Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Sixers Vs. Celtics: Countdown To Game Seven

The Schofield Report: 1/3/11

First Schofield Report of the New Year! Feedback appreciated.

Playing your starters: great move, considering you've locked up the division title and the #2 seed in the NFC playoffs. Had Cutler torn his ACL in this game, the Chicago media would be destroying Lovie Smith.

The Packers finish the regular season at 10-6 after a 10-3 win over the rival Bears.

Star-divide

Season Recap:

Packers 27, Eagles 20: Packers knock Kevin Kolb out of the game and survive Michael Vick's 2nd half onslaught for their first win in Philadelphia in several decades.

Packers 34, Bills 7: Packers knock Trent Edwards out of the game, and the Bills decide to give Edwards the boot for good.

Bears 20, Packers 17: Poor play by the Packers allows the Bears to stay in the game, and the Bears win a game the Packers would love to have back.

Packers 28, Detroit 26: Packers do just enough to win, but this game tastes bad afterwards.

Redskins 16, Packers 13: Rodgers knocked out in OT, another game the Packers would love to have back.

Dolphins 23, Packers 20: Packers can't close out Dolphins in regulation and lose heartbreaker at home.

Packers 28, Vikings 24: Packers finally close out an opponent, with no small amount of help from a certain QB 4's interceptions.

Packers 9, Jets 0: The stunner of the season? Mark Sanchez serves up a disaster against the Packer defense as the Jets get shut out at home.

Packers 45, Cowboys 7: Wade Phillips gets axed after a horrible performance.

Packers 31, Vikings 3: Packers thwart unfounded revenge AND sweep the Vikings for the first time since 2007.

Falcons 20, Packers 17: ST can't stop big kick return, and defense can't stop Falcons from marching into FG range for the game-winner after an epic drive of their own.

Lions 7, Packers 3: Poor offensive effort leads to a Detroit win, their first of 4 consecutive wins to close out the season.

Patriots 31, Patriots 27: Packers manage a near-upset of New England in Gillette despite starting Matt Flynn at QB in place of the injured Aaron Rodgers.

Packers 45, Giants 17: Packers take control of their own destiny with blowout of the Giants.

Packers 10, Bears 3: Packers secure 6th seed in NFC playoffs.

---

Offensive Breakdowns:

Passing; Aaron Rodgers didn't have a perfect game, and misfired on a few throws, but he completed 19 passes on 28 attempts for 229 yards with a touchdown...and a horrible interception. In addition, he was sacked twice and seemed to be running for his life much of the first half.

Grade: B+. Good work by Rodgers against the Bears' secondary for most of the day got the Packers going late in the game when they needed it, but that interception...was just bad. Jennings appeared to give up on the route, Charles Tillman made a difficult, questionable pick...and the Bears got absolutely amazing field position out of it thanks to bad tackling and downfield blocking. Still, Rodgers managed a 67.9% completion rate against a very good defense despite not having his main tight end. Not great, but not bad at all.

Rushing: Oh goodness, was this bad. Starks managed 4.0 YPC on 5 carries, for 20 yards total, but Aaron Rodgers was our leading rusher, with 7 carries for 21 yards. That's...not good at all when you want to keep the QB upright when you have control of your own destiny. Brandon Jackson's 7 carries for 19 yards was just maddening. And Kuhn had his worst game of the year, with 0 yards on 4 carries.

Grade: D. Your QB as your leading rusher is not a good thing at all, unless he has a great YPC (3.0 is not great). Rodgers was well-contained, and Starks wasn't used enough in my opinion. Jackson is not a great every-down back, which is what McCarthy seems determined to use him as.

Receiving: This was a good area. Greg Jennings definitely had a role in Tillman's pick, along with a couple drops, but overall, he had 4 receptions for 97 yards (24.3 YPC) along with a huge reception that set up a touchdown. Donald Driver caught 5 passes, and  Donald Lee's 1 yard touchdown would go on to win the game. James Jones had a game to forget (1 reception for 8 yards) but Rodgers did an excellent job distributing the football to his receivers (finding 9 different players).

Grade: A-. The INT was pretty bad, but other than that, the Packers did a great job getting open for Aaron Rodgers to find them. Still, that goal-line play was...unimpressive and the first series was practically doomed to a FG.

Pass Blocking: Good overall after a poor start. Rodgers was running for his life for much of the first half, though, but after that, the Packers managed to contain whoever the Bears rushed.

Grade: B. A good second half saved these guys after a poor start. Story of our season?

Run Blocking: Not good. The Bears have a great run defense, but you need better blocking than what the Packers put together if you're going to get anything out of your running game. There's a relationship between rushing and run blocking that goes something like this

Good run game (W) = good run blocking (x) * good running from the backs (y)

We haven't really gotten good run blocking AND good running in the same game this year, IMO.

