Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yankees Deny Rumors That Team Is For Sale

ESPN and AP Reports: Favre Will Not Play in 2010

ESPN and AP reports that QB Brett Favre has told the Minnesota Vikings that he will not return for the 2010 season. My first reaction was: how long will he be "retired" this time?

Brad Childress will hold a press conference later this morning.

I'm still rolling my eyes at his umpteenth retirement announcement, but there could be one difference this time. From the AP:

The person says the 40-year-old Favre called coach Brad Childress to say his injured ankle is not responding as well to surgery and rehabilitation as he had hoped.

Maybe his ankle is just too injured to play on. But it didn't look too bad after all the times he took to the high school practice field over the last month. 

So here's my post about it because I feel obligated to post something. Everything said/written today should be taken with a grain of salt.

And, if by chance, he's really retired this time, it does completely change the playoff picture in the NFC North. QB Tarvaris Jackson hasn't shown any sign that he's stepped up his game after one season of Favre's famous "mentoring". 

Comment 181 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Favre

If he truly doesn’t play this year, how can the Packers not be favored to win the North and have the best record in the NFC? The schedule has a few hurdles but essentially the two toughest games become considerably easier with T Jackson or Rosenfells (SP) in there.

by Eman6880 on Aug 3, 2010 10:59 AM CDT reply actions  

The toughest game is against Dallas

Whether Favre returns or not.

"Tragedy is what happens to me. Comedy is what happens to you." -Mel Brooks

by jobe on Aug 3, 2010 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know. The last time the Packers played the Cowboys...

Things don’t stay the same from year to year, though. I’d still love it if Woodson and the D completely shut down the Cowboy’s offense.

The Packers badly needed that game last year and they took it. They had to take it.

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lets take a history lesson...

Not to sound like a jack wagon but…They have never beat us in Lambeau….I dont expect them to this year at all…I’m more worried about NY Jets away game along with the Patriot game in Foxboro…thats me tho..

by SpaceGhost34 on Aug 3, 2010 6:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

no

Cowboys beat us the year before, 3rd week of 2008 – it sucked too

by Dave Z on Aug 3, 2010 8:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

they won for the first time in 2008

which is why the cowboys are my most hated team

something tells me even the mafia wouldn't call on greg walker if a hit was needed.

-MarketMaker

by blackoutsox on Aug 3, 2010 8:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Appologize...i wasnt aware of that...

Wasnt around much in 2008…Did not know that

by SpaceGhost34 on Aug 4, 2010 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

The end!

As a Lion’s fan, I always hated playing against Favre but, especially when he went to the Queens. I believe we all hate the Queens! I always respected Brett as a player but, lost a lot of respect for him through all this retirement soap opera era.
You’ve got a great QB in Rodgers. The division title should not be a problem. I just hope we
can now at least take one from the Queens this year and help you out. I’ve many friends that
are Packers fans. I live in MN although growing up in MI. I detest the fans here. It’s hell living
here through football season. They are such fair weather a holes, it’s sickening.
Suh’s dissapointed. He wanted a crack at Favre. But, there’s always Cutler, Jackson & your
new star to target.
Have a good season!

Expectations don't produce!

by 2manyears on Aug 3, 2010 11:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

HAHAHAH

They made a deal with the devil…this is what they get! Not saying Brett is the devil but bringing in the guy that EVERYONE hated to be your man…your starting QB…I don’t feel an ounce of sympathy. I AM heading over to DN to see what R4F is saying though!!!!

by TrevorR on Aug 3, 2010 11:02 AM CDT reply actions  

The irony is

Lots of posts at DN of fans of other teams apologizing to Vikes fans for this dilemma.

by Danwood on Aug 3, 2010 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

Honestly I don't blame Favre for this

He stated he was on the way out, if he came back it would be a bonus. I do blame Childress for not addressing this issue in the offseason.. We could be working with McNabb, or an assortment of QB’s from the draft. Personally, I don’t know how Childress could not have at least thought about this posibility.

It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...

by Grime on Aug 3, 2010 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's simple

Remember Childress always thinks he’s a genius.

The good news is though that Farve always retires in the offseason these days. Then he wides up in camp in the end.

by PackApologist on Aug 3, 2010 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

the tough thing with that though...

is that this time Favre is under contract. You bring in McNabb, it would probably make Favre want to come back even more and then you’d be stuck with two HUGE contracts and 5 QBs.

by TrevorR on Aug 3, 2010 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, Chilly has to shoulder some blame here if he really doesn’t come back. He passed on Clausen in the draft, and didn’t do anything in FA despite having only Jackson and Sage at Qb.

by packallday555 on Aug 3, 2010 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

BLAMING CHILDRESS

Childress’s hands were tied. Literally and figuratively. He made the boat for Favre who would carry them to the SB. We all know that Favre has long needed strokes and adulation. Favre and his happiness were paramount. Had Childress made any moves at QB he would aggravate Favre, something he could not do. Favre and Childress had some issues which most of us saw on TV.

by marcopo on Aug 3, 2010 8:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry. Can't resist.

If Bertt really IS gone, then who is running the Vikings’ locker room, now? :)

-
The glass is more than half-full.

by NorthStarr on Aug 4, 2010 1:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

In a way, signing Favre now hurt Minnesota severely

It was a lost year in developing Tarvaris Jackson. You know Favre doesn’t coach those backup QB’s, and even if he did, you don’t listen to Favre. Favre’s magic was just that magic, because he plays with one of the worst fundamentals and techniques. He makes the most ridiculous plays and throws. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t, but when it does work, his magic is in play.

In addition, the signing of Favre got Childress of new 5 year contract. Have fun with that Minny fans.

The only positives out of this is: at least Minny fans got a taste of excitement last year and….hey, there’s still plenty of Training Camp left yet! Favre usually doesn’t announce his return until Training Camp is almost over!

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 3, 2010 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Eh, disagree on that

I don’t think the Vikes go 12-4 without Favre. You could argue they pursued Favre because TJ didn’t develop, and the coaches didn’t have faith that he would develop to lead a team that was one polayer from seriously contending for a SB.

