Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Ten Worst Swings Of The 2011 Season

Packer Links: Harris is Out, Rodgers is Confident, Jennings is Hurt, and Newhouse is Improved

Via NFL Players Association: WR Greg Jennings is honored for his community work. Primarily for his work through Habitat for Humanity. As I write this, I'm exhausted because I spent the night volunteering at a local legal aid clinic, so it's great to see people give back to their community.

According to the Press-Gazette and Greg Bedard: CB Al Harris was not able to pass his physical on Monday and he remains on the PUP. I can't say this surprises me at all, despite the optimistic comments last week from his agent. I don't doubt his desire or hard work to return this season, but his knee injury was serious, beyond a typical ACL tear. I would expect it would be at least 12 months before he could return, and it's been well short of 12 months since he had surgery.

From the Journal-Sentinel: QB Aaron Rodgers says the team has a "mature, realistic confidence" this season vs. last season. I had to read that the quote three times before I got it, and I still don't know if having the right confidence in 2010 will make any difference.

In the same Journal-Sentinel post. There are a lot of injuries going around in training camp, but it's hard to tell the severity. It's never good to read that Jennings has back spasms.

From the Press-Gazette: rookie 5th round LT Marshall Newhouse has improved. I don't think I mentioned him after the Seattle game, but he looked much better than he did against the Browns. While he looked OK against the Seahawks, he had a terrible time keeping his man in front of him during the first preseason game. A week ago I thought he had no chance at making the 53-man roster, but now I think it's possible and that is certainly an improvement.

Comment 75 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The Glaring Off Season Truth

As much as fans love Al Harris and admire his great work at CB throughout, it’s frustrating the Pack didn’t make moves for another good CB. Yes, everyone knew there were serious concerns about the O-line and shoring up other parts of the defense, but CB was an obvious position to attend to.

Sure we were all optimistic Al would be back in time to start, but fans are always optimistic (unless they’re in Detroit) and the job of the organization is to be skeptical.

They’re going to have to make it a policy of putting serious pressure on opposing QBs just to offset this. Against strong O-lines, QBs with time to throw are going to be looking to exploit that all the way.

"Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser." - Vince Lombardi

by AdamA on Aug 25, 2010 8:31 AM CDT reply actions  

What would you have the Packers do?

Draft Wilson instead of Bulaga?
Over pay Dunata Robinson?
Make a trade for Cromartie and hope that he fits?

You’re right that this is a moment of truth, but before we start bringing in new players left and right we have to see what guys like Underwood and Lee can do.

As much as you are right and fans are overly optimistic about the players on their team, there is also a strong sense of the grass is always greener with fans as well. Too many fans think that bringing in new blood is automatically an upgrade or a solution to situation, when that’s not always the case. There really weren’t too many CB’s past the first round that would be an upgrade over Lee and Underwood. There was only one FA that was worth the time to look at and we would of have an uphill shot of getting him. There were a few CB’s for trade, but I don’t know if they would be worth the draft picks and long term contract they wanted. This year was not a rich year from the CB position.

The other reality is that when you have a team with a powerful offense then talent at the corner position isn’t as necessary as talent at the o-line. Do the Colts have very talented corners? What about the Saints? They were picking guys off the street last year and still winning games. The secondary is important, but the real key to winning a SB is keeping Rodgers upright and Bulaga goes a long way to doing that.

by PackApologist on Aug 25, 2010 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Don't get me wrong...!

I do understand that and you’re right, but who did the Pack pick up in the second round? Wasn’t that DT Mike Neal? I really would have been thinking about someone in the secondary with that pick – even though there wasn’t an astounding number of premier choices and Neal does have the potential to make me eat my words – a competent backup CB or even Safety would have boosted the short term confidence of shoring up that part of Packers’ D.

As it stands, we’re going to be relying on jammed plays as the key component of the defense, whereas the real threat last year it was a bit more complete gameplan.

I will say that Underwood and Lee deserve a shot though. Fingers crossed.

"Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser." - Vince Lombardi

by AdamA on Aug 25, 2010 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

But we need Neal now

The odd drafting decision of the Packers showed that they knew something was going down on the Jolly situation. Not to mention that right now we are looking at our two primary backups along the line are Neal and Harrell. Could you imagine if it was only Harrell?

The other question would be if a guy we get at the bottom end of the second round would be as valuable this year as Lee or Underwood? Maybe, maybe not. It’s a tough call at the point in the game. I will say this though, I’m happy with the Neal pick. He’s got a great bull rush and should be able to learn to put a couple more moves in there. That should help collasp the pocket and give some options to rush the passer.

Hell, even picture a 2-4-5 line up where Neal and Raji are the down linemen, Jenkins, Barnett, and Chillar are the moving LB pieces. That could add for some rather unpredictable blitz packages.

by PackApologist on Aug 25, 2010 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think Neal may be one of the keys to the whole season

Whether Jolly was here or not, he and Picket are too big to provide a consistent pass rush. I don’t believe they’re quick enough from rushing that much further outside. I think that was a must have pick (or someone similar).

