Season Reviews: Aaron Rodgers
While our 2009 wasn't as successful as it was for other teams, we saw enough to expect more success in 2010 and beyond. There's a lot to like about the Green Bay Packers going forward, unless of course you're cheering for the other team. But which players fit in the best? Which don't? Which ones are keepers, and which ones need to be driven out of town? It's time to look at who did well (and who didn't), and ultimately what their role will be going forward.
Between 1992 and 2007, Green Bay was associated with one man. In 2008, there was some question as to whether or not the team could establish a new face of the franchise. In 2009, we found that face, who just happened to play the same position as the old one. Ladies and gentlemen, I present Aaron Rodgers.
Obviously, Rodgers' starting debut in 2008 was very good. However, his 2009 season was downright stellar. Between the two seasons, Rodgers increased his yardage, completion percentage, yards per attempt, TD:INT ratio, passer rating, rushing yards, and total touchdowns. He was voted to his first Pro Bowl, led the team to an 11-5 record and a playoff berth, and looked sharper as the year went on.
In all honesty, there isn't much for Rodgers to improve. He showed off outstanding accuracy, excellent touch on all his throws, the ability to connect with a receiver on any route, a cannon arm able to stretch the field vertically, fantastic mobility, Favre-esque durability, and a knack for finding gaps in the defense. In a nutshell, he's everything you want in a quarterback from a physical standpoint.
But what about the intangibles? After all, players like Akili Smith, Joey Harrington, Ryan Leaf, and JaMarcus Russell all had the physical tools to succeed. What does Rodgers have that they didn't? As it turns out, he's got a lot. He commands the huddle and has the faith of his teammates. He has the work ethic to keep improving his game. He has the poise to stay cool under pressure, both from opposing defenders, media spotlight, and the drama of replacing a legend. He even has the respect of his opponents, if this quote from Cardinals' safety Antrel Rolle is any indication:
Let me tell you something – that dude is scary. We have a great defense, and we were up on him and ready to pounce, and he found ways to tear us apart. I don’t ever want to face him again in my life. I am dead serious. I’ll face Drew Brees any day of the week before I face him again.
High praise from a player on a defense that got shredded by Breesus the following week. Regardless, Rodgers' reputation around the league is similar to the gist of Rolle's comments. At 26, he's a two-year starter who learned from a Hall of Famer on an offense that is tailored to fit his strengths, which are only going to improve going forward.
Of course, nobody is perfect, and neither is Rodgers. He still needs to make better decisions at the line when making audibles, including line protection calls. He also needs to know when it's right to fight to extend a play and when it isn't, relying too much on his natural talents and athleticism instead of simply throwing the ball away and taking the incompletion. Most of all, he needs to improve his pocket presence and release the ball quicker. These three things will all help to fix the biggest problem in Rodgers' game: taking sacks. His 50 sacks were a league high, and nearly 40% of them could have been avoided had Rodgers gotten rid of the ball sooner.
Still, if our biggest complaint is something that is more the fault of the five guys up front than the one guy behind them, it can't be that bad of a situation. Just imagine the season Rodgers could have had were he not cursed with horrid protection for the first 8 weeks, or the running game been more consistent, or his receivers not suffered from an unusual case of the dropsies all year long. He could have topped Brees' completion percentage, Marino's yardage, or Brady's touchdowns. There is no conceivable ceiling going forward if the team can fix the rest of the problems. He's that good.
31 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
odd
fixed
"Brandon Jennings needs a nickname before he gives himself one. Oh wait, Young Money, he already did."
by Mitchell Maurer on Feb 15, 2010 9:39 AM CST up reply actions
Better
Really how much better can Rodgers get? Its hard to say… I kinda feel he will make strides and improve but I don’t know that it will necessarily show in his stats. It will hopefully only show in W’s and this past season we won 11 games. Next year w/ a far more difficult schedule 11 W’s will easily win the North. He has a chance, and the requisite intelligence to take on the majority of play calls in game, a la Manning! I can see him gradually over the next 2 or 3 seasons beginning to call the game at the line of scrimmage, if McCarthy lets him! Leading the team to 12 and 13 Win seasons consistently is about as high as any Fan can possibly expect of any QB!
Of course the only way to cement his legacy in GB and around the NFL is to win close games in the regular season and win in the playoffs, including a SB or three!!!
About the ONLY ways he can improve and those won’t necessarily show in stats…
Yeah I think you are right there. His stats aren’t going to get much better than they were this year…he put up some pretty stellar numbers but before he makes the leap to being an elite QB, he has to win more of those close games and develop that kind of x-factor thing that the greats have. Other teams need to fear him for him to be elite…he’s getting there but not quite there yet!
