equal. Jones was the leading AFC rusher for most of the season.

by StephanL on May 13, 2009 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Aaron

Rodgers essentially had to win games himself last year since the defense was so bad. There were many weeks where he was one of the top performers but the team still lost because they gave up so many points (partially due to a combination of injuries and bad scheme-not necessarily the players). Also, Ryan Grant would have better stats if every game didn’t become a high scoring passing shootout and would get more carries if we could run the ball with a 2nd half lead.

by justinlewis on May 9, 2009 12:07 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

comebacks

First, Aaron did make comebacks and the defense blew it as time expired. Remember? Carolina? Tennessee? Jacksonville? Houston? How about Minnesota, when the kicker missed the field goal?

Did the Packers win any of those games ? No, so they are NOT comeback wins. I don’t remember extacly the scoring sequense in all the games you mentioned, but I do think Houston was one of the games that ended on a Rodgers int. I’m not going to get all over Rodgers for that. That stuff happens, and Favre had his fair chair of those, trying to hard to win.
Putting the FG unit out for a 52 yd attempt in Minnesota is definatly not a qualifier. A 52 yd attempt on the road, is at best a 50/50 shot at making it. I did however forget the game in Chicago, lost on a blocket FG from something like 26 yds, so I’ll give him half a comeback for that, the kicker botched that one. But for the other close games, it was just as much Rodgers inexperience as bad defense that lost the games.
The defense also sealed several wins with big plays, the first Minnesota game, both Lions games, and the Colts game where all greatly helped by big defensive plays. The Colts game in particular where they had two ints returned for TDs.
The defense was horrible yes, particular in the last half of the season, and who was to blame for that ?? TT, he did not resign one of the best D linemen from ‘07, and bet his money on Bustin Harrell. Not a good move, the most siginficant problem for the ’08 defense was lack of quality depth on the D-line, they could not keep a solid rotation, and the good players got tired in the 4th qtr, casuing them to get shoved back in to the LBs, makeing both huge holes for opponents running games, and makeing the LBs job 10 times harder, you can’t be an effective LB when you get your own DL in your way most of the time, the DL has to hold of blockers so the LBs can see and move.
Do you blame anyone other than TT for not having enough depth on the D-line ?

Mitchell, I know that no player should have the right to dictate management, that’s why you have management, but there’s nothing wrong with management listening to suggestiongs from players.
I also know there’s a lot more to winning a SB than just signing some big name FAs, but TT didn’t even try.
Some players would always want to come play in GB, all I’m saying is the team may be less attractive for veteran FAs after the way TT treated Favre. TT takes care of the “his own” players, he did support Rodgers, he also gave Rodgers a HUGE extention last year. After Rodgers had 6 – 7 good games. Rodgers played a lot better than I expected him to, but I’ve been around long enough to see many one-year wonders come and go. So I do think TT gave Rodgers to much to early, but I sincerly hope I’m wrong on that one.

Verno, yes the 2007 season ended on a Favre int in the NFC championship game, but it was not Favre who only rushed for 28 yds that game, I was not Favre who let Plaxico catch 17 or something passes for a 140 + yards in that game, the Packers got outplayed by the Giants, the team that went on to beat the 18 -0 Patriots in the SB.

All I’m saying is TT has pushed Favre towards retirement since the he took over as GM, and that I think he should have tried a little harder to both make a serious run with Favre and rebuild for the future. It is possible to try for both, TT goes on on with just the draft, and so far he has done a horrible job with the very foundation of the team, the offensive and defensive lines. It does not matter how good your QB is as long as the 5 big boys up front don’t protect him.

by Jarlsberg on May 9, 2009 9:41 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Verno, yes the 2007 season ended on a Favre int in the NFC championship game, but it was not Favre who only rushed for 28 yds that game, I was not Favre who let Plaxico catch 17 or something passes for a 140 + yards in that game, the Packers got outplayed by the Giants, the team that went on to beat the 18 -0 Patriots in the SB.

