Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Nevin Shapiro Vows To Bring Down Miami

How an Expanded 18-Game NFL Season Will Work




Taken from "The Klown Times":

 

While I am in favor of an 18-game regular season schedule (who doesn’t like more NFL games?), this is not as simple as the NFL saying ‘let’s expand the schedule, peace out’.

The NFL needs to do something about those damned over-priced preseason games.  NFL Warden/Commissioner Roger Goodell believes the fans want fewer preseason games – he is correct. 

The flip side is how in the hell would coaches evaluate talent to know who/who not to cut.  This could be accomplished by having more joint team practices.  Coaches could have simulated games in those practices, which could be conducted on weekends.  Essentially, those practices could be glorified scrimmages – which are what those preseason games amount to in the first place.

I also think that the NFL should expand player rosters.  Extending one of the harshest regular seasons in all of sports (hockey being the other) would increase the probability of more injuries occurring before the playoffs.  Plus, it never hurts to have good depth at vital positions.

What would really help is a minor league that would be expanded to non-NFL cities.  NFL teams could have minor league affiliates in places such as Greensboro and Raleigh, NC; Birmingham, AL; Richmond, VA; San Antonio, TX; and so on. 

The NFL should buy the UFL and utilize it as such.  That way, when injuries occur from such a long season, teams would be able to “call up” players.  NFL rosters are so small it’s near impossible for teams to keep its young talent.  My Steelers may have to cut some good rookie linebackers just to get under the 53-man limit.

An 18-game regular season is a good thing, only if done effectively.

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I like the farm league idea, but not the expanded schedule.

Too many teams have starters out at the end of the season as it is. More games means more injuries, which means more playoff games being decided by 3rd-string scrubs.

You ask who’s not in favor of more NFL games? That’s what they said at one time about the NHL, NBA, and MLB, all of which have given in to the temptation to over-expand and dilute their product to the point where nobody cares about it anymore. Quick, tell me what Toronto’s NBA team is called. Are the Grizzlies still in Memphis? How long has Charlotte had a team, and who’s their star player? You’re not sure, are you? Neither am I. When you dilute the product, then every part of that product (teams, players, games) becomes less important and therefore less interesting.

I’m not saying that the NFL’s there yet, but I don’t want it to even move in that direction. As it stands, I care about pretty much every game for every team. Let’s keep it that way.

Like Dr. Z used to say: “Football’s a nice game. Leave it alone.”

by Curly Lambeau on Aug 27, 2010 12:00 PM CDT reply actions  

I don’t think the NFL will have to worry about diluting the game as long as games stick to once per week. The reason the other sports can feel that way is 1) Length of the season (NBA and NFL are both about 9 full months in length for the actual season), 2) Number of games a week (its hard to get up for every game when there are 80 of them or 160 of them). If the NFL started talking about playing twice a week and doubling the games then I would be worried.

by TrevorR on Aug 27, 2010 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

NBA's roster allows

a maximum of 15 signed players, only 12 of which can play in a game. I wouldnt say their product is diluted, it just appears that way since the NBA has now entered the era of the “superteam” (e.g. Miami Heat). 3 NBA teams = 1 NFL team

I agree with you on the expanded schedule, there is no need for it. I am sure the owners are singing a different tune though.

by bheidge on Aug 27, 2010 8:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Where are all these fans that are clamoring for fewer preseason games?

I sure haven’t seen it. I’ve seen fans complaining about having to purchase over-priced pre-season tickets with their season tickets, but not about having the pre-season games all together.

Towlieppan: "You wanna throw high?"

by GoGregGo on Aug 27, 2010 12:11 PM CDT reply actions  

I’d love to see fewer preseason games. They are worthless as a fan. You watch them and all you think the whole time is that nothing you see is real. Your offense isn’t running their bread and butter plays, either is your D. The diehards will watch for indiv. player performances but ultimately most fans don’t care at all.

by TrevorR on Aug 27, 2010 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree with this

18 game seasons would mess with a lot of records and put the players at more injury risk. I heard a good idea where they expand the playoffs instead and eliminate the bye.

Thome Walks-Off Sox, Twists Knife, Continues To Make Sox Brass Look REALLY Stupid - White Sox Season Recap

by blackoutsox on Aug 27, 2010 12:33 PM CDT reply actions  

extend the playoffs?

Meaning put more teams in it? I don’t think I’d like that either. Its bad enough when an 8-8 team makes it, this might mean a below 500 team might make it. Yuck. I dislike that as much as the NCAA expanding to like 100 teams. Don’t ruin a good thing.

by TrevorR on Aug 27, 2010 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree. The only league that should think about expanding the playoffs is Baseball. Having 12 teams out of 32 make it into the playoffs is great. I love the fight for a first round bye. I take it you want 16 teams to make it. That’s HALF the league. You’re looking for Basketball style playoffs. #1 seed vs. #8 seed in first round. That #8 seed would be like a 7-9 Kansas City Chiefs vs. the 13-3 Colts. I don’t want to see that.

"A ringing single for David Eckstein who, in my view, is the perfect size for an American male." -Bob Costas

by Troy J. on Aug 29, 2010 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Longer season...

I like it. Sure there are some downsides (injury risks, records, etc) but ultimately as a fan, more meaningful football games is always a good thing in my book! :-) I don’t buy the excuse that teams will have things wrapped up sooner though cause the argument works both ways…it also gives teams more time to catch up and more games to catch up for teams that are behind. Heck we might have seen the Titans make the playoffs last year if they had two more games. The Packers might have caught up to the Vikings. I get the argument against it and I don’t blame people for being against it, but I love the idea and I hope it happens.

by TrevorR on Aug 27, 2010 1:58 PM CDT reply actions  

Totally agree.