I can’t fault the Vikes for getting Favre and making a serious run. Minnesota was going to be in the same place without Favre this year than they were in 2008, and I seriously don’t think the Vikes would’ve drafted a QB. Doing so is an admission of failure on Chilly’s part that he picked the wrong guy. So, he probably gets another Gus Frerotte clone, and the Vikes drift at a 9-7’ish clip, give or take a win.

No, I’ll take the one year of Favre, and all the drama that involves. If he comes back, bonus, if not, then it’s 2008 redux again, with the hope that TJ picked something up along the way.

"Whoever said that the pen is mightier than the sword never encountered automatic weapons."

The Daily Norseman The Rivalry, Esq. SB Nation Minnesota

by Ted Glover on Aug 3, 2010 9:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

No doubt, Favre was a smart pick up. He gave you a MUCH better chance then Jackson did. If he ultimately does end up leaving this season though, I think it’s going to end up hurting you guys. It probably helped Jackson to learn from him but at the same time, Favre coming did only delay his development.

Though I think all this is pointless cause I’m sure Favre will come back. This isn’t the first times he’s decided to “retire” at this point in the offseason.

by packallday555 on Aug 3, 2010 10:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

That was the point I was trying to make

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 3, 2010 10:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

In 2008, the Vikings did more with less than any other team.

Sydney Rice was a nonfactor, the QBs rotated in and out week after week, and the team pulled into the playoffs.

Obviously the messy ending that followed was somewhat disappointing, but that team overachieved. Those two narrow wins over the Lions were pretty ugly, but you HAVE to win those games to be a contender in your division.

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

R4F is probably going

into conniptions. Or collapsing over his keyboard. Or triple facepalming with his buddy gothicpurple. Remember him? Was he banned at DN too?

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm amazed he hasn't been banned THERE

for flaming CG and the guys at DN.

Take everything with a pinch of sea salt, I guess…

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

gothicpurple is a notable Viking extremist

as is Revenge4Favre.

I won’t call them trolls, but extremists. They take issue with the people running DailyNorseman.com

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 9:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Still skeptical

I dunno, Schefter is basin this off a text to teammates that says “this is it.” What does that mean?? This is my real retirement? This is my last season? We’ll see…

by HankO on Aug 3, 2010 11:05 AM CDT reply actions  

rumor central

who do you think he wants to play for this year? Is this a ploy to play in Jacksonville? HA! Wouldn’t that be hilarious?

by gern blanston on Aug 3, 2010 11:08 AM CDT reply actions  

49ers have a somewhat dysfunctional QB

But he’s NOTHING compared to Farve.

Give Alex Smith a chance before you drive him to insanity, York Family…

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 5:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Would anyone be surprised

if his ankle mysteriously healed by the end of training camp?

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Aug 3, 2010 11:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Haha no I wouldn’t be surprised one bit.

by packallday555 on Aug 3, 2010 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

We'll see

..if he makes his triumphant return in October or November..

Pack has to be favored now..

Sometimes nothin is a real cool hand.

by White92 on Aug 3, 2010 11:10 AM CDT reply actions  

LOL!!!!!!

Sure… I bet he will come back like he always does

by Yankees10 on Aug 3, 2010 11:13 AM CDT reply actions  

I won't believe Farve's retirement

until the Vikings come out of the tunnel WITHOUT him.

I’ve been burned three times too many… (2007, 2008, 2009…)

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 5:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Took the words out of my mouth.

by Curly Lambeau on Aug 4, 2010 1:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thank god...

…he is on the Vikings and not the Packers, I hate when he pulls that shit.

by TheSwish on Aug 3, 2010 11:20 AM CDT reply actions  

Someone

Doesn’t think he can beat the Packers this year.

by drezdn on Aug 3, 2010 11:36 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Just Brent

being Brent…

Son, when you participate in sporting events, it's not whether you win or lose : it's how drunk you get.

by snibbodmot on Aug 3, 2010 11:37 AM CDT reply actions  

I don't know what to think

This can’t be a ploy to get out of camp as I thought Childress pretty much gave him a free pass to skip camp.

by Charlie Kelly on Aug 3, 2010 11:53 AM CDT reply actions  

That's what has me thinking he might be serious.

Maybe he wants to go out fresh off a great season, and not risk a mediocre one. Maybe his ankle really is so bad it’s a liability. It’d have to be one heck of a bad ankle to make Lame Favre worse than Healthy T-Jack, though…

Is it football season yet?

by juperee on Aug 3, 2010 6:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yea i think he might just be trying to skip camp...

But I wouldnt apologize to the Vikings for anything…I hate them more than anything on this planet…IF Favre doesnt come back…Man everybody in the state of Minnesota KNOWS…They are fucked…And we are gunning for them too…Its gonna be bad for them and i cant wait..

by SpaceGhost34 on Aug 3, 2010 12:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Everyone saw this coming.

It is sad because he has had a great career and should be celebrated for retiring, not causing everyone to go “ok here we go again.” I still think he plays but not at the same level and that will be it. Even with Favre back I feel the Packers are still the team to beat in the north.

There is nothing wrong with me cheering for players that are former players for my teams. Unless they become a Viking.

by Giant_in_la_area on Aug 3, 2010 12:12 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

I wont believe this until the season starts without number four on the field for the first time in 20 years

something tells me even the mafia wouldn't call on greg walker if a hit was needed.

-MarketMaker

by blackoutsox on Aug 3, 2010 12:15 PM CDT reply actions  

I call B.S.

My hunch is that he’s trying another ploy to skip training camp.

Really, Brett ? Your ankle isn’t “fully” healed. Those types of things never seemed to stop you DURING the season. Why not go to camp, get put on the PUP list, and knock back a few brewskies?

As far as Dallas being the toughest game, I’d nominate the Jets game.

by Squatbulk on Aug 3, 2010 12:41 PM CDT reply actions  

I agree...

But they are having issues off the field…Im concerned about the in New England game to some degree…

by SpaceGhost34 on Aug 3, 2010 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Patriots scare me far more than the Jets.