Well, you have missed the point again. You said that TT should have made an effort to win a Super Bowl for Brett so he could retire and then we wouldn’t have this mess. I was pointing out that TT did, in fact, do just that and put together a team that had a chance to get to the Super Bowl. And while, yes, the Packers abandoned the run way too soon and they refused to give Al Harris help when he was being shredded by Plax, to say that they were outplayed by the Giants is a bit of a stretch IMO. They were in OT after all. Kinda hard to get to OT while being outplayed the whole game.

All I’m saying is TT has pushed Favre towards retirement since the he took over as GM, and that I think he should have tried a little harder to both make a serious run with Favre and rebuild for the future

The effort was made to both make a serious run with Favre and rebuild for the future. If you can’t see that then your Favre-colored glasses are whats getting in your way.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on May 9, 2009 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well then I'll do the work for you

The Titans game

The Vikings game in Minnesota

I would say the play calling at the end made the field longer than it should have been. Two runs back to back from the 40 that picked up a total of 3 yards didn’t help out Crosby at all.

The Panther game.

We thoroughly outplayed the Panthers in the second half but every time we scored Delhomme simply heaved the ball in the air and Smith ran underneath it and brought it to the one. I guess Rodgers didn’t motivate the defense properly, huh?

The Texans game

With a 1:49 left the defense allows a drive from the Houston 3 to the Green Bay 22.

The Jaguars game

The defense gives up two TD’s in the fourth quarter and the game ends on a Rodgers INT.

The Bear game in Chicago

Facing a short field the defense gives up another fourth quarter TD to send the game to OT where we don’t get a chance with the ball cause the defense allows a drive from the Chicago 33 to the Green Bay 20.

All of these games show the weakness in the defense that was present in the end of the year. I wasn’t a big of fan of trading Corey Williams either but he didn’t have the greatest season in Cleveland either. Losing Jenkins and Barnett, the demise of KGB, the injury that slowed Hawk down to an average LB at best last year, and the injuries in the secondary all contributed to the collapse of the defense. Simply having Corey Williams wouldn’t have solved the problems.

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on May 9, 2009 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

“Did the Packers win any of those games ? No, so they are NOT comeback wins. I don’t remember extacly the scoring sequense in all the games you mentioned,”

Yeah, why would you want to go and actually investigate the evidence you point to as support for your thesis that Rodgers was worse than Favre last year.

For instance, this gem: “the running game for the Jets and Packers were pretty even.” Did you even do basic research while making this baldly false assertion? For gawdsakes, Thomas Jones was the pro bowl starter last year, scoring 13 TDs to Grant’s 4. Plus, while I would agree that the Packers WR corps is more talented overall than the Jets’, Laveranues Coles and Jerricho Cotchery are pretty damned good.

I guess you’re just going to see what you want to see regardless of reality. You exhibit all the symptoms of a true believer and your cause is dual: Favre is infallible and Thompson cannot do anything right and has a personal vendetta against Favre.

Oh, and how has Ted done “a horrible job with the very foundation of the team, the offensive and defensive lines”? What evidence do you have of this? You do understand that injuries occur in the NFL, right? The Packers lines are young and unproven, but you cannot say with a straight face that Ted has done “a horrible job” with either. Let me guess, the sum of your evidence is drafting Justin Harrell.

by 400metres on May 9, 2009 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

For instance, this gem: "the running game for the Jets and Packers were pretty even." Did you even do basic research while making this baldly false assertion? For gawdsakes, Thomas Jones was the pro bowl starter last year, scoring 13 TDs to Grant’s 4. Plus, while I would agree that the Packers WR corps is more talented overall than the Jets’, Laveranues Coles and Jerricho Cotchery are pretty damned good.

There’s a lot more to a teams running game than jsut rushing TDs by the starting RBs, total rushing TDs were Jets 20 Packers 11, still in favor of the Jets, but total yds, Jets 2004,Packers 1805, (Jones 13xx, Grant 12xx) that narrows things down a bit, and considering the Jets playes more with a lead which greatly affects playcalling, it evens out pretty good. (yes I do know total attempts fo both teams would favor the Jets) Other things, Rodgers did while a head in score, or early in games, snap the ball with 5+ seconds left on the play clock, Favre damn near all the time snaps it at 1 (unless his team needs a quick score in the 4th.) let’s look at that 5 sec difference, if the offense runs 50 plays while the clock is running, this times out to 4 min 16 sec in time of possesion in a game, that is HUGE, but ofcourse it’s high speculations, since there are a lot more factors affecting the gameclock, but still it helps having a QB who by keeping the ball dead, helps minimize time of possesion for the other team. Now, you also need to go back and look at how opposing defenses played vs Jets / Packers, after about game 5, (and in the Cowboys game) teams started to challenge Rodgers to beat them, there were oh-so-many times he did not see and take advantage of that, by chaning to either short or deep routs, depending on what they gave him.

