A Plea To Curb Your Enthusiasm
And no, this isn't a letter to the producers of Larry David's hilarious HBO show.
Larry must read fast if he can read the New York Times in twenty 30-second trips.
Green Bay beat Arizona 44-37 last night, but the game was 38-17 going into the fourth quarter. As the Packers' scrubs took the field, Matt Leinart went off for 3 touchdowns and made the game far closer than anyone could imagine. Still, the game wasn't nearly as close as the final score would suggest; it was a thoroughly dominating performance by Green Bay on all fronts, just like the previous two preseason games.
Yes, they have looked spectacular on nearly all fronts. The team is showing the symptoms of greatness. Preseason predictions are transforming into post-season ones, and there's not much opposition. But I'm here to be the proverbial rain on the parade, whether you like it or not.
Don't get me wrong, there's a lot to be excited about. Like how the first team defense only allowed 10 points to the Cardinals, one of the best offenses in the NFL, ending the shutout streak from the first two games. Or how the offense is averaging 4.4 yards per carry. Or how they have a +10 turnover ratio through the first three games. Or how the offensive line hasn't let anyone lay a finger on the starting QB.
Let's talk more about that defense. The Legion of Dom has made life miserable for opposing quarterbacks with superior line play, excellent coverage packages, and disguised blitzes out of the 3-4. How miserable? 11 sacks, 8 interceptions, and 8 forced fumbles worth. And this, which was pretty sweet.
Wanna talk individual performances? How about Charles Woodson? Last night, he had four tackles, two sacks, three forced fumbles, recovered one of them, and generally made Shaft look like a sissy. So this is what Chuck looks like when he's healthy, considering his campaign in 2008 was hindered by a toe injury.
Wait, he did what last year? Holy moly.
Defense isn't your thing? Let's talk offense. How about Jermichael Finley, who is turning last year's frustrating performance into a push for Donald Lee's job? In three games, he has 9 catches for 92 yards and 2 scores, but his play cannot be quantified by stats. The only numbers that matter are these: 6'5", 247, 4.76, 29". Those are his height, weight, 40 time, and vertical leap. You add massive improvements to blocking and route running, and you have a big time weapon on your hands. He's a mismatch for anyone who tries to cover him: too fast for linebackers, too big for cornerbacks, too athletic for safeties. And since he can line up in a three-point stance or split out, he's nearly impossible to jam at the line. Words cannot express how excited I am about Finley this season.
And how about the wide receivers? Donald Driver, James Jones, and Jordy Nelson have all combined for 16 catches, 345 yards, and 3 touchdowns. That's including a 76-yard bomb to Nelson, who was matched up against Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie, one of the NFL's better corners; when Nelson caught the ball off of the playaction, he was at least 7 yards in front of DRC. In the business, that's what we call a nice play.
And can we talk about Aaron Rodgers for a minute? In three preseason games, he's put up 458 yards on 71% passing, has 12 yards per attempt, and has a TD/INT split of 6/0. Oh, and his QB rating is 151.1. And he can move in the pocket and turn a sure sack into an incompletion at worst. Nearly every ball he's thrown has been perfect. And his best target (Greg Jennings) is gonna be OK after that hit he took last night. He sufferred a minor concussion (then again, when is a brain bruise ever minor?), and will be 100% well before the opener against Chicago.
I don't know about you, but I need to sit down for a second. Get my bearings. There's just too much excitement for me to handle. As I said before, there are signs of greatness on this team. Each skill position is positively stacked, the less talented players are executing well, and the coaching has been superb. There's a chance for the 2009 Packers to be something special.
What I want is for everyone to just calm down.
* * *
Remember, they have not played a dominant running team yet. The Vikings still have Chad Steve Hutchinson and Adrian Peterson, who I think could run for 1,000 yards with just Chad Steve blocking and AP running. Matt Forte is far more potent than Fred Jackson, Jamal Lewis, and Beanie Wells. And Kevin Smith is a top-20 back handicapped by a bad offensive line. Remember how poor the run defense was last season? Don't think that keeping the Bills, Browns, and Cards at bay is a sign of a complete turnaround.