The Jets are good for a 5 INT game. Against a healthy Woodson and Harris combo, Sanchez and that running game could be stifled.

The Patriots have a QB who’s made his living off of NOT making bad throws. They also have more stability from their running backs (I don’t believe in Shonn Greene at all).

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1,000,000

that was my next point…Mark Sanchez doesnt scare me at all…sorry he can go to hell with the rest of the USC QB’s…They have a descent run game but i just dont see their offense out gunning ours…Both teams have a great Defense I wont take that from them…But how will this Revis thing effect them? OR more importantly him? New England is not the old team it was anymore…They are young but, not someone to overlook…

by SpaceGhost34 on Aug 3, 2010 6:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

wonder?

I’m wondering what the thoughts of Thompson and McCarthy are on this… I know what they’ll say, but wonder how they’re feeling or what is said behind closed doors!

by Strohman on Aug 3, 2010 1:03 PM CDT reply actions  

They avoided it

Both of them had a press conference on Tuesday, and neither said anything directly about it. Thompson was asked a few questions about it, while McCarthy drifted off after only one.

by Brandon on Aug 4, 2010 1:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Of course they did...

Thats pretty much what I meant saying I know what they’ll say… But wouldn’t it be kinda interesting to be a fly on the wall in their offfices when they are alone and know nobody is listening? I think that would be really interesting!!!

by Strohman on Aug 4, 2010 2:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

I honestly don't think it would've been more than a 3-4 minute discussion

Unlike us, who enjoy hanging on to every gossip tidbit ESPN wants to invent, they have a job and really don’t care one way or another.

by Danwood on Aug 4, 2010 6:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Too early to tell

I’ll believe he is retired when week 10 rolls around and he still hasn’t replaced the struggling Jackson. I have no faith in this man, as far as I am concerned everything he says is a lie.

by msc32887 on Aug 3, 2010 1:16 PM CDT reply actions  

I only need to see him miss the first week.

IMO, once the streak is broken, he will definitely be done.

-
The glass is more than half-full.

by NorthStarr on Aug 4, 2010 1:56 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Pretty much I gather from this thread:

-People either don’t care with a been there, done that attitude.
-People are not shocked, surprised, or miffed.
-Vikings go from competitive to “ALL HELLS BREAKING LOOSE. CALL THE FBI’S, CIAS!!!”
-He is doing this to skip training camp.
-Ankle really hasn’t healed.

All are valid, all could be true. I will buy into the skipping training camp because this is what we’ve come to expect. But I don’t know about this time around.

I bet Spielman and Chilly are forcing him out! SPECULATE!

I will sit in the skeptical corner.

by Bush League All Star on Aug 3, 2010 1:54 PM CDT reply actions  

haha

We are the experts in Favrewatch 2010!

It’s like chess, we are prepared for whatever move…..errr, decision he makes.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 3, 2010 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not buying the skipping camp line

Childress has said that he can skip as much as he wants.
Camp is going right now, so he was already skipping with no problem.

All in all, it seems like the real deal, but I still won’t be suprised if he pulls into camp next week.

by PackApologist on Aug 3, 2010 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Seeing is believing ...

Ok, we’ve all heard this before, and we know what happened two weeks later.

I’ll believe it’s for real when Favre is not under center sept. 2nd when the Viqueens play the Saints. If he doesn’t start that game, his streak (which supposedly is important to him) is ended, and it would make less sense to come back.

To the people who believe this is just his sceem to skip camp, well DUH !!! he all knew he wasn’t going to camp anyway, and if training camp was the only issue, it would have been very easy for him and Chilly to agree on him “missing” camp because of the ankle, they could just have issued a statement saying he is going to play, but being 40 yr old, his recovery isn’t as fast as expected, so he will rehab in Mississippi and be back in Minnesota whenever it suited him.

I can believe his ancle will be the decideing factor, it might be fine for running around throwing to high-school players, but that’s very, very far from even one single NFL game, and much further from an entire season…

Again, I’ll believe it’s for real when the season starts without him…
If so, I might break my promise to keep my Packers #4 jersey in the back of my closet until he’s inducted in the HOF, I might attent the Vikings @ Packers game, and would consider wearing it just to show the Minnesota fans he’s no longer there,….

by Jarlsberg on Aug 3, 2010 2:25 PM CDT reply actions  

The real point is...
Early this afternoon, FoxSports.com reported that the Vikings are prepared to offer Favre more money and more time away from camp prior to the season.

Butler also mentioned that he had heard through some NFL channels that Favre was trying to extend his contract to three years at $13 million a year. He didn’t know if Favre wanted guaranteed money behind this year or some kind of assurance he would be paid next year if there was a lockout.

…the Vikings are the spineless idiots that are groveling at the feet of a 40-year old player, and the Packers are set up with a great young QB. I appreciate what Brett did for our franchise, but no team should ever treat any player like he is some sort of king or savior. Look what happened with LeBron.

Invariably, teams that do that sort of thing ruin chemistry and choke before they get a title.

"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne

by dishingoutdimes on Aug 3, 2010 2:28 PM CDT reply actions  

Spineless idiots....

For trying to offer one of the best QB’s in the NFL a little more cash to change his mind?

Nonsense.

If you guys had the opportunity to address a major flaw in your offense by offering a guy more money to stay out of retirement, you know full well the Packers would do the exact same thing.

Think about it, if you DIDN’T have a QB as good as Rodgers, the Packers would be in the exact position the Vikings are in, and likely offering him the same raise. Stop with this “holier than thou” attitude and look at it objectively.

by Bjorno on Aug 3, 2010 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would certainly hope that no team I ever rooted for

would bend over backwards and do ANYTHING just to please one player. A football team is about more than one player.

The Vikings are prepared to throw more money at him, offer him guaranteed money even if there is a lockout, constantly fly down to Mississippi to have chats, and most importantly they’re bending the rules for Brett! What other player could get away with never showing up at the beginning of training camp? He always has an excuse. The Vikings are basically saying – look Brett, we don’t care what you do, but you will be the starting quarterback whenever you decide to show up.