It’s too early to really tell, but I think we may have gotten a real gem in Shields. I really like our depth there now. I like the fact that Underwood and Lee both are not rookies and have had some time to absorb the playbook, have gone through the off season conditioning programs, etc. That has more immediate benefit to me than a mid to late round draft pick that has potential.

What will be interesting to me is to see what TT does in the next week or so. We’ve got potential trade bait in a few key guys. I can see Colledge or Spitz traded. I can see Donald Lee or Crabtree or Quarless traded. Trade for what, however? Definitely an OLB.

by gern blanston on Aug 25, 2010 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

A Lee Colledge trade could be interesting

Although it was be a bit scary to see both of them go. One injury could change an area of potential strength (O-line or TE depth) to a weakness of those guys leave the door.

by PackApologist on Aug 25, 2010 5:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

LOL

Lee, Crabtree have little to NO trade value. Lee is too valuable to us as the primary backup to Finley! Even Havner has next to NO trade value! Colledge or spitz might have some value, but only for a backup. Definitely not for a possible starter!!!

by Strohman on Aug 25, 2010 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

oh ye who knows all...

you contradict yourself!!!!!!!!! you say Lee is too valuable to trade but has no trade value. That makes absolutely ZERO sense!!!!!! (see I can use exclamation points, too) Annoying, isn’t it? LOL!!!

Lee is NOT a serviceable backup. He lead the league in percentage of drops last year. He’s not as good of a blocker or ST player as Crabtree, either. Who was responsible for that big return last week? Oh yeah…Lee!

I read the other day how Buffalo is in dire need of a TE due to injuries. It therefore stands to reason that if we like all 5 enough to potentially make the team, someone might want them. Really, stop talking like you’re the definitive expert. It gets awfully old. I mean unless you work in the front office of an NFL franchise, you’re really just guessing.

bottom line is that the Pack is one of the deeper teams in the league at many positions. Just because they’re our trash doesn’t make them worthless to someone else. Who’d have thought that we’d get trade value for Tony what’shisname that we got Derrick Martin for?

by gern blanston on Aug 25, 2010 10:04 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Lee's value

Lee has alot more value to us as a backup to Finley than he does to another team who hasn’t had him in camp all offseason! No contradiction whatsoever… Most backup players have far more value to their current teams than to some team that doesn’t have him!!! Why do you think Thompon hasn’t traded Bishop yet…. He’s had several teams approach Thompson about trading for Bishop but hasn’t done it yet! And he won’t unless he gets a bonafide starter or high draft pick (2nd likely) for him!

Lee is the only other TE on the team that is capable of holding down the starting TE job w/o totally disrupting the offense! It would change w/o Finley but they would still function very well w/ Lee starting, like it has the past couple years! I don’t see that being the case w/ Havner or anyone else… More value to us than to another team…

If Buffalo give up a high draft pick, like a 2nd then they can probably get Lee, but that seems unlikely unless their TE’s are out for the season. They won’t give up enough for the Packers to diminish their depth in a season they look to make a SB run!!! More value to us than to them…

ALot of our player that get released will get picked up by other teams! That doesn’t mean they will trade for them. Theres a difference, especially for a vet TE like Lee w/ a 2M salarty AND giving up a draft pick for a someone and picking up a FA on the waiver wire!!! Why would someone trade for a player w/ a 2M salary and give up a draft pick when they don’t have to? THat makes Lee more valuable to us than he is to other teams!

You don’t seem to have much of a knowledge of VALUE for NFL players!!!

by Strohman on Aug 25, 2010 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

trades

You will trade for someone that you think you have to have and don’t think you’ll get through waivers – even if it’s a player for player swap like we had with Moll and Martin last year. NFL front offices have depth charts of all the teams. They know as much as they possibly can about their players and their needs. I’m going to go out on a limb and suggest you’re not that big of a loser as to have a board for every team. You sure talk like it, however. So really, please tone down the arrogance a few notches.

Now if you think Crabtree is just a guy and there are 4 others just like him, then no, he has no trade value. Unless you have a board for each team, you really don’t know what they’re thinking. It’s like trying to second guess Thompson’s draft board – you simply don’t have enough information to do it. If he had Neal with a second round grade, you can bet other teams did too. Again, the bottom line is that if a guy is impressive enough to make our roster, he very well may have trade value – with the exception of guys like Barbre and Giacomini. Heck, even Jarrett Bush has potential trade value.

by gern blanston on Aug 26, 2010 8:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Crabtree IS just a guy! He’s a good backup TE and ST player. You can find plenty of TE that are good blockers w/ not great hands or ball skills on the waiver wire just about anytime you want.

