Preview: Bengals at Green Bay Packers
The Cincinnati Bengals looked like an up-and-coming team back in 2005, during their first trip to the playoffs in over 15 years, but those heady days are long gone. They were awful during the 1st half of the 2008 season, and needed a 2nd half rally to reach 4 wins. And it was a rally not from their offense, who scored no more than 21 points in any of their final 8 games, but their defense.
In that regard, the Bengals might be catching the Packers at a good time. The pass protection fell apart during the 1st half last week against the Bears, and the offense isn't in sync. Their best chance is to keep it a low scoring game, and hope the ball is deflected their way this time.
I don't believe the coaches handed RT Allen Barbre the starting job if he was really that bad. He'll get another chance to start on Sunday, and I don't expect he'll disappoint. Once the pass protection is improved, the pass offense should be back on track.
My full preview is after the jump. Packers 24, Bengals 10.
Here's the replay of the deflected TD pass that lost the Bengals the game last week:
Here are the team rankings based on yardage from NFL.com for both teams in 2008:
| Teams | Run Offense | Pass Offense | Run Defense | Pass Defense |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Packers | 17 | 8 | 26 | 12 |
| Bengals | 29 | 30 | 21 | 15 |
RB Cedric Benson averaged 3.5 yards/carry in 2008, and averaged 3.6 in his first game of 2009. And that was against Denver which had one of the worst run defenses in the NFL last season. They're playing with four new starters on the offensive line in 2009, but they're not showing any major improvement yet. RB Ryan Grant looked good against the Bears, although he still doesn't look like the same player he was in 2007. Either way, the Packers should be much better running the ball then the Bengals.
As long as Barbre is straightened out in practice this week and WR Greg Jennings wrist injury isn't serious, Mike McCarthy says their just being cautious, the Packers passing attack should do much better against a weaker Bengals unit. The return of QB Carson Palmer alone should improve their passing attack, but his offensive line didn't provide much protection last Sunday, and they lost WR T.J. Houshmandzadeh in free agency. His free agent replacement, WR Laveranues Coles, was drop-tastic in his first game as a Bengal.
The Packers fielded an awful run defense last season, but shut down fantasy football star RB Matt Forte last week. The Bengals didn't look much better in 2008, but this is based on yardage and their opponents ran the ball against them a lot last season. They held the Broncos to 75 yards on 20 carries last week. The Bengals run defense is the better unit, but overall it might be a push since the Packers D has to stop the lesser running back.
The pass defense looks close, but it's based on yardage which ignores that the Packers had 22 INTs compared to only 12 for the Bengals, and 27 sacks vs. 17. The Packers' opponents had a 71.9 QB rating while the Bengals allowed an 87.3 rating. The Bengals held QB Kyle Orton in check, until the fluke play to WR Brandon Stokley, while the Packers dominated QB Jay Cutler. The injury to S Atari Bigby doesn't help the Packers, but the step down to S Aaron Rouse isn't very big.
0 recs |
16 comments
|
Comments
The offense shouldnt have ANY problem moving the ball against the Bengals D
Oz+Coop+Hawk= baseball trinity
by OznCoop on Sep 18, 2009 8:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
the only concern the Bengals pose in my opinion is their quick passing ability
down the middle, over the top is where the Packers seem to have their biggest lapses in passD. If they can keep that undercontrol on Sunday this SHOULD be a a large-margin win for the Pack
Oz+Coop+Hawk= baseball trinity
by OznCoop on Sep 18, 2009 8:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yup
Cutler had a couple of runs because all of our pressure was to the outside, and the secondary was hanging back
On that fly to right-center
I kinda expected JD to plow into Rios with an ATV.
EVERYBODY PICK US FOR 3RD OR 4TH SO I DINK WE DOIN POOTY GOO
Sox Machine
by Sox Machine on Aug 17, 2009 7:35 PM PDT reply recommended Unrec 3
by blackoutsox on Sep 18, 2009 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the Bengals D is actually good, better than the offense
"Ghiaciuc's play was a distraction"
by firstPick on Sep 18, 2009 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lulz at Tecmo Bowl.
Good analysis…this should be a real eye opener for the league if we can prove our D isn’t only good against Da Bears.
by Thaddeus? on Sep 18, 2009 8:45 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
3 out of every 4 experts have the Pack in the SuperBowl
not an eye opener, but a comfirmer.
Oz+Coop+Hawk= baseball trinity
by OznCoop on Sep 18, 2009 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, but arguably we played like shit compared to what we could last week. Cutler just played shittier.
We need to DEMOLISH someone. This could be it.
by Thaddeus? on Sep 18, 2009 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
now,
close your eyes and go back to sleep, your still dreaming. plus those so called experts couldn’t find their own a$$es with a detailed map and a funnel . as they say " that’s why they play the games" !!!!!!!
take a kid fishing, it's good for the soul. not only yours, but the child's as well !
by whanabarf on Sep 18, 2009 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
this also,
apply to my fellow vikes fans, who also believe that we are Superbowl bound! perhaps we are, but until late in December we are all just “paper tigers”
take a kid fishing, it's good for the soul. not only yours, but the child's as well !
by whanabarf on Sep 19, 2009 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pressure
Is the name of the game.
The Bengals can look good offensively if Palmer has time to throw but I don’t think he will. The Bengals O-Line looked as bad as the Packers last week and their starting LG is probably out for the game. Cullen Jenkins abused the Bears LG and now he’s gonna be going up against Nate Livings backup. Nate Livings isn’t any good himself so I’m guessing his backup is terrible. Jenkins is gonna have a field day.
The Bengals O-Line has two solid players and three bad players so I see Palmer having absolutely no time to throw which inturn should mean a blowout.
by FavreSucks on Sep 18, 2009 11:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The only area I worry about is our Oline vs their Dline…its much improved this year behind the addition of Tank who should remember us from his days with the Bears. if they haven’t fixed the line yet, our O could be in for some more trouble. I don’t worry about Cedric and I think our DBs will do fine against their WRs.
by TrevorR on Sep 18, 2009 11:45 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I hear you about the O-Line but with McCarthy at the helm it seems like everytime an offensive position group or player does bad one week, he or they do really well the next week.
The Bengals front 7 does look much improved but I think the O-Line will have a turnaround game and if a unit fails it will be a different unit. I just see the Packers getting more pressure on Palmer than vice versa.
Plus Palmer is about as mobile as Kerry Collins ever since he had that knee/ankle injury against the Steelers. Rodgers is a lot more mobile so if the Bengals pressure, Rodgers can do something about it, if Palmer is pressured there isn’t much he can do anymore.
by FavreSucks on Sep 18, 2009 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Packer Haiku
Fluke Bronco touchdown
Leaves bad taste in Bengals’ mouth
Hope Pack’s not the Scope
http://www.PackerHaiku.com
Clark Osborn - PackerHaiku.com | FavreHaiku.com | BadgerHaiku.com
by PackerHaiku on Sep 18, 2009 3:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Your best one yet
battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm
by Michael M on Sep 18, 2009 11:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
by far
you have to respect someone who insists on using a poetry device most of us abandoned in middle school english.
"Brandon Jennings needs a nickname before he gives himself one. Oh wait, Young Money, he already did."
by Mitchell_M on Sep 19, 2009 12:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Love the replay...
… but what’s a Delfection?
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Sep 18, 2009 8:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















