Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Strikeforce: Cormier vs. Barnett Fight Video Highlights

Washington Post: Will Favre Start Next Sunday?

As I wrote recently, I can't imagine how Brett Favre will be able to start next Sunday, but at the same time I expect he'll be too stubborn to come out. From my article at the Washington Post.com, here's a look back at the last time I expected he would miss a start:

The last major injury he played through as a Packer happened in 2007 when he hurt his throwing elbow and separated his left shoulder against the Cowboys, and, of course, he started their next game.

Comment 40 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I honestly wouldn't be surprised

either way, to see him play or sit out. I think the Chilly PC afterwards shows that hes not happy w/ Brett and everything, plus the who Penisgate thing, and this injury, it just seems like now might be the time for him to kinda take his step out and be done w/ the game for good.

With that said, I expect that if he’s not retired by like Thursday or so, to see him out there next week making errant throws from a combination of poor decisions, and an inability to put any pressure on his fractured heel (and just any announcer, he’s loves throwing off his back foot)

I think it’s best for him to step aside and say he’s done and he tried to come back for the team and everything but his body just can’t hold up. I think that shows that he was there for the team and not himself (to a point) and lets him save a little face. If he keeps going out there and costing his team games, then that just furthers his selfish image imo

by Goldenarmadillo4 on Oct 26, 2010 1:19 PM CDT reply actions  

Predictions:
Favre will start, play maybe a whole quarter.
Romo will not start.

by GinSlinger on Oct 26, 2010 1:32 PM CDT reply actions  

He'll probably play.

From what I understand, this injury is still manageable with some treatment (ie: meds) and an ankle brace. His mobility will be limited, of course, but I didn’t think he was very mobile to begin with. The only cause for concern would be does he want to risk making it worse, which I don’t think will bother him much.

I hope he plays and does not get hurt further.

by Bush League All Star on Oct 26, 2010 1:39 PM CDT reply actions  

Ike: Brett Farve’ll get no sympathy from me!

You can't be serious, man! You cannot be serious! His foot was on the line! It was ON THE LINE! He was clearly out! How could you possibly call him in!?

"I'm going to award a point against you, Mr. OBrienSchofieldismyHero."

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Oct 26, 2010 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was half-listening

to the radio and Cowherd said that Chilly was going to sit him — to “protect him from himself”

"False start: the whole offensive line." -Hocculi

by BrewKitty on Oct 26, 2010 1:52 PM CDT reply actions  

It might be in Favre's best interests to sit

if he thinks he might actually get suspended. I doubt Favre wants to be remembered as the Iron Man Whose Streak Was Broke Because of his Penis.

If he doesn’t think he’ll be suspended, then expect him to play. Unless Childress tries to wrest back control of his team by benching Favre for a week or two. Minnesota has so much talent it’s not like they can’t win with T-Jack – who took the Vikings to the playoffs before Harvin and Moss and before Edwards and Greenway had emerged as playmakers. He doesn’t look pretty doing it, but he can win games.

by I voted for Kodos on Oct 26, 2010 1:57 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, but

breaking his streak because he got too old and tried to get fruitless revenge on his former team, who then broke his ankle in return, doesn’t look too much better.

by Archibaldcrane on Oct 26, 2010 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Brett Farve

and unfounded revenge.

Sounds like a bitter combination.

You can't be serious, man! You cannot be serious! His foot was on the line! It was ON THE LINE! He was clearly out! How could you possibly call him in!?

"I'm going to award a point against you, Mr. OBrienSchofieldismyHero."

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Oct 26, 2010 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don’t think he’ll get suspended. Sterger didn’t release the pictures and texts, the guy from deadspin did. She’s been uncompliant with the NFL’s probes. I suspect she was paid some hush money and forced to sign a non-disclosure agreement. This will quietly slip away. Personally, I’d like to see him suspended, but I don’t think it will happen.

I don’t see Chilly as being man enough to bench Favre. He’s talked about pulling him several times now and yet hasn’t done so. As I’ve said before, to criticize Favre for throwing INT’s is like complaining that water is wet. He had to know what he was getting himself into.

TJack could hardly do much worse.

by gern blanston on Oct 26, 2010 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

You think Assistant Coach Childress will try to regain control of Minnesota? Seriously?

No way head coach Favre allows that.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Possibly hiking up Mount Marcy during the weekend of October 23-24. State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Oct 26, 2010 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not sure

What the vikes will do… But on a really bum ankle and behind a porous OL he was already getting pounded on pretty well. With a broken ankle and heal it will limit his mobility (or lack thereof) even more!