Grading the Offense as a Whole: B. There were definitely areas to improve on for this weekend against the Eagles, but overall, the team executed when it absolutely had to and got a much, MUCH-needed W.

Defensive Breakdowns:

Pass Rush: EXCELLENT. Cutler never looked comfortable and was sacked 6 times, inluding a pair of sacks by Erik Walden and one by HOWARD GREEN, of all people. Even when the Packers rushed three, they managed to make Cutler miserable in the pocket.

Grade: A+. When Howard Green gets a sack, you're having a great day rushing the passer.

Run Stopping: Definitely an area to improve on, but with Jenkins out things weren't exactly set for a great day stopping the run. The Packers held Matt Forte under 100 yards (he had 91) but he averaged 6.1 YPC. In light of how poorly Cutler was doing passing the ball and how well Forte was rushing the ball, it's rather unusual that Chicago didn't start running the ball a little more than they did. Oh well.

Grade: C. 6.1 YPC by the opposing feature back: DO NOT WANT. Packers will have to do much, much better against LeSean McCoy and the Eagles.

Pass Coverage: Excellent. 8 combined receptions by Bears receivers on the day left Cutler looking over the middle, and the Packers managed to contain Greg Olsen and Forte out of the backfield. Charlie Peprah's endzone INT was a thing of beauty that saved the Packers after the Tim Jennings INT. Overall, a very good performance, but there were some lapses, particularly on 3rd downs, where the Bears were able to exploit the middle of the field. Still, the secondary did its job and intercepted Cutler twice. Collins's INT sealed the deal.

Grade: A. Tramon Williams and Charles Woodson had good games once again, and Peprah had the endzone INT. I can't mention that enough. Collins's interception to end Chicago was much like Blake Sorensen's in Wisconsin-Ohio State earlier this year.

Grading the Defense as a Whole: A. Holding the Bears to 3 points, and 5-16 on 3rd downs? That was nice. The defense forced 8 Chicago punts, and held the Bears scoreless in the 2nd half.

---

End of the Day: The Packers stayed with the Bears, refusing to let Chicago take the game and keeping the Bears in check offensively. The 6th seed is ours.

106407375_display_image_medium Show me your moves!

Shout-outs: Charlie Peprah, who had a gorgeous read of Cutler for an INT, Erik Walden, who had 8 tackles and 2 sacks, Josh Sitton, for another solid game, and Tim Masthay, who was very, VERY good at getting the Bears almost no room to work with.

Next Week: 1/9/11 @ Philadelphia

OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Comment 46 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

dude

Offensive Breakdown, Passing: “…he completed 19 attempts for 28 yards with a touchdown”???
Otherwise, good breakdown and analysis. Bring on the Iggles!

Bev Pear: A jar? Girls don't pee in jars.
Randy Pear: Oh, right. Sorry. Jason, we're gonna need a jar and a funnel.

by Ben T on Jan 3, 2011 3:29 PM CST reply actions  

fixed.

It was 3 in the morning when I started writing this…

"There’s no reason Brian Cardinal should be blocking your shot on a fast break." - Golden State of Mind

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Jan 3, 2011 3:52 PM CST up reply actions  

I take one issue as I am scanning.

The grade for the WR corps could be a little high. I think there should be a slight downgrade for some crucial drops (stop dropping the gd ball!). Jennings and Jones each had one that stick out. Jennings was bad because that would have been a TD.

by Bush League All Star on Jan 3, 2011 3:54 PM CST reply actions  

Drops...

Jennings, Jones and Driver!!! WHy does everyone overlook Drivers drops? DOn’t get it… Not to mention Driver Fumbled yet again!! Why is that overlooked too?… Dont get it…

Bad game by anyone not named Jennings, IMO… Give them a C+/B- for a score!

Driver now has to be replaced… He’s worse than Jones anymore! Was just given more chances to make up for his mistakes! Get Jones in there or draft a WR to be a true #1, which Jennings and he can share depending on matchups. Otherwise start Jones over Driver next year!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on Jan 3, 2011 5:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Never saw Driver's fumble and very few drops.

Do not profane his sacred name, Stroh…I’m warning you…

REVENGE4DRIVER

"There’s no reason Brian Cardinal should be blocking your shot on a fast break." - Golden State of Mind

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Jan 3, 2011 7:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Driver had the fumble

and Jennings dropped what could have been a long TD pass. Otherwise, the receivers looked pretty good. Not great, but good.

I’d add a special teams grade if it’s not too late. They looked pretty good out there, didn’t let Hester make a fool of Slocum, and even got a touchback on one of the kickoffs (if my memory serves me well). I think the special teamers would be pretty proud of their grade for Sunday (but not as embarrassed as they would be for their special teams grade on the season).