Where is the loyalty to the entire team in that?

That’s all I’m saying.

"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne

by dishingoutdimes on Aug 3, 2010 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

I won't argue that it shouldn't be team first...

But if the rest of the team does not care, it really does not matter.

These are grown men that understand football is a business and with Favre at the helm they all have a much better shot at their ultimate team goal, which is to win a Super Bowl. Sure, in any other situation, many of the players would be pretty peeved. But considering the night and day difference between a team with or without him, they are all pretty understanding. Even Tjack is taking advantage of the situation.

Players get preferential treatment all the time in the NFL. Mostly because they are very good players.

You think some rookie on the Colts gets pissed off because Peyton Manning is paid more than he is, or that he gets to call the plays from the huddle?

You think Bears players are mad because Jay Cutler got a huge contract?

You think that Matt Flynn is pissed because everyone loves Rodgers and was given the starting job without having to compete for it in the offseason?

A team is a team, but to say you cannot give preferential treatment to your most valuable player is a little much.

by Bjorno on Aug 3, 2010 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Aaron Rodgers, Peyton Manning, Jay Cutler, and Matt Flynn also all show up on time to training camp and work hard with the rest of their teammates.

"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne

by dishingoutdimes on Aug 3, 2010 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

True..

But it needs to be said that those players I mentioned are also not as old or as beat up as Favre is.

Ask any 7 year RB, 11 year CB, 18 year QB, 13 year OL or 14 year DL veteran and they will tell you that training camp and preseason does more harm than good to their old bodies.

These people can only last a short time at high levels once they reach that age. I would rather let Favre sit out of training camp and 2 preseasons games, than to have him hit a wall in the first week of the playoffs.

by Bjorno on Aug 3, 2010 6:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Excuses

Your making every excuse in the book for the guy!!! LMAO Packers put up w/ his drama for a little while, but like a good organization it planned for the day #4 wouldn’t be in uniform! Unlike your viqueens!

by Strohman on Aug 3, 2010 7:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not making excuses...

Playing Devil’s advocate, maybe.

The point is, we don’t care if he comes to camp or not. He makes the Vikings a Super Bowl contender.

Without Favre, we are nipping at the Bear’s heels for a Wild Card berth.

by Bjorno on Aug 3, 2010 9:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Farve is special

Obviously a legend with Favre time and grade is entitled to some benefits. But it’s pretty obvious that the Viking organization carried the theme too far. No organization, large or small can let the tail wag the dog and be successful. Childress now has a huge cleanup problem. All these Vikings rallied around Favre to transport them to the big game. Pffffffff. Gone. Now he’s got to rally them around Tavaris Jackson, who ain’t no Favre and he ain’t no Rodgers.

by marcopo on Aug 3, 2010 8:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, definitely not a Favre or Rodgers...

But he may be a Rex Grossman, which was good enough to get a team that is similarly built get to the Super Bowl.

by Bjorno on Aug 3, 2010 9:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don’t think your defense will be nearly as good as the Bears was in 2006 though. And probably not your special teams either.

You guys would still be good with Jackson, I just don’t think you’d be good enough in the big time games, which is ultimately what ends up mattering most.

by packallday555 on Aug 3, 2010 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

The coaching staff does a good enough job at losing big games...

But I think our running game is superior to the Bears in ’06 which might give us a better chance.

by Bjorno on Aug 4, 2010 1:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Unbelievable!

You simply dont get it do you? You took on #4 and threw Jackson away like the garbage and now you expect that TJ is going to come to your rescue?! Seriously???

I don’t care that #4 made you a SB contender, nobody doubts that… But what did you do for Jackson’s confidence? Pretty much ruined what little he could have had! TJ is at best a low level NFL starter, more likely a good backup who was throw under the perverbial buss (pun intended) by your HC and GM and owner and teammates and fans and… LMAO Yet you actually still think TJ is going to be willing to lead the team that basically discarded him as a starter? Like I said… UNBELIEVABLE!!!

by Strohman on Aug 4, 2010 2:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I think Jackson’s confidence issues will be a big problem. He had major confidence issues before Favre, so I’m not sure how he couldn’t have confidence issues after Favre. On top of that, he still hasn’t ever shown the ability to read coverage. I don’t think he can get it done against the better teams.

by packallday555 on Aug 4, 2010 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Or

that the rest of your team is going to look at TJ as their leader?
Seriously?

-
The glass is more than half-full.

by NorthStarr on Aug 4, 2010 2:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don’t think so. I think having a dominant defense is more important then a dominant running game, and I don’t see how the Vikings defense will be dominant this season.

by packallday555 on Aug 4, 2010 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess few players would be mad about the situations you mentioned.

Like the Peyton scenario, that would be like me being hired on by a company then becoming upset that I make less money than the CEO. And like dishingoutdimes said, all of the players mentioned show up to camp with their teammates and work.

As for the players being content with the situation. Well, players are kept on a very tight leash by coaches and management on what they can say to the media so even if some players were peeved, chances are they aren’t gonna say anything. Especially younger, less established players who are trying to earn a roster spot.

Second, last year played out pretty much perfectly for the Vikings. Favre played great, the team played great, they swept the Packers, won the division, and came close to winning it all. When things are going great, you’re not very likely to hear any complaining. But if things had been last than stellar, I’d expect we’d hear much more anger (See New York 2008)

by Charlie Kelly on Aug 3, 2010 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

until it turns sour

The Vikings may purport to be unified as a team in their “let’s give him the time he needs” but my guess is that if he comes back it will only hold until they start losing. If Brett starts tossing up picks left and right, as he’s prone to do from time to time, I’ll bet dollars to donuts that the locker starts saying things like “he is doing more harm than good.” and “he’s not really a teammate because he skipped mini camps, ota’s, etc”

by gern blanston on Aug 3, 2010 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Of course,

When things are all Duckies and Bunnies there is rarely a complaint heard, especially when you are on the fast track to the postseason.