Besides, Beanie Wells had a few highlight plays of his own against our starters. Check out this video, and take notice of the poor angles taken by Packer defenders, the failure to disengage from blockers, and bad attempts at tackles.
Also, they have not played a dominant defense yet. The Bills and Browns are not stalwarts, and the Cardinals are merely above-average on a good day. Yes, the offense was top-10 last season, and they have had an excellent showing in the preseason, but preseason is short for "the defense is going to try to run the right play but not try too hard because they don't want to get hurt just yet."
And don't forget the Cardinals' fourth quarter performance. Matt Leinart singlehandedly willed the Cards back into the game by sparking a 27-point second half, albeit against Green Bay's backups. But this is a sign of a potential depth issue on defense. If a critical player gets hurt, one of these backups is going to have to step up. If the backups allow 360 yards and 3 TD's to Leinart and the Cardinals' second- and third-stringers, how are they going to perform when faced with NFL starters?
All this aside, my biggest concern lies with a few key players.
1. Mason Crosby. The Colorado Kid has dynamite for a leg, but he's struggled with accuracy. He's 4/7 through three games, but his misses are from 29, 48, 55, and 60 yards. The first two are really the only misses that concern me, but his inability to hit the long ball in game situations takes away the option of a 50+ yard attempt later in the season.
2. Quinn Johnson. Johnson hasn't done too much in the preseason. His lead blocking abilities were supposed to open huge holes for the running game, but that really hasn't happened. I liked the prospect of the fifth-round pick blowing linebackers up at the second level, but nobody's seen it yet, which makes his likelihood of making the roster less than a sure thing.
This concern is pointed not only at Quinn Johnson, but at the running game as a whole. While it might be a by-product of the passing game's explosiveness, the offense hasn't fully exhibited the type of ball control offense needed to hang onto close games. Maybe it's because Ryan Grant has only gotten 21 carries, or because the offensive line has just ended the position battles. All I know is that I wanted to see some strong running, and the only back that's shown it consistently is Tyrell Sutton, who should but might not make the roster.
3. A.J. Hawk. There's been a lot of talk about A.J. Hawk in the last two weeks, mainly concerned with his fit (or lack thereof) in the new 3-4 defense. Maybe it's his short arms, or his injury history, or his skill set, or his athletic tendencies. We really don't have much of a clue as to why he's been struggling, or even if he really is struggling and we're just creating the illusion of a problem where there is none.
Here's what it really comes down to; in three preseason games, here's the tackling totals for Green Bay's inside linebackers:
| Desmond Bishop | 16 tackles, 2 assists, 1 sack |
| Danny Lansanah | 11 tackles, 2 assists |
| Brandon Chillar | 7 tackles, 3 assists |
| A.J. Hawk | 1 tackle, 2 assists |
To be sure, this is not the kind of performance expected out of a 5th overall pick who's playing style racks up tackles like Steve Nash racks up assists. He's been around the ball, but he constantly ends up on the ground or pushed in the opposite direction. He hasn't gotten to the quarterback the way people thought he would. He's being outperformed by nearly every linebacker on the roster.
The point of all this talk is this: the coaches need to put the right players on the field to give the team the highest chance of success. If that means A.J. Hawk doesn't fit into that simple criterion, then he needs to be either coached and developed better, benched, traded, or cut.
I am a huge A.J. Hawk fan; his jersey was the first Packer jersey I bought when I started getting money with which I could buy jerseys. (My first actual jersey was an Allen Iverson home jersey...the year before he got traded. That sucked.) I like the way Hawk plays, I admire him for playing as hurt as he did last year, and I think he has the tools to be a solid starter in this league. But I have my doubts as to whether or not he's a good fit for the fast-paced finesse-heavy 3-4 defense that the team is installing.
