Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Lakers Should Trade Andrew Bynum So He Doesn't Go To Waste

Q&A with Ted Glover of The Daily Norseman

Tonight I took some time with Ted Glover of the SBNation blog The Daily Norseman, and we swapped a series of questions about the teams in this weekend's Sunday night game between the Packers and Vikings.

APC: I've seen You-know-who take some big-time hits so far this season. What is the consensus on how the offensive line has performed so far this year?

Ted: Anecdotally, they seem better.  The running game is a lot more effective so far this season, and while there have been breakdowns in pass protection, Favre has had time.  The big loss for passing has been Chester Taylor.  He was phenomenal as a pass blocker, and his ability to pick up a blitz has been notably absent so far this year.  As to public opinion, I think it's close to a 50-50 split on whether or not they've improved.  I think they're better, but that's just me.

APC: Randy Moss' numbers through two games with the Vikings are almost identical to four games with New England (9 catches, 136 yards in MIN vs. 9 catches, 139 yards in NE). What are your expectations for him the rest of the season?

Ted: If he scores a TD Sunday and we don't see a 'Moon over Lambeau:  The Sequel', I'll be crushed.  Seriously, I expect him to open up the field for Percy Harvin and whoever else lines up opposite Moss until Sidney Rice comes back, and I expect him to be a difference maker.  And he's already doing that.  Harvin's production has gone up dramatically in the two games since Moss came home, and I think we'll see him integrate more into the offense as the season progresses.

Star-divide

APC: The Packers will likely get Clay Matthews back on the field this Sunday. How can the Vikings minimize his impact?

Ted: Hmmm, maybe sneak into his house and turn off his alarm clock so he misses the game?  Huh?  It's a night game?  Rats.  Well, the Vikings have been using more two tight end sets lately, so using Jim Kleinsasser to chip or double team would be a good start.  Favre has been effective rolling out with a mobile pocket, and as long as they do it in the opposite direction of Matthews, they could have a lot of success.  But the best way to neutralize Matthews is to be able to run the ball effectively, early, and often. 

APC: Pat Williams is almost as old as Favre and looks like he ate a manatee. How can he possibly still be so effective?

Ted: Little known fact:  Manatee blubber contains massive amounts of resveratrol, which reverses the aging process.  Pat Williams is now 28 years old.  Seriously, all he's asked to do is plug the middle, and when you weigh 340 pounds he has an advantage even before the ball is snapped.  Williams' ability to take the attention of two inside guys frees up the rest of the line and MLB EJ Henderson, who is having a helluva comeback season.  Pat's just a beast, and although he's lost some physical ability, he's more savvy and still highly effective.

My thanks to Ted for being a good sport, and hopefully we get an entertaining game and a Packers win this weekend. Also, check out some of Ted's other work as an contributor to Off Tackle Empire (SBNation's Big Ten Blog).

Comment 70 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ted is a good egg

even if he is an OSU/Viking fan.

by TarHeelHawk on Oct 21, 2010 9:17 PM CDT reply actions  

He is in his

6th trimester… I imagine his hormones are raging. I wouldn’t want to be line up opposite of him, he might try to eat me.

by Bjorno on Oct 22, 2010 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

This team needs to pull it together. A great QB. Can lead u far. But it is clear, the time has come for another star, on the offense. Too bad about not getting Marshawn. He sure is looking good in Seattle…

"Practice does not make perfect. Only perfect practice makes perfect."

