Preview: Green Bay Packers at Chicago Bears
Waiting for Monday Night Football is going to be hard this week because I want to see the Green Bay Packers at Chicago Bears NOW! OK, I'll be quiet and wait in the corner.
While I'm doing that, here are the official rankings from NFL.com:
| Team | Run Offense | Pass Offense | Run Defense | Pass Defense |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Packers | 14 | 16 | 28 | 3 |
| Team | Run Defense | Pass Defense | Run Offense | Pass Offense |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 1 | 27 | 28 | 3 |
I haven't watched the Bears that closely this season, but it looks like they are playing great in some areas, and struggling badly in others.
Meanwhile the Packers offense is good at everything, especially scoring (No. 3 overall at 30 points per game). Their pass defense is getting too much credit for shutting down non-QB Trent Edwards last week, while the run defense is looking worse than it is because they had no answer to QB Michael Vick's legs in week 1.
And what's this game doing on in September? All of the Packers' recent games in Chicago have either been late in the year and very cold, at night, in bad weather, or all of the above. The last time the Packers played at Soldier Field in September, the Bears had Kordell Stewart in at QB (2003).
My complete analysis is after the jump.
Packers pass offense vs. Bears pass defense. While the pass offense is only 16th overall in the official standings (based on yardage) they're doing something right because they're 3rd in the league and have averaged 30 points per game. Also, QB Aaron Rodgers was nearly perfect in the 2nd half against the Bills, so he is apparently rounding into his MVP form. Meanwhile, the Bears gave up over 370 yards passing last week, and only slowed the Cowboys down thanks to a couple big INTs. Their cover-2 defense needs the front four to pressure the QB so their LBs can drop back in coverage, so it's crucial that LT [Insert Clifton or Bulaga Here] can keep DE Julius Peppers away from Rodgers. Can the Bears force turnovers? Can the Packers offensive line force the Bears to blitz their LBs? Two big questions, and I expect both to favor the Packers.
Packers run offense vs. Bears run defense. Yes, the Packers run offense is actually ranked higher than the pass offense, and even Football Outsiders has them ranked high at No. 3 overall. Yes, the Bears run defense has been nearly perfect, allowing only 28 yards/game. True, the Bears have seen the 2nd fewest rushing attempts this season, but they are still holding opponents to well under 2 yards/carry. As usual, the run offense won't be the focal point of the offense, but they'll run for better then 28 yards.
Bears run offense vs. Packers run defense. Sit down for this, but Mike Martz doesn't like to run the ball and he's a "pass-happy" offensive coordinator. He's ran the ball a little, 50 attempts in their first two games, but they're averaging under a 3 yards/carry. According to Football Outsiders, RB Matt Forte is one of the worst backs at running this season. The Packers have a low ranking, but they've looked decent whenever they've tried to stop someone other than QB Michael Vick from running. The run defense is just as good as last year, except rookie SS Morgan Burnett is clearly step down from SS Atari Bigby in run support (while he's better in coverage).
Bears pass offense vs. Packers pass defense. Did I say Matt Forte was one of the worst? Well Football Outsiders says he's the best running back in the NFL as a receiver. I didn't think highly of the Mike Martz hiring, but he's better than Ron Turner who was finally fired after last season. The combination of Martz, and former Vikings head coach and new Bears offensive line coach Mike Tice, have given QB Jay Cutler a better offensive scheme and better pass protection. Over at Windy City Gridiron, they looked at a potential matchup of CB Charles Woodson on WR Devin Hester, which is likely at the start of the game, but in the end Woodson will cover whoever Cutler is targeting the most. He certainly hasn't found a favorite target this season. WR Devin Aromashudu led the team with 10 targets in week 1, and then wasn't used at all in week 2. The expected top 2 WRs (Hester and Johnny Knox) were the two yardage leaders last week. Cutler is certainly spreading the ball around. And that might be the best strategy, as they look to expose rookie CB Sam Shields.