As much as I like the idea of his streak being ended by the Packers, I almost like the idea of him continuing to get PUMMELED on even more!!! Can you just imagine the utter beating he would take w/ NO mobility whatsoever?!! LOL

You've been Stroh'd!!!

by Strohman on Oct 26, 2010 2:12 PM CDT reply actions  

He has no mobility

He’s going to get the cr@p kicked out of him this weekend. The Patriots are lethal at home in the regular season, they have young LBs and a good DL rotation.

Their secondary, on the other hand, is reminiscent of the Wisconsin Badgers. Except for Devin McCourty, who was one of the most astonishing first-round selections of the last few years, they struggle in pass coverage. Patrick Chung was hurt in the Chargers game, and he’s their best coverage S.

You can't be serious, man! You cannot be serious! His foot was on the line! It was ON THE LINE! He was clearly out! How could you possibly call him in!?

"I'm going to award a point against you, Mr. OBrienSchofieldismyHero."

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Oct 26, 2010 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

either that...

or he tosses up like 6 INTs to avoid getting clobbered. I believe that the Bishop pick 6 was the result of pressure from a play or two previous. I think Jones (?) hit him pretty good.

St. Louis playoff loss level performance if he plays…..

by gern blanston on Oct 26, 2010 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Predicting Favre's stat line if he's dumb enough to play that game:

4 for 20, with 8 INTs and 3 lost fumbles

Devin McCourty one-ups DeAngelo Hall’s performance from Sunday with 4 INTs of his own.

Soon coming to SBNation: The Peyton's Liberation Army?

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Oct 26, 2010 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

How awesome would it be if Tavaris told the Vikings and their fans

“You wanted Brett, now you got Brett”. I know this would never happen seeing as it would be dumb for a guy like Jackson to waste an opportunity to prove himself but it would be highly fitting seeing as how this organization and it’s fans has basically taken a giant crap on him despite the team making the playoffs his first year and only year starting. Now after all the calls for Brett Favre and even Sage Rosenfels, they want Tavaris in thinking he might possibly save their season that their supposed Messiah seems to be willingly flushing down the toilet.

by Charlie Kelly on Oct 26, 2010 2:27 PM CDT reply actions  

Have to agree.

Honestly…the Vikes wanted Brett so damn badly. They wanted a FORTY YEAR OLD beaten up, broken down legend. And that’s what they’ve got. Now suddenly the steroid injections and painkillers aren’t able to keep him upright and they change their tune. It’s funny, really. The puppet strings of modern medicine will eventually break and Brett will go crashing to the turf for good.

"False start: the whole offensive line." -Hocculi

by BrewKitty on Oct 26, 2010 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sigh

Again with the steroid allegations? We’ll talk about it once there is some supporting evidence on the table and not when it’s just idle speculation.

Towlieppan: "You wanna throw high?"

by GoGregGo on Oct 26, 2010 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not "pump you up" roids

Steroid injections into his joints to keep them supple and mobile.

"False start: the whole offensive line." -Hocculi

by BrewKitty on Oct 26, 2010 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry

I guess I jumped to conclusions there. My mistake.

Towlieppan: "You wanna throw high?"

by GoGregGo on Oct 26, 2010 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=3&sqi=2&ved=0CBsQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnbcsports.msnbc.com%2Fid%2F39722807%2Fsports%2Fplayer_news&rct=j&q=cortisone%20favre&ei=wzPHTMS-O83pOYzR6N4B&usg=AFQjCNFTwQLuLO39vBK_vqz_Qm5_4MiJIg&cad=rja

Cortisone is a steroid. It’s no secret Favre’s been taking the cortisone injections. What’s interesting was the comment I read yesterday to the effect that Favre could play on that ankle if it was injected with long-lasting local anesthetic. I find it odd that the NFL allows that treatment.

by GinSlinger on Oct 26, 2010 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

After the game

his foot falls off.

Soon coming to SBNation: The Peyton's Liberation Army?

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Oct 26, 2010 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

No way Favre lets Green Bay break his streak

"A ringing single for David Eckstein who, in my view, is the perfect size for an American male." -Bob Costas

by Troy J. on Oct 26, 2010 3:20 PM CDT reply actions  

which begs the questiong...

what is a “performance enhancing drug” to begin with. That seems like one, but they arbitrarily draw a line.

That’s why I’m in favor of legalizing all performance enhancing drugs.

sips his performance enhancing coffee to stay awake at work

by PackFaninFL on Oct 26, 2010 3:22 PM CDT reply actions  

Meant this is a response ...

to ginslinger in the “subthread” up above.

by PackFaninFL on Oct 26, 2010 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree that it’s best to not ban any substance. Too much energy is spent trying to uncover the ones who break the rules (Williamses?), and it probably puts those who are scared of the league at an unfair advantage. There’d probably develop two leagues, though—one for users and one for non-users.