As for Coles and Cotchery, well Cotchery was ok, but Coles was horrible last year, just go back and look at the number of dropped balls in the last 5 games, and his “effort” to jump and catch when Favre goes to gambling mode and tosses one up for graps. They were not very good wrs in 2008.

Yes I do know the Packers defense lost some game in the 4th qtr, but they also saved some. It is a team sport, you need both units (+ special teams) to win a lot of games, and the offense have to help out by keeping the ball.

by Jarlsberg on May 10, 2009 4:12 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

wow
Other things, Rodgers did while a head in score, or early in games, snap the ball with 5+ seconds left on the play clock, Favre damn near all the time snaps it at 1 (unless his team needs a quick score in the 4th.) let’s look at that 5 sec difference, if the offense runs 50 plays while the clock is running, this times out to 4 min 16 sec in time of possesion in a game, that is HUGE, but ofcourse it’s high speculations, since there are a lot more factors affecting the gameclock, but still it helps having a QB who by keeping the ball dead, helps minimize time of possesion for the other team. Now, you also need to go back and look at how opposing defenses played vs Jets / Packers, after about game 5, (and in the Cowboys game) teams started to challenge Rodgers to beat them, there were oh-so-many times he did not see and take advantage of that, by chaning to either short or deep routs, depending on what they gave him.

I never thought I’d hear a Favre defense that was grounded on the play clock.

"I'm so clean, cats think I sip Ajax."

by Mitchell_M on May 10, 2009 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

its called grasping for straws

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on May 10, 2009 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok, whatever you want to call it …. But do you disagree that managment of the gameclock (also by using the playclock) by a QB is not important for winning footballgames ?

But hey, we can agree about at least three things, we disagree about wheter or not TT is to blame for the Packers 6-10 season. We all apreciate what Favre did for the Packers, and we all dislike the Minnesota Viqueens.

I think we’re all just passionate fans with diferent opinions on what’s best for the Packers. I don’t think the 0.6 yds/att the Jets had more than the Packers last season indicate that their running game was siginficantly better than the Packers, if you disagree about that, fine, don’t agree with me.

So I do think we should all read the initial posting again, and start focusing on what’s really important, the Green Bay Packers.
(and let us just hope Brett Favre stays retired this time)

by Jarlsberg on May 10, 2009 11:11 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

So I do think we should all read the initial posting again, and start focusing on what’s really important, the Green Bay Packers.
(and let us just hope Brett Favre stays retired this time)

I couldn’t agree more.

"I'm so clean, cats think I sip Ajax."

by Mitchell_M on May 10, 2009 1:39 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Acme Packing Company, the SBNation blog for fans of the Green Bay Packers.
Start posting about the Packers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Stoopshead_small
The Aftermath

Recent FanPosts

Zygi_wario_solo_small
Just had to share
Tex1_small
Tex's Friday Preview - Tampa
1001_large_small
Packer fans..check out a Video History of your team VS Bucs in Orange
Seal_small
Please protect Aaron Rodgers.
Small
Status of The Packers Post Week 8
Small
Your Proverbial Conspiracy Theory...
Image_021_small
What to make of this team
Me_at_the_vikings_game_small
Interviews with Bart Starr, Jan Stenerud, and Paul Krause up now at DN
Small
Ted Thompson for president....
Sniperjesus_small
Thanks, Packer Fans!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Mobile Live
Edgerrin James Messes With The Wrong Fullback
Mobile Live
Matt Hasselbeck's Square Wheels
Mobile Live
Pawns In The Greg Knapp Offense

Manager

Acmepackingco_small Brandon

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell_M

Me_working_foh-icon_small RobertArthur