Wildcard: special teams. I'm not expecting P Tim Masthay will carry the Packers to victory, but thanks in part to his decent punting (his net average is 20th overall), which is a huge improvement over last year's fiasco, the special teams are ranked No. 5 overall according to Football Outsiders. The top two stars are K Mason Crosby (who's perfect on kicks so far) and WR Jordy Nelson, who has delivered a few quality returns. Also the kick and punt coverage, while still not an elite unit, is much better this season thanks in part to some new coverage guys like TE Tom Crabtree. Usually the Bears have a huge advantage in this area, but they've gotten off to a slow start, especially on punt coverage where they've already surrendered one TD return to WR Dez Bryant last week.
The Bears are going to need a big game (i.e. no turnovers) from Cutler, who threw 6 INTs combined against the Packers last season. If the Bears defense can force turnovers, and win the field position battle on special teams, the Bears could find themselves scoring the 27-30 points they need to win. The Packers haven't lost a game to an opponent who's scored under 30 points against them since 2008. But as a Packer homer, I'm expecting the Packers will be able to throw the ball and move down the field without turning the ball over. Packers 28, Bears 14.
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Pass, pass,pass
As long as they can block Peppers without help, I think the Pack should be able to pass and win by 2 scores.
Sometimes nothin is a real cool hand.
This game worries me
We haven’t been consistently sharp offensively, we’re going to be more one-dimensional than usual on O because the Bears are good at stopping the run and Cutler’s got his confidence back.
Hoping the former’s just been a matter of the Packers playing down to their opponent.
"Hawk Harrelson: Annoying even the hearing impaired": Teahenny Penny paraphrasing Chisoxfan1473
by NorthSidePaulie on Sep 24, 2010 11:19 AM CDT reply actions
West Coast short pass game plan
A lack of a running game can be offset by using screens, quick slants, short passes in the flats, 5 yard passes to the TE, etc. That is fairly typical of a West Coast offense. Jackson seems to do well on outlet passes in the flats. Jennings on quick outs and curls can pick up 5-8 yards. All of these 3-7 yard pass plays are similar to running the ball: high percentage plays, keep the defense honest, etc.
However, while we supposedly run a West Coast offense, it seems that Rodgers has been throwing down field on the majority of his passes.
I think that's a result of defenses keying on Driver
Rodgers’ favorite target in the slant is DD – they’ve been staying on him in the <5 yard situations. Using him and Finley to sow confusion in the LB would be a fine way to recreate this phase of the game. Or they could, y’know, screen to Jackson.
I’m really not greedy, I just want to see fewer (or no) delay-draws, a couple of screens, play-action every now and again, and maybe some quick crossing routes in the 4-5 yard range. Do you think MM would do it if I wrote him a polite letter?
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
The Bears running 5 wide sets could be a disaster.
Especially if the Clay-maker knocks Cutler out of the game. They have a schizophrenic running game that worked very well in 2008, poorly last year, and is untested this year. And I think if the Pack’s run D is anywhere near where it was last year, we can FORCE the Bears to pass. Hopefully Cutler can catch Woodson in stride for a TD…
Maybe Koa Misi and Jared Odrick would be Patriots if Bill Parcells wasn't Comedic.Sans's father...
"I looked at BN once. I got banned." -the immortal words of JShufelt
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Sep 24, 2010 12:14 PM CDT reply actions
They haven't ran a 5 WR set yet this season
Tice and Martz are well aware of the pass-blocking deficiencies of this line. The only way I see that happening is if it’s a bubble screen or a quick hitch of some kind. 3-step drop without worrying about Matthews coming like a hurricane.
"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo
True.
But they HAVE to use quick hits. And quick screens can just as easily be stopped for a loss as much as they can get a gain for a first down.
It all depends on what sort of pressure Capers dials up for the game, how Cutler manages the offense, and how Cutler’s OL hold up.
Maybe Koa Misi and Jared Odrick would be Patriots if Bill Parcells wasn't Comedic.Sans's father...