* * *
To sum up, the Packers have shown a lot of growth and development from last year's 6-10 campaign. Fans are perfectly justified in predicting great things this year; the team has shown several great things in only a few weeks. I myself will go out on a limb and predict that Green Bay will end up with the division.
But don't let the early success get to your head. There are legitimate concerns about parts of our roster. The team to beat is still Minnesota. Chicago is still neck-and-neck with us. Detroit simply won't go without a fight anymore. Nothing is a given, everything is fluid.
So when other fans come over here and talk smack, let them. When other sites post ridiculous articles that make wild assertions about their delusions of Green Bay's shortcomings, don't respond. When media outlets hype up other players and other teams while leaving ours on the side, don't complain about it.
Because come September 13th, the Packers are going to start the season, and you'll see a drop in the smack talk on the site. After September 20th, you'll notice a huge dropoff in the Packer bashing. By September 27th, you might see a Green Bay highlight in the first half hour of SportsCenter.
Then October 5th will come, and it is legitimately the most important game of the year. If Green Bay wants the division, they're going to have to take it from last year's champion. It's going to be a huge event, transcending the sport and focusing on the celebrity component that will dominate the coverage. This game will be a turning point in not just the 2009 season, but the momentum of the rivalry.
2009 figures to be a big year for the Packers. But for now, curb your enthusiasm, and let's focus on Tennessee.
0 recs |
44 comments
|
Comments
Chad?
I think you mean Steve Hutchinson. Or is there an inside joke I’m missing.
NFC North should be an interesting division to say the least. Packers/Bears will be a great early season test for both teams.
by umfan83 on Aug 29, 2009 11:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
er, yes
inside joke.
"I'm so clean, cats think I sip Ajax."
by Mitchell_M on Aug 29, 2009 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not kicking it to the curb just yet...
my enthusiasm, that is
Rodgers just looks super smooth and extremely confident!
I am curious to see how the bigger and more experienced Offensive line will do against a big dominating defensive line like Minnesota.
This could look a lot like the 2007 season, it really could!
by PackFaninFL on Aug 29, 2009 11:40 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Seriously
Rodgers arguably did better then Favre in 07’ when he came in. The difference was Favre have the defense choking in the 4th quarter, and for that matter, pretty much the whole game. Rodgers looks even better this year, and I can’t wait to see what he’ll be able to do.
by packallday555 on Aug 30, 2009 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay don't call me crazy
I think ARod has what it takes to be big time, close to Favre….Assuming I’m right, would the Packers be the first franchise with 3 homegrown Hall of Fame Quarterbacks?
by PackFaninFL on Aug 30, 2009 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Favre was homegrown? He was drafted by Atlanta.
by uglyfatpimplynerd on Aug 30, 2009 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who would you choose?
Although Favre could perform some incredible physical feats and had an iron will, Rodgers is looking like he is the cerebral, accurate passer, leader type of QB. I tend to prefer the accurate passer over the physical marvel at QB.
One could argue that the two QBs who have four SBs wins, Montana and Bradshaw, were arguably one of each type. If Rodgers really does master the intellectual part of the game and throws with the accuracy he has displayed this preseason… who knows what he could achieve.
by NYCPac on Aug 31, 2009 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rodgers
I prefer an intelligent, accurate QB. The thing about Rodgers is he is intillegent, and accurate, but he also has great physical skills. He has a very strong arm, and is mobile as well. He really is the complete package. If he continues to progress like he has thus far, he could accomplish some great things.
by packallday555 on Aug 31, 2009 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm still in baseball mode, but the
preseason play has really been exciting to follow. Rodgers looks REALLY ready. And 12 t/o in 3 games? Good grief. It’s going to be a fun year to watch and be a fan.