There certainly was a fallout with Favre’s performance late in ‘08, and that will likely happen in Minnesota should Favre have another arm injury and throw the season rather than telling the coach "I can’t play" and letting the new guy play.

I liken it to politics. The second you are not getting what you want, you start to complain about how the president is not doing his job correctly. But as long as you are getting your universal health care, lower taxes, and better paying jobs; you could care less what country we are invading. But we won’t get into that… politics are nasty.

The thing is, with the team we have it is hard to imagine that Favre will not play lights out again. It does not take much when you have the offensive weapons we have, and his experience is the most important factor.

Since we know that Favre joining the team pretty much guarantee’s us a playoff berth, (save for injuries and the like) it is hard not to make those exceptions.

by Bjorno on Aug 3, 2010 6:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

A few years ago ...

the Packers once DIDN’T have a QB as good as Farve – they had an unproven kid named Rodgers. Yet the Packers still had the spines to tell him they’ve had enough.

Three years later, the Packers have molded a top NFL QB, the Jets have a nice QB2 in Mark Sanchez and the Vikings will be forced to pay the old man primadonna what he wants for 3 years.

Even though he’ll likely put up good numbers for this year, they’re stuck him. The Packers are not.

by Squatbulk on Aug 3, 2010 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Unproven on the field, maybe.

But there was no doubt that Rodgers was an excellent QB, which is exactly why the Packers chose to go with Rodgers instead of Favre in the first place.

by Bjorno on Aug 3, 2010 6:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

no doubt

If you lived in Wisconsin there was plenty of doubt about Rodgers. Many, in spite of his performance still doubt, because they can’t let Favre go.

by marcopo on Aug 3, 2010 8:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe.

Personally, I knew Rodgers was going to be a good QB the second I saw him come in for Favre in mop up.

Not that I am some great QB evaluator or anything, but sometimes you can just tell.

by Bjorno on Aug 3, 2010 9:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

That was a pretty good hunch then

I’ll admit, I was not a believer in Rodgers after his first couple seasons. And I know I was not alone with that. He proved us all wrong though. Anytime one seems to doubt him, he proves you wrong. So, for one to have any kind of hunch in him through his first couple years before 2007, that’s impressive in it’s own way I guess.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 3, 2010 9:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rodgers changed that game in Dallas from a fiasco to respectable

In just a couple of quarters. I had hope after that.

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Aug 3, 2010 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

I started to get a feeling of hope in the 2007 Preseason. I gained even more confidence after the Dallas game, although I unfortunately didn’t have the luxury of watching it considering it was only aired by the NFL Network. sigh…

05’ and 06’ though, no hope whatsoever. I thought we’d be screwed after Favre retired. Boy, was I wrong!

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 3, 2010 10:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Disagree

Good teams and good organizations address major flaws BEFORE they become a problem! You know… Kinda like the Packers did when they drafted Rodgers to become the successor to #4!

by Strohman on Aug 3, 2010 5:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

but we do have aaron rodgers

which makes your whole point invalid

something tells me even the mafia wouldn't call on greg walker if a hit was needed.

-MarketMaker

by blackoutsox on Aug 3, 2010 8:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

It is a hypothetical...

Which makes the removal of Rodgers completely valid.

by Bjorno on Aug 3, 2010 8:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

then lets hypothesize about a packers board without viking fans!

something tells me even the mafia wouldn't call on greg walker if a hit was needed.

-MarketMaker

by blackoutsox on Aug 3, 2010 9:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

the Packers are spineless idiots

for offering him $20 mill to stay retired.

by dsludo on Aug 3, 2010 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

What is past is past.

To say that all Packers are spineless idiots is stupid. Go home, Viking fan.

by starmark on Aug 3, 2010 3:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

He didn't say "all Packers"

He just said “The Packers”. Just like Dishingoutdimes said that the Vikings are spineless idiots.

by Bjorno on Aug 3, 2010 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Real clever.

Here is my clever reply “Fuck the Bears”.

See what I did there? I took what you said, and I changed a word so it said “Fuck the Bears”.

Cool huh?

Why don’t you come at us with something useful, rather than just generic insults?

by Bjorno on Aug 3, 2010 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, hey

I’ll take that comment! The fact of a matter is the Bears still suck.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 3, 2010 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

how shocking that someone would say something like that on a packers blog?

its completly unforseen!

something tells me even the mafia wouldn't call on greg walker if a hit was needed.

-MarketMaker

by blackoutsox on Aug 3, 2010 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well...

It was supposed to be clever.

But I done went and outsmarted myself.

That’s what I get for bouncing from DN to APC to WCG.

by Bjorno on Aug 4, 2010 1:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

True.
…the Vikings are the spineless idiots that are groveling at the feet of a 40-year old player, and the Packers are set up with a great young QB. I appreciate what Brett did for our franchise, but no team should ever treat any player like he is some sort of king or savior. Look what happened with LeBron.

Invariably, teams that do that sort of thing ruin chemistry and choke before they get a title.

“But we all know that games aren’t played on paper…they are played by little men inside our TV sets.” —Kenny Mayne

by dishingoutdimes on Aug 3, 2010 12:28 PM PDT reply actions

by Bjorno on Aug 3, 2010 8:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wish they hadn't done that

Oh well, like starmark says – the past is the past

"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne

by dishingoutdimes on Aug 3, 2010 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

well if it isn't the pot calling the kettle black

Frye is honestly gotta be one of the top 10 3rd Stringers in all of the NFL right now--colbyb

by verno329 on Aug 3, 2010 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah a package designed to try and compromise the situation is so much worse the setting your franchise back between two and five years. What were they thinking?

by PackApologist on Aug 3, 2010 6:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

They weren't

and by they, I mean the Vikes.

Going all out for a title can backfire spectacularly. This just proves it.

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 6:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

they offered him an advertising opportunity to keep him involved

not to stay retired

something tells me even the mafia wouldn't call on greg walker if a hit was needed.

-MarketMaker

by blackoutsox on Aug 3, 2010 9:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

lol

Oh was that what that was? Keep telling yourself that…

by dsludo on Aug 3, 2010 10:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

aaand flagged!

something tells me even the mafia wouldn't call on greg walker if a hit was needed.

