Packers Defense Recap: Great Game Against The 49ers Clouded By Four Big Plays
The Green Bay Packers defense had a weird game against the 49ers. For most of the season, they've been giving up some yards, but few big plays. Against the 49ers, they gave up a few big plays and nothing else. I was shocked watching QB Troy Smith complete a 39 yard pass to WR Michael Crabtree, a 66 yard touchdown to TE Vernon Davis, and two more passes to Davis of 25 and 20 yards. Those plays happened on four separate drives, and the 49ers scored on all four. But beyond those four plays that totaled 150 yards, the 49ers only totaled 119 yards on their other 47 plays (2.53 yards/play). Most of those were incompletions by Smith. All yardage counts, but it explains why after three big plays, the 49ers were forced to settle for field goals, and why they couldn't rally in the second half.
The other story is that LB Clay Matthews "has been slowed" and held without a sack over his last two games. What's happened over those last two games is that he's faced a couple of mammoth right tackles. His shin injury (which has held him out of practice a lot over the last month) has slowed him down just enough that those right tackles are able to get their hands on him, and use their size to keep him contained. The 49ers decided to double him at times, which certainly didn't hurt DE Cullen Jenkins and NT B.J. Raji as they recorded 3 sacks. He'll get better as he gets healthy, and he's still bringing a lot of energy to the game each week.
Also, it was another special teams day to forget. K Mason Crosby missed a 29 yard field goal, and a lousy punt by Tim Masthay and poor coverage gave the 49ers starting field position at the Packers 39 yard line. And that was just in the first quarter. Plus two of their five penalties were on special teams. It only cost them 6 points, but it could have mattered. They continue to give up plays, while never offsetting them with any big plays in their favor.
Four Quarters
I've been very impressed by the Plan C option of S Charlie Peprah at starting safety this season, but this was a game for him to forget. Remember the 39 yard pass to Crabtree? Peprah bit hard on the play action and Crabtree got behind him. The defense only gave up 1 yard thereafter, and the 49ers had to settle for a field goal.
The second quarter was the other Peprah play to forget: a 25 yard pass to Davis. Smith threw it short, but Peprah never turned around. Then Davis got away from him for another 10 yards. But once again the defense stood up and kept them out of the end zone after the 49ers had a 1st and goal from the 2 yard line. The 49ers went three and out on their next two possessions before Davis rumbled down field for a 66 yard touchdown near the end of the first half. I have no idea why CB Charles Woodson wasn't covering Davis all game long. On the touchdown reception, Davis was covered by LB A.J. Hawk (who he easily got away from), and then an uncharacteristic missed tackle by S Nick Collins gave him a free run to the end zone.
The 49ers first drive of the third quarter went back to what was working: passes to the tight ends. A 20 yard pass to Davis, and a 15 yard pass to TE Delanie Walker, set up their third field goal. But that was their last gasp. The Packers forced another three and out on the 49ers next possession, and the Packers offense started to eat a lot of clock.
After another three and out by the 49ers near the start of the fourth quarter, the Packers offense went on an 17 play, 8:35 drive that kept the 49ers offense off the field. The 49ers only had one more chance (unfortunately their final drive was the one that knocked Jenkins out of the game), and it ended with a Collins interception.
Individual Analysis
S Charlie Peprah. Usually I point out someone in the secondary for having a great game, but instead it was his first bad game as a starter. Their is no Plan D, and it's only one game. He's got some film to study, and he's got to bounce back next week.
LB Frank Zombo. With Matthews largely contained, it was Zombo who took advantage of backup LT Barry Sims to force some pressure. It was his second week in a row with a sack, and he does seem to be playing better.
DE Cullen Jenkins. He's already been announced out for next Sunday, which is a shame since he had arguably his best game of the season with 2 sacks and QB hits. Now he can focus on getting himself ready to play the Patriots in two weeks.
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
collins
you forgot collins looking lost on 66yrd td
i sort of think woodson wasn't on davis all game because
he’s one of our best run defenders and the plan was to take away the run and force t. smith to make plays. …he made one, and had many more crappy plays.
Why
Was Jenkins in on the last drive when the game was essentially over? If he was completely healthy I could see why but with him battling injuries all season his day should have been over at that point.
I thought the same thing
Just drop Harold Green, CJ Wilson and Jarius Wynn in there for a series or two.
by Archibaldcrane on Dec 7, 2010 11:55 AM CST up reply actions
I read...