People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring. ~Rogers Hornsby
by FoulJack on Aug 29, 2009 11:42 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Haha dunno if I can do it
I get that it’s only preseason but if our “vanilla” stuff is that much but then other teams “vanilla” stuff I can’t wait until we use the whole playbook. I really can’t get over how good Rodgers looks. He really does look improved, and I really wasn’t sure if he could improve anymore. Finley looked excellent, and speaking of him I thought he broke his arm?
On defense we’re a whole new time. I was almost giddy watching our new aggressive style. Warner looked confused, and flustered out there at times, and that’s saying something seeing as how he pretty much ripped upart the Eagles last year, and the Steelers for parts of the games. We look super deep at LB, and I can’t wait to see Barnett, Thompson, and Matthews.
I’m not sure if I can curb my enthusiasm. This was a good test for us, and we passed it with flying colors.
by packallday555 on Aug 29, 2009 12:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, as to the Cardinals
They did not play #2 WR Boldin or #3 WR Breaston— both of whom are awfully good. Meanwhile, Fitzgerald ran wild on us a little and WRs 5-8 made big catches and got big yardage in the near comeback.
If the Cards were playing everyone from their first unit, it might have been a more apt to compare their playoff form of last season.
by NYCPac on Aug 29, 2009 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh wow
Haha I feel like an idot, I thought Boldin was playing last night. That makes things much easier on us. I’m sure they would have been much more successful had Boldin and Breaston played.
Should be interesting to see how our run defense does against the Titans. Their a pretty dominant running team.
by packallday555 on Aug 29, 2009 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
All one needs to know about preseason
2008 Lions:
Preseason = 4-0
Season = 0-16
Now, of course I do not think that the Packers are going to duplicate that ignominious feat, but it does help to temper the enthusiasm to know it has happened once.
On the kicking game, I am EXTREMELY concerned about field goals, not because our kicker is not doing well, but because the holder situation is now looking like a mess. I suspect that Ruvell Martin never suspected that he would be holding on kicks and seems to be struggling at the task. My concern is that the current holding problems could lead him into genuine bad habits when Flynn is back to holding, making the now temporary problem into a long-term one.
Also, if Flynn does not recover quickly, that would mean a serious problem for the upcoming season should Rodgers get hurt. That said, I am optimistic about the upcoming season and expect something much better than 6-10.
by NYCPac on Aug 29, 2009 1:02 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Crosby needs to make those anyway
Even with the snap and a less-than-perfect hold, the guy should make a 29 yarder. That wasn’t a Romo hold. I think the really good kickers would have made it.
by uglyfatpimplynerd on Aug 29, 2009 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the holders
the holder situation is now looking like a mess. I suspect that Ruvell Martin never suspected that he would be holding on kicks and seems to be struggling at the task.
Excellent point, which may, at least partially, mollify Mitchell’s (and my) concerns about Crosby’s accuaracy and/or lack of it.
The glass is more than half-full.
by NorthStarr on Aug 29, 2009 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The coaches mentioned it too
The coaches, Mike McCarthy and Shawn Slocum (special teams) were asked whether Martin was having trouble. They wanted to review the game film, but sortof confirmed something didn’t look right. Obviously that has a huge impact on Crosby. The miss from 28 yards really stood out as an odd kick, he’s never that wide right on any attempt.
by Brandon on Aug 30, 2009 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not a good hold, but
Apparently Crosby was hitting a lot of them to the right earlier in the preseason.
by uglyfatpimplynerd on Aug 30, 2009 12:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ya
After the kick Crosby didn’t react so hot, and it looked like he said something to Martin. They showed the hold in slow motion, and it looked like Martin was still spinning the ball when Crosby kicked it. I hope his struggles are just because of the holder. He has the power to be a really great kicker, he just needs to be a little more accurate.
by packallday555 on Aug 30, 2009 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Linebackers & Expectations
Your tackle totals are misleading. Des Bishop and Danny Lasagna have played over 8 quarters worth of snaps against what for Bishop at least would be considered sub-par competition. Hawk & Chillar have played about 4. Apples to oranges there.