As long as we’re talking about good ideas that will never be enacted, I think the NFL should drop helmets and pads, or at least reduce them significantly from their current levels. If the hitter felt as much pain as the hittee, we might not see guys throwing themselves around at opponents heads.

by GinSlinger on Oct 26, 2010 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

The problem with not banning any substances IMO

is not at the professional level, but at the high school and college level. These kids emulate whatever the professionals do, and would in all likelihood be more likely to put chemicals in their bodies with the rationale “Hey, if the NFL lets their players do it, why can’t I.”

Towlieppan: "You wanna throw high?"

by GoGregGo on Oct 26, 2010 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

You cannot be SERIOUS

…hard to work up McEnroe type outrage when the Packers beat the Vikings on the same weekend that the Bears lose and the Cowboys get embarrassed in the home stadium on MNF, but…

Here goes:

Players are already too big, strong and fast. With legal ‘roids… They would be literally killing each other. I, for one, would stop watching football. At that point, it would cross the line from “sport” to “bloodsport.” But maybe that’s okay with you, I don’t know.

by Curly Lambeau on Oct 26, 2010 6:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Stop stealing my ex-signature!

I got sick of dragging it around lol.

Soon coming to SBNation: The Peyton's Liberation Army?

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Oct 26, 2010 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Isn't the correct answer "who cares?"

The Vikings are going to get beat on Sunday whether or not he plays. That team is too top heavy and too dysfunctional to go on the road and beat the Pats.

But it would be ironic if it was the Packers who snapped his consecutive games streak, wouldn’t it?

Sweet, delicious, irony.

by TarHeelHawk on Oct 26, 2010 4:27 PM CDT reply actions  

Yes

honestly there’s a bit too much talk about one particular non-Packers QB on here. We knocked Kolb out but once the game was over we weren’t spending front page articles wondering whether he’d start against the Lions. If he’s iffy coming into week 11, let’s revisit the issue.

by Archibaldcrane on Oct 26, 2010 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think

we just got so used to living and breathing Brett Favre that we can’t help ourselves. Packers fans know him better than anyone, period. It’s only natural for us to wax philosophic about his comings and goings.

"False start: the whole offensive line." -Hocculi

by BrewKitty on Oct 26, 2010 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Kolb wasn’t starting for our division rival.

by Curly Lambeau on Oct 26, 2010 6:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jay Cutler is though

where’s his post when he was out against the Panthers?

Just saying, I was glad when we got rid of Favre in ’08….I want to actually be rid of him as a Packer fan, not be continually obsessing over his every idiotic overture.

by Archibaldcrane on Oct 26, 2010 7:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well Cutler didn’t get hurt against the Packers and he’s not a former Packer…that is why its not being discussed. He’s also nowhere near the QB that Favre has been. All that said, honestly I am done talking about him too…

by TrevorR on Oct 27, 2010 8:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

One thing that we must all remember,

After Favre hurt his elbow and shoulder in November 2007, he had a week and a half until the Packers played a then-weak Oakland team at Lambeau Field (who they clobbered 38-7).

This time around, he’s got a short week and the Vikings go on the road to New England (which is never an easy place to play). Will he play? I suppose I’ll have to wait until Sunday afternoon to find out.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Possibly hiking up Mount Marcy during the weekend of October 23-24. State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Oct 26, 2010 5:21 PM CDT reply actions  

shameless play for sympathy

Peter king has an article at si.com in which a orthopedic doc says the ankle injury is nothing but a “glorified ankle sprain” that the Viqueens are manipulating into something much worse. He implies that you don’t have to be Superman to play with that injury.

I think that they’re playing the “healing miracle” card to get everyone fired up for the Hoodie.

by Egbert Souse on Oct 27, 2010 9:25 AM CDT reply actions  

Or Chilly is going to use the injury to his advantage

and bench Favre because of the injury. He said that after the 3 picks, Brett was “one bad drive away” from being benched. So it’s somewhat reasonable that Chilly wants #4 on the bench and I don’t think he would just straight bench him but if he’s “too injured to play” well that would just work perfectly.

If you don't know the cadence of GO PACK GO your opinion doesn't matter
--John Jurkovic

by sidtheelf on Oct 27, 2010 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed



Manager

Img00243_small Kevin McCauley

Editors

Texbucky_small texwestern

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Ayrton_senna_1988_canada_small Vermont Cubs Fan

Fallout-3-1010_small PackApologist

Gassertaylor_small OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Linkedin_picture_small Zack Ward

Carson-palmer-hot-dog_small MatthewJStein