-MarketMaker

by blackoutsox on Aug 3, 2010 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Because many of us bring our special shade of green there

What makes this forum so good is the fact that many other viewpoints can be heard. If it was only Packer fans around here the place would be way to insulated and be overcome with group think.

by PackApologist on Aug 4, 2010 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

ehh...good point

Still hate the Vikings tho brother

by SpaceGhost34 on Aug 5, 2010 7:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

favre wants money beyond the potential lockout?

god how long does he want to play?

something tells me even the mafia wouldn't call on greg walker if a hit was needed.

-MarketMaker

by blackoutsox on Aug 3, 2010 8:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

IF this is true...

Then one of the best players in history will be gone from the game. The NFL will not be the same without him. Many of you hate Favre and that is silly. Respect the player for his ability. He was good for the game.

Having said that, the Packers will win the NFC North easily now. For fantasy owners out there, Sidney Rice and other Vikings receivers drop quite a bit without Favre. Their offense becomes a running offense again. AP all day. Stop him and you win. What do the Packers do best? They stop the run. Looks like the chances for the Packers run to a SB victory just got a lot easier.

With Favre there were only three teams that would likely win the SB, Packers, Vikings and Saints. Now without Favre, there are only two. The Packers are younger and improving. This will be their year.

by starmark on Aug 3, 2010 3:01 PM CDT reply actions  

With Favre there were only three teams that would likely win the SB, Packers, Vikings and Saints

Do you mean from the NFC? Because I would argue that there are a few AFC teams that are looking pretty good – Jets, Colts, etc.

"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne

by dishingoutdimes on Aug 3, 2010 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

I suppose you could make an argument for the Cowboys.

They should win the NFC east and at least be competitive in the playoffs. I’m not so sure they can handle a great offensive team, however. Time will tell. This is a new year and we cannot base everything off of what happened last year.

by starmark on Aug 3, 2010 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

They’ll definitely be competitive. Lots of weapons on offense, and they can pressure the QB

by HankO on Aug 3, 2010 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

fantasy

Tell me!! I have Sidney Rice. waaaaaa

by marcopo on Aug 3, 2010 8:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I have Rice on one of my teams too.

No big deal. Someone might want to trade for him later on. I’m not going to panic. Favre has not retired yet.

by starmark on Aug 3, 2010 11:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Humorous slant on things from the SBN homepage:

http://www.sbnation.com/2010/8/3/1602813/brett-favre-plans-to-retire-espn

"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne

by dishingoutdimes on Aug 3, 2010 3:04 PM CDT reply actions  

+2

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 3, 2010 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was innocently watching

sportscenter just wanting to catch the top ten before I went off and about and lo and behold Favre interrupts my viewing. It was then that I realized I would never get to see the top 10.

All is vanity.

by levnclf on Aug 3, 2010 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wonder how many hits from the Brewers 18-1 shelling of the Cubs were on that list...

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't be surprised if it was 0

I always found it ironic that when the Brewers hit a walkoff homerun it doesn’t make the top 10, but when the Yankees do it, that’s the #1 play. LOL!

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 3, 2010 9:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, they have 26 hits to choose from...

Not to mention McGehee’s 3 run homer…

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, I wish I could agree that I was confident in this being the Packers year

but I’m still a little uneasy. The way Warner walked all over us in that playoff game is still haunting my memories.

"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne

by dishingoutdimes on Aug 3, 2010 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

wild card game

On that day, and on that field, Warner gave one of the greatest performances in the history of the league. Not saying the Packers were perfect, far from it, but no team in the NFL couldve stopped Warner. Rodgers performance was also terrific, but no like Warners.

by marcopo on Aug 3, 2010 8:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

The only team that instill fear in me in the AFC are the Jets.

Lord, they look good. And though i think we can at least match any offense in the league, the Cowboys and Saints could beat us at least 5/10 times.

All is vanity.

by levnclf on Aug 3, 2010 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

I aint too worried

NYJ struggled against spread offenses just as we did, and we run out of the spread offense.

Their offense is heavily relied upon their running game, just as our D is a beast against the run.

Their QB is still young and interception happy, our secondary will feast on every opportunity given.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 3, 2010 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Most noticeably against the Colts

not that we should be surprised though, but our offense is just as good as Indy’s offense overall.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 3, 2010 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Remember the Jets lost to the JAGUARS at home...

And they also tossed away their game against the Falcons. But that was more Matt Ryan being determined than the Jets being good…

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comon

They were 9-7 last year and made the playoffs because the Colts rested there starters they should have been 8-8. They traded a 1400 yard rusher in Thomas Jones for a totally washed up (it pains me to say it) Ladainian Tomlinson, they also got rid of Leon Washington. I did not understand these moves. It seems like half the team wants a new contract and is pissed off. Chaulk it up as a easy win. The media can’t wait to promote a New York team if there is a remote possibility of success.

by the yooper on Aug 3, 2010 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jets will be a victim of their own self-promotion

I respect much of what you write, but I think you took a wrong turn here, buddy. Cliche away, but it’s a QB driven game today and defenses no longer win championships. (they may help, however) Jet’s still have a sophomore QB who hasn’t proven didley. Colts surgically removed them from the field. Further, it’s a more then fair statement to say the Jet’s had super luck just to make the playoffs. They’ll have the same struggle this year despite going crazy in free agency. NE and Miami pose a serious barrier to the Jet pretenders.

by marcopo on Aug 3, 2010 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Man I can't understand how

Mark Sanchez gets all this adoration, yet Chad Henne gets none! I’ll take Henne over Sanchez any day!!! Gotta love the New York bias. Heck, even ESPN loves Sanchez and his, what, 19 or 21 interceptions he had last year (forget the number).

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 3, 2010 9:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's the thing about Mark Sanchez.

He’s not afraid to throw a terrible pass into double coverage. You have to admire that about him.

