Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin And How The Pac-12 Missed Him

Analysis: Packers Offensive Line

NEW YORK - APRIL 22:  Bryan Bulaga from the Iowa Hawkeyes holds up a Green Bay Packers jersey after the Packers drafted him number 23 overall during the first round of the 2010 NFL Draft at Radio City Music Hall on April 22, 2010 in New York City.  (Photo by Jeff Zelevansky/Getty Images)

Since LG Daryn Colledge and offensive coordinator Joe Philbin are publicly discussing Colledge's excuses, this might be a good time to look at how the Green Bay Packers offensive line played in 2009. 

According to Football Outsiders, they were No. 30 in pass protection and No. 8 in run blocking. RB Ryan Grant ran the ball well last season and the o-line certainly deserves some credit for it. Could there really have been two teams worst in pass protection? Yep. The Raiders were dragged down by LT Mario Henderson who was ranked as the worst tackle in the league by a wide, wide margin according to Pro Football Focus. The Bills were so bad that they raided the Packers practice squad for RT Jamon Meredith who apparently did OK last season according to Pro Football Focus.

The 2009 stats by player are from Pro Football Focus (after the jump): 

Star-divide

Position Player Rank Overall Rating Pass Rating Run Rating
LT Clifton 46 -7.4 5.7 -4.6
LT Lang 53 -10.3 -9.1 1.8
LG Colledge 19 4.8 4.3 3.0
C Wells 18 1.5 2.4 1.6
RG Sitton 10 13.1 10.1 6.1
RT Tauscher 42 -5.8 2.8 -7.1
RT Barbre 58 -14 -13.4 2.4

On one hand, Colledge is right. Based on the above stats, he's arguably the 2nd best offensive lineman on the roster if left alone at his best position: left guard.

On the other hand, I would argue that the best pass blocking offensive lineman are LT Chad Clifton and RT Mark Tauscher and they are the only two lineman who played at either tackle position with a positive pass blocker rating. I didn't post Colledge's disastrous 3 game stint at LT above, but he had -13.0 pass block rating during them. Colledge appears to be one the many offensive lineman on the roster who is best suited to play inside the tackles, and he should be prepared to fight for his job in 2010.

I haven't read a single word that anyone is clamoring to watch either C Scott Wells or RT Josh Sitton work at tackle. Sitton would appear to be the best pass blocker on the line, but he's also earned that above statistical ranking because he's played exclusively at right guard. I'd expect both players to struggle more at either tackle position. It still doesn't take away from the fact that Sitton was the best o-lineman last season, and he's turning into a solid pro.

What to do with Scott Wells? One player not mentioned above is C Jason Spitz. He hardly played in 2009 due to a back injury, but he did play better than Wells at center in 2008. The real problem for Wells is that his stats went down significantly in 2009. I had noticed a couple more bad plays then usual from him last season, but I had dismissed them as infrequent events. Maybe those bad plays I can remember are just the hint that's he's declining. Both Wells and Spitz enter 2010 with question marks.

The real surprise for me was that there appears to be some hope for OL Allen Barbre. He should never be allowed to play tackle again, but he did a good job on running plays. Maybe he can become a decent guard or backup guard option, and a decent pass blocker when playing between the tackles.

The same may be said for OL T.J. Lang who allowed too many sacks at left tackle last season. Where or when he'll play in 2010 is uncertain due to his recent wrist surgery. He's listed as a left tackle above because that was where he had the most snaps in 2009. He could compete against Colledge at left guard, but I expect he'll primarily backup at right tackle. 

The wild card is rookie LT Bryan Bulaga. He won't start at left tackle in 2010 unless something happens to Clifton, but he may be too good to keep off the field. Will they be forced to play him at left guard this season if they want to start their 5 best lineman?

My best guess is that the starting 2010 offensive line is LT Clifton, LG Colledge, C Spitz, RG Sitton, and RT Tauscher. LT Bulaga and RT Lang are the top two backup tackles. Wells and Barbre backup at the three interior line positions. With one or two more lineman making the 53-man roster for additional depth. 

Comment 25 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If Breno Giacomini is finally healthy....

I think TJ Lang should stick to the OG position from here on out. I don’t have my hopes up for it though. Plus, I’d prefer to have Bulaga to be the primary backup for both OT positions just to give him an opportunity for more playing time. If Bulaga is too good, but can’t start, we need him available to play both LT and RT if Cliffy or Tausch go down.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on May 24, 2010 10:28 AM CDT reply actions  

I agree generally with your list of starters, but Wells may yet beat out Spitz – between those two and Colledge, one is likely to be riding the pine or traded at the end of preseason assuming all three are healthy.