Regarding Chillar’s numbers vs Hawk’s, Chillar is playing the weak side and has access to the ball carrier relatively unfettered. Hawk is playing the strong side and has to wade through the muck more. Again, apples to oranges.
If it were up to me though, I’d throw Hawk outside ahead of Poppinga and elevate either of Chillar or Bishop to the starting lineup at SILB (Bishop would be the better fit). Poppinga is a liability out there, no matter how much effort he gives. Hawk is much better in coverage.
And unless there are those here who are pumped about this team solely for their 3-0 record, there is no reason to curb our enthusiasm. It’s the performances of the first team units that matter. It’s the continued maturation of Rodgers (ahh… the wonders of a distraction-free camp). It’s the emergence of Jermichael Finley. It’s Ryan Grant remembering how to fall forward (seriously, he had no lower body strength last year). It’s the continued excellence of a full cadre of WRs (welcome back, James Jones). It’s sound blocking up front while going younger on the o-line. It’s the excellent defensive scheme and depth. The list goes on and on. Considering the results, there’s no shame in being excited and no harm in high expectations going forward.
by _William_ on Aug 29, 2009 1:08 PM CDT reply actions 3 recs
I thoroughly enjoy this rebuttal.
"I'm so clean, cats think I sip Ajax."
by Mitchell_M on Aug 29, 2009 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We may be putting too much emphasis on "starting" at LB
Because so many LBs are needed when a team plays the 3-4 and since Dom is so creative in his schemes, I personally suspect that he is going to get to know all 8 or 9 LBs well enough to rotate them in a manner that keeps all of them fresh and exhausts the opposing offensive lines. Who is the “starter” might mean less than usual in terms of playing time.
My basis for this thought is just that all of our LBs have been showing so much and since most also are not perfect for every situation. Capers himself said in an interview that I saw that the Packers would obviously still play a significant amount of 4-3 front despite the official changeover, especially in this first season. I just love that opposing offenses will now find it tougher to gameplan for our defense.
by NYCPac on Aug 29, 2009 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice post William
" It’s the performances of the first team units that matter."
Exactly. The fact that our 1st stringers have outperformed all the other 1st stringers we’ve played it what I’m excited about. Naturally if your 1st stringers are manhandling other first stringers, your going to be excited and have some fairly high expectations. Of course we have to keep in mind, not every teams key players have played against us (Boldin, Breaston, T.O.). Obviously those players would make a difference for their team. I think I’m most excited about the new defensive system. Capers play calling is exactly the change we needed. I found myself bored watching our defense bring 4 down lineman, and play press-man coverage. I think it actually fits our players well, and from what I’ve seen so far our defense should be much improved. (Which is exactly what we wanted and needed.)
by packallday555 on Aug 29, 2009 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice post
But like some have said they were against the Browns, Cardinals, and the Bills. Now you may say that the Cardinals were NFC champs but they are an offense known for their pass attack and they were missing both Boldin and Breaston just as Buffalo was missing TO. Now this isn’t to say that I think we haven’t played well or don’t deserve praise. Also, none of these three teams have a strong defense. That being said, I am excited about our chances this year as I think the team barring injury can only improve as the season goes on.
by Charlie Kelly on Aug 29, 2009 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"It’s the performances of the first team units that matter."
Exactly; and that’s why it’s critical to note what a sheer drop-off in talent exists on this club behind the starting unit. But then again, that’s true for every team and explains why injuries (or the lack thereof) is usually the main reason why a team is successful in the NFL in any given year.
I’m also all for ginning up some healthy cynicism after three straight excellent performances in the preseason, but watching Rodgers’ progress has warmed my ol’ TT-worshippin’ heart (not to mention a defense with ferocity). Yowza, I’m stoked for 9/13!
by 400metres on Aug 29, 2009 9:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
a sheer drop-off in talent exists ?
