Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Strikeforce: Cormier vs. Barnett Fight Video Highlights

Recap: The Packers Defense Forces Favre To "Re-Evaluate"

Game balls all around as the Green Bay Packers defense almost shut out a Vikings offense that had scored over 24 points in 3 of their 4 home games this season. There were some standout individual efforts, but the entire defense (with one exception) played great. The Vikings offense isn't what it was a season ago, but holding any NFL offense to only 3 points, at home, in favorable dome conditions, is an impressive feat. 

The only injuries reported were three in the secondary: backups S Anthony Smith, S Atari Bigby, and CB Pat Lee. It's hard to tell whether they'll miss any games, but at least the Packers have some depth.

Four Quarters

After a three-and-out, the Vikings got a 25 yard run from RB Adrian Peterson and 29 yard completion to WR Greg Lewis to move into the red zone. If there was any complaint on defense it was that CB Sam Shields did not have a great game. He got turned around and beaten on a couple pass plays. But once in the red zone, the Packers defense forced a field goal. That 10 play, 77 yard drive was notable because it was their only scoring drive and accounted for nearly a quarter of their total offense. Those 89 yards of offense in the quarter were the highlights for the Vikings despite the fact that the Packers were consistently getting to and knocking QB Brett Favre down.

Star-divide

In the second quarter, their offense did manage a couple of respectable drives that moved into Packer territory, but both ended with a costly turnover. First was a short pass to RB Toby Gerhart that was stripped by CB Charles Woodson and recovered by LB A.J. Hawk. A couple of drives (and two punts) later, their offense once again got down to the Packer 25 yard line, but CB Tramon Williams jumped an inside route and his interception return set up the Packers second touchdown of the quarter. Despite 78 yards of offense in the quarter, those two turnovers outweighed any benefit. 

After the Vikings fell behind 24-3, it effectively took Peterson out of the game. He only had 3 carries in the second half. Favre did manage to get WR Sidney Rice involved in his first game of the season, but it took 10 pass attempts to get Rice three receptions. Favre's protection was improving, but they only had the ball for just over 5 minutes in the quarter and were forced punt twice as the defense let them get no closer than the Packer 33 yard line.

Down 31-3, the Vikings went for it twice on 4th down and failed to convert both times. Favre only converted 5 of 12 pass attempts, but he struggled to even get his hands on the ball. The Vikings had it for less than 4:30 in the final quarter as the Packers went 4 for 6 on 3rd down and ran out the play clock. WR Percy Harvin had his long reception of the game (9 yards) during this quarter, and limiting him to only 30 total yards of offense was a huge key to the game. 

Individual Analysis

LB Clay Matthews. As usual, he was a terror in the backfield. He was credited with a sack, two tackles for losses, and two QB hits. He also drew at least one holding penalty. 

LB Erik Walden. Who? The recently signed free agent doesn't play a lot, but he's the player on defense you're least likely to know about. He's getting a chance as a situational pass rusher on the strong side, and he drew one false start penalty. 

CB Tramon Williams. Has he been beaten at all this season? Football Outsiders said no (coming into this game) and this was arguably his best game of the season.

CB Sam Shields. As mentioned above, if there was a weak link in this game, it was Shields. One bad game isn't trouble, but the rookie has some more film to study.

Everyone else. Did anyone else have a bad game? If you want to nit-pick, LB A.J. Hawk over pursued on Peterson's 1st quarter run, but he was good in coverage and frequently caused trouble in the back field. Also, LB Frank Zombo missed an open-field tackle during the Vikings lone scoring drive that would have kept them well short of the red zone. Overall, if you're wondering about someone else on defense, they probably had a good or great game. 

Comment 27 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ahem.... ya forgot Woodson, Brandon.

Not only did he have 7 combined tackles, he had the crucial fumble come out of the BiQueens’ FB’s hands in the 2nd when things didn’t look great for the Pack and they were driving up the field. He should get a gold star too.