Barring a preseason disaster, both Barbre and Giacomini risk getting cut. As I see it, Lang will be the primary backup at RT in all likelihood, Newhouse will spell Sitton at RG, Dietrich-Smith will remain behind someone at C, and Bulaga will understudy Clifton at LT. Giacomini isn’t a guard – he’s too tall – so he’d better make himself pretty darn indispensable at RT. Barbre might end up being the backup LG if he’s very very lucky, but he’ll have to bust his butt and the chips will have to fall just right. I don’t buy TJ Lang at LG unless Giacomini becomes an overnight sensation in preaseason.

Essentially, Lang, Newhouse, Barbre, and Giacomini are fighting over probably two roster slots, and my money’s on the first two. If Newhouse can get stashed on the practice squad, one of the others might get a reprieve – but after losing Jamon Meredith last year, the Packers may be disinclined to risk that a second time.

by Ebongreen on May 24, 2010 10:51 AM CDT reply actions  

I wouldn't trade Wells/Spitz/Colledge.

mainly because of last season showing us that you can’t really have too much depth at line. of those three 2 will start, and the odd man out shouldn’t be traded in my opinion.

by jemoen on May 24, 2010 11:01 AM CDT reply actions  

No trade clause

No not a players… MINE… LOL I want a no trade clause for this season… We finally have alot of depth, and I don’t want to lose that depth! We may need all of them, we just don’t know. And I would rather pay an extra OL this season to assure we have all the depth we need this season!!!

Giacomini needs to step up this season to show he can be a good OL. He likely won’t beat out Tauscher this season, but he has to show he will be the next RT! He can only play RT, so thats why he hasn’t been active for any games! Backup OL on game day rosters have to be flexible and able to play multiple positions, since we only dress 7 or 8 on game day!

by Strohman on May 24, 2010 12:12 PM CDT reply actions  

Basically a good post, but...

Why would you even think about moving Wells to tackle? And then you also talk about moving Bulaga to guard in order to put the 5 guys out there? Nuts!

Don’t worry about Bulaga getting on the field. Clifton WILL get hurt and miss time at some point. It’s not “if,” it’s “when”. Let the rookie learn his position. I mean, haven’t we had enough of these creative attempts to “play the best five”? We just need to stop out-smarting ourselves and Let. Players. Play. Their. Position. We’ve got the depth for it now. Put guys at a spot and leave it alone.

by Curly Lambeau on May 24, 2010 3:21 PM CDT reply actions  

I agree

Probably the only thing I disagree on is making Bulaga the primary OT backup. Which means, he will play either LT or RT depending upon who is injured first between Cliffy and Tauscher. His primary role should be LT though. I’d like to see Newhouse get some reps at RT to see how he compares with TJ Lang. Lang’s future is at OG, so lets find a way to keep him there.

Any chance our future at RT is already on our team? Giacomini, Lang, Newhouse?

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on May 24, 2010 8:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

future RT

Depends how far you mean the future to be… Packers already said that Lang is going to be a RT for this season. He is taking 80% snaps at RT and 20% at other positions, presumably LG. Giacomini definitely has a chance to be the RT long term (beyond this season). He hasn’t been active at all, cuz he is ONLY a RT, and doesn’t have the versatility to play any other position, that is needed by the backups on the game day roster. I think Newhouse has a chance to be a LG or RT as well. I would say between those 3, and Bulaga (if he were to fail horribly at LT), there is every reason to believe the RT of the future is on the roster!

by Strohman on May 24, 2010 9:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wells at tackle?

I didn’t think I did. I tried to make the point that the reason that Sitton and Wells play inside is that they probably wouldn’t be any good at tackle. We know Barbre and Colledge can’t play tackle. If Wells or Sitton were good enough to play tackle we would have probably seen them out there.

by Brandon on May 24, 2010 11:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh, okay. I guess I was getting that from this:

I haven’t read a single word that anyone is clamoring to watch either C Scott Wells or RT Josh Sitton work at tackle.