I wouldn’t go that far.
The Packers have very good depth at defense.The LB depth is almost too deep. Will Blackmon, Tramon Williams, and Anthony Smith aren’t bad. If they lose 7 1st stringers, then I’d worry.
by Squatbulk on Aug 30, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm still excited
It is preseason, and obviously that means everything is taken with a grain of salt. Still, they have looked really good and getting excited is what sports is all about. Maybe this team remains dominant and steamrolls to the Super Bowl, perhaps they fall flat on their face and have another 6-10 season. Likely, they’ll content for the Division and the playoffs.
Either way, right now they are a blast to watch and as a fan, I’m excited.
by shaftr on Aug 29, 2009 1:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Tennessee’s going to be the big test, as far as the preseason goes. It’s tough to take the Cards’ offense seriously without their top two receivers.
It’s like I said after the Browns and Bills games. “Very nice…now let’s see if they can do it against an actual NFL team.”
That said, I do feel much better about this season. I think we’ll definitely challenge for the division. Anything past that…we’ll have to wait and see.
Before each game, please remember to feed the bats.
by Cool Hand on Aug 29, 2009 1:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I kind of want them to lose this last game
Just bc I’m getting too excited. This offense seems like it will be a freight train that can’t be stopped and the defense is showing a lot of good things too.
I do want to Curb my enthusiasm just bc this team seems amazing.
Just say no to players named Aaron on the Cubs.
by nji232 on Aug 29, 2009 1:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm a Cardinals/Bears fan, and...
I’ll admit that you guys looked really good last night. Although I believe that the Packers had more of a gameplan, while we did not plan things out, and we were just calling plays and seeing what worked.
Hopefully when the Packers and Cardinals play again at the end of the season it is closer than this. And after how badly we did last night it should help keep the Cards from getting complacent.
by JoeCB1991 on Aug 29, 2009 4:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That's certainly what Whisenhunt claimed.
Could be true. We’re coming off a 6 win season, we have 3 new starters on the OL and we’re running new defense. It makes sense that GB would gameplan a bit more than other teams and run through more of their stuff in preseason than other teams.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Aug 29, 2009 5:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
AJ Hawk a loogie
I tried my best to watch AJ on every defensive snap he played last night, even using my DVR to rewind each play to note how crappy he played. I’m by no means a scouting expert, but it’s my opinion the dude sucks. He never seems to flow to the ball because he’ll run into somebody on the other team and play pattycake. I’ll bet he starts all 16 games, though, and they leave Bishop for special teams.
by Wade V on Aug 29, 2009 5:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
My only Packers jersey right now is an AJ Hawk..
Hes been pissin me off for a while now and I’m debating if I should go buy another jersey.
Rodgers jersey or Jennings?
Oz+Coop+Hawk= baseball trinity
by OznCoop on Aug 30, 2009 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Woodson
Get it now while he’s still All-World.
"I'm so clean, cats think I sip Ajax."
by Mitchell_M on Aug 30, 2009 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
jersey
I was faced w/ exactly this decision when I went home to GB last year for the Dallazz game… I went w/ Rodgers as a show of support in giving him the job that #4 quit from! And because I thought his play to that point was stellar. Jennings was definitely a consideration, but I am now a proud #12 fan. I have never looked back, though my next jersey will likely be a Jennings, #85!
by Strohman on Sep 1, 2009 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Preseason...
…is basically meaningless. You’d rather your team looks good than bad, but no matter how good or bad they look it means very little for the actual season.
What you are really looking at is whether or not guys expected to be new contributors are able to play effectively at full speed. So late in games where everyone tunes out might be the most important part in terms of what it actually means to the team (in this case, the team’s depth).
The Packers starters are in sync and executing plays which is certainly a good sign. But come regular season start that is all out the window. Also I question the comment that the Packers game planned for Arizona. That would be an oddity for NFL teams. Usually teams like to stick to base packages and make sure those are working rather than game plan, which to me means stressing formations and looks design to help against their elite players.