Vince Lombardi

by CaliSeth on Oct 21, 2010 10:19 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

thats true on pat

he cant move forward anymore, but just hunkering down and being a brick wall to running backs is still very effective

4 hours 5 minutes? Is that all? Buehrle coulda pitched three CGs and the bottom of the 14th in Houston by then. FTMFYITA! - RWShow

by blackoutsox on Oct 21, 2010 10:43 PM CDT reply actions  

Pat doesn't NEED to move forward

His gravitational pull brings RBs and QBs right into his arms.

by Jepp The Viking on Oct 22, 2010 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Missing Taylor

I had read that the Vikings pass blocking was poorer this season. I say read because I admit I have only watched the Vikings/Saints season opener. I was expecting blame to fall on C John Sullivan, decline by the rest of the o-line. or the fact that Favre is playing on surgically repaired ankles and gimpier than ever. But losing Taylor was not something I had thought of, and makes a lot of sense as he was their version of Brandon Jackson.

by Brandon on Oct 21, 2010 11:34 PM CDT reply actions  

As a Packers fan in St. Paul

I haven’t been as blinded by AP as everyone around me. Although Taylor isn’t as explosive or high octane as AP, I’ve thought for about 4 years now he’s the best all-around RB in the NFC North. If the Vikings would have traded AP after his rookie season and used the pieces they got in return to sure up some of the glaring holes on their team that they still have today, Taylor was definitely good enough to take them to the super bowl. He’ll never lead the NFL in anything, but he’s good at everything. I don’t care what the distance was, when he came in on third down I always thought they had a shot at picking it up, even if he was just staying in to block on a pass. They obviously couldn’t afford to pay him what Chicago did, but if they keep him and use the 2nd rounder and the pick they traded up with on DB’s instead of Gerhart, I think you’re looking at a 4-1 Vikings team right now. No one around here believed me when I told them how much they’d miss him, obviously they’re all starting to realize. Plus all the blame here seems to be going to McKinnie and the hatred for him amuses me

by uofmike on Oct 22, 2010 12:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Pretty obvious around here...

Almost all of us thought losing Taylor was a huge loss! He picked up blitzes and converted alot of 3rd downs for them the past couple years! I heard/read he led the NFL in 3rd down conversions for a single player. He always came thru on 3rd down for them… Whether that was pass blocking or catching a pass it didn’t matter.

Viking fans have their heads buried to far up #4’s arse to notice something as important as converting on 3rd downs! LOL

You've been Stroh'd!!!

by Strohman on Oct 22, 2010 1:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

and how are the bears doing on third downs now?

oh.

4 hours 5 minutes? Is that all? Buehrle coulda pitched three CGs and the bottom of the 14th in Houston by then. FTMFYITA! - RWShow

by blackoutsox on Oct 22, 2010 1:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Can't blame all that on Taylor

He’s not the one that gave up a sack on first/second down to put them at 3rd and fifteen. Their line is terrible, their receivers mediocre, their quarterback inconsistent, and their offensive coordinator’s system isn’t a good fit for poor offensive lines.

by I voted for Kodos on Oct 22, 2010 1:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

eh they just aren’t using him. What a waste of money for the Bears…can’t complain though, I hope they keep misusing him!

by TrevorR on Oct 22, 2010 6:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Bears offensive line is terrible

and they’re running an offense that requires the QB to hold on to the ball for as long as possible. Seeing as how Cutler isn’t the most mobile guy in the world, that’s pretty bad combination.

by TarHeelHawk on Oct 22, 2010 8:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

The thing is

When Cutler was hurt and Todd Collins had to play, if you want to call it that, the Bears were very effective running the ball. But the only reason they ran it is because Collins had 4 picks and 6 completions.

But because Cutler is in there, Martz is enamored with the deep pass, which I don’t think they’re capable of doing on a consistent basis, but could a lot more effectively if they ran the ball.

Odd catch 22 Martz has put the offense in, if you ask me. They won’t run because they have Cutler, but if he’s out they can run but not pass.

The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota

"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."

"Pull your 84 jerseys out, man. I think this is going to be a fun ride." Randy Moss, WR, Minnesota Vikings

by Ted Glover on Oct 22, 2010 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Everyone saw it differently I suppose... Most Vikes fans I mix with appreciated him

I was really, really hoping somehow we’d manage to keep him on, although I exptected him to cost too much and he did. AP, being the face of the franchise, wasn’t going anywhere… so it made sense business-wise. He wasn’t just a great blocker, as UofMike said he could do everything well, and it was nice to be able to field a 3rd down group that could pass block AND be a legitimate running threat. The biggest pains for me thus far as a Vikings fan have been the missed bocks by HB’s… I can think of three glaring failures just in the ’Boys game, the guys in the film room must be weeping…

by CaP'M on Oct 22, 2010 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah lets throw another 7M at Favre and ignore the best 3rd down RB in the NFL.