Two of those close losses were lost by the defense, not Rodgers. Rodgers put the team in position to win in both. The two, of course, are the Pittsburgh and Arizona play-off game.
In Pittsburgh, Rodgers put the Packers ahead. The Defense screwed up and let Pittsburgh win at the last second.
In Arizona, the Defense couldn’t stop the AZ “O”. If they had even a 25% better game, Rodgers could have won that game. Sure, he fumbled in OT, but he is also the one that got them to OT in the first place, despite what the Pack “D” did in regulation time.
So I would hold either of those two close games against him.
Regarding the two Minnesota games, again the “D” failed to show up.
The only true bad game Rodgers had, that was on him, was the Tampa game.
Well, I think Mitchell summed it up
Really how much better can Rodgers get? Its hard to say… I kinda feel he will make strides and improve but I don’t know that it will necessarily show in his stats.
Getting rid of the ball quicker will show in his stat, not only negating a sack but helping his completion total by going to a checkdown earlier.
The difference between Manning and Rodgers is definitely the people around them. People can point to the Colts and say that “without Manning, they’re nothing.” I point to their receivers and say “without them, Manning isn’t in the SB.” And before you go making Rodgers our Offensive Coordinator (effectively), I just want to remind you that it was Manning’s tendencies and repetitious behavior which led to their SB loss. The dual role works to an extent, but if it wasn’t for the fact the Colts got the Bears in 2007, Manning may still be ringless.
Quicker
Getting rid of the ball quicker would cut down on sacks, but that in and of itself doesn’t necessarily mean the completion % goes up. I do think its the one area he can get alot better in… As he gains more experience he will KNOW where he can go w/ the ball on a more timely fashion. It will likely raise his yardage and number of attempts and completion, not necessarily his %. Will it lead to more W’s and SB W’s? That is really the only thing that he has left to prove.
I am NOT saying that he SHOULD be calling ALL the plays at the LOS just that he will likely do it more, more audibles and maybe more no huddle. There is a reason that most coaches do not let QB’s call the plays, a la Manning.
Just to play Devil's Advocate
A lot of questions have been leveled at MM’s play-calling – would allowing Rodgers a few sequences be as awful as some of the decisions we’ve seen coming from the sidelines?
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
Aaron Rodgers
The Packers are extremely fortunate that Rodgers fell in the draft and that the 49ers made the bone headed decision to take Alex Smith instead of Rodgers. Rodgers has the ability to be easily a top five QB in the league behind only Brees, Brady, Peyton Manning and maybe Philip Rivers. Rodgers may be more physically gifted than all of the aforementioned QB’s when you look at the size, arm strength and mobility factor as it relates to playing QB. In fact, I’d take Rodgers over Rivers based on his superior mobility, arm strength and poise under pressure [playoff pressure].
Rodgers has a gun for an arm, makes all the throws [stick throws into tight windows], is poised, can pick and slide in the pocket [ this pocket movement skill will be necessary if the Pack OL slips any in 2010] , improved at reading the defense and was like a Timex Watch [took a licking and kept on ticking]. The one weakness that Rodgers does have …….. he sometimes does not sense the pressure resulting in the sack/strip/fumble…….so he is not perfect.
I love watching the guy play and I hope like hell that Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy do right by the guy and keep him protected. If this occurrs Packer fans should be happy for a long time and Rodgers will remain an elite level player at the position. Yes, 2009 was good as Rodgers improved dramatically——-2010 should be better. Packer fans……you are in good hands….with Rodgers. You win Super Bowls with players like Aaron Rodgers in my opinion.
Of all the QBs you mentioned
Rodgers is the youngest by 4 years. He still has room to improve (as everyone has mentioned), but he also has the time to do so, assuming he doesn’t end up on the turf as often as he did in the 1st half of the 2009 season.
The Packers organization as a whole has seen the benefit (on and off the field) of having a top-tier QB as the face of their franchise. I believe that as long as Rodgers can keep performing near where he has in the past two years, he will have many, many years under center in green and gold.
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
Brady's doesn't belong in that group, he had one great year, otherwise he's only been good in the playoffs and even then it was mostly his defense
by Donald Driver on Feb 15, 2010 9:43 PM CST up reply actions
Upon further review
Brady did slip in 2009 and looked to be an average player for much of the season. We can only by what we see on the film and in games. The elite pocket movement, the refined sense of timing and anticipation, the willingnes to look down the gun barrel until the last possible second before releasing the football, and the consistent desire to step into throws while under duress in the pocket was not there in Tom Brady’s game from a week to week basis. He just did not appear to be as mentally tough in 2009 [the ACL injury apparently affected his play——-some?].