That teams will always remove offensive players to protect them, but they never remove defensivie players for the same reason! Can’t say I totally agree w/ that philosophy, but it appears to be the case league-wide, not just the Packers!
You've been Stroh'd™!!!
why didn't belichek
take brady out of the game last nigh?. he did play the whole game.
is belichek a bad coach? if so, mcarthys the worst.
Belichek wanted to make a point to NYJ...
Thats what I think… McCarthy took Rodgers out at the end of SF! Flynn took the final series or plays! And neither choice makes him a bad HC, IMO… Just stating a point! And your apparently trying to start an argument!!!
You've been Stroh'd™!!!
simply
pointing out that hindsight is 20/20. every coach is different and its their decision on who comes out of games. since nobody on this blog is qualified to be a nfl head coach——imo—- we should go with his judgement.
i think somebody on this blog mentioned this same arguement a few times before.
nobody on this blog is qualified to be a nfl head coach
Never stops anybody otherwise… LOL I mostly stay away from good HC, bad HC arguments! Like you said we’re not qualified to be one, so who are we to judge.
Might have been jobe… Not sure tho.
You've been Stroh'd™!!!
Match ups
Is it just me or do the Packers never really matchup our top guy with their top guy. It was brought up in the article when Brandon said he was surprised at Wood not being on Davis all game. But, that seems to be the case season long… maybe one of the negatives in Capers system.
Every game it seems there are “prime matchups”… but then I look, and their number 1 or 2 WR is being covered by shields (or their probowl TE is being covered by hawk)
Not sure what we are trying to accomplish by putting faith in the guys lower on the depth chart.
Capers system moves guys around,
and Charles is best utilized all over the place. He can lock down the opponent’s #1 at times, but it’s better for the team if Tramon can handle him. That allows Woodson to do what he does: make plays.
Anthony Tolliver says "Get that weak stuff outta here!"
EXTEND JASON RICHARDSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Capers' strategy
First of all, it’s not very easy to stick a corner on a tight end. That either puts either a safety or a LB on the 2nd WR, so I think that’s part of the reason we didn’t see Woodson on Gonzalez or Davis the last few weeks. Either that or you have to play nickel all game, which is fine against some teams but won’t work against teams like the 9ers or Falcons, who can run the ball.
Second, I think Capers often doubles up on the opposing team’s best receiver and uses Williams to shut down their #2 WR by himself. That gives us two guys on their top WR to take away the short pass with the CB and the deep pass is covered by the S. So it’s not putting faith in any single player, but putting faith in two players working together.
53 Bears, 1 Cup
by I voted for Kodos on Dec 8, 2010 1:17 AM CST up reply actions
If Capers system has a weakness...
… then it must be very minor, because the Packers have given up the fewest points in the league! I agree with the responses by Omaha and Kodos, and the variety of ways that Woodson is being used seems to be working out well.
i like capers
and applauded him many times on this blog, but honestly his weakness is still going up against elite qb’s. i still don’t know if it’s fixed yet.
we have only faced 2 qb’s (that started the game) in the top 16 in the 2010 season. those would be ryan and sanchez. what will happen if brady torches us for 350 and 3-4 td’s——call it a bad game like we did last year with roethlisberger and have the same thing turn up in the first round of the playoffs? i’ll wait until we play the pats to point out the weaknesses.
nfc qb’s in the playoffs 2010 season——-imo—— brees, rodgers, vick,e. manning,ryan, bradford.
I don't know
First, you could say every team’s weakness is going up against elite QBs. That’s how they became elite QBs.
Second, I’m not sure you could identify something that general as a weakness. My reasoning is that the strategy for defending elite quarterbacks is not always going to be the same — it matters which QB we’re talking about. For some, it might be bringing pressure more often and for others it might have more to do with coverage schemes. Any given defense might be good at one of those and not good at the other, so it will matter which elite QB it is to determine whether or not it’s a weakness.
Finally, for the Packers, I don’t think our problems against great QBs are a scheme issue, but one of execution. Oh, and the two good QBs you mentioned: one scored 20 points on us and the other scored none.
Bonus Question
Which elite QB scored the most points against the Packers this season? Drum roll, and the envelope, please: Shaun Hill, he of the 78 QB rating. Not only did they score a whopping 26 points (in a loss, of course), but they racked up over 400 total yards.
its not about the QB…its about system and the WRs. That is my opinion.