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 9:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Somewhat, but not really

His role is to be a game manager, nothing more. Roethlisberger is praised by many for winning 2 Superbowls. However, he won both of them as a game manager. Thus meaning all you have to do is NOT turn the ball over. If the Jets only had a mediocre defense, then I’d say Sanchez should play the role he plays now. He’s in the ideal situation. You have a great defense behind you, you don’t have to carry the team, all you have to do is not screw up and get a couple TD’s in the game, mostly through the running game.

I’ll give him this though, he’s good with the playaction. But then again, who wouldn’t be as often as the Jets ran last year and considering how effective their running game was.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 3, 2010 9:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Big Ben

Actually in the 1st SB he won Ben was a game manager… In his 2nd SB Ben was a playmaking QB!!! He did more to win that SB than any other player for the STeelers!

by Strohman on Aug 4, 2010 2:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Santonio Holmes would disagree with you if he wasn't on the Jets.

And how could you forget the total BS INT return by James Harrison? That play won the game!

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 4, 2010 3:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

I know

but who made the tremendous throw under duress that Holmes caught? Harrison’s was at end of half not end of GAME!

by Strohman on Aug 4, 2010 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Big Ben won that game. I can’t argue that. He is clutch.

The Steelers defense carried the team to the Superbowl and kept them in the game in the Superbowl. My point is the Jets D can do the same if Sanchez is careful with the football. Last year, the Steelers D was average. It wasn’t good, but it wasn’t bad either. The game was solely on Big Ben’s shoulders, and he failed to carry them into the playoffs. I’m not trying to dis him, but trying to prove my point that the Steelers were always about defense. The Jets are that way with Rex Ryan as their Head Coach.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 4, 2010 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Big Ben's absence definitely had an effect in the KC game.

Chris Chambers set up the game winning field goal with a wild run through the Steeler D.

And the loss to the Raiders was a defensive breakdown like 2008 GB. Remember?

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 4, 2010 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

That was last year, right? Yeah, that goes to prove my point earlier that they only had an average defense last year.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Aug 4, 2010 5:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Don’t believe his lies. He will be back.

"Practice does not make perfect. Only perfect practice makes perfect."

Vince Lombardi

by CaliSeth on Aug 3, 2010 3:09 PM CDT reply actions  

That is the one concern I have as well

With Bigby ailing, the Safety position is relying on a rookie a little early. And I had hoped for a little more help at CB during the offseason. I feel better about the OL. The only area of concern is that defensive backfield that seems to give up too much against good passing teams. I hope that our top guys stay healthy. Assuming that they do, it could be a superbowl year. As always, until we reach the end of the year, nothing is certain.

by starmark on Aug 3, 2010 3:14 PM CDT reply actions  

He really does love the game...

His family always seems to have to get involved in this stuff. Here is the latest gem I found.

"Practice does not make perfect. Only perfect practice makes perfect."

Vince Lombardi

by CaliSeth on Aug 3, 2010 4:26 PM CDT reply actions  

I love how everyone makes assumptions about the guy

Ok, so what does all this mean? Absolutely nothing.

by starmark on Aug 3, 2010 5:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

THIS JUST IN

Favre plans to hold a 2 HOUR prime time special on ESPN Thursday night, called THE Decisions, in which he will officially retire and unretire 3 times over in the same program.

All is vanity.

by levnclf on Aug 3, 2010 4:38 PM CDT reply actions   2 recs

Will ESPN call in LeBron James as a guest speaker?

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 5:45 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

LMFAO...I WAS ABOUT TO SAY THAT...BRON DOES 1 HOUR, FAVRE DOES 2 LMAO..

Let me guess…he is taking his talents to…well who cares i’m tired of the guy…

by SpaceGhost34 on Aug 3, 2010 7:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

He'll be back

He always comes back.

Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan [I have always lived in Arizona, dad is from Chicago].

I can't stand fair-weather/bandwagon fans, stick with your team, throughout the good and the bad. And don't switch to whichever team wins the Super Bowl each year.

by JoeCB1991 on Aug 3, 2010 5:41 PM CDT reply actions  

Live by the sword

you die by the sword. Childress had to know this, if true, was a possibility. If not, he’s a complete idiot. Yet he did nothing to prepare for it due to Brett’s infamous “I don’t mentor young quarterbacks” stance because he couldn’t jeopardize his return by threatening him in that way.

Until the season is more or less over, I won’t believe it until it he actually files the paperwork for retirement (because that little technicality has never been completed is why I’ve been convinced this is some contrived gimmick for years). This just strikes me as Favre bringing the retirement saga to a new level to keep people talking about him, get more money out of the Vikings, miss more practice time, or some combination of the lot.

by gern blanston on Aug 3, 2010 9:32 PM CDT reply actions  

I bet Adrian Peterson saw this,

rolled his eyes, and said, “Yeah right.”

Wait, that was me.

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 9:52 PM CDT reply actions  

F**k Brett Favre

I hope he comes back, and every single team on the Vikings’ schedule follows the game plan that the Saints’ defense did in the NFC title game; beat the living daylights out of the NFL’s version of Tila Tequila.

by mike_o on Aug 3, 2010 10:08 PM CDT reply actions  

Keep in mind, this exact same thing happened at pretty much this exact same time last offseason. Then a couple after his “retirement” I turned on my tv to see him being picked up by Chilly at the airport.

I doubt he’s really retiring.

by packallday555 on Aug 3, 2010 10:29 PM CDT reply actions  

Of course he doesn't.

This is the same crap that happens every year.

What begins in fear usually ends in folly.

by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Aug 3, 2010 11:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Two things are certain:

1) Favre is a douche-bag.
2) Favre will blame this on the press and suggest the whole thing had nothing to do with him, even though it clearly did.