So we agree that Brady may not belong in this discussion based on the 2009 season. To say however, that Brady has had just one good season does not due Brady justice. We do not see eye to eye DD on what Brady’s ACCOMPLISHED prior to the 2008 season.
Brady definitely had more then one good year. I would leave him out of the current elite Qb conversations though.
by packallday555 on Feb 16, 2010 9:20 PM CST up reply actions
While he showed me wrong 3 seasons ago I still don’t think Brady is among the elite of all time yet. Sure he’s won the titles but I still feel it was a right place, right time kind of thing. His team was top to bottom amazing. While not every QB would have been successful I think his greatness was overstated some.
I'm all with you on this one
while Tom’s always been a solid QB, he’s pretty much the epitomy of a system quarterback and is not of hall-of-fame calibre.
by Donald Driver on Feb 17, 2010 2:29 AM CST up reply actions
Also, Peter King is very grumpy with us.
by Donald Driver on Feb 17, 2010 2:30 AM CST up reply actions
haha
Yeah he sure would be…maybe we’ll be mentioned in his things he doesn’t like column then. I am sure he’ll be looking for something stupid to write about.
Tom Brady
The system QB argument is an interesting one and I’m of the opinion that the term can not be applied to Brady. Lets forget about the Championships that Brady has won for a second.
When Brady came in as a 6th round pick he was raw, unrefined and frail physically—-he lacked the great physical tools of say an Aaron Rodgers for the sake of this discussion. Brady sat behind Drew Bledsoe biding time until oppurtunity knocked. When Bledsoe got drill by the Jet LB Mo Lewis it jump started Brady’s path to greatness resulting in a shift in power that is still felt in the NFL today on the AFC side.
The Patriots immediately became Brady’s team and the rest is history. The multiple big game wins in the playoffs, the winning of Championships (Super Bowls) without big-time talent at the WR position and at times carrying the offense to said Championship at the expense of PAYTON MANNING . Sure Adam Vinatieri and some outstanding defensive talent played a role but Brady was the trigger man and central figure in it all.
Brady has gotten it done in a coventional offense and the shot-gun spread that Belichick now favors. In fact, it can be argued that Brady elevated his game to even greater heights after Charlie Weiss left in a more pass happy system under Josh McDaniels. No they did not win a Championship BUT they were right there. Brady became a great player with the help of great coaching. Maximization of good talent and eventually becoming a great player, integrating that great talent into the team concept and winning for a sustained period——— is what it’s about. Brady has done that better than any QB this side of Joe Montana, Terry Bradshaw and John Elaway in the modern era.
At the end of the day though…… if I were asked who I would rather have at the position if I were starting a team……….I think it is already known……..Aaron Rodgers.
I don’t want my post to try to say that Brady is the equivalent of say Trent Dilfer. Brady is a VERY good to maybe great QB…I just don’t believe that in raw skill and talent, that he stacks up among the best ever. I think if you put him on a bad team he’d be an above average but probably not great QB. But he is where he is and as a Patriot with the system and team around him, he’s among the top 5 or so active QBs out there.
I voted uphill, but thats contingent on getting a new left tackle
RIP Jim Thome 1-25-2010
an AL team not having a DH is like a giraffe fucking a mule. - larry
I'm not sure how he could possibly digress.
The line can only get better, the WR’s are top notch and all returning, and a full year of Finely. As good as Rodgers was this past year I’m expecting an even better year, but I’d be perfectly happy with another year like this past one.
Jones,Kotsay,Vizquel < Thome
Uphill
That was only his second year starting. Too early for him to be peaking.
by TGPackersTwins19 on Feb 15, 2010 7:36 PM CST reply actions
Drops
Why hasn’t anybody mentioned the Packers ‘elite’ receiving core and their 50 drops (Stats, LLC), 2nd only to the Chiefs?
Wow, is that what we ended the year with? That’s absolutely horrible. That’s definitely cause for concern.
by packallday555 on Feb 16, 2010 10:30 AM CST up reply actions
Out of 800 votes...
7 Vikings/Bears fans voted “downhill”…other than that, it’s unanimous
Haha funny you mentioned that. I was just thinking about how I wish they would show who voted for what. I bet anything R4F is one of the guys who voted for regress.
by packallday555 on Feb 17, 2010 3:07 PM CST up reply actions
Hahahaha! I’m glad you said that. It was a much needed pick me up after spending 4 hours doing homework for just ONE class!
by packallday555 on Feb 17, 2010 10:00 PM CST up reply actions

by 




