When life gives ya lemons, shut up and eat your damn lemons.

by P-Townfan on Nov 22, 2010 11:07 AM CST reply actions  

The fumble

was actually forced out of Gerhart’s hands. It was still an amazing play, and one that definitely turned the tide of the game.

Beat Northwestern, THEN I'll talk Wisconsin in the BCS. But not until that happens.
For all the crap we give Wil Wheaton, he can still tackle better than Asante Samuel...

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Nov 22, 2010 12:31 PM CST up reply actions  

And there was much rejoicing in Minnesota...

And the main difference between Chilly and any other coach? Any other coach would have Benched Favre’s ass a month ago.

"Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser." - Vince Lombardi

by AdamA on Nov 22, 2010 12:13 PM CST up reply actions  

penalties

Someone made a comment about this on an earlier post, but doesn’t it seem like the Packers have really fixed any penalty problems on both sides of the ball? I can’t recall them committing any mind-numbing penalties the past couple games, and they’ve certainly kept the unavoidable or justifiable ones to a minimum. I’ve noticed this defensively in particular. I think this is another indication of the entire unit stepping up its game.

by Do the Math on Nov 22, 2010 11:30 AM CST reply actions  

Good point

Penalties have really leveled off. I think this is a sign that the team is really focusing well and that once again, MM may have saved his best for the second half of the season (hopefully).

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on Nov 22, 2010 1:36 PM CST up reply actions  

One penalty...

…for 5 yards (Zombo). A factor that gives McCarthy a bit more credibility.

by docg on Nov 22, 2010 3:32 PM CST up reply actions  

long term and for this season

I have two worries for this team.

1.) Frank Zombo concerns me more than Sam Shields. Shields will get beat from time to time, but he makes plays.
2.) Bulaga. I don’t think he’s had a game yet this season where he’s graded out positively. He’s definitely the weak part of the line.

I’m guessing Bulaga will continue to improve, but I’d like to start seeing the results.

by shaftr on Nov 22, 2010 11:57 AM CST reply actions  

Yeah he’s been a little sketchy but he’s still better than our other options at this point. Our Oline is starting to gel nicely now. Heck Sitton is a pro bowler (should be) and the other guys are all playing the best I’ve seen them play in years.

by TrevorR on Nov 22, 2010 1:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Zombo

is probably the weak link on defense in my mind. His lateral movement is pretty poor. That might be the first and last time that Gerhart jukes a defender in his NFL career.

Shields doesn’t get beat anywhere near the frequency of previous Packers nickel backs, and he makes enough plays where you can’t really pick on him without risk.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on Nov 22, 2010 1:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Shields v Zombo

yeah he bit real bad on two play action plays…but the funny thing was that he had enough make up speed (that 4.2 40 comes in handy) to catch Rice on the 2nd one.

the first one he had Collins covering for him when Lewis got by..

But I agree with the above guy…Zombo concerns me WAAAYYY more as our starter than Shields. First of all, LBs are so crucial to our Defense, plus Zombo is just too raw, a real project. Luckily we have Chillar and others that can sort of step in there. Oh and Poppinga I guess.

by PackFaninFL on Nov 22, 2010 12:04 PM CST reply actions  

Yeah Zombo doesn’t look like the answer yet but I do like that he’s getting this time to get used to playing at NFL level. He and Jones and whomever we draft can all compete next year and it will just mean we are deep with experienced guys.

by TrevorR on Nov 22, 2010 1:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Brad Jones

I’d like to see him at inside linebacker. He’s got the speed and the body type to be an ILB in the 3-4. The OLB in the 3-4 needs someone a bit stronger than him. He’s very sound in his assignments and is probably better than Hawk in coverage.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on Nov 22, 2010 1:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Hawk back to the outside

would be interesting to see, he played OLB at ohio state and his first few years in green bay, then play desmond bishop and barnett in the middle for next year

by wisconsinsportsfan on Nov 22, 2010 7:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Well then...
Someone needs to make a ‘’thank you’’ post on Acme PAcking Co.
Who would have thought the best thing to happen to the 2010 MN Vikings came at the hands of GB?