I look at it w/o green and gold glasses. Realism means I don’t over-value players on the Packers just cuz they’re on the Packers! Has he done anything in the games or even practice that 95% of the TE can’t do? Other than being a better than average blocker? NO, not from what I’ve seen and heard… That makes him just another guy…

As for the arrogance… Maybe I am. I KNOW I’m opinionated and very knowledgable about the game. Having sports journalists ask me my opinions gives me that arrogance, if thats what you want to call it… And I don’t think they know everything but they are around the game and others that know the game alot more than you, or I for that matter.

by Strohman on Aug 26, 2010 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah it seems like you know what you're talking about Strohman

Usually at least.

But the exclamation points are kind of grating…

Best game I ever attended was the 163rd game of 2008.

by NorthSidePaulie on Aug 26, 2010 11:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanx

try to curtail the !!!, but have trouble doing it for some reason. Sorry, thats just me I guess.

by Strohman on Aug 27, 2010 2:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

the only question that remains

is whether or not the guys we don’t want meet that criteria for other teams. Chicago’s front office is pretty darn desperate right now. IF they had a key injury, they’d pull the plug and make the deal. What do they care about draft picks next year if they’re not going to be there? There’s no cap this year, so who gives a crap about a $2m salary. Would we trade with Chicago? Probably not. The point is still valid, however. That’s a desperate team.

Yes, there will be a lot of people available soon. I suspect we’ll pick some of them up, too. There probably wont’ be that many trades. That doesn’t mean that there isn’t potential trade value. As they say in sales “it only takes one” That appears to be a concept you don’t understand.

by gern blanston on Aug 26, 2010 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

it only takes one

Or more likely you don’t understand… There isn’t another team willing to trade. Packers won’t trade Lee, IMO cuz he is the only other TE on the team w/ the ability to keep the offense functioning very well. Havner and Crabtree don’t have that ability.

by Strohman on Aug 26, 2010 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

WAT no Donald lee isnt

Have u seen Andrew Quarless? he and Finley are just about the same thing…….I’d like to see both of them on the field at the same time tho what a nightmare that would be for any D coordinater…..but the fact is GB has 5 NFL calibre TE’s sum have to be traded or released. HOWEVER the most obvious thing at this time to me is the packers need to sign Adalious Thomas

by Robbie Henges on Aug 26, 2010 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

sign Adalius Thomas

that shows you need to do more homework! Thomas is way old and hasn’t played well in a couple years. Theres a reason nobody has even talked to him!!!

by Strohman on Aug 26, 2010 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

I struggle with this one

Really I could go either way with the Thomas signing. On one hand, getting an older, bad tempered, sack specialist isn’t always a good thing.

On the other, how much better can Zombo be to Thomas? I mean really? At the very least he’s a warm body as a place where we are might thin.

Really the value of Thomas becomes how much is willing to sign for. If he decides he’s willing to play on the cheap, then awesome, get the deal done. If not and he’s still demanding starter money, then I’m not sure the value is there.

by PackApologist on Aug 26, 2010 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

OLB

If you sign Thomas you probably have to release Zombo… I don’t think he’ll last long as a FA. He actually has made some plays and has plenty of upside. I would rather have the young guy w/ upside than the old vet who can’t really get it done anymore!

Besides thats been Thompsons M.O. since he arrived and thats not going to change.

by Strohman on Aug 26, 2010 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

read it again there is a comma after Lee i think he ment crabtree has little to no trade value.

by FFmorgan89 on Aug 26, 2010 3:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Who’s talking about starters. I didn’t see him say anything about getting a starter…I’d be happy to get some new talent in areas that we are weak. Maybe a another backup RB, we could use another talented CB, etc.

by TrevorR on Aug 26, 2010 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, Jolly complete justifies it...

Just added further aggravation. I was miffed most of last year because of his antics in the Minnesota game. His off-field BS just iced it forever.

Hope Neal proves to be all that. Raji too… a lot of hope invested there.

"Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser." - Vince Lombardi

by AdamA on Aug 25, 2010 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good answer

Everyone seems tor remember the one good play a corner or whatever position a player has for another team. Everyone sees Jennings, Driver, Finley running down the field making huge plays down after down. Remember there is a corner or safety from another team on their ass being burned. There is no way a team can have a Woodson or Revis at every DB position. I think were pretty solid everywherewhere were not there is a lot of youth and will be better every week

by the yooper on Aug 25, 2010 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Cromartie one always intrigued me. Sure he’s not perfect but heck he’d be an easy upgrade for us as a #2 guy…and for what a 3rd that could become a second if he turns out to be great. I think that was a fair price for a guy that could have really improved our coverage. I know he’s a poor tackler but everyone has their shortcomings. I was one that wasn’t expecting much from Harris this year. I’d be thrilled to be wrong but I think its going to be the beginning of the end for him.