At least you got Gerhart to pick up those crucial 3rd downs?!! LMAO

You've been Stroh'd!!!

by Strohman on Oct 22, 2010 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

To be fair...

Taylor was signed by the Bears long before we threw the extra cap space at Favre.

It was kinda hard to pay Taylor as much as the Bears did to be our 3rd down back.

by Bjorno on Oct 22, 2010 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Cap Space

There is NO salary cap this year and everyone knew it… They could have easily signed Taylor if they wanted too! They just didn’t think he was good enough or something to pay him! Its easy to make excuses though isn’t it? Been doing it for about 50 yrs now! LOL

He’s being paid to be only a 3rd down RB in Chicago! Forte gets all the carries and Taylor plays mostly 3rd downs.

No reason whatsoever that you couldn’t have had Taylor and still paid Favre!!!

You've been Stroh'd!!!

by Strohman on Oct 22, 2010 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

In Minnesota's defense

They already have the 3rd-highest payroll and don’t have the high revenue of larger markets and/or fancy new stadiums (yet).

by I voted for Kodos on Oct 22, 2010 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

But they were still willing to throw an extra 7M at Favre when he probably would have played for the 13M he was under contract for.

Take away that 7M and where do they stand? Give Taylor 4 mil and still have enough to give #4 some extra if he needed it to play another year.

You've been Stroh'd!!!

by Strohman on Oct 22, 2010 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

to be fair…Favre probably won’t see most of that money he was promised cause in order to get it he has to win them a super bowl!

by TrevorR on Oct 22, 2010 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't say cap space had anything to do with us not signing Taylor...

Only that it is kinda hard to pay Taylor as much as the Bears did to be our 3rd down back.

Excuses? That is all I am gonna hear from Packers fans after Sunday.

by Bjorno on Oct 22, 2010 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Taylor was signed by the Bears long before we threw the extra cap space at Favre.

You are the one who brought the cap space into the argument! Basically saying that the bears gave Taylor money that the vikes couldn’t due to the cap! Try again!

Go on back to DN! That junk of a blog that bans people for expressing opinions that don’t kiss #4 and viqueen ass.

You've been Stroh'd!!!

by Strohman on Oct 22, 2010 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Trotting out “Viqueen”? Stroh’d indeed :)

by CaP'M on Oct 22, 2010 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Poor Baby...

If you can’t stand the heat get out of the fire!

You've been Stroh'd!!!

by Strohman on Oct 23, 2010 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Actually...

I was hoping you could change my diaper for me?!? Chipotle was a BAD idea…

by CaP'M on Oct 24, 2010 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

I would have been THRILLED if we had. It would have been fun to have trotted him out there as our starter this week.

by TrevorR on Oct 23, 2010 7:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wow, you are really an ambassador for your team's fans.

I come over here for an intelligent conversation, and I get this crap with you telling me to leave.

You sir, are a jackass.

Yes, I brought cap space into the conversation, but you can read it again, the cap space comment was in regards to Favre not to Taylor. You can interpret it that way if you want, but I could give a rat’s ass anymore.

Maybe you should aim your vitriol at the trolls.

by Bjorno on Oct 23, 2010 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

All that over a little viqueens reference?

Really thinned skinned aren’t we? I would expect similar if I went to a rivals site! But then I wouldn’t even bother to respond to such a little thing as a poking fun at my teams name! Not like I was attacking YOU!

Like I said… If you can’t stand the heat…

You've been Stroh'd!!!

by Strohman on Oct 23, 2010 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

Had nothing to do with the Viqueens comment...

That insult doesn’t even register anymore, just like if I called you an equally immature name based on anal sex and the name of your football team… but I am not going to because it’s pointless.

