On Michael Vick's Future

I didn’t want him before i still don’t want him now!!

Two reasons why I doubt this would happen.

1. I don’t think the Eagles are going to get rid of him. I think one of the guys at NFL Network said it best: the Eagles are stuck with Vick at this point. For good or ill, the train has sailed on this for the Eagles, and it set off the moment they got rid of McNabb. In Philly the Eagles can just hope that Kolb is going to be good, they need to have some sort of back up, which is what Vick adds to the team. While this may be true in just about any year in that city, this year it’s especially critical since they just got rid of one of the better QB’s in the league. No matter what happens to Vick, the Eagles can’t afford to lose him.

2. I doubt Vick would want to come here. Even this would have two reason for it (I guess I’m in a two reason day today)

2a. Vick doesn’t want to learn something new. As far as I can tell this guy doesn’t really want to go into a place and learn, and that’s really what coming here would be for him. The GB coaches are teachers and they mold QB’s. Vick’s actions show that he has no interest in learning how to be a great QB. If that is the case, why would he want to come here.

2b. Vick wants to be the man. In that case staying in Philly is a great idea since he would get a contending team and possibly beat out a young guy who couldn’t get it done. That’s about as good a situation as you are going to find in starting roles right now in the NFL. After that I would imagine he would head off to a team where he can start such as Buffalo or Jacksonville. For as needed as QB’s are in this league, there aren’t that many starting jobs left really.

Because they have pretty jerseys?

I dont think we would need him

I’d be disappointed in the team if they did sign him.

It’s not really even him that I dislike, it’s anything that resembles a wildcat. We’ve got no reason to take the ball out of Aaron’s hands unless were winning or losing by 40 points in the 4th.

If I had to rank every single player in the league in order of “would I want the Pack to sign them,” I think Michael Vick would come in dead last.

The truth is that the NFL has showns some pretty damn unethical behavior, over all, and releasing Michael Vick would be the same as inviting him to sign with another team.

A bad move, especially without that other QB they had who they released and can no longer leverage good behavior out of Vick with, in the event Kolb goes down.

What was that guy’s name again…? ;)

which I guess is what they would do until announcing such a decision. For what it’s worth, the birthday party was open to the public… whoever bought a ticket. To me that makes this incident less of a reflection on his personal character, just another bad decision. Either way, I can’t see why anyone would want him on the roster.

They don’t seem to like risky players

Just cuz Thompson didn’t deny looking into acquiring Vick, doesn’t mean he was interested in doing so!!! I don’t think the Packers were ever interested in Vick!!! Thompson just played the “don’t say anything” line… Vick has none of the skills the Packers desire in their QB’s!!! Accuracy? No!!! Game manager? No… Leadership? Some, in that he can lead when the team is ahead, but when its difficult he shrinks.

Never thought Thompson wanted Vick in the first place and don’t see any reason for that to have changed!!!

was one of his bankruptcy attorneys, she used to talk to him weekly when he was in prison.

I tried to get her to ply him for some Eagles@Giants tickets (she lives in NY) but she thought that might’ve been unethical or something.

Damn her and her ethics.

it would be inviting a circus into town. We don’t need help getting the media here.

You’d be fools to sign Vick. Unless……..with all things considered……….he’s much better
than your current backup should Rogers go down and……he can be had cheap!