by TrevorR on Aug 26, 2010 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

I would rather have Tramon Williams than Cromartie any day of the week… Twice on Sundays! I don’t see him being better than Williams… About the same guy, but not better.

by Strohman on Aug 26, 2010 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Come on, that’s just crazy. Cromartie isn’t a good tackler but he is one of the better cover guys in the league. (zone or man coverage) Williams is probably an average tackler and slightly above average cover guy. I think with his speed and break on the ball, he could possibly become a better cover guy but he hasn’t yet.

by packallday555 on Aug 26, 2010 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've not followed Cromartie

but aren’t his stats down pretty much every year he’s been in the league? There’s a reason the Chargers let him go on the cheap. I’m not saying I know what that is, but it doesn’t pass the sniff test for me.

by gern blanston on Aug 26, 2010 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah his stats are going down...

And from what i’ve heard he hates playing zone. And doesn’t do it very well. Pretty good man skills which is why NYJ wanted him. He had one really good year and earned a reputation as a shut down CB but since has done little but live off that rep and its been downhill since. Bad off-field stuff too. Maybe he’ll be re-juvinated by playing man coverage only, but if the Packers are going to be playing more zone then I don’t think Cromartie is the guy you want.

by Strohman on Aug 26, 2010 4:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think he’ll step his game up, and become the player he was in 2007, or at least close too it.

by packallday555 on Aug 26, 2010 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

technically the stats aren't going down.

Up until last year, his tackles were going up, quite a bit actually.
Passes defended: 18-9-10
Interceptions: 10-2-3

He wasn’t really known as a shut down corner as much as he was known as a playmaker. A guy who made great plays on the ball but obviously someone who wasn’t a great tackler and could be exploited due to his risk taking on turnovers. His third year (second as a starter) he played the season with a broken hip.

Anyway, none of that matters really no point of arguing about someone that is on a different team now.

by TrevorR on Aug 29, 2010 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

What in the sam hell is going on with our guys getting hurt this early?

I can maybe see Al Harris because he’s getting to that age where he’s as fragile as a wet paper towel, but Jennings and Bulaga and Matthews? Those are the very guys we need to be a threat!

When life gives ya lemons, shut up and eat your damn lemons.

by P-Townfan on Aug 25, 2010 10:50 AM CDT reply actions  

The right confidence

Al will be back sooner than later.

Enough on that. Of the articles referenced above, the most relevant (I thought) was the one about the team’s confidence. In the JS blog, they quoted some stuff from last year about how the Pack only seems to play well when their backs are up against the wall. That’s exactly right in describing the attitude we’ve had in the past, and it’s got to change. This has been a team that doesn’t handle success very well.

The two most glaring examples I can think of are
1) when we rocked the preseason last year and came in with confidence that was as soaring as it was unjustified. We’ve got to learn from that. Sure, the offense has looked good in the preseason, but it’s a sobering thought to realize that the preseason test is so easy that, last year, Allen Barbre looked like a good pass protector. That says it all. So, take the preseason results and put them in the circular file.
2) when we won our final regular season “contest” against Arizona. AZ rested everybody, came out totally vanilla, and put themselves on cruise control. Their complete lack of concern for the outcome of that game was obvious to anybody who watched. Nevertheless, all week long everybody on the Packers talked about how it was a good win and how they wanted to keep the momentum going and blah blah blah. It was like “momentum”?? What are you talking about?! You game-planned and they didn’t. Of COURSE you crushed their 3rd stringers! Congratulations.

(alright, gotta’ settle down here…)

My point is that they’ve got to have the kind of confidence that comes from having done something worthwhile, or from having faced top competition and gotten a true measure of your performance, good or bad. Those are the experiences that you consider, and the rest of it you disregard.

The JS writer expressed the opinion that the team has a better confidence this year. We’ll see. I hope so. But based on past observation, I say this team has a weakness in the area of thinking realistically about itself. They’ve got to stop coming out flat in big games, where they come out weak and tight and turn the ball over a couple times before pulling their head out of their you-know-what.

[end rant]

by Curly Lambeau on Aug 25, 2010 12:13 PM CDT reply actions  

a young team

I think that arrogant confidence is the sign of a young team. They start reading and thinking they’re pretty good, having a bunch of wins, then wham. The door is closed on their face.

Now you’ve got most of the guys back from last year who can say “remember last year when we thought we were pretty good?” Keep it real guys.

by gern blanston on Aug 25, 2010 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jennings is Hurt

Your artical says nothing about jennings being hurt! I thought there was a scoop I missed ,but guess not!

by BIRDMAN62 on Aug 25, 2010 12:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Read it again.

