The Innovative "Capers Nickel," Charles Woodson's Role, And The Irrelevance Of Formation Notation
When Dom Capers joined the Green Bay Packers as their defensive coordinator, much was made of the team's shift to a 3-4 defense. The Packers had always, at least in modern times, been a team whose defense operated in a very standard 4-3 setup with smaller outside linebackers and pass rushing defensive ends. There was a lot of speculation about how the Packers' existing players would fit into the new scheme. A lot of the question marks centered around A.J. Hawk, who seemed to take until the second half of this season to fully adjust to his new role. More of the questions centered around Aaron Kampman, who has moved on in his career and been unable to return to top form, due to a combination of injuries and a position switch.
Players came and went, but the Packers still don't have perfect personnel for Capers' preferred base defense - or at least they don't with all of their injuries. Still, despite a less than ideal setup and a lot of injuries, the Packers have a lot of talent on their hands. A lot of stubborn coaches would try to throw square pegs into round holes and refuse to adapt, but Capers and Mike McCarthy have tailored a system around their talent without sacrificing any of their ideals.
Because of the versatile skill sets of Cullen Jenkins, B.J. Raji, Ryan Pickett, and most importantly, Charles Woodson, the Packers are able to run a defense that other 3-4 teams simply don't utilize. It's incredibly inventive, and it defies notation. It can't be classified as 4-3, 3-4, nickel, dime, or anything along those lines. Those descriptions can't tell the whole story of the Packers' surprisingly effective new defensive formation.
While it can't be described by simple notation, it certainly doesn't defy description. Capers is good, but he's still human, our brains can all comprehend whatever defense he comes up with. If we were going to give it a notation, it would have to be 2-4-5, but that still doesn't tell you anything. The formation that Capers seemingly invented features two down linemen, where usually at least one of them is a good hybrid 4-3 tackle/3-4 end (like Jenkins), two outside linebackers acting like pass rushing defensive ends, just from a stand-up position, two linebackers, two corners, two safeties, and Charles Woodson. Woodson doesn't get a position, because he doesn't really play one. He's listed on the roster as a cornerback because that's certainly what he plays when the Packers aren't in this setup, but he does any number of other things while the Packers are in this defense, which will henceforth be referred to as the "Capers Nickel" to avoid insane wordiness.
The beauty of this system is that it allows us to get our best talent on the field for defending against the pass in obvious passing situations. Sam Shields made a lot of rookie mistakes in the first half of the season, but his development in the second half of the season and the playoffs has been faster than a Delorean time machine. Most Packers fans have been well aware of his incredible natural talent since the first time they watched him, but it's been a pleasant surprise to see him morph into a complete football player over the last two to three months. Shields' emergence as a legitimate NFL cover corner has been massive for the Packers. His abilities, combined with the incredible play of Tramon Williams, frees up Woodson to perform lots of other tasks beyond playing man to man coverage on one of the Packers' opponents' best receivers.
In the Capers Nickel, Woodson's role can be tailored to fit whatever need Capers needs to address. Against the Philadelphia Eagles, Woodson was deployed as a spy on Michael Vick in this formation, neutralizing his running ability. Against the Atlanta Falcons, Woodson was asked to perform a wide variety of tasks, including blitzing more often and occasionally covering tight end Tony Gonzalez. Against the Chicago Bears, he is likely to be used in a similar role, occasionally blitzing and working to shut off passing lanes to arguably the Bears' best offensive weapon, tight end Greg Olsen. Woodson could also end up playing a lot of straight man-to-man coverage on third down out of the Capers Nickel due to the frequency with which the Bears play Olsen or other talented receivers in the slot on third down.
Oh, and the best part about the Capers Nickel? The limited amount of film the Bears have on it. It will be very easy for Capers to throw multiple packages at Jay Cutler that he has never seen before.
