Matchup to watch this week
Since we all need a break from discussing who the Packers should and should not acquire or get rid of, I thought I'd do a post on what I think will be the most important matchup of the Packers-Redskins game. If you're still interested, follow the jump!
According to Football Outsiders, the Packers currently are ranked 22nd against passes to tight ends. I'm sure this comes as little surprise to anyone who saw Shaun Hill complete pass after pass to Pettigrew and Scheffler in Week 4. The really bad news is that the tight ends the Packers have faced so far this season are only ranked (by DVOA) 30th (Celek), unranked (Stupar), 31st (Olsen), 28th (Scheffler), and 14th (Pettigrew). And consider further that Brandon Chillar (who had the best stop rate on passing plays of all the starting Packers LBs last year according to Football Outsiders) was available for most of these games.
Chris Cooley is ranked 20th among tight ends by DVOA, higher than all but one of the tight ends previously faced by the Packers this season. In addition, while Fred Davis is unranked by DVOA due to not having enough receptions, his DVOA of 90.7% would lead all tight ends. With Chillar and Burnett out of the game, Capers is going to have to actively scheme to keep the Redskins from bleeding us to death with passes to their tight ends. Does he put Woodson on Cooley all game? Bracketed coverage? What are your thoughts?
Me? I'll be giving a first hand report next week, maybe. (I'll be at the game, very excited!)
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Woodson on Cooley...
Doesn’t sound good at first, simply because the idea of McNabb to Santana Moss on a deep route is somewhat terrifying to me. Moss has great vertical speed; if he gets away no one is even going to touch him. So…traditional CB-WR matchups, possibly drop the safety closer to Cooley and definitely drop an LB in coverage to stick to Cooley like poster tack.
Did any of what I just said make sense? Sorry if it didn’t…
I'm just glad Scott Tolzien didn't go all Drew Tate on Nick Toon and whack him upside the head...
No longer using Yahoo! Sports for anything besides stat checking since 9/29/2010...
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Oct 6, 2010 8:51 PM CDT reply actions
I don't see why Williams wouldn't be able to cover Moss though
And beyond Moss none of the Washington’s receivers scare me. My thought is why not use your best two cover guys on their top two receiving targets?
Towlieppan: "You wanna throw high?"
True, Tramon is having a great season so far
and while he might not be as fast as Santana Moss, he should still be able to break up some of McNabb’s deep passes as long as he’s in good position and looks for the football first.
I'm just glad Scott Tolzien didn't go all Drew Tate on Nick Toon and whack him upside the head...
WHAT DO YOU MEAN I WAS BANNED FROM STAMPEDE BLUE? - Clay Matthews III
No longer using Yahoo! Sports for anything besides stat checking since 9/29/2010...
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Oct 7, 2010 5:02 PM CDT up reply actions
Maybe this is one of those games where we start using a lot of bumping at the line to neutralize the speed of a guy like Moss.
yes, this would be one of the games where we miss Al Harris’s bump n run abilities
by Packer superbowl champs 2010 on Oct 8, 2010 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Tramon would actually be the perfect guy to cover Moss, and I bet he will. He’s our fastest, most explosive corner, and he often does match-up on the opposing teams most explosive guy.
by packallday555 on Oct 9, 2010 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions

by 





