It says Jennings had back spasms in both articles.

by jonohull on Aug 25, 2010 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Packs pass D

Unless theres something up their sleeve, I think any and all teams just have to pass against the Packers.Exposed in last year`s games and showed no signs of improvement ,in this years preseason!

by BIRDMAN62 on Aug 25, 2010 12:57 PM CDT reply actions  

Injuries

Sometimes I wonder if the coaching staff is doing something wrong because of all the training camp injuries. Any thoughts?

It is tough to fill all the holes through the draft and I believe we will always be a couple of players short of a great team if TT continues to refuse to bring in free agents.

Hopefully one of the young corners lights come on and can contribute this season because I don’t see Al contributing a lot until at least week 4.

by Wisfan on Aug 25, 2010 2:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Injuries

Injuries are a part of training camp! Most are just minor, like Jennings stained back… That happens to every team. They all have at least 10-20 players that are nursing some sort of injury in training camp. Its preseason so they hold them out, but if it were regular season we wouldn’t even hear about most of these! Jennings wouldn’t even be listed on the injury report during the season, IMO.

Now when you get a position like LB and RB that right now each has a few guys missing time it can get to be a problem w/ the reps that are needed to be run and not having enough bodies to share them. Its a physical game and the Packers run camp just like other teams and I don’t think they have more injuries than any other team. It just seems that way cuz we pay alot more attention than most fans!

Feel free to name the FA Thompson should have brought in… Otherwise your being a “nag”…

by Strohman on Aug 25, 2010 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

So you don’t think they were ANY free agents out there that could have helped the team? What is TT paying you to defend him?

by Wisfan on Aug 25, 2010 5:04 PM CDT reply actions  

Funny thing about defense

Typically it’s the other guy who has the initial burden of proof. So if you are going to say there were FA’s out there who could make this a better team, you have to state somebody, anybody, but just name a player. Then the burden shifts to the defenders of the current inaction to state why that player wouldn’t of been worth the cost necessary to get him.

I can’t speak for other defenders on the CB front, but I’ve been pretty consistent with naming some names and giving the anti TT people the benefit of the doubt. Along with that are the reason why I can guess the front office didn’t really make a large effort to go out and get them. The main ones are Duanta Robinson, Antonio Cromartie, Lito Shepard, and Kyle Wilson. The main one that would of been a great trade for would of been Dre Bly, but I’m not sure that would of been a good long term move on the Packers part.

Moral of the story, got to come strong if you are going to attack…it’s the nature of offense.

by PackApologist on Aug 25, 2010 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

YOU tell me who they were!!!

Unless you offer a remedy all your doing is complaining… Not offering any answers… In short being a “nag”.

by Strohman on Aug 25, 2010 6:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

and you are being a bitc&

by Wisfan on Aug 25, 2010 7:50 PM CDT reply actions  

he's talking to me...

Cuz I called him out for not giving any FA that we should have signed and called him a nag for bitching but not offering any solutions!!! I’m still waiting for that to occur, just like you…

by Strohman on Aug 25, 2010 11:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Robinson is really the only FA. other than peppers who if he played hard every week would be a PERFECT fit for green bay him and mathews together on the outside it would be brutal to other teams.but i can understand not getting him with his work ethic. but Robinson would be a good player to play opposite of woodson and then when harri comes back in week 6 or so ease him into the nickle spot at first so you dont just throw him to hte wolves on a bad knee

Cromartie would have also been a good pick up Wilson perhaps but i dont really think safety is that big of a need but him and collins together would have been VERY interesting.

leon washington would have been a good compliment to grant. and it is very possible that grant gets injured some time this year with him having so many carries

by FFmorgan89 on Aug 26, 2010 4:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Peppers

Would be alot like Kampman… I don’t think he could function in a 34 D! So that doesn’t make Peppers a good fit in GB!

Neither Robinson or Cromartie are good tacklers and Capers D requires the CB to be strong in run support. So in that regard at least they wouldn’t fit Capers D either! Wilson would have been a pretty good draft pick, but not a better one than Bulaga, and personally I would have taken Jerry Hughes before Wilson too… What Wilson are you talking about?

Washington I can’t argue w/ cuz he might be terrific as a reciever out of the backfield, but how good is he picking up the blitz? I think he would struggle when he had to block and Rodgers health is perimount!!!

Any others???

by Strohman on Aug 26, 2010 7:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

You asked him for names and he gave you some…quit being a douche man. Is it the wrong time of month or something? You seem to really be on a rampage lately…

by TrevorR on Aug 26, 2010 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

yeah he gave me names...