Packers fans, sit back, relax, and enjoy the show on Sunday. Dom Capers' defense and the Capers Nickel against Jay Cutler is going to be a fascinating battle, no matter the outcome. Win or lose, one thing is clear: McCarthy and Capers have done well to get the team this far with the large number of injuries they have sustained. Lesser defensive coordinators would not have been as innovative as Capers and their teams would have suffered considerably after sustaining the injuries that the Packers have suffered this season. The outcome of the game will do nothing to change the fact that the hiring of Dom Capers as defensive coordinator was one of the best things to ever happen to the Green Bay Packers.
76 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What rookie mistakes has Shields made?
He really wasn’t targeted much in the beginning of the year. Dallas tried to attack him a bit and he got a pick there. ATL picked on him in the playoff game and was able to capitalize on that a bit, but otherwise teams just haven’t gotten to him in the progression. That’s why Al Harris was let go, because Shields just wasn’t making those mistakes early.
I agree
Shields has been great and I havnt really seen any mistakes ANY player wouldnt make at some point. Nobody is perfect and will sometimes get beat, but Shields is usually making a play and great catches by the man he is covering will happen. Much props to Shields. During Packer Family night I was pointing him out to my Family and telling them to keep an eye on him. Go Pack, lets put down those Bears and get us a Super Bowl!!!
I didn't criticize him guys
I said he’s made a couple of rookie mistakes and improved rapidly, and that he’s wildly talented.
SBNation.com Soccer contributor
by Kevin McCauley on Jan 20, 2011 6:16 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
But that's just it...
See I don’t see the rookie mistakes because he simply wasn’t tested. So if teams generally don’t throw to him how can we see the improvements or the mistakes?
by PackApologist on Jan 20, 2011 6:56 PM CST up reply actions
well
It’s hard to test a guy when he’s blanketing your receiver. Throw in the fact you know he has some great breakign speed and can take it to the house no wonder he hasnt been tested alot. That and CM3 bearing down on you doesnt give you much time to find the rookie.
He definitely has made some mistakes. He gave up a TD against Maclin week 1 and had some gaffes against Bryant and the Cowboys. I remember Knox getting behind him for a few catches in week 3 too.
Fire Slocum
by packallday555 on Jan 20, 2011 7:22 PM CST up reply actions
Mistakes...
He’s made some mistakes… The Great thing is his speed covers them up!!!
You've been Stroh'd™!!!
Details
“Sam Shields made a lot of rookie mistakes in the first half of the season”
I would be hard pressed to say he made a lot of rookie mistakes. I’m just pointing out that I respectfully disagree with that one line. I would say he made a “few” mistakes this year but no real display of “Rookie mistakes” or Mistakes ala Bush. I think he gave up a few plays early and everything in the second half has been just good plays by the other team. Symantics I guess.
I think that Shields' insane speed and ups allow him to cover up mistakes
Where as Jarrett Bush is slow and was never really that talented in the first place. Not hating, he’s just an average player and probably makes the most of his limited talent.
SBNation.com Soccer contributor
by Kevin McCauley on Jan 20, 2011 8:52 PM CST up reply actions
Nice job on this, Kevin!
I really enjoyed it. I think the coaching reaction to the injuries is something special. Lesser coaches would have probably reverted to a much more conservative scheme when faced with all of those key injuries on defense. Dom Capers certainly has some major cojones!
"Believe me Delmar, woman is the most fiendish instrument of torture ever devised to bedevil the days of man."
2 DT, 2 ILB, 2 OLB, 2CB, 2S, and Charles Woodson
So…2-4-4-CW?
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
Yes
Doesn’t really roll off the tongue, does it?
SBNation.com Soccer contributor
by Kevin McCauley on Jan 20, 2011 6:19 PM CST up reply actions
We could just shorten it to the C-Dub D.
Because honestly, this defense would not be possible without #21.
...in accordance with the prophecy.
Our DC DC + CW
I hereby nominate CWDC^2
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
I say
we call it the 2-4-4-Chuck
REPORTER: What do you think is happening to the team?
MICHAEL RAY RICHARDSON: The ship be sinking.
REPORTER: How far can it sink?
MICHAEL RAY RICHARDSON: Sky's the limit.
Beastie Boys?
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
yeah
chuck D isn’t beastie boys… pretty much the opposite of the beastie boys. However I do like the name.