"I looked at BN once. I got banned." -the immortal words of JShufelt
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Sep 24, 2010 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions
Look for the one on one matchups
and the Bears receivers trying to find the gaps in Capers zone blitzes. In man coverage Knox, Hester, and Aroma will have to beat their man if the passing game is to succeed. It’s certainly going to be an interesting game.
"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo
I expect a fantastic finish.
This series has been entertaining of late. But the Jay Cutler the Packers face on Monday isn’t even close to the Jay Cutler who threw 5 INTs to open last season. He’s developed some great chemistry with his WRs.
Maybe Koa Misi and Jared Odrick would be Patriots if Bill Parcells wasn't Comedic.Sans's father...
"I looked at BN once. I got banned." -the immortal words of JShufelt
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Sep 24, 2010 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions
the other way
no way they match up with us if we went 5 wides.
by gern blanston on Sep 27, 2010 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm not expecting too many sacks on Cutler
because I have a feeling Martz will call for more quick passes. The same way he beat Dallas. the only difference is, we won’t be blitzing 7-8 guys a snap.
"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi
The Greg Olsen TD was ridiculous.
He juked about everyone on his way to the endzone.
Maybe Koa Misi and Jared Odrick would be Patriots if Bill Parcells wasn't Comedic.Sans's father...
"I looked at BN once. I got banned." -the immortal words of JShufelt
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Sep 24, 2010 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions
Great preview
Although I disagree with the final score. I see it being a much closer game. 30-27 either way.
"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo
As I posted on the JSO blogs
I have a gut feeling that Brad Jones will have a monster game vs Forte.
With Matthews creating havoc on one side, Jones will be covering the safety valve of Forte and I think he’ll do really well.
Packers 27, Bears 13
Friends don't let friends post on the JS blog.
Seriously, it’s been shown to cause IBS in monkeys. Trust me on this.
by Curly Lambeau on Sep 24, 2010 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
These ratings mean nothing (sorry)
Bears run defense against a Cowboys run offense that (in my opinion) is the achilles heel of their team? Kind of slides it over. And didn’t Jahvid Best score on them?
Look, I’m not saying Jackson and Kuhn will post career numbers, but I will say that they’ll be able to pick up adequate yardage when it counts.
I’ve watched the Bears all preseason into the present. Their defense is good. Real good. When it’s all said and done, they’ll be close to the tops in the league in containing short yardage plays. But they’ve faced oppostions with limited weaponry.
The Lions didn’t have Stafford throughout and once he got injured, it hurt the running game somewhat because coverage didn’t need to be so intense. The Cowboys have a disappointing former number one in Roy Williams and a green number two in Dez Bryant, leaving Austin to carry the day for them, as Witten wasn’t on all cylinders that game. When there is no strength in the passing game, the running game suffers.
If you have a fantasy team, think about Jones. All I’m saying. Enough burned up deep routes (what Dallas really failed to do) and that running game will reappear.
"Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser." - Vince Lombardi
I think the Bears are much improved over last year.
However, I think they have relied on luck and the fact that they forced Dallas to become one-dimensional. The Packers this year may have lost Grant, but I believe Jackson is capable of carrying the load, at least for a while.
The Bears’ luck runs out this week. Green Bay Packers 31, Chicago Bears 20.
I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.
Mount Washington conquered July 5, 2010! State high point count: 3/50
by Vermont Cubs Fan on Sep 24, 2010 7:21 PM CDT reply actions
And about the Packers playing at Soldier Field,
The last time they played a day game in Soldier Field early in the season was in 2001, when the Packers ended a six-game Bears winning streak by winning 20-12.
Before that, you have to go back to 1997 for another day game in Chicago early in the season. Quite the interesting bit of trivia, but you’re right, Brandon … many of the Packers’ recent games in Chicago have either been night games or day games toward the end of the season.
I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.
Mount Washington conquered July 5, 2010! State high point count: 3/50
by Vermont Cubs Fan on Sep 24, 2010 7:30 PM CDT reply actions
A good sign?