And I gave him reasons why the Packers didn’t or wouldn’t get them… Not being anything but honest about the situation! Just cuz he gave names didn’t mean they made sense for the Packers! They didn’t…

by Strohman on Aug 26, 2010 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

peppers has stated in the past that he wanted to play in a 3-4 ( obviously he took the money instead) i think he would have been fine as a OLB. and im not disappointed in the Bulaga one bit. im not really even arguing that they should have gotten any of these players. some one just asked who was out there so i just listed some.. and Washington from what i saw wasnt a GREAT blocker but i really dont think that thats what he would be used for ( had he come to GB) they PROBABLY would have kept 3 RBs ( Grant Washington Jackson) and had jackson as the blocking back. and having cormartie or Robinson (which i admit you are right are not strong tacklers) would still make a QB think twice about throwing. ( also they cant be any worse than Williams) and they dont need to be that strong of a tackler if they break up the pass. and tackling can be taught pure athletisism can not.. now again im not saying that GB should have gone after them nor am i upset that they hadnt just giving some names that Could have been.

by FFmorgan89 on Aug 28, 2010 4:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Peppers hates Trgovac

Trgovac was his coach in Carolina. The Packers were on the short list of teams that Peppers would not play for.

Cromartie doesn’t like to tackle and is not a very good tackler. He is probably not the best fit for our system.

I like Robinson, too. The question is what price do you bring him in at? Odds are he’d be making more than Charles and Collins. And while he’s good, he’s not DPOY good. So, you have to give Charles a raise. Then Williams and Al are sitting there going “how about me, too?” That’s the primary problem with free agency.

I would have liked to have seen Washington in a Packer uni. I think he could have been had for the right price, too. Yet TT hates to give up his draft picks….

by gern blanston on Aug 26, 2010 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Peppers would have been a bad signing. He has no history as a 3-4 LB which is what he wanted to be and as you pointed out he and Trgovac have a bad history. He was NOT coming here and I am okay with that.

Washington would have been a GREAT addition, I was pushing for that in here. Really disappointed to see him end up on Seattle. Imagine him coming out of the backfield on third downs.

by TrevorR on Aug 26, 2010 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

Pretty much agree with you two guys

The only things I would add is that Robinson is an Atlanta guy and if we were to beat out the Falcons we would of needed to pay much, much more than they did…which would probably be more than the value he brings. (Note, I said probably, he might of been right bargain after all).

Washington is the other one and this nonsigning I actually fault MM not TT. TT can really only bring in the guys that are going to fit what MM envisions for the offense. Typically, the guys that have been used here in Green Bay, especially under MM, has been big bruising types. That’s just the type of RB he likes I guess. If that’s the case, then Washington doesn’t fit that mold, and paying him a whole bunch of bucks isn’t going to work since the coach wouldn’t make the most of his talent.

by PackApologist on Aug 26, 2010 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

you do realize

that by being so self aggrandizing that you are having the effect of driving people off this board, don’t you? No one will want to offer an opinion only to have you shout at them with exclamation points and be called dumb. Dude, be the bigger man and let it go. If the comment is stupid in your opinion, don’t say anything. Or at least be nice about your reply.

by gern blanston on Aug 26, 2010 8:34 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I see

Everybody responding to my comments… That tells me I create discussion and increase comments and the activity on the site…

by Strohman on Aug 26, 2010 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

if that's what you want to do

it will be a lonely place being right all by yourself.

My Dad once told me “you can be right, or you can be married.” I think the bottom line Stroh is you are welcome to your opinions and you offer lots. Yet not everyone is a total maroon that needs to be shot down for having an uninformed opinion, or a different opinion than you. Even if you’re right 100% of the time, there’s little call to berate someone else. Instead, use it as an opportunity to educate them. You don’t educate someone when you talk down to them.

by gern blanston on Aug 26, 2010 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

point taken

and i’ll try. I don’t do it to put anyone down or berate them though. If I argue strongly its cuz i’m opinionated… Thats just me…

by Strohman on Aug 26, 2010 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know you mean well, and it’s clear your very, very knowledgeable about football. I know personally, I’ve learned a lot more about the game from you and I’m sure everyone else has too.

I think when gern says, “..use it as an opportunity to educate them. You don’t educate someone when you talk down to them.” he is exactly right. I’m sure you don’t try and talk down to people but sometimes it can come off that way.

by packallday555 on Aug 26, 2010 4:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’ve learned a lot more about the game from you and I’m sure everyone else has too.

tks PAD, i just had milk come out my nose after that statement.

i’ve learned zero——no offense

i am hermitcrab——————-self educated in football knowledge.

by hermitcrab on Aug 26, 2010 6:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Opinionated is great. Belligerent is not. I like having discussions/arguments with ya as long as its civil…

by TrevorR on Aug 29, 2010 10:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

To the guy who said see wat pat lee can do..