Well done, OBSimH. Any chance we’ll see a report with grades for the season in its entirety? Including coaching grades? That could generate a lot of debate!

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on Jan 4, 2011 1:01 AM CST up reply actions  

Coaching grades

no go. Definitely. I refuse to indulge in blatant speculation.

"There’s no reason Brian Cardinal should be blocking your shot on a fast break." - Golden State of Mind

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Jan 4, 2011 3:34 AM CST up reply actions  

Coaching grades

Would be difficult, but I was thinking more along the lines of position coaches. As in Trgovac = “A+”, Slocum = “D”. I think everyone can agree that Capers gets an “A” but MM and Philbin would be too hot a topic, I guess.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on Jan 4, 2011 11:45 AM CST up reply actions  

gotta give Kevin Greene an A too…

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Jan 5, 2011 12:15 PM CST up reply actions  

definitely

I watched the NFL Network Replay of the game and saw Mr. Greene doing a heck of a job on the sideline coaching up the OLBs. I love seeing that stuff, and it just reminded me that Kevin’s gotta be a major contributor to what CM3 has achieved in his young NFL career.

Bev Pear: A jar? Girls don't pee in jars.
Randy Pear: Oh, right. Sorry. Jason, we're gonna need a jar and a funnel.

by Ben T on Jan 6, 2011 2:58 PM CST up reply actions  

special teams...

I’ll definitely consider that, though. I gave Masthay a shout-out because he was great when the Packers relied on him. Had Kapinos been in charge Sunday, I think we’d have lost the game because Hester would have taken one to the house or gotten 30 yards of field position the Bears needed to work with. Masthay has improved as the season progressed.

"There’s no reason Brian Cardinal should be blocking your shot on a fast break." - Golden State of Mind

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Jan 4, 2011 3:36 AM CST up reply actions  

Kapinos

Ha! That’s great. I’m so glad to see the improved and more consistent Masthay out there. It’s funny how the little things make such big differences.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on Jan 4, 2011 11:53 AM CST up reply actions  

Or put another way

Had the Week 3 revision of Masthay been in charge Sunday, I think we’d have lost the game because Hester would have taken yet another one to the house.

by Danwood on Jan 4, 2011 2:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Keep in mind, he is young and still learning. I think he has a BRIGHT future and we’ll see more games like week 17 than week 3.

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Jan 5, 2011 12:16 PM CST up reply actions  

I was going to say something about the WR's

But everyone pretty much covered it. I thought they played pretty poorly through 3 quarters.

I hate the Eagles... and kittens.

by Smeefers on Jan 4, 2011 10:04 AM CST up reply actions  

We need to execute better on offense

I think Rodgers grade is a little too high because of this. We had opportunities for big plays but fell short. Jennings dropped a perfect pass that was a sure TD. Bulaga was called for 4 holding penalties that stalled drives. We need to execute better. At least our penalties as a whole was reduced, but it’s an area we need to improve on. Jennings also dropped a sure TD @ Detroit a few weeks ago and that dropped pass turned into an interception. Had he caught it, we would have won the game and would be the #2 Seed in the NFC right now!!!! I applause our defense and Mathsay for doing a great job, but our offense needs to do much better in the playoffs.

The Eagles have a decent pass rush, so we need to watch out for that. I think we need to get Starks heavily involved in this game. He needs more than just 4 or 5 carries. Starks also needs to practice harder too.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Jan 3, 2011 5:01 PM CST reply actions  

Eagles pass rush.

Is good but I hope they blitz Rodgers cuz he makes them pay dearly! Would love to see Starks get the ball more, but until his practice habits and intensity pick up that won’t happen! When it does he’ll show why Thompson drafted him!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on Jan 3, 2011 5:56 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

We hope.

We can only hope.

"There’s no reason Brian Cardinal should be blocking your shot on a fast break." - Golden State of Mind

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Jan 4, 2011 3:39 AM CST up reply actions  

+1

Starks is a beast. The guy just gets yards. No reason not to give him the ball 15+ times a game. Bjax is a great 3rd down back, but that is it.

Starks is the most natural runner we have had in quite some time.

by Acme on Jan 4, 2011 3:21 PM CST up reply actions  

The one thing I want to see Starks do...

is get in the open field. I want to see how breakaway he is in the NFL. I’ve seen the clips of him against the Buffalo (collegiate) opponents. I want to see how he fares against NFL folks. But that would require us to block and get him to their 2nd/3rd levels. :)

by Bush League All Star on Jan 4, 2011 5:32 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

+!!!

