Analysis: Packers Crush Bills, 34-7
The Buffalo Bills do not have an NFL ready offense. This is the 2nd week in a row that they've been held under 200 yards of total offense, and QB Trent Edwards won't throw deep. Maybe he can't since only former Badger WR Lee Evans is their only proven wide receiver. They can run the ball a little, but they aren't a big play threat and didn't have a carry for more than 14 yards. Their offensive tackles, as expected, ha d trouble slowing down either LB Clay Matthews or DE Cullen Jenkins, and the pass blocking scheme even had trouble stopping LB A.J. Hawk. A great performance by the defense, but the Bills clearly have one of the bottom offensive teams in the NFL.
The Bills defense was much better by comparison. The Green Bay Packers were held to well under 4 yards/carry and WR Greg Jennings was a non-factor against their top corners. But their linebackers couldn't keep up with TE Jermichael Finley and they got no pass rush which gave QB Aaron Rodgers time to throw or scramble. Also, Rodgers spread the ball around which helped avoid their better defensive backs.
It's always important to stay healthy, and the Packers only had a couple injuries of note, including FS Nick Collins. According to the Journal-Sentinel, McCarthy doesn't expect Collins's injury, or injuries to NT B.J. Raji and LB Brad Jones to linger, but Jones was limping pretty badly at the end of the game.
As much fun as this win was, the Chicago Bears had a big win of their own on Sunday, and now a big match-up to decide the early leader in the NFC North is looming on Monday, September 27th.
Play-by-play from NFL.com.First Quarter
(14:26) 32-B.Jackson right tackle to BUF 47 for 6 yards (56-K.Ellison).
(13:49) 30-J.Kuhn right guard to BUF 44 for 3 yards (95-K.Williams).
Almost as if to show their intentions, they called back-to-back running plays with FB John Kuhn as the tail back and RB Brandon Jackson. They ended up splitting the carries evenly (Kuhn - 9, Jackson - 11) and gave a brief 2 carry cameo to recently signed RB Dimitri Nance. I expect this will be the plan going forward.
(11:58) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete deep left to 89-J.Jones.
(7:45) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete short right to 89-J.Jones (56-K.Ellison).
The offense looked good on their first two drives: completions to multiple receivers on the first drive, and a big wide open run across the field by TE Jermichael Finley on the other one. And both were ended on incomplete passes to WR James Jones. There were only 10 incompletions in the game and 4 were on passes to Jones (a 5th was taken away on a penalty). He doesn't seem to be running crisp routes and finds himself drifting out of bounds. He seemed to get off to a slow start mentally last season too. I'm still puzzled why WR Jordy Nelson isn't playing in front of him.
(10:19) (Shotgun) 5-T.Edwards sacked at BUF 7 for -13 yards (52-C.Matthews).
LB Clay Matthews was just getting going. He seemed to abuse anyone that tried to block him, and he seemed to come from everywhere. That, of course, is the plan.
(3:22) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass deep right to 88-J.Finley to BUF 20 for 32 yards (90-C.Kelsay).
(:16) 32-B.Jackson right guard for 1 yard, TOUCHDOWN.
Finley can't be covered by a former 4-3 defensive end (Chris Kelsay). It's the big play that sets up the TD run.
Second Quarter
(10:54) 69-J.Meredith reported in as eligible. 22-F.Jackson left end for 3 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The Bills put together a nice 80 yard TD drive, mostly on the ground, and exposed the Packers's run defense. The run defense isn't the same top rated unit from 2009, but they haven't returned to the bottom five as they were in 2008 either. The truth is somewhere in the middle, which works just fine, and they still held the Bills to under 4 yards/carry overall.
9-R.Lindell kicks 57 yards from BUF 30 to GB 13. 87-J.Nelson pushed ob at GB 40 for 27 yards (27-R.Corner).
Nelson's just settling into his role as the best return option on the roster.
(9:02) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete deep right to 89-J.Jones.
(4:33) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete short right to 30-J.Kuhn.
It seemed like the offense was lost in the 2nd quarter, and they did go three-and-out on both of their possessions. It just happened at the same time the Bills offense showed some life, so it seemed worse then it was.
Third Quarter
(12:58) (Shotgun) 5-T.Edwards pass short middle intended for 13-St. Johnson INTERCEPTED by 54-B.Chillar [50-A.Hawk] at BUF 48. 54-B.Chillar to BUF 39 for 9 yards (83-L.Evans).
Nice grab by LB Brandon Chillar.
(8:37) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass short left to 80-D.Driver for 7 yards, TOUCHDOWN [90-C.Kelsay].
QB Aaron Rodgers was nearly perfect in the 2nd half. He only had 2 incompletions in the half, and threw to 4 different receivers on this TD drive.