Its not just a coincidence that both Pitt and AZ put up HUGE yards on us last year.
The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010
No coincidence at all...
Those are the 2 teams w/ the most intimate knowledge of Capers and his D schemes! Pitts plays the same D the Packers do and have been for alot longer. ANd Whisenhunt (HC in AZ) was the OC in Pitts and faced that D everyday in practice! Thats no coincidence at all that those 2 team were able to exploit the Packers D, and their relative inexperience in it!!! Thats my opinion…
I don’t think the WR had much to do w/ it, but the opposing team being able to put the WR in the right place to take advantage of a lack of proper communication from the Packers DB’s!
You've been Stroh'd™!!!
I don’t know if Brady has the right tools to torch us. The QBs that burn us usually have more talented WR corps that can get us with the big play (a la Ptt and AZ last year and Minny too). I think we can slow down Brady and be okay, but the guy is in a zone right now so its going to be a tough one for us!
The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010
are you serious?
you do remember that the pats went to pitt already and put 1 on them, right?
the pitt defense seemed to not slow him down.
brady——30-43—350 and 3 td’s—-1 rush td.
tools—-gronkowski,hernandez,woodhead against hawk and our safeties. advantage brady——especially at home where they won what? 25 games in a row.
Pats
They no longer have that singular weapon in a Moss that they used to threaten the field vertically, but they do have a plethora of good talent that they use to threaten the field more in a horizontal manner by speading the defense out across the entire field. Packers will have to be very good in their short to mid range zone coverage to contain the Pats and have a chance to break that home field advantage. I think the Packers might have a pretty good shot, but I’m not betting on it! LOL
You've been Stroh'd™!!!
The Pats passing game
centers around short dump off throws… this means our linebackers need to be ready and we can expect a weak game (stat wise) from the D Line and CM.
by Chief Oshkosh on Dec 9, 2010 7:06 PM CST up reply actions
not that simplistic
as short dump of throws. the pats have the perfect offense to beat 3-4 teams. that’s why they got rid of moss, he was 1 dimensional. 3-4 defense easily covers moss with the 1 safety over the top. the hoodie realized this after the jets beat him the 1st time.
now the pats isolate the inside backers and/or a safety on their skill young players like gronkowski, hernandez and woodhead. those guys are match-up problems for any team and as the season goes on, it’s becoming more apparent that the hoodie is a damn good football coach/gm.
imo——if brady and the hoodie win another super bowl——they both will be considered as the best ever at their perspective occupations.
and no i’m not a pats fan——-just appreciate great things that happen before my eyes.
i meant respective not perspective-------
for the linguistic majors out their——my bad.
Capers the best D Coord
I am a Steelers fan and wish he was ours again. I believe your team has teh best D in the league, the Steelers are kicking butt against the run, maybe the best but you our better balanced and look to be poised for a serious title run
Any task BIG or small, Do it well or not at all
Capers
We are very pleased w/ what he’s done as our DC… THe Steelers, in my opinion, have an advantage in pass rushing w/ Harrison and Woodley! Matthews is as good as either, but the other gives you the advantage. For us Woodson and Williams are far better than the CB for Pitts! So that probably balances out… Its kinda funny that you wish you had Capers and alot of our fans wish we had LeBeau… IMO, they are both top tier DC’s!
Good luck on the rest of your season and hope to meet you in Dallas!!! Thanks for stopping by and giving us your input!
You've been Stroh'd™!!!
Really?
The Steelers fan wants Capers back? I’ll trade him even up for Dick LeBeau any day of the week. How about A.J. Hawk for Harrison or Charlie Peprah for Polumalu, while we’re at it?
Speaking of Hawk, why bother having him cover the tight end? He couldn’t cover his grandma with a circus tent. He might as well blitz every pass.
I rest my case!!! LOL
Some people always think the other girl is prettier after they have “been” w/ the one they have!!! Not that Egbert has been w/ any women… LOL
You've been Stroh'd™!!!
It was just a little joke...
After the best example I could think of for grass is always greener…
You've been Stroh'd™!!!
Dick is getting old
The guy still has it, but I’d think he’s pretty close to throwing in the towel. He looks great but at some point you want to enjoy life, grand kids, etc.

by 

