More meaningful NFL games is a good thing in my mind! Fewer preseason game means the HC and GM have to base their decisions on the practices, of which some would have to be more scrimmages. Probably at least one of which is against another team!

Sburks… Hope your steelers do release some of those OLB. The Packers could use one or 2 more, especially if they can rush the passer!!! LOL

by Strohman on Aug 27, 2010 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

What about when its Week 15 of an 18-game schedule & a certain team is 13-2 with its division in clear wraps. Normally in the season structure as we now know, the starters would likely rest during the final game or two. Are teams going to start resting their players during the last 3 games of an 18 game schedule because they either have homefield or their division wrapped? A longer season also means a larger margin between the good and great teams in the standings which leads to more meaningless games at the end of the season which can essentially be considered what? … Preseason games.

Favre 4 Ever
I Believe In Chris Drury

by Plusch on Aug 27, 2010 5:54 PM CDT reply actions  

What you are missing though is that if there were 2 fewer games they STILL would have had the division wrapped up. Just cause there are more games doesn’t mean there will be more teams wrapping up divisions earlier. It also gives more time for teams to catch up too. Look at baseball, despite playing over 160 games, each of the last two years, it took an extra 163rd game for the AL Central to be decided. Its silly to think there will automatically be more. I think there will be just as many as there are now. Its just as likely that 2 more games makes more closer races as it is likely that there are more division blowouts.

by TrevorR on Aug 29, 2010 8:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

Keep everything the way it is

Why do you think the NFL is more popular than the MLB now days? It’s the way it’s set up, not so much the game itself. Baseball season drags, it gets boring, it gets old. If you lose, it doesn’t matter. “Just get em’ next time.” If you lose in football, it’s a big deal. Every game means more. Just by expanding the season by 2 games alone, you lose the importance of each game. Also, if you do this and a team has their division locked up by week 10 or so, that’s a lot of games of them playing backups. It will only make things worse. Fans have already been complaining about all the rule changes, so why would the NFL want to blow that out of proportion? Yeah, yeah, yeah, i know….money. Well, they should consider the loss of interest too. As for the Farm Club, then you lose interest in the NFL Draft. College Football is the Farm Club! Keep it the way it is now. We need 4 Preseason Games to properly evaluate our talent. You can’t get a lot out of 2 Preseason Games.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 28, 2010 7:38 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Couldn't disagree more!

Its NOT the setup… Its ALL about the game! Lose 2 preseason and gain 2 meaningful games if fine w/ me… Look at Tenn last year. In the last half of the year they were one of the best teams in the NFL! Another 2 meaningful games would have gotten the better team in the playoffs! So the agrument about teams mailing it in works both ways!!! There aren’t that many teams that ever have a division locked up w/ 4 games left. 2 games is the norm and I don’t see that changing that much! You would have to have one great team and a bunch of patsies for someone to be more that 3 games up… If thats the case it wouldn’t matter if they played 12 or 18!!! But divisions don’t have that kinda disparity in the PARITY driven NFL!

by Strohman on Aug 28, 2010 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

It still leaves the team less time to take a look at players for depth

I see your argument here, and it is legit. However, Preseason is a time to find out your depth. Who are those hidden gems? You can’t be settled on it in only 2 games. 3 game maybe, but not 2. Many of us still have question marks on our depth, the team still has some question marks on it. If you eliminate 2 Preseason games in favor of 2 more Regular Season games, you lose valuable time to get the right players on your roster for depth.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 28, 2010 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I understand the argument about the preseason games being important for determining roster decisions. But I think teams would then have another full team scrimmage and could also schedule a scrimmage w/ another team to get a look at players. Roster decisions would be more difficult, but w/ more scrimmages you could negate that to some degree. If you look at this year the Packers roster was becoming pretty clear after 2 preseason games… At least I thought so!

by Strohman on Aug 28, 2010 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was thinking after 3, but still with a few uncertainties

I don’t really see the point in replacing a Preseason game with a Scrimmage game. That doesn’t increase any income for teams, but yes a Regular Season game would. Also, are these scrimmage games in pads? Is it like our Family Night Game? You can’t diagnos as much out of a Scrimmage game as opposed to a Preseason Game. I think we need at least 3 Preseason games, but the 4th one is merely just to “make sure” the right decisions are made.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 28, 2010 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

That is a logical argument too

but I think coaches will find ways to analyze their players without the preseason games: Scrimmages, more interteam practices, etc. They will adjust.

by TrevorR on Aug 29, 2010 8:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Acme Packing Company, the SBNation blog for fans of the Green Bay Packers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gassertaylor_small
APC Open Thread #33: Ron Dayne Thread? Why Not?
Packer_brewer_badger_logo_small
The APC Helmet Logo Bracket Tournament: Elite Eight

Recent FanPosts

Small
When And Why
Small
Where were you?
Ukcat_small
How about a little love for Cobb!!!
Jordy_nelson_small
MVP baby!
Football-funny-pic_small
NFL could add two new teams
Ukcat_small
Nike taking over Jerseys
Small
Free Agency Opinions
Small
NFL needs to fix its playoff system...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Acmepackingco_small Brandon

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Ayrton_senna_1988_canada_small Vermont Cubs Fan

Texbucky_small texwestern

Gassertaylor_small OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Img00243_small Kevin McCauley