I think you are confusing me for the other guy who you called a “Baby”.

Regardless, the first reply to something I said was you accusing me of making excuses for us not signing a guy. Why would I make excuses for a move I did not agree with?

I understand why the move was made, it doesn’t mean I condone it.

Now, I can understand you coming at me with that kind of crap if we had already established a conversation and were feeding and returning friendly jabs. But this was your first reply and rather than offer useful insight, it was just useless insults.

by Bjorno on Oct 23, 2010 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Where did I insult you?

Your crap blog… Yes, and from experience thats what it is… Your team? Yes… But what did I say to insult YOU?

All I did mistake you for him… Big deal.

WHile at the same time you throw the J-Ass term at me?!! Very nice of someone on another teams site and claiming not to be a troll…

And the other guy? If he’s crying foul over being over the term viqueen, then he is a baby! Especially on another teams site.

You've been Stroh'd!!!

by Strohman on Oct 23, 2010 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

“How to Win Friends and Influence People” by Strohman.

You’re not wrong, Stroh, you’re just an asshole.

by Curly Lambeau on Oct 23, 2010 4:31 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

One last Lebowski quote

Walter, I love you, but sooner or later, you’re going to have to face the fact you’re a goddamn moron.

by I voted for Kodos on Oct 23, 2010 8:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

I really don’t see a connection between paying Favre huge money and not keeping Taylor. The FO didn’t think he was worth the high price he was commanding, and likely thought a draftee or Young could step in. Maybe they thought AP would learn to block?! So far it hasn’t worked out well.

by CaP'M on Oct 22, 2010 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes!

I think this is a strong argument. There’s absolutely no question that Peterson has the strength and skill to pass block. Why he hasn’t been able to learn is beyond me. The Vikings should hire Clinton Portis to teach him the technique and joys of laying out a blitzing linebacker.

Although I live in Minnesota I don’t speak much with the locals regarding the Vikings due to bad experiences. What’s the take on Gerhart? I thought he was a great pick but he’s looked pretty mediocre to me thus far.

by I voted for Kodos on Oct 22, 2010 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

pass blocking

AP has never had to do anything like pass blocking in his entire career. HS, college or Pro’s… Its not a surprise that he hasn’t learned it. He’s never been put into position, prior to this year to have to do it. Takes a couple years of experience to master it. Look how long it took Bjack to become proficient at it. And he was used in that role at Nebraska alot.

As for Gerhart… Nothing but a big power RB w/o breakaway speed! He was awesome in college, but he was bigger and faster than the LB trying to tackle him! Thats not the case in the NFL!!! I didn’t like him at all… He’ll never be a top NFL RB and it wouldn’t surprise me if he’s out of the NFL in a few years w/ little to show for it!

You've been Stroh'd!!!

by Strohman on Oct 22, 2010 10:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

"With very little to show for it"

Well, that depends on how well he invests his signing bonus

by I voted for Kodos on Oct 23, 2010 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

I was talking in terms of on field accomplishments

I’m guessing you knew that… LOL

You've been Stroh'd!!!

by Strohman on Oct 23, 2010 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think the primary issue is how he plays football, and what he’s focused on to this point. He seems to operate on instinct out there, which can be great for bull rushing in the open field but cause problems when he has to wait for a hole to develop, or a gap in the line to let a blitzing LB through. I’m hoping more time spent playing with that focus will help (or he could just watch tape of LT when we played the Jets).

I don’t know what to think of Gerhart. I thought initially he would be a Kuhn-type back, give some reliable short yardage to ice games, but so far he hasn’t shown he can overpower people reliably. Work in progress.

by CaP'M on Oct 24, 2010 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don’t think he’ll ever show the ability to consistently run people over either. I actually found myself laughing out loud when the Vikes traded up for him. He just never impressed me a whole lot. I didn’t and still don’t think he’ll be able to overpower linebacker’s which was part of why he was so effective in college.

by packallday555 on Oct 24, 2010 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

As another Packers fan in St. Paul

I have long thought McKinnie was overrated. His Pro Bowl near-appearance last year is State’s Evidence A that the Pro Bowl system is broken. Remember how KGB used to abuse him? Wait until he faces Peppers again this year – he did so poorly against Peppers last year that they benched him. The offensive line looks about the same to me as it did last year, but Favre seems to be a little slower in his reads. I think he’ll keep improving as the season goes on, though.