Are you thinking of Mike D from the beastie boys
REPORTER: What do you think is happening to the team?
MICHAEL RAY RICHARDSON: The ship be sinking.
REPORTER: How far can it sink?
MICHAEL RAY RICHARDSON: Sky's the limit.
I like it!
As I just told a Bears fan: Sometimes, they double down when they shouldn’t, but if you play the odds, it usually works.
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
Yeah. My bad.
I was thinking about Mike D.
Damn them for both having the same last initial. I fail at hip-hop.
...in accordance with the prophecy.
The "Chuck D"
is Public Enemy, not the Beastie Boys. Don’t believe the hype. . . .
53 Bears, 1 Cup
by I voted for Kodos on Jan 23, 2011 7:11 PM CST up reply actions
That statement
Works exceedingly well with your sig. Kinda scared now, mommy.
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
my wife is trying to figure out why I'm laughing
A combo of humor in the remarks and a really good article. Thanks guys.
I especially love the explanation of the defense, because honestly I’ve been wondering this all year. It certainly doesn’t look like what I would call a 3-4 almost every single play I see it out there. In fact, I can tell we are in a 3-4 because they look like they are out of their base defense.
I think this is the most underrated and underappreciated part of our defense this year:
Shields’ emergence as a legitimate NFL cover corner has been massive for the Packers. His abilities, combined with the incredible play of Tramon Williams, frees up Woodson to perform lots of other tasks beyond playing man to man coverage on one of the Packers’ opponents’ best receivers.
"Coach Gundy, why was Oklahoma able to march right down the field against you?" --Erin Andrews
by dishingoutdimes on Jan 21, 2011 12:46 AM CST reply actions
The best play Shields has done all year
was that pass defended in the first half against Philly. He ran as fast or faster than Maclin and knocked the ball out of there.
Double Awesome
because he also showed he had the speed to keep up with someone like Miles Austin.
53 Bears, 1 Cup
by I voted for Kodos on Jan 23, 2011 7:21 PM CST up reply actions
True 3-4 this weekend
Just like we put Howard Green into the game against ATL, we will play more 3-4 than normal to stop Forte.
Olsen is a threat, but Forte is the engine that runs this offense.
Green in to stop the run, while CWood spies him coming out of the backfield in case they pass.
Front 7 bringing constant pressure.
Hopefully, 2nd half we have the lead and switch back to “The 21”!
CMIII has had success on rematches this year and he only has 1 sack in 2 games against Bears. He needs to unleash the combined fury of his bloodline.
We have been SO unbelievably lucky to avoid CB injuries this year. Knock on frickin’ something. Jarrett Bush has seen the field only a handful of times, and he still managed to get burned for a TD.
Shields is absolutely the key to our season. …reminds me of our Craig Newsome was the key in ’96. That guy hit like a ton of bricks and was as fast as the day is long.
…not sure if that tops the speed of a Delorean, but…
You built a time machine… out of a Delorean?
Well lucky us…we actually ONE position where we weren’t ravaged by injury!! :-) Alright two if you count WR…but still I wouldn’t use the words “lucky” “injury” and “Packers” in the same sentence when talking about the 2010 season!
The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010
Fair point, but...
CB was key. It was key to our success this year, and it was the key to our failure last year.
Without these three guys, it would’ve been last year all over again, with the only difference being that teams would have seen last year and therefore known at the outset that we were unable to even slow down the pass, much less stop it.
by Curly Lambeau on Jan 21, 2011 11:51 AM CST up reply actions
Oh man…CRaig Newsome…I LOVED that guy. IT was a really a shame his career was cut so short!
The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010
I know.
It was like “hey this guy’s awesome” followed by “hey where’d that guy go?”
It was his knee, right? I don’t remember him even trying to play post-injury. I also don’t remember thinking it was catastrophic at the time that he was hurt. He was just all-of-a-sudden gone and then… nothing. Whereas I’d been expecting him to anchor that side of the defense for a decade.
by Curly Lambeau on Jan 21, 2011 11:58 AM CST up reply actions
What was the condition he developed? I can’t remember.
