Madden 11 Player Ratings Released
I started off the discussion of the upcoming Madden NFL 11 video game several weeks back, and yesterday ESPN published a complete list of all of the ratings for the individual Packers players. Some make a lot of sense, while others...well, others left me scratching my head.
As for things that make sense to me: Aaron Rodgers earns a 94 overall, Charles Woodson is a 97, Nick Collins is a 93, and Greg Jennings clocks in at 90. Ryan Grant is a solid but not spectacular 88, Jermichael Finley clocks in with an 86, Nick Barnett and Clay Matthews lead the linebackers with 87 and 86 ratings respectively, and Cullen Jenkins appears as the best D-lineman at 87 overall.
As for some confusing things, let's start with the secondary. Chuck, as I mentioned earlier earns a 97 rating, and Al Harris received an 85. I think those are right on, though maybe a bit generous for Harris. What boggles my mind is that Tramon Williams, who many of us regard as a potential replacement for Harris as soon as this year, only got a 75 overall rating. Awareness stats make up most of the reason that Williams is rated that low, which I can understand to a point, but I think his physical attributes, which are superior to the aging Harris, should at least bring him closer to #31 overall.
The next puzzling area for me is the offensive line. Brandon examined its performance in 09, with the conclusion that Josh Sitton was the best OL on the team in 09 and a significantly above-average starter at right guard. In light of that, why does he only earn a 78 overall rating (the same as rookie Bryan Bulaga) while aging tackles Chad Clifton and Mark Tauscher, who didn't perform nearly as well as Sitton, are in the low- to mid-80s? I also think Scott Wells got a bit of a low grade. He's not spectacular by any means, and I think most of us would agree that Jason Spitz is a better lineman, but he's a solid starter and performed slightly above-average last season. Ultimately it appears that EA Sports is expecting a starting O-line of Clifton, Spitz, Wells, Sitton, and Tauscher, which is what we expected as well. It just seems to me that they didn't identify the stronger players on the line correctly.
One curious addition this year to the ratings is the new "Swagger" rating (brought to you shamelessly by Old Spice). However, it will have no bearing on actual game play, only the likelihood of a celebration or other such silly antics. Jermichael Finley leads the Packers in foolishness with an 88, while Ryan Pickett leads all non-punters in professionalism with a 35. Not surprisingly, players with notably high swagger ratings include Chad Ochocinco (99), Adrian Peterson (98), Brandon Marshall (98), Philip Rivers (98), Chris Johnson (97), Andre Johnson (97), and everyone's favorite showboating DE, Jared Allen (96).
As a last note, Nick Barnett chimed in on his ratings, tweeting this morning that he wasn't happy with his speed rating of 77. He apparently was also driven to have a good workout today, thanks to his strength rating of 76.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
LOL
Gotta love those ratings sometimes. They baffle me every year.
Finley should be a 90.
Rodgers- 96. What more could’ve he done?
Barnett should have a speed of 80-82
Tramon Williams should be 84
Clifton- 85
Spitz- 85
Wells- 83
Sitton- 92
Tauscher- 85
Ryan Grant and Al Harris were right on. Maybe I would have dropped Grant another point in fact.
By the looks of it off hand, Madden made Green Bay’s defense very average or slightly above average. Hardly the case considering they were the #2 ranked defense last year. It’s Madden though. Now we can all see one of the reasons why sales have dropped. No need to truly complain about it though, because all that matters is how they perform on the field. I’m happy to know that it motivated Barnett though!!!
"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi
I agree with you there.
I’ve bought NCAA each of the last three years and probably will soon for another year. I haven’t bought Madden since 2004 (though this may be the year I break down).
"Career highlights? I had two. I got an intentional walk from Sandy Koufax and I got out of a rundown against the Mets." - Bob Uecker
I hate that everyone is just a number there. Its hard enough to keep up with all the names flying through the college ranks but you take away the names complete and then its just another game to me. Much of the fun of Madden is getting to play GM with your fav team and getting the names you’ve always wanted!
Pasta Padre...
I don’t know who this guy is, but he fills the rosters each year with names.
For PS3: From the NCAA 11 menu go to Team Management – Roster Share – Download Roster – Download Roster. Then search the PSN name “gamingtailgate”. Full rosters with names in a flash.
For 360: From the NCAA 11 menu go to Team Management – Roster Share – Download Roster – Download Roster. Then search the 360 gamertag “pastapadre”.
This worked for me a few years back, but I haven’t bought NCAA in some time, hope it still works (link).
"My ambition is handicapped by laziness"
— Charles Bukowski
by NYSteelersFan4 on Jul 20, 2010 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Also, I should have been more specific about Swagger.
In case you don’t check the links, I was serious about Old Spice being the official sponsor of the Swagger rating. Brilliant marketing ploy or shameless excuse for product placement in a video game? You decide.
"Career highlights? I had two. I got an intentional walk from Sandy Koufax and I got out of a rundown against the Mets." - Bob Uecker
inevitable...
sponsorships are everywhere so why not there I guess. Then again I am a marketing major who works as a marketing manager for a Fortune 500 company so it would be wrong for me to not like it!
You said
and everyone’s favorite showboating DE, Jared Allen (96).
And you are right. He IS my favorite showboating DE. But I think, perhaps, you were being facetious. ;-P It’s all a matter of perspective.
Your fantasy football expert since Jerry Rice's rookie year.
How good are they making the Patriots this year? Last year every starter was above 90. I really hate the favoritism that Madden plays. It’s Green Bay. So of course they would have lower ratings.
Actually, for a very long time Green Bay was stacked well above its merits
That was back in the 90’s though so it’s been a while.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Right, but the thing is
Green Bay was a Superbowl contender almost every year in the 90s. Good reason to have a lot of good rated players on that team.
"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by 


