Also, I know Favre’s ankle has gotten a lot of attention, but it seems to be holding up quite well thus far. He seems as mobile as he was last year.

by I voted for Kodos on Oct 22, 2010 1:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Another Pack fan in dreaded Minnesota...

I was with you on telling people how much they would miss Chester. Everyone wanted to downplay it but I don’t know if they really believed it. I think its human nature to downplay the loss of a player, we have done it before too. I don’t know if the Vikes have more wins with him here, but their offense wouldn’t have struggled as much cause he was one of Favre’s safety valves.

by TrevorR on Oct 22, 2010 6:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

yeah I think most people down played it because we couldnt' do anythign about it

I would say if it was put to a fan vote he would have been kept. As is I’m hoping they start putting K-Sauce in the back field more as a blocking back on sure passing downs. He was good at it for Cunningham and I think he’ll do a good job with Favre, plus he also has the rare ability to catch a ball and fall down.

It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...

by Grime on Oct 22, 2010 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Minnie fan here, head's up...

Anyways, I LOVED Taylor, he was actually my favorite Viking last year. (I have a soft spot for the unsung hero.) I was heartbroken, but not surprised, when he left. I’ve said before the only reason he wasn’t a first stringer is because ‘3rd down Wizard Master’ isn’t an actual position… yet. (I do believe Goddell has been getting my letters on the subject, it’s all a matter of time now.)

Funny thing- I actually suggested last season, after all of AP’s fumbles, that we trade HIM, pay CT to stay, and use whatever ridiculous draft picks/ traded players/ whatever we got for AP, and it would have been a lot, to boost our O-line and secondary.

That said, however, now that AP seems to have cured his fumbleitis (I SWEAR that fumble last week was Favre’s fault and not AP’s- I’m in the minority, but Favre put the ball in AP’s stomach, when AP’s hands were both at his chest), and with our issues at WR (didn’t see that coming…), I’m glad we kept All Day around. I just don’t know if we could have counted on Taylor to do all that Peterson’s done to keep this team competitive, even in losing games.

by KJSegall on Oct 22, 2010 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

The fumble last week was really, really odd looking

It could’ve gone either way. And while it’s the same stat, that isn’t the kind of fumble AP was chastised for, which were usually for trying to get yards after contact. He has done a lot better this year for sure.

by Danwood on Oct 22, 2010 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hard to figure out who to blame though usually QBs are trained to put that ball in their gut, not their chest.

by TrevorR on Oct 22, 2010 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

...Trade AP

For WHAT ’’glaring’’ hole one our team? It’s the same one minus CT that fumbled it’s way out of the Super Bowl last season…

by Jepp The Viking on Oct 22, 2010 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Haha

In spite of all the fumbles that went on earlier, your team still had a good chance, and was not ‘out’ of the Super Bowl, when Bertt threw his classic interchokesion at the end of regulation!

-
TT bashers - turning my stomach since 2005!

The glass is way more than half-full!

by NorthStarr on Oct 22, 2010 8:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

well...

I said trade AP after his rookie season. After that season, if I can recall, there was a team that paid a lot of money for one Michael Turner. They had 2 first rounders that draft, Matt Ryan (QB of the future, something you don’t have) and a 20something pick to replace Griffen and pretty much all DB’s on the Vikings (I like Winfield, but he’s old and only “okay” at pass coverage. Good tackler though.) My favorite reason from Vikings fans this preseason was “we have lito now, we’re going to be deep in the secondary”. Which turned out to be when Lito plays, WRs are going to be deep in the secondary. Back to the topic, the Vikings could have easily gotten those 2 first rounders and at least two more first day picks for him. The Vikings don’t pay up the butt for Berrian, don’t need to draft the glorified KR 2 years ago in the 1st (yeah, I said it, just wait a couple seasons. Percy = Devin Hester) and what are they going to do next year when Moss leaves and Sidney has to be a #1 w/o Favre having the best year of his career? Cause he did great before that season… (btw I actually like Sidney as a WR but he’s not the dominant player he was last season with any QB not having a career year). Do I need to talk about the right side of the OL or the DL that is slipping?