Did you watch the steelers game? what about both of the vikings games? or the Arizona game? thats what pat lee and Brandon underwood can do, and guess what they did nothing and yes they should have drafted Brian Wilson ahead of Buluga ive said the entire time he is NOT a LT. He is a G or RT. Oline was not the biggest need this season CB was and will continue to be. So yes over you do over pay Robinson why because your much better with him than without. and cromartie guess what of course he would fit he is talented. at the very least TT should have cut lee and underwood realizing that they have ZERO potentiol and signed a verteran like Mike Mckenzie or Chris McAlister to 1 year deals and let them be number 4 and 5 CB’s just like New Orleans did last year. ive said it once ill say it again, the packers will NOT win a SB under TT.

by Robbie Henges on Aug 26, 2010 10:28 AM CDT reply actions  

Pat Lee didn't play in those games!

He was on IR the entire year!!! Underwood was a very green rookie who hadn’t played CB for about 3 years before the Packers drafted him.

BTW – It wasn’t Brian Wilson, its Kyle Wilson and I disagree.

by Strohman on Aug 26, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

First off, like Stoh said, Lee was out all last season and Underwood only played in the Steelers game I believe (he got injured towards the end of the season).

As for Robinson, I doubt he really wanted to come here. Green Bay isn’t really a place that is going to catch a guy’s eye like New York, Miami, etc. On top of that, he made it pretty clear that from the get go he wanted to go to Atlanta which is where he grew up or lived at some point (can’t remember exactly). We didn’t have much of a chance from the beginning, and I doubt many other teams did either.

I would have liked to have seen a veteran Cb signed this season but the bottom line is, that’s just not TT’s style. He likes to build from within, and give the guy’s he drafted a chance. Lee is only a 3rd year guy and Underwood will only be a 2nd year guy. It usually takes Cb’s time to develop, and both Lee and Underwood have great physical skills. (tall and fast) It’s worth seeing if either of them can become contributors for our team.

I think a good comparison for Lee and Underwood would be Finley, Collins, or Rodgers. None of them contributed much their first 2-3 years in the league. Collins looked good at times but then also bad at times as he took way too many chances. Finley barely saw the field, and too me that was a bit of a concern because I never saw Lee as anything more then average. Rodgers had Favre sit behind but even in those first two years, he looked pretty average and had injury troubles which was a bit concerning considering he wasn’t riding the bench.

I guess the point I’m trying to make is what if TT had just cut those guys because they hadn’t shown much right off the bat? Guys develop differently, and going from college to the NFL is a difficult thing to do. Most guys don’t just come in, and make an impact right away. There is a developmental process, and our staff does a great job at improving guys throughout that process. Because of Woodson and Harris, we didn’t need either Lee or Underwood to come in right away and make an impact so I’m sure we’ve been developing them, and not giving them much of a chance until our staff actually feels their ready. Obviously both are going to get their chances this season, and let’s wait a little longer then 2 preseason games before we just write them off as being horrible ok?

by packallday555 on Aug 26, 2010 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

I am that guy

Stroh actually stole a bit of my thunder with his pithy little retort, but here goes.

Yes, I did watch those games, but I’m not sure if you did because you didn’t realize that Pat Lee wasn’t there. In fact, because Pat Lee(and Al Harris) weren’t we had Jarrett Bush and Josh Bell on the field. You remember those two guys right? Josh Bell was the one who gave up the winning touchdown in the Steelers game. Jarrett Bush was the one the Cards picked on all day. As for Pat Lee’s performance on the field…well it’s been limited. Right now I want to see if he can stay healthy for a full year and if he can perform at this level. If the answer is no to either of those questions I will whole heartedly agree with you that he is a bust and we should move on, but not until this year is done. We just haven’t seen enough to rush to that judgment.

Brandon Underwood. I get that you are down on him, and he probably deserves it. Before you completely write him off remember it takes about three years to develop a corner. Underwood was also a relatively low round pick, meaning the Packers (and the rest of the league) believed that he probably wouldn’t produce right away. [Note, I understand that being picked low doesn’t automatically mean that, but it is a good rule of thumb that these guys aren’t expected to produce right away like say a first or second round guy.] The last thing that your analysis fails to appreciate is that Underwood had some serious maturity issues last year. I remember reports that his coaches described him as “just happy to be there,” he showed up late for meetings, and just didn’t have a professional attitude. Further evidence of his knuckle headedness would be the whole prostitution case against him right now. Something must of hit him because now the reports that you hear (mind you from the coaching staff which isn’t always the most unbiased of sources) is that he’s working hard and turning around his career. If that is the case then I want to see what he can do when he adjusts his work ethic to that needed for this level. Throwing him in the fire will answer this question too., thus why I want to see what he can do and not just write him off.