(2:03) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers right end for 9 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
During the previous drive, he didn't slide or run out of bounds on a scramble, instead taking a good hit. Hopefully the coaches told him not to do that again. He either ran to daylight or slid the rest of the game. On this TD run, he had a wide open field.
Fourth Quarter
(14:22) 5-T.Edwards pass short right intended for 11-R.Parrish INTERCEPTED by 42-M.Burnett at GB 48. 42-M.Burnett to GB 48 for no gain (11-R.Parrish).
A nifty first career INT for rookie SS Morgan Burnett, who took the ball away from the receiver on the ground. He's part of the problem on run defense, he takes bad angles and doesn't provide support like SS Atari Bigby, but he's looked good in coverage.
(12:22) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass deep right to 89-J.Jones for 30 yards, TOUCHDOWN. Penalty on BUF, Defensive Offside, declined. Penalty on BUF, Defensive 12 On-field, declined.
I'm not sure why they're still slinging it downfield when the rout is underway, but Jones looked great on this play, and it was the only thing that kept this game from being a disaster for him.
(1:19) (Shotgun) 5-T.Edwards left end ran ob at GB 38 for 4 yards (54-B.Chillar).
A pretty feeble ending on 4th and 11. Couldn't he at least throw it somewhere?
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Couldn’t he at least throw it somewhere?
Yes. Trent Edwards could have thrown to Morgan Burnett again.
"What's your formula for the corner?" -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory
"Because one of the great minds of the 21st century is raising glow-in-the-dark fish and weaving serapes..." -Leonard Hofstadter from The Big Bang Theory
For all the crap we give Wil Wheaton, he can still tackle better than Asante Samuel...
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Sep 20, 2010 7:42 AM CDT reply actions
James Jones & the Claymaker
Did he REALLY look that bad? Statistically you’d think he had a nice game but I didn’t get to watch it. Maybe I’ll try to trade him off in some of my FF leagues using his stats as a reference! haha
Clay HAS to be an early front runner for Defensive MVP…6 sacks in two games is SICK SICK SICK. We thought he was good last year, seems like that was just a taste test of the full meal we are going to see this year. He might be JUST what we need next week to make Cutler turn into Mr. Hyde and make him throw up picks like he’s…well Brett Favre.
I wouldn't crown him yet
This time last year, Johnny Jolly was looking like the absolute best thing we had on D, but Woodson kept getting it done through the whole season. But I do think his potential is amazing – he’s going to make a lot of O-Line coaches very, very nervous.
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
I like the hunger
Yeah, Jolly had one big game against Chicago in Week 1 last year, then basically just batted passes down and got some tackles in the Run D. With him out we bolstered out pass rush, and I think that much is fully evidenced against both Philly and Buffalo. Kolb and Edwards didn’t have a chance back there against our Nickel D. Raji and Jenkins are getting it done. They are collapsing the pocket. That’s what we didn’t have in Jolly.
At some point Clay will cool down. At least that’s a logical statement because I don’t see him averaging 3 sacks every game for a total of 48 sacks this year!!!! haha. However, there’s no reason to think he’s not capable of doing it against the awful OL that Chicago has. With that said though, Chicago did manage to control the Line of Scrimmage against Dallas, which has a very good Front 7 on defense.
"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi
Jones just wasn’t aware enough. He actually had two pretty nice catches but wasn’t able to keep his feet in bounds. I think he dropped another but even if it had been caught it would have been for like a 2 yard gain.
by packallday555 on Sep 20, 2010 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions
By Week 7
CM3 is no longer going to be content with sacks. He is going to start physically consuming opposing linemen and quarterbacks right there on the field, growing stronger with each victim.
by Puddleglumed on Sep 20, 2010 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’m not sure why they’re still slinging it downfield when the rout is underway
I’m not sure why Flynn wasn’t in at that point. The D may not be able to make a 2-possession lead hold up against a surprise Michael Vick attack, but a 3-possession lead vs. the Bills? MM should have put in a couple of the backups and given them some game snaps when he had the chance.
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
On the other hand
You have to admit that after last week’s scare, it was fun to not just watch them nail the coffin, shut, but drop it off a cliff and burn the remains.
by Puddleglumed on Sep 20, 2010 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions
This was my thinking too
but logic says you should go with the backups.
"Hawk Harrelson: Annoying even the hearing impaired": Teahenny Penny paraphrasing Chisoxfan1473
by NorthSidePaulie on Sep 20, 2010 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions
I think with rodgers being rusty in the first half and last game he wanted to keep rodgers rolling so he’d be in more of a groove for the bears
This is a good counterpoint
and AR didn’t look so sharp in the 2nd quarter of this game either.
We’re going to need the best of Rodgers for all 4 quarters next Monday.