What a colossal asshole. Last weekend my family and I went to Door County. While trying to make our way to Peninsula Park, we were stopped in Fish Creek by a guy in a silver Hummer with an Obama 08 sticker on it who was backing a rather large sail boat down the middle of a street towards the marina which was a good 100yds away. He was moving at about 3mph, but it was unclear why he’d chosen to back his rig down the street when he could have driven into the marina like everyone else does and been clear of traffic before ever hitting reverse. Maybe he transmission was out and he couldn’t move in drive. Who knows. We sat there watching him, waiting for a few minutes, when the guy behind us lost his patience, honked his horn about 6 times and then started yelling out his window. Mr. Hummer looked over, but only after the guy behind me pulled his head back in his window, so Mr. Hummer flipped me, my wife and my 5 year old off assuming, I would imagine, that I was the shouty guy.’

I thought that guy was the biggest d-bag ever.

Then today happened. And I stand corrected.

What begins in fear usually ends in folly.

by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Aug 3, 2010 11:11 PM CDT reply actions   2 recs

Brett Farve had to

have murdered Herky Hawkeye at the 50 of Kinnick Stadium on live television…

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wow

There are so many times that I’ve hit lol in my life and never really laughed. Today I laughed heartily at this post. Bravo.

It’s really interesting to see everyone’s reaction to this whole storyline. Viking fans tend to piss on the Packers organization and takes Farve’s side. Hey, I get it, he’s your boy now and you’ve got to stand by your man.

Packer fans tend to point the finger at Brett, saying he and Cook manipulated the press and public into his sob story. After all it happened the year before (Steve McNair) and the year after (Jay Cutler).

Overall I know Farve is a nice and personable guy. I’ve been lucky enough to consisently be around people who know him. That said, this is his asshole season. He plays this game as selfishly as he can, no matter the team. He pouted his way out of the Green and Gold. He jerked around the Jets until they just let him go for nothing, leaving them and their fan base empty handed. Now he is playing some sort of game with the Vikings, the end of which only Cthulhu knows.

But Ted, for your use of Door County and the term d-bag affectively I have to give a rec’d to this post. It truly was awesome.

by PackApologist on Aug 3, 2010 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

LOL + infinity.

2) Favre will blame this on the press and suggest the whole thing had nothing to do with him, even though it clearly did.

Yes, he surely will.

by packallday555 on Aug 4, 2010 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

oh Brandon

i know that it seems like you dont think Jackson will do anything with Favres “tutoring” but Aaron Rodgers did turn out to be an excellent quarterback with that same tutoring, so I wouldnt laugh at Jackson just yet. He does have a poor track record compared to Aarons but I always though that benching him a few games into his second season was stupid. who knows how he may do

something tells me even the mafia wouldn't call on greg walker if a hit was needed.

-MarketMaker

by blackoutsox on Aug 3, 2010 11:44 PM CDT reply actions  

Ok going to say it again

I’ve fought this fight at DN and countless other places, but here we go again. QB’s learn more from coaches then they do from other QB’s. What made Rodgers great was the tutoring and mentoring he received from MM. MM has extra time that all QB’s put in during the offseason and this pays off in better decision making and form. The Vikings don’t have something similar in place. I also have severe doubts in Childress and Bevell’s ability to truly form this young man. It’s completely possible that Jackson has improved, but I don’t think it’s going to be enough to truly be the franchise QB the Vikings will need if they are going to contend for a SB.

by PackApologist on Aug 4, 2010 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Childress

has NEVER made a QB!!!! Nor has Bevell for that matter!!! Bevell inherited a Favre that had no self control and didn’t do a damm thing to improve it… Basically he enabled Favre to continue to take chances and throw away game ending INT’s… Childress was given some credit for McNabb, but remember Andy Reid was the HC that made McNabb!!! Childress did little… Except draft T. Jackson too early in the draft and THINK he could make a viable QB out of him. And he couldn’t!!! TJ will never amt to much as an NFL QB…

Childress knows hes a fraud who got a HC job riding Reids coattails and now he has to explain to a team that has SB aspirations why they don’t have a legit QB!!!! Yeah… Good luck w/ that one Childress!!!

by Strohman on Aug 4, 2010 2:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Quarterback coach

Childress was McNabb’s quarterback coach his 1st 3years in the league(the most important time) and his offensive coordinator the next 4, so I would asume he was instrumental to McNabb’s development. He’s turned out pretty damn good. Personally I think he’s a idiot but give credit where credit is due.

by the yooper on Aug 4, 2010 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Reid

I know that Childress was his QB coach… SO! Bevell was #4 QB coach too?!!! What did Bevell ever do for #4? Nothing but enable him… To keep F’en up!!!

Reid is by far the better QB guru of the 2… And its not even close! Reid had ALOT more to do w/ McNabb’s development than Childress…

by Strohman on Aug 4, 2010 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

well thats true

consider my view changed!

something tells me even the mafia wouldn't call on greg walker if a hit was needed.

-MarketMaker

by blackoutsox on Aug 4, 2010 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Rodgers and Jackson are totally different Qb’s though. Don’t mistake Rodgers being the player he is because he sat behind Favre. I’m sure it helped him to a degree but he’s still a good decision maker, with a strong arm and great accuracy. He’s also a damn hard worker, and from what I’ve read on him he always has been.

Last season, Pat Williams called out Jackson on his work ethic. I don’t know how much to read into that but it’s something to think about. Jackson’s also not a very good decision maker. He struggles to read coverage, he struggles to see where the blitz is coming from, and he has next to no awareness in the pocket. He has showed that he can play well against average teams but come playoff time there are no average teams.

I’m having a hard time believing that spending one season behind Favre is going to correct all those problems.

by packallday555 on Aug 4, 2010 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actually, if Favre stays retired...

…I think that the Bears will surprise some people

"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne

by dishingoutdimes on Aug 4, 2010 2:22 AM CDT reply actions  

It means the Vikings are sure to get swept by them this season.

Possibly. The Vikings’ last five road trips to Chicago have NOT been kind to the team…

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 4, 2010 4:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed



Manager

Img00243_small Kevin McCauley

Editors

Texbucky_small texwestern

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Ayrton_senna_1988_canada_small Vermont Cubs Fan

Fallout-3-1010_small PackApologist

Gassertaylor_small OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Linkedin_picture_small Zack Ward

Carson-palmer-hot-dog_small MatthewJStein