On drafting KYLE Wilson (Brian Wilson would be the lead singer of the Beach Boys, I don’t know if he would make a good CB for the Packers) instead of Bulaga. I asked this above, but if you are the NO Saints, which is more important….keeping Brees healthy or getting interceptions. I could ask the same of the Patriots and Colts as well. The reason I start here is because Rodgers was sacked over 50 times last year. That’s just completely unacceptable. The other question I would have is, if we didn’t draft Bulaga, who would be our backup LT? See, I don’t believe Farve torched us last year. I watched those game Robbie, and you know who I saw that torched us? Jared Allen. He got seven sacks in two games. He had what, 14 all year. Half his sacks came against us…and do you know why Robbie? Because Clifton was out those two games. Thus we return to my question, who backs up Clifton? Blindly relying on a guy who has had countless surgeries the last two years to stay healthy all year isn’t a good plan, especially when this guy protects the blind side of the most valuable player on our team.

On Bulaga not being a LT. Simply put the Packers don’t agree with you. There are some in the NFL who would agree with you, there are many others who wouldn’t. I could refer you over to the discussion with the Colts fans that is going on right now where they talk about the Colts wanting to move up to get Bulaga. I could reference his strong camp. I could do lots of things like that, but I’m not going to. Rather, I’m just going to say this for the people who think that Bulaga is not a LT: the best argument I’ve heard against this, and the only come to think about it, is his arm length. If this is the major test to see if a guy can play LT or not then Jake Long and Joe Thomas aren’t really LT either because they have a similar arm length as Bulaga. If there is an argument I’m missing then I would love to hear it because LT is an important position and one that the Packers need to nail down more than any one particular position on the defense. Once there is a long term viable starter there, so many things are going to fall in place.

Duanta Robinson. Do you think he would be worth as much to the Packers as Charles Woodson? Do you think he would be more valuable to the Packers than NIck Collins? See when you over pay FA’s like this the other guys, who have been with the team longer, come out of the woodwork for more money. We have already heard some rumblings of Woodson wanting a pay increase, and Collins was in a contract negotiation at the time Robinson would of been signed. Putting a guy who probably wouldn’t be as valuable as those two guys in the locker room with more money then them might not of worked out quite as well as you think. I might of, but I doubt it…that was my point.

Cromartie. Man, this guy is a chicken or egg problem. Was his good year because he was a good corner guy or because the Chargers were putting pressure on the QB? Cromartie’s dip in status falls pretty close to where Merriman was off steroids and just sucking up a starting spot. He might be awesome out in NY, in fact a part of me expects him to…but is that again due to the system or the player? Let’s face it, even if we got Cromartie, the Packers aren’t going to get the same pressure and shut down the other receiever out there the same way the Jets will. Thus it begs the question, would Cromarite be as good in GB? That’s tough.

The other question about that then is who would you rather have on the team? Morgan Burnett or Cromartie? I ask this because Cromartie was traded for a third round pick and that is where Burnett came on the team. If we didn’t have him right now we would be looking at Derrick Martin (you know the main guy on the defense Farve did torch @MN?), Will Blackmon (first year as a safety), or Jarrett Bush (we talked about him earlier, remember him?) as our starting safety week one. Just some food for thought on that one.

by PackApologist on Aug 26, 2010 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Other safeties

I forget the great Charlie Peprah. He would fix all our problems much more than those other three guys or that rookie. Totally.

by PackApologist on Aug 26, 2010 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

quite the post, PA

I hope you’re a good typist! I’m in agreement with all of your sentiments. I also appreciate you taking the time to explain, rather than barking. That’s a direction I’d like to see more people take. Nicely done!

by gern blanston on Aug 26, 2010 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks

That was my rant. Remember to tip your waiters!

by PackApologist on Aug 26, 2010 5:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

LOL

Nice novel… Great read and spot on…

But why the disrespect for me? I didnt say anything that should be taken as arrongant or anything… Just the facts!

by Strohman on Aug 26, 2010 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

No disrespect

More angst since you stole my thunder while I was writing the novel. That is all

by PackApologist on Aug 26, 2010 5:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

now if only something could be done about that vexing QB situation...

should have gone after Delohme or Garcia. Rodgers just isnt getting it done. GB will NEVER win a SB with him.

(i just realized that sarcasim does not show very well in text…)

by FFmorgan89 on Aug 28, 2010 4:39 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Acme Packing Company, the SBNation blog for fans of the Green Bay Packers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gassertaylor_small
APC Open Thread #33: Ron Dayne Thread? Why Not?
Packer_brewer_badger_logo_small
The APC Helmet Logo Bracket Tournament: Final Four

Recent FanPosts

03112008811_small
Clearing Cap Space & Roster Spots!
Pack_small
Current Cap Situation
03112008811_small
Wow... Won't Ever Doubt TT Again... (Of course I will... : )
Small
When And Why
Small
Where were you?
Ukcat_small
How about a little love for Cobb!!!
Jordy_nelson_small
MVP baby!
Football-funny-pic_small
NFL could add two new teams

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Acmepackingco_small Brandon

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Ayrton_senna_1988_canada_small Vermont Cubs Fan

Texbucky_small texwestern

Gassertaylor_small OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Img00243_small Kevin McCauley