Be interesting to see how Favre does tonight in a full half with some time in the Vikings O. Curious to see if they stick to the run AP every down MO or if they try to pass more than usual.
by Sand0 on Aug 31, 2009 1:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Favre excuses already?
He told ESPN he thinks he has a cracked rib, but no one on with the Vikes know about it…
by bizzle4 on Aug 31, 2009 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Such a sideshow...
I remember other players struggling to finally call it quits, but can anyone remember anyone ever turning their twilight seasons into the sideshow that Favre’s are becoming? I mean, if his rib is truly cracked (or believed to be injured), the way to handle that is to go to the Viking team doctor, get a checkup, and then allow the team to announce your condition as the reason for not playing.
What is this garbage of him self-diagnosing and then setting himself apart from his team by announcing his own condition to the media (if early reports are actually accurate that this is what happened)? If true, he really seems to believe that he is above his teammates, his organization, and the game itself.
by NYCPac on Aug 31, 2009 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Be enthusiastic
Looking back at history, unless your team has just won the Superbowl there’ll always be a reason guard your optimism. People have thrown out the Lions’ 4-0 preseason of last year as an example, but it extends into the regular season as well.
Does anyone remember the beating that the Bills put on the Patriots in the opening game of 2003? The Bills had just acquired Lawyer Milloy. I believe the final score was something to the tune of 31-0. I’m sure a number of Bills fan were feeling pretty good about their team at that point while the Patriots probably weren’t thinking 14-2 and Superbowl.
There’s also the Vikings from 2003. Started 6-0 and managed to miss the playoffs on the final play of their season.
And I’m sure the Patriots felt pretty good after going 18-0 in 2007.
Basically what I’m trying to get at is that nothing that has happened so far guarantees anything, but I’d still rather enjoy what I’m seeing right now than worry whether or not the season will ultimately end the way we want it to.
On a separate note- don’t see why you’re down on Quinn Johnson. I’ve been very pleased with how the running game has looked. They’re been consistently getting 4 and 5 yards a carry on 1st down.
by Phoenix138 on Sep 1, 2009 2:19 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Being pragmatic curbs my enthusiasm...
I guess I’m not the only one questioning whether the 5th pick of the ‘06 draft was the right pick. So far, this season, he hasn’t earned a starting position. Nick Barnett, coming-off a serious torn acl doesn’t appear to be ready to play. That being said, I like what I see from Kampman, Poppinga, Bishop and Chillar. Just maybe those four are the starters NOW. Last year is done with. Also, Jeremy Thompson, Danny Lannsanah and Brad Jones have also looked solid.
Another thought, about our previous drafts since 2006…in hindsight…2006:1st rounder A.J. Hawk is at best, an average inside linebacker…3rd round pick Abdul Hodge was a bust-he’s now in NFL Purgatory (Cincinnati)…2007:1st round-Justin Harrell because of multiple injuries to date, has been a bomb, 2nd round pick-Brandon Jackson was a reach then and is a very pedestrian back-up (will he make this year’s cut), 3rd round-Aaron Rouse, at best is a disappointment, takes bad angles, isn’t a hitter or much of a tackler, yet is a ballhawk, 2008: 2nd round-Brian Brohm-tonight is make or brake for him, so far, so bad (I truly hope he turns it around tonight) and lastly 2nd rounder Patrick Lee, has so far shown next to nothing-another dud…Of these seven high draft picks in the past three years, only one has been a starter-Hawk, and he’s never mentioned among top linebackers in the NFC. So, tell me, is Ted Thompson only adept at picks in the 4th through seventh rounds? Let’s hope this year is different and Raji and Clay Matthews turn into All-Pros. Go Pack!
by Here'sJohnny on Sep 3, 2009 4:26 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