I just remembered that one day I was thinking…I should get a Newsome jersey and the next season I was glad I didn’t!
The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010
I saw a guy who had converted a Newsome jersey into a Woodson
just a little bit of tape is all it takes!
Didn't Newsome bust up his knee once or twice?
But yeah, I loved that guy. Good against the rush and the pass. And with Reggie White applying consistent pressure despite double/triple teams our defense was so impressive. And LeRoy Butler was always so underrated. I’ll always be happy with the Super Bowl we won, but I’ll also always think we could have won another with the talent we had.
53 Bears, 1 Cup
by I voted for Kodos on Jan 23, 2011 7:20 PM CST up reply actions
Anytime you feel a need to knock on wood,
any common sheet of paper will do,
as it is made from wood pulp.
But, don’t knock on Woodson. :)
The glass is way more than half-full!
I'd rather be correct, than politically correct.
I'd rather be right.
The Bears still suck!
The only criticism I have
is that there’s not more actual examples of this new defense. Explaining “Capers Nickel” has eluded me for quite some time, but you broke it down succinctly and comprehensively. A play diagram or other footage would only help your post.
Otherwise, excellent post.
"Brandon Jennings needs a nickname before he gives himself one. Oh wait, Young Money, he already did."
by Mitchell Maurer on Jan 21, 2011 11:54 AM CST reply actions
I wish I had access to footage to screencap
But if I ever write some kind of strategic piece like this again, I’ll make a diagram ala my buddy at http://www.zonalmarking.net (Writing about soccer is my day job)
SBNation.com Soccer contributor
by Kevin McCauley on Jan 21, 2011 12:20 PM CST up reply actions
Jay Demerit is from GB
Recently signed with Vancouver Whitecaps after leaving Watford in the second division of English football. His contract is believe to be somewhere between $500k and $1m a year, but we won’t find out for sure until the union releases the numbers this summer. I know you were just joking, but sadly, I think Mr. Demerit is a little too slow to play WR and a little to small to play TE. If he put on a few pounds, he could potentially make a decent OLB/SS hybrid player, though!
SBNation.com Soccer contributor
by Kevin McCauley on Jan 24, 2011 8:28 AM CST up reply actions
He plays the "other" football..
The kind we call soccer. Was on the US squad for the world cup.
You've been Stroh'd™!!!
Future Hall of Famer
Charles Woodson, is what Woodson should be starting to get referred to as!
The glass is way more than half-full!
I'd rather be correct, than politically correct.
I'd rather be right.
The Bears still suck!
by NorthStarr on Jan 21, 2011 11:19 PM CST reply actions 5 recs
Just read
an article on Woodson today, at the bottom of which, this is addressed.
When winning the MVP, Woodson stated, "I’m just going to keep taking shots until I get back to the Super Bowl — and win it."
He has another shot. And this time around, if he makes it to the big game and wins it, it will just lock what has already been a Hall of Fame career. He’s going to Canton, but on the strength of his revitalization in Green Bay, not his early success with the Raiders.
The glass is way more than half-full!
I'd rather be correct, than politically correct.
I'd rather be right.
The Bears still suck!
+21
God I love me some Charles Woodson! The best free agent ever signed is easily Reggie White, but Charles Woodson has to be close to the top as well.
53 Bears, 1 Cup
by I voted for Kodos on Jan 23, 2011 7:25 PM CST up reply actions
Clay Matthews????
Charles Woodson is my favorite player of all-time and the defense described in this article that the Pack have shown all year has been tremendous. I think Woodson is arguably the best all around CB in the league…yes better than Revis. However, I think the Defensive MVP for the Packers down the stretch has been Clay Matthews. Like Woodson, he can single-handedly take a game over and I think his quickness off of the end adds to the already impressive blitzing system that the Packers use. Matthews, Hawk, Woodson and Raji may be the best 4 players on any one team for the defense!! If there are other combinations, please let me know!
We'll be seeing ya...
I said in the game thread that I wanted a Dom Capers jersey
And I still do.