by uofmike on Oct 23, 2010 1:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Great article...

one of your better contributions to the site Tex. You should do a weekly interview thing like this with someone from another site and come up with a name. I don’t THINK this was a regular thing, but maybe I am just forgetting…

by TrevorR on Oct 22, 2010 6:53 AM CDT reply actions  

Agreed.

Ted approached me this week, but I’m going to be more proactive about it from now on.

"Career highlights? I had two. I got an intentional walk from Sandy Koufax and I got out of a rundown against the Mets." - Bob Uecker

by texwestern on Oct 22, 2010 7:43 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

We do it over at DN

but then we’re just better than you guys are :D

It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...

by Grime on Oct 22, 2010 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

-1

-
TT bashers - turning my stomach since 2005!

The glass is way more than half-full!

by NorthStarr on Oct 22, 2010 8:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Question you missed...

What the heck is up with Gonzo out there lately. Seems like everytime I go there he has some post with a crazy rant about something. Has he gone off the deep end?

by TrevorR on Oct 22, 2010 10:20 AM CDT reply actions  

Well

The desperation of having never won a Super Bowl (or much of anything) might be taking it’s toll. Also the possibility of the Vikes moving to the West Coast might be stressful too.

As Packer fans, we really can’t relate.

Poor guy.

by PackFaninFL on Oct 22, 2010 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

You got to give it to Warcraft.

Plus his interviews are pretty much the best.

It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...

by Grime on Oct 22, 2010 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Kluwe

Has been about as good as a punter can be so far.

by Jepp The Viking on Oct 22, 2010 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Up here in Minnesota

The Vikings have these billboards celebrating “50 Years of Greatness.” I keep wanting to climb up there and change it to “50 Years of Near-Greatness.”

On a more serious note . . . I don’t think trading Adrian Peterson for a king’s ransom would be worth it (or even close). He is such a dangerous runner that last year, even when the passing game was running on all cylinders, teams would constantly play the run and dare Favre to beat them with the pass. Which he did, up until the Saints game.

Even with a good back like Taylor, teams wouldn’t have to gameplan for him the way they do for Peterson. AP and CJ are the two game-changers in the NFL at running back, and that’s something you just don’t trade away. If the Packers had AP our offense would have the potential to set some records, in my oh-so-humble opinion.

by I voted for Kodos on Oct 22, 2010 1:00 PM CDT reply actions  

My cheese themed meal for Sunday nights game will be.

No cheese at all, but some Johnsonvilles minus the casings flattened out and filled with kraut and spicy brown mustard. I’ll then roll it all up and smoke it. YEAH! I like brats and beer as much or more than any cheesehead. :D

by KC612 on Oct 22, 2010 1:49 PM CDT reply actions  

APC: I’ve seen You-know-who take some big-time hits so far this season. What is the consensus on how the offensive line has performed so far this year?

Ted: Anecdotally, they seem better.

I read that response as “[Well, mis-using an adverb up front here in an effort to sound intelligent,] they seem better.”

Nah, just hackin’ on ya. Thanks for coming by, Vikings fans. …and I’ll admit that the comment about manatee blubber was kinda’ funny.

by Curly Lambeau on Oct 22, 2010 4:03 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed



Manager

Img00243_small Kevin McCauley

Editors

Texbucky_small texwestern

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Ayrton_senna_1988_canada_small Vermont Cubs Fan

Fallout-3-1010_small PackApologist

Gassertaylor_small OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Linkedin_picture_small Zack Ward

Carson-palmer-hot-dog_small MatthewJStein