"Hawk Harrelson: Annoying even the hearing impaired": Teahenny Penny paraphrasing Chisoxfan1473
by NorthSidePaulie on Sep 20, 2010 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Our D was simply not contested in that game
It’s nice to know we made adjustments to stop the run at Halftime, but that was a very vanilla offense Buffalo played. After Buffalo’s loss to Miami last week, Chan Gailey mentioned he wanted the team to go back to the basics. I didn’t think he’d go this far! He literally went back to the very basics. Maybe he was just trying to send a message to his team. IDK. Point is, you can’t take too much out of this win over Buffalo, other than the fact that we stopped the run in the 2nd Half…..and Clay Mathews is still a beast. haha.
Anyhow, we have a big game next week against Chicago and we need to be prepared. I wouldn’t underestimate Jay Cutler’s athletic ability either.
"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi
James Jones
I think he is being blamed a bit too much AR’s throws to him weren’t very accurate. AR threw too far inside when JJ was open in the endzone and the throw he went out of bounds was thrown too far outside, if you look at the replay JJ was far enough from the sidelines but AR’s throw took him to it.
by Wisfan on Sep 20, 2010 10:01 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Jones was good
I agree the passes could have been better. There was really only one play I saw that Jones slipped and he couldn’t make it to the sideline for a difficult catch. The passes could have been more accurate.
"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi
Yeah, good point. The one back shoulder throw from Rodgers was a little too far outside too.
by packallday555 on Sep 20, 2010 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions
match ups
the Pack clearly thought they had a match up problem that featured Jones. They kept going back to it. He looked good on the TD. He made a nice side line grab, but couldn’t get his feet down due to the throw being off a little. I agree – it was really more Rodgers being off than Jones.
by gern blanston on Sep 20, 2010 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions
Rodgers
Was defiantly not in rhythm the first half though the second half looked prolific for the offense, hopefully they can stay food vs. the Bears.
Momentum killer
It didn’t matter against the Bills (who have no pass offense) but he missed a couple completions on 3rd down that ended drives, and could make a difference against a better team. Jones really looks good at times (like on the meaningless last TD reception), but I’d much rather see Jordy Nelson in there on 3rd down when they absolutely need a few yards.
And I have a lot of trouble blaming QBs for a pass that is just a bit off, or a bit too far, since we’re not really sure where the WR is supposed to go. Also, we can’t expect Rodgers to get every pass exactly where it needs to go. As much as it’s the QB’s responsibility to get the ball in the right spot, at the right time, the WR has to make a play for the ball. And know where the sidelines is. Jones is going to get a lot of favorable matchups (single coverage, 3rd or 4th CB) and he’s got to make teams pay a price for shutting down Jennings or Driver.
Making teams pay...
Isn’t that what Jones did vs Buffalo? They do have a talented secondary, and Jones DID get a 30 yd TD vs them! I would say that qualifies! Also last year Jones had 5 TD’s in about 40% fewer snaps as Driver who had 6 TD’s… And how many TD’s did Jennings have? 4 if memory serves!!! Seems like Jones did a rather exceptional job of making teams pay last year, and so far this year, too, for that matter!
I don’t understand what you want from Jones? He is making the most of his somewhat limited opportunities! Not to mention making teams pay…
Agreed.
He was GREAT in his role last season, and looked really good too me Sunday. If Rodgers throws the ball a little more inside, both of those are completions and really good catches by Jones. The one where he elevated over the corner and caught but had his right foot land just out of bounds was impressive. It’s clear that he has the ability to be a starting receiver imo.
by packallday555 on Sep 21, 2010 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I really feel for our friends in Buffalo
This could be a three or four win team this year. But the fans may have to feel inclined to still come out to games to watch this inferior product in fear of the team moving to LA or Toronto.
"Tragedy is what happens to me. Comedy is what happens to you." -Mel Brooks
I'm torn on this, what's better?
(1) Total emotional destruction for all the idiot Vikings fans – or –
(2) Not being able to have the Packers destroy the Vikings twice a year for the next 5 years.
One or the other will happen.
#2 shoulda been "Having the Packers..."
If the Vikes stick around, we will dominate them. If they don’t, it will kinda suck, but I will always have the upper hand on several friends. Hmmm….
The Bucs only went to where they belong.
As would the Vikings be doing.
-
The glass is way,, way, way more than half-full.
I think they should just change their name to the lakers. I always loved the irony of them keeping their name the same out in LA.
Which is why they shouldb't change their name at all when they move.
Norsemen in Los Angeles makes just as much sense as Lakers. LmAo.
-
The glass is way,, way, way more than half-full.
Where're they gonna have a Love Boat scene in Boise?
-
The glass is way,, way, way more than half-full.

by 




