But what number would you put on it if you made one?
Don't get angry... but
I do not mean to troll, I am here to get your insight to the game and not cause trouble. However, saying that I need to correct you on something. The same thing on defense is being done by the Jets, Ravens, and the Steelers…. as a matter of fact the idea is pretty old, and was introduced to Capers by Labeau when your DC was the Steelers DC. I will note that (future hall of famer) Charles Woodson and your secondary are taylor made for this defense, William Gay is our Nickle/flex guy. The original name of this Defensive tactic is ‘NickleZoneOption’…. this means that the Nickle back and Strong safety have several options depending on Offensive formation, and what is done immediately after the snap.
So, again, while Mr Capers should be credited the modern version of this (while at Pittsburgh) I just wanted to let you know some of the history behind it. The Jets were also taking credit for this defensive scheme aswell, saying it was a Rex Ryan invention.
anyway, have a good day
Cheerz
"Steel lightens your work, brightens your leisure, and widens your world."
"I've gotta a feelin!
Pittsburgh Steelers to the Super Bowl!"
by dmdjr1 on Jan 30, 2011 4:06 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Thanks man, I don't take it as trolling
I tried to find other instances of this before I wrote it and wasn’t able to. I’ve seen a few Steelers games over the years and don’t recall ever seeing the Steelers utilize it. I’m always happy to be corrected.
SBNation.com Soccer contributor
by Kevin McCauley on Feb 1, 2011 7:26 AM CST up reply actions
No prob, bud
I also took the time to do some research, I even talked to my old HS coach a few days ago. I was surprised to learn that this has been quite common for 25 years for teams who run a 3-4 base to use the 2-4-5 nickle… coach even said he uses this on occasion (I played NT and glad he didnt when I was there!LOL)
With so many teams relying on the passing game this is becoming more common… as is 3-3-5 nickle, even a resurgance of the ‘umbrella d’ with 3 safeties (think Jets against Patriots in playoffs). Did anyone notice afew teams doing the “spider defense” this year? My, how the game has changed.
Another note, the more film I watch of your team (rewatching games- not spy gate!LOL) I am convinced it just might be the best SB ever in terms of matchups and having two class organizations. You can really see how our teams play like family, unlike several talent laden teams that truly squandered their chances this year (e.g.Dallas)… that to me, and the history of both franchises, makes me love this game even more.
two trivia questions for yinz (I love trivia)
1) Name the first proffesional football team ever (hint they played in 1896)
2) Name the oldest NFL franchise (answer shocks me too)
"Steel lightens your work, brightens your leisure, and widens your world."
"I've gotta a feelin!
Pittsburgh Steelers to the Super Bowl!"
HA!! just noticed I can't spell
"Steel lightens your work, brightens your leisure, and widens your world."
"I've gotta a feelin!
Pittsburgh Steelers to the Super Bowl!"
lmao you said "yinz"
Yinz goin dahnner to da Strip ta get some Primantis, then goin up Mount Warshington? Later yinz gotta hit da bars on da Sahth Side.
And I don’t know the answers :)
SBNation.com Soccer contributor
by Kevin McCauley on Feb 1, 2011 6:47 PM CST up reply actions
Isn't the answer to both the Chicago/St. Louis/Phoenix/Arizona Cardinals?
Happy Birthday, Don Hutson
Wiedmann you got #2 correct!!
good job
the first professional football team, was… the Alleghany Athletic Club. They played in the first professional game against the Westmoreland Athletic Club (the second pro team) in 1896. The rest of the details are on Pro Football hall of fames website, and on NFLs website.
LMAO!!! Kevin, are you from Pittsburgh? Are we Nebbers?
"Steel lightens your work, brightens your leisure, and widens your world."
"I've gotta a feelin!
Pittsburgh Steelers to the Super Bowl!"
I'm from WI, my roommate is from Da Burgh
SBNation.com Soccer contributor
by Kevin McCauley on Feb 2, 2011 7:19 PM CST up reply actions

by 




















