Players to pay attention to against the Browns
Before I get started on the rant I just have to recommend to everyone here today's article by Andrew Brandt over at NFP. Wow, that's a good read on some CBA stuff. I miss him in the Green Bay FO.
Ok, so the other major article I came across today was a proposed 53 by Mike Vandermause over at the Press Gazette. I know, I've been big on the whole guessing the roster thing, and instead of subjecting everyone to that again I thought I would highlight a few players who should be watched as we start preseason games. These guys may push out someone expected to take a spot or catch on the PS and become future contributors. I'll take on the more obvious ones after the jump, but first here are a few guys you may or may be really thinking about...
1. Quinn Porter. Vandermause is thinking he could be the number three guy. I like that plan so far. Porter is a bit smaller than the typical Packer back, but he's quick on his feet and runs with more power than looks suggest. He's made a few good runs and has turned heads so far. He's even been back there for kick returns, but doesn't seem to have the hands for it yet. All in all, if he can make some noise then it's possible he could pass up Starks or Lumpkin on the depth chart.
2. Anthony Levine. Vandermause has him getting cut. He's turned heads as well out there and making some plays. He's also rooming with Burnett and Shields. I guess the three of them are going over the playbook together to help get over some of the rookie learning curve. With a play or two in the preseason he could help recover some of the depth needed at safety with the current injuries to Blackmon and Bigby.
3. Tom Crabtree. Brandon did a great job of introducing this guy to us recently, so there's not much to say here other than what was in that post.
Now for a few guys that many of know of...
4. Breno!! So he's basically soaked up a roster spot and pay check for a while. It says something when Justin Harrell has more production that you. This may change however and if it does it will start against the Browns. Yesterday Packer fans were treated to two articles stating that Breno might be worth the investment the Packers have made in him. Campen was even quoted in the offseason as saying he expects Breno to push Tausch for a starting job. Crazy? Maybe, but if he can put together some solid performances then we may have something to be excited about.
5. Morgan Burnett. It looks like he's starting, let's see how he can handle another team's ones. Even if the Brown's ones might be another team's twos.
6. Sam Shields. The dude doesn't look like he's got the hands to be a return man, but crap he's making his name for himself as a corner. A few plays here and there in the preseason might make him too valuable to stash on the PS and earn him a place on the 53. The good news if this happens? I would imagine his place would be the one that has been filled by one Jarret Bush.
7. Matt Flynn. I guess there are many in the NFL who love this dude. I know fans don't often see it, but I think there's more than meets the eye with him. I always am reminded of Doug Flutie or Shaun King with Flynn. He shouldn't be be good and he shouldn't win, but man he just does some how. If he can get some good tape out there he could become a starter somewhere...and the Packers can get some picks in return for it. It worked for SD and Charlie Whitehurst.
What are all of you watching for the game this weekend? Is there anyone or a battle I missed?
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
FB??
I haven’t heard much of battles going on there…the depth chart reads Hall, Kuhn, then Johnson. But then again I don’t think much stock is put into the preseason depth charts
Yeah that's a good one
It’s been surprising to me to hear the talk of Quinn Johnson losing his spot on the team. It seemed so many were hoping him to be the second coming of Will Henderson.
by PackApologist on Aug 13, 2010 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Johnson
Johnson’s skills won’t show up until the games start! He needs to play a STRONG game in all the preseason games. But it should be noted that his physical blocking style and impact to the team can’t really be measured w/o pads… He is very much on the outside looking in right now, so his performance in the exhibition games will have to be stellar as a lead blocker! He’s also hurt by the fact that he’s light years behind Kuhn and Hall as a ST player!
What's Johnson is up against
I whole heartedly agree with what you are saying. Johnson’s skills aren’t really seen right now, and he’s also been having a case of the dropsies…never good when trying to make the team on the offense.
The other problem he has is the over abundance of TE’s we have right now. IF the Packers keep 4 TE’s (Stroh I know your mind is exploding right now, but hear me out) then they will have more than enough H-backs and blockers. The five guys we have right now are also very versatile athletes who can look at add to special teams too. This is double whammy for a guy needing to make a FB spot. He really needs to shine somewhere because those five are really catching attention. Kuhn and Hall are also very known commodities.
Finally the FB is quickly becoming the football equivalent of the dinosaur. Here again I go back to the TE’s. Since TE’s are becoming offensive weapons and doing the dirty blocking work there is not as much need for a FB. An offense can create as much or more havoc going to 311 alignment than the tradition base 212. As a result the offense will scheme to create holes rather than pound with a lead blocker. Johnson might be as outdated as my old NES right now.
by PackApologist on Aug 13, 2010 5:35 PM CDT up reply actions
I've come to the realization
that 4 TE’s are more likely than not. I don’t really care for it, but it seems almost inevitable. If that is the case I keep Crabtree over Havner cuz he has the same kinda blocking mindset that Johnson has, and he should be just as good a reciever.
At least the 4 TE’s have the opportunity to contribute more to the offense than keeping 3 FB did!!! And you can go 221 w/ 2 TE and have Finley go in motion to the slot and in essence make it a 311.
That sounds like me with the Bulaga thing
Really I see some advantages to having the four TE’s. There will be more use for them and that’s just where a bunch of talent is right now.
Not to mention that if our LB get any more injured then Havner will have to play that position too.
by PackApologist on Aug 13, 2010 11:15 PM CDT up reply actions
i wanna see
levine stick hes shown some skills and hes at a thin position
2 rookies
I like Levine too, but I want no part of having 2 rookies at safety!!! That would REALLY leave us vulnerable, IMO… We would be one injury away from having 2 rookies starting in the secondary. Hope we can get him on the practice squad though!
better
Don’t know if he’s better right now, but has more potential. And Martin is a core ST performer. So Levine MUST show alot on ST to win the job!!!
drops on kicks
He’s GOT to start catching that ball better on kicks/punts though man. He made a GREAT play at CB so I think he’s impressing coaches some but if he keeps bobbling catches he’s not going to make it! I think he has a chance to be something great though!
IMO
Shields has already made the team as a CB alone. He’s making plays at CB on a daily basis. If he can’t catch the ball on returns he won’t get that job. They can still use him as a gunner.
+1
I agree, his performance at CB is actually shocking me a little bit. I expected him to not look good at all considering his inexperience. I was expecting Jarrett Bush V. 2.0 in fact! Ok….maybe not that bad….haha. I’m not saying he should suddenly be a starter, but I’m impressed with his production so far as a CB.
I don’t really see why there’s panic with him as the returner. He wasn’t signed to be the returner, but when signed, the team sought to experiment with him as the returner. He has speed, and so if he is a gem as a returner, then great. If not, then he goes to his role he was initially signed for: a Gunner. He was also a long shot to make it on the field as a CB, but is looking good so far.
So far, the experiment with him being a returner is a failure, but it is still early.
The experiment with him being a CB is looking to pay dividends.
He’s already a decent Gunner. Not really sure of his performance in Preseason at this position has been so far though.
"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi
Returns
Remember that Shields hasn’t done ANY returns since his HS days… I would imagine he has alot of rustiness to shake off. Both catching the ball and reading the coverage about whether to fair catch.
well…except for this one. UGH
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4q9zZAsTeic
What amazing speed this kid has!!!

by 



