Just heard on ESPN radio in Chicago the Bears are going to wear 1948 throwback jerseys. Please let this be the same result as 1994 Monday night game. Living in Chicago I am tired of hearing all the Bears love this week. After the Lions game, which they should have lost, they were ready to tar and feather their team. Now they played a non-focused Dallas team and they are on their way to the Super Bowl?
As long as Rodgers gets great protection, we should carve up their secondary!
Pack 27 – Bears 17
Mayhem
Kuhn running right at Peppers with Quinn Johnson lead blocking. Then do it again. And then again. Set the proper tempo for mayhem. This game will be won by the team that hit’s the hardest and the mostest.
If the 'D'
…keeps playing the way it has, keeping pressure on the QB, the Packers will win, if not dominate. Deficiencies in the Packer secondary are being alleviated by a consistent pass rush.
The offense has had a bit of trouble finding itself, until the point in the game Aaron Rodgers finds himself.
Losing Ryan Grant is not the same thing as losing the running game. For a pass-first team, the running game doesn’t look bad, and that quick hit fullback first through the hole, is showing potential at just gashing teams.
WSG notes that the Bears have no No.1 wide receiver and somehow translates that into the strength that their wide-outs are plug and play guys. Apparently unnoticed is that what makes a No.1 is consistent route-running, good hands, speed, and tenacity, and the Bears have no one who fits that description, except maybe a running back!
I don’t think the Bear’s defense can shut down the Packer’s offense for long. I think the Packer defense can not only shut down the Bear offense, but score on it. Cutler has been sacked five times in two games….expect that stat to double by the end of Monday night.
Packers 24
Bears 13
Just trolling
I’m a die hard Bears fan, and I’m looking forward to this match up, I’m so sick of hearing the experts talk about how Dallas lost that game, and hardly giving the Bears any credit for winning the game. As far as the Detroit game goes, if we hadn’t of had greasy hands that day, Detroit wouldn’t of even had a shot. Yes Best scored 2 touchdowns, but he ran far less than 30 yards. If we win this game, of course I’m gonna be happy as hell, but if we lose and put up a helluva fight, I’m still going to be satisfied with this team. Green Bay is one helluva team, this is going to be one helluva test for us, but then again all of the experts said that Dallas would demolish the Bears, and that didn’t happen, according to them, it’s because Dallas made too many mistakes. I’m hoping they give the Bears some credit if we win this game, but I doubt they will, but either way it look s like it’s between us and you for this division, cause the Vikings are a shell of who they were last year.
What were they thinking?
by touchdown bears on Sep 25, 2010 6:16 PM CDT reply actions
Why?
Bear fans are so much more civilized than Viking fans. Why?
My grandma's a Bears fan and we have friends that are Vikings fans.
Both are as classy as they come.
Thankfully, I’m not and will rub it in their faces when we demolish them :)
Why?
Maybe it has to do with the fact that we don’t eat fish that was soaked in lye.
What were they thinking?
by touchdown bears on Sep 25, 2010 7:05 PM CDT reply actions
Arkansas/Mallet really choked that one away.
by packallday555 on Sep 26, 2010 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions
Key to D
It hardly ever gets mentioned. The key to Caper’s D is the DL. In particular Raji has to continue to push the pocket. So far this year, his improvement is dramatic. He should not have too much trouble with the Bear line. Everyone keeps talking about sacks. Well and good, but pressure is the main thing. Whether it results in a sack is just frosting. There is no reason that I can see the Bear OL defeating this defense.
On the other side of the coin, the Bears allowed massive yardage against the Cowboys. Boys just couldn’t finish. But a pox on those who say the Bears didn’t deserve to win. Of course they did. I have trouble thinking a Leopard can change his spots dramatically into Peyton Manning. Aside from that the Bears are going to need more than 19 points to defeat the Packers. Pack 33 Bears 17

by 


