…and then in the next paragraph you wondered about “what to do with Scott Wells?” So, I took that as “we don’t know what to do with him, so maybe he can be a tackle, and why isn’t anybody talking about this.” I should’ve known you weren’t saying that, though. …since it’s obviously a silly idea, silly enough that, like you said, nobody’s talking about it. Even the troll convention at the JSOnline blog hasn’t come up with it from what I’ve read there (although, granted, I only read about .05% of the comments there. I only read them when I want to be reminded that, yes, there are a lot of bullet-heads out there).

by Curly Lambeau on May 25, 2010 12:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

I just hope they stop the musical chairs act

Pick your guys this offseason and then stick with it. I think one of the problems has been the general lack of cohesiveness due to the switching around players.

by Charlie Kelly on May 24, 2010 8:26 PM CDT reply actions  

Agreed, having guys having to play multiple positions can’t be easy on them.

by packallday555 on May 25, 2010 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Newhouse

Don’t forget Newhouse in your calculation

by Sunshine MN on May 25, 2010 4:47 PM CDT reply actions  

If he makes the team

It’s tough to see who is going to make the team and who would be able to clear waivers to make it to the PS.

A part of me still wishes that Merodith had made the 53 instead of Breno last year.

by PackApologist on May 26, 2010 12:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Same, Gianconmini is kind of a mystery. I read an article a while back talking about him as if he had great potential when we took him in I believe it was 2008 draft. Basically saying that the staff though he needed 3 years to develop. Obviously this will be his third year but we have Tausch on the roster. And looking at things from the opposite end of the spectrum, it can’t be good that when we had Barbre and Tasucher out at RT, Lang was chosen over Giancomini, even though he was a rookie. I’m not really sure what think.

by packallday555 on May 26, 2010 4:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Giacomini

He has great potential, but he needs to show this year that he will be the backup to Tauscher, this year and take over next year. Problem is you don’t see him on the active roster on game days and think he’s a waste of a roster spot. but the real issue now, is that he is a RT ONLY. He can’t really be on the active game day roster, if he can only play one position! The primary backups have to be versatile enough to play multiple positions!

You have to remember he played RT for only 1 year at Louisville… Prior to that he had been a TE. So he had alot to learn… I mean ALOT to learn!!!

by Strohman on May 26, 2010 9:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

but the real issue now, is that he is a RT ONLY. He can’t really be on the active game day roster, if he can only play one position! The primary backups have to be versatile enough to play multiple positions!

I never really thought of this but it’s a good point, especially because we all know how much TT likes his versatile OL. Plus, with two old OT’s who are injury prone, we really do need a guy active that can play any spot on the OL.

by packallday555 on May 26, 2010 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, looking around a little bit at evaluations of Newhouse, people seem to think he has some good potential. TT and MM also made some nice comments about him, though that’s probably expected. Who knows what will happen with him? Maybe they’ll stick at LG, or RT.

by packallday555 on May 26, 2010 4:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Aaron may end up a tackling dummy if the coaches can't figure it out ???????

This team goes thru O-lineman like I go thru Trevor’s sisters . You let go of talented men last year as you will do this year . I like Newhouse . This position will get Aaron killed if they don’t find a formula . The Defense in camp will tell alot . If you here a bullshit smokescreen than watch out !!! They have a few average games to prepare for the rough middle of your schedule . We both play good run teams . We both have the capacity to jump out with leads . But……

by gothicpurple on May 27, 2010 8:32 PM CDT reply actions  

Eh, we’re fine as long as Buluga is ok. Sitton is going to be a starter for a while. Spitz has been a starter for 3 years, and Lang played well enough at RT to be a good starter there for a while. Though he’ll probably end up at LG. Regardless, after Clifton and Tauscher are gone we’ll need to find either a LG or RT depending on what the staff does with Lang. And who knows, maybe the guy you like Newhouse will surprise us and eventually start at one of those positions.

Question is, what are you guys going to do when McKinnie, Hutch, and Herrea are gone? Think your OL will be addressed in the 2011 draft?

by packallday555 on May 29, 2010 1:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Acme Packing Company, the SBNation blog for fans of the Green Bay Packers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gassertaylor_small
APC Open Thread #33: Ron Dayne Thread? Why Not?
Packer_brewer_badger_logo_small
The APC Helmet Logo Bracket Tournament: Elite Eight

Recent FanPosts

Small
When And Why
Small
Where were you?
Ukcat_small
How about a little love for Cobb!!!
Jordy_nelson_small
MVP baby!
Football-funny-pic_small
NFL could add two new teams
Ukcat_small
Nike taking over Jerseys
Small
Free Agency Opinions
Small
NFL needs to fix its playoff system...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Acmepackingco_small Brandon

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Ayrton_senna_1988_canada_small Vermont Cubs Fan

Texbucky_small texwestern

Gassertaylor_small OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Img00243_small Kevin McCauley