From Jepp The Viking on DN’s breaking announcement thread.

Beat Northwestern, THEN I'll talk Wisconsin in the BCS. But not until that happens.
For all the crap we give Wil Wheaton, he can still tackle better than Asante Samuel...

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Nov 22, 2010 12:27 PM CST reply actions  

Yeah

We’ll keep the favors coming, for years to come.

by StephanL on Nov 22, 2010 12:34 PM CST up reply actions  

haha I already went over there and told them Your Welcome in their thread.

by TrevorR on Nov 22, 2010 1:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Funny

I wonder what they were saying about Childress a year ago. He seemed pretty popular then.

Last year I tried to tell some Vikings fans that Childress was the only thing standing between them and the Super Bowl and I nearly got beat up.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on Nov 22, 2010 1:43 PM CST up reply actions  

We thank you???

First,
Many of us wanted Chilli’s head last year! The most boring and predictable play calling ever. Also, he did not have the locker room last year and definitely didn’t have it this year. The current players rolled over for this game, perhaps in protest that he was still there. Favre is an interception machine, but he has never been that inaccurate on unpressured throws as he was in the game yesterday. Throwing balls 4 feet above wide open receivers and running backs hasn’t been his style. That’s why he gave us such fits when he was with the Pack.

Second,
Favre and Childress didn’t see eye to eye from the beginning. Favre likes to control the play calling and you can’t deny that. Unless the interception machine is stopped….

Third,
Perhaps we will have a good contest again next year when our team isn’t such a mess. I enjoy the rivalry. Good game to Aaron and your “D”. Hope to see you next year and not from L.A.

Thank god you helped us get rid of that moron. He was such a control freak and wasn’t at all good in handling the locker room!!!

by Vikes Rule on Nov 22, 2010 4:47 PM CST up reply actions  

TJ Lang

What happened to him? Last year he looked really good at RT as opposed to LT since he is strong, and I thought going into this season he would be the primary backup for RT. I did hear he pulled a Justin Harrell, and came to camp out of shape, and pissed some of the coaches off, but I’m thinking maybe he might be a better option at RT then Bulaga, since he is stronger and won’t get bull rushed as easily. What do you guys think?

by Katsuya89 on Nov 22, 2010 1:18 PM CST reply actions  

I would agree...

…but Bulaga is pretty well settled in at RT now. Plus, Clifton’s playing lights-out, so… I might have been in favor of either playing Bulaga at LG or just letting him sit and learn for his rookie year, but I’d have to say that the ship has sailed at this point on Lang cracking the line-up.

Maybe next year Lang takes over at RT and Bulaga moves over to the left. Although, then again, you’ve got a bird in the hand with Clifton until his performance slips, so it’s kind of an indefinite waiting game at that spot.

by Curly Lambeau on Nov 22, 2010 3:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Lang

He got some reps in at the end of the MN game at LT. He did alright, but I don’t think you can take much out of that. Bulaga is the better option this season and for our future.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Nov 22, 2010 4:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Lang

Lang missed the entire offseason up until training camp! He had the surgery on his wrist and it prevented him from working the weights very hard. I’ve had the same wrist surgery he had and its very difficult to work any upper body stuff with it!!! ANd even when he got the cast off just before training camp, he had to do some rehab on it for range of motion, prior to being able to stress it with the weights!

Not to mention that he needed all the technique work he could get in the offseason to have a chance as a primary backup, much less a starter! You just cant miss an entire offseason of weight work and technique work (especially for such a young player from a small school) and expect to have a chance to be productive!!!

Lang is NOT stronger than Bulaga!!! Even with a good offseason he wouldn’t have been as strong as Bulaga!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on Nov 22, 2010 9:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed



Manager

Img00243_small Kevin McCauley

Editors

Texbucky_small texwestern

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Ayrton_senna_1988_canada_small Vermont Cubs Fan

Fallout-3-1010_small PackApologist

Gassertaylor_small OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Linkedin_picture_small Zack Ward

Carson-palmer-hot-dog_small MatthewJStein