Acme Packing Company: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Once A Metro covering Red Bull New York!

In Minnesota; Tarvaris Jackson or Sage Rosenfels

With QB Brett Favre out of the picture, until he reconsiders his retirement again next week, the Vikings have a decision to make at quarterback. Tarvaris Jackson or Sage Rosenfels.

At first the decision might seem like trying to decide between having your mouth washed out with Lux, Palmolive, or Life Buoy. Tim over at Battle Red Blog, who spent the last two years watching Rosenfels play for the Texans, thinks it will be Rosenfels. Although he admitted at the end of last season, that Sage is nothing more than "a fine back-up." Anthony at Daily Norseman expects Rosenfels will be the starter too because he "chose him by default." Strong praise indeed.

I'm inclined to think Jackson will win the job. He's a more talented athlete with the stronger arm who's been coached by Brad Childress for the past three seasons, and likely knows the offense better. His ceiling is higher. They did everything they could to turn him into the starting QB last year, and I expect they'll favor him again this preseason. I expect Vikings management and coaches will want him as their starting QB.

But I agree with Tim and Anthony; the Vikings would be better with Rosenfels. It's not that he's some solid veteran game manager who will take care of the ball. He had a lot of trouble in 2007 and 2008 with turnovers; allowing 22 INTs and 8 fumbles in just over 400 pass attempts. But when he can avoid turnovers, he was very productive at moving the offense down the field in Houston. That's unlike Jackson, who seems to have trouble when forced into must-pass situations.

0 recs  |  Comment 9 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I'm pulling for Tavaris

Pete Rose was actually banned from baseball for teaching Jeff Francoeur how to play. He made up the gambling stuff to hide his shame.

by VivaLosBravos on Jul 30, 2009 3:05 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Jackson did reasonably well at the end of the season after being benched last year, especially in the Cardinals game. I agree that he has more upside than Rosenfels, who is a known quantity. With AP, the Vikings have a fairly good environment for developing a young qb. Whether Chilly & Crew have the ability to develop him is another question.

by uglyfatpimplynerd on Jul 30, 2009 9:53 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

M. Vick

I wouldn’t be surprised to see that on the back of a purple jersey this year at some point.
Vick might not be an upgrade to T. Jack, but with the “loss” of the mighty Lord and Savior Our Favreness, maybe it could be some damage control? They know their not going anywhere with what some refer to as Sagevarius Jacksonfels,

by PackaCracka on Jul 30, 2009 12:01 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

part 2

so they might need a backup plan..?

this weird thing just like insta posted on me…

by PackaCracka on Jul 30, 2009 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Riiiiight?!!

Why would they want Mike Vick? THey already have a #7 who is a better runner than he is a passer!!! LOL

Damage control… to bring in a felon who kills dogs?!! Funniest thing I have heard in a year!!!! LMAO

by Strohman on Jul 30, 2009 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jackson...

well he just sprained his MCL which is not as bad as the ACL but will still keep him out for awhile so any edge he had on Sage for knowing the system will be gone.

As for Vick going to MN I dont think that would ever happen. Childress wants someone that can throw the ball. If he wanted a “playmaker” running QB, Jackson would be the starting QB with out a doubt.

by bizzle4 on Aug 1, 2009 5:05 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He pushed hard for Jackson for years now

So, I do not know that the style would be the reason Vick would not sign in Minnesota.

by NYCPac on Aug 1, 2009 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And....

I think Minnasota was 1 of the 23 teams that have come out already and said they wouldnt sign him.

by bizzle4 on Aug 2, 2009 9:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now

that is something tangible showing that he will not be in Minnesota. However, I stand by my claim that Minnesota is not scared by Vick’s style.

by NYCPac on Aug 2, 2009 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Acme Packing Company, the SBNation blog for fans of the Green Bay Packers.
Start posting about the Packers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dsc00341_small
Collins and Pickett signed to long term contracts!

Recent FanPosts

Thumbnail
Glanville finally confirms he had Favre trade
Me_as_a_simpson_small
Represent Your Team in MHR's Live Mock!
10424_528302137858_173702948_31567344_967269_n_small
Possible Tickets to Packers at Patriots 2010
Ronniebrownjuke_small
Franchise Players
34_small
Eagles release G Shawn Andrews, Bears release CB Nate Vasher
03112008811_small
You Are At the Podium... Who Do You Announce the Packers Pick Is?
Friarbob2b_small
Mock Draft Help Request
Small
Ruvell Martin signs with Seattle
10424_528302137858_173702948_31567344_967269_n_small
Brady Quinn Traded to Denver Broncos
Percy_small
Selling Packers Jerseys

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Windy City Gridiron
Bears' Madness 2nd Round
Niners Nation
100 in 100: Kareem Jackson (67 of 100)
Cat Scratch Reader
Mocking the draft- A Revshawn and Aussie odyssey

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

A Deeper Look At The 2009 Cowboys Running Game

Photo +1 updates

Rams, Redskins Showing Interest In QB Sam Bradford

Photo +1 updates

Conflicting Reports On The Future Of 49ers GM Scot McCloughan

More from SBNation.com >


Manager

Acmepackingco_small Brandon

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell_M

Me_working_foh-icon_small RobertArthur

Ice_square_small texwestern