Thats my only real question w/ him! Well his ability to take it the distance in the NFL and stay on the field is a minor question. I think he will tho!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on Jan 4, 2011 6:41 PM CST up reply actions  

I am encouraged that he hasn’t appeared back on the injury reports in his limited action. Hopefully a sign of things to come. Maybe the Packers were saving him for the playoff run…

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Jan 5, 2011 12:17 PM CST up reply actions  

That's what I want to see

Ive heard or read from several different sources Starks could be quite the find. But I want to see it. I saw the video clips from college and he looked like he has some tools, but I,ve been fooled before by a players competiton he’s playing against. I want to see some moves and that burst on the NFL level before I’m convinced he’s Grant’s replacement.

by the yooper on Jan 4, 2011 10:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Personally

I’d drop each grade on the offense down 1; including the running game, which was downright awful and fully deserving of an F. We’ve got to be able to do better than 10 points. Defensive grades are very accurate; Tim Masthay did a great job pinning Chicago inside their own 20 four times (awesome, really). Let’s hope the run defense can step it up on the big stage starting this weekend @ Philadelphia.

Hell of a report, OBrien. I couldn’t have analyzed it like that, heh.

Can woodchucks chuck wood? Yes. The moral of the story? Woodchucks are assholes.

by mike_o on Jan 3, 2011 5:59 PM CST reply actions  

Grades

I’d give the running game a “D-.” I’d really only give an “F” if they had fumbled one or two away.

As for Forte: he had half of his yards on two carries (Bears’ last drive of the 1st quarter, which ended in a punt). So they did do a pretty good job shutting him down except for those two plays. Not great, but not terrible.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on Jan 4, 2011 1:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Agreed

I guess an F is pretty harsh, but the numbers are really, really ugly :S

Can woodchucks chuck wood? Yes. The moral of the story? Woodchucks are assholes.

by mike_o on Jan 4, 2011 1:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Exactly.

At the same time, Chicago has one of the best run defenses in the NFL, and we put up one of the worst run offenses in the NFL. What did we get out of it? Well, we got a bunch of Allan Evr*dge, which is about what we should have expected. Getting 220 yards rushing against Chicago doesn’t happen unless you’ve got a completely healthy Adrian Peterson.

"There’s no reason Brian Cardinal should be blocking your shot on a fast break." - Golden State of Mind

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Jan 4, 2011 3:40 AM CST up reply actions  

I think

your overall offensive grade is a little high. I would go more B-/C+. They struggled to get it going too much to give them a straight B. Great breakdown though!!

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Jan 4, 2011 8:41 AM CST reply actions  

agreed

The running game, recurring recieving drops, and miserable short yardage offense add up to a lot of inconsistency..

I love wins. Wins are good for the soul.- Barry Alvarez Sep 25, 2005

by White92 on Jan 4, 2011 10:16 AM CST up reply actions  

Run Defense

I think should be a little bit higher. Forte was held to 91 yards, but 50 of those (approx) were on two plays that happened within minutes of each other. I know you can’t take away big plays in stats, they happend and should be counted, I just think our defense pretty much shut him down after those two big runs and played more in the high B, low A range. For once.

I hate the Eagles... and kittens.

by Smeefers on Jan 4, 2011 10:06 AM CST reply actions  

Yep..

Capers was going exclusively nickle at the start with just Raji and Pickett as lineman. After they were gashed for the 2 runs, they went with more base 3-4 with Green in there. It seemed to solve the problem pretty good.

I love wins. Wins are good for the soul.- Barry Alvarez Sep 25, 2005

by White92 on Jan 4, 2011 10:11 AM CST up reply actions  

Exactly the kind of insight I love...

This is the kind of people don’t think about when they think stats. They don’t look at when the stats happened compared to what the teams where both doing in the game. They look at 6pC rushing and think OMG the running back gashed us alot. They don’t look at huh, why did he have so few carries and realize that he was running against just 2 down linemen. Huh, wonder why as soon as we went base 3-4 again chicago stopped running as much and his YPC went way way down for the rest of the game.

Good Analysis White92, makes total sense.

by azreal60 on Jan 4, 2011 1:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks

I love wins. Wins are good for the soul.- Barry Alvarez Sep 25, 2005

by White92 on Jan 4, 2011 2:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Sorry don't mean to just critisize..

overall a good report Schofield and thanks for sharing your opinion

I love wins. Wins are good for the soul.- Barry Alvarez Sep 25, 2005

by White92 on Jan 4, 2011 10:18 AM CST reply actions  

Oh, me too

Good report. You do a great job of getting the discussion going.

I hate the Eagles... and kittens.

by Smeefers on Jan 4, 2011 10:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Really good breakdown overall

but I’d drop a couple of those grades like others have mentioned. Believe me I understand Packer homerism but run game had to be an F and I’d say passing game deserves a C. 229 yards for Aaron is textbook mediocre. Totally agree that Starks needs to be used more. And Nance got 0 carries after doing a good job running the ball against the Giants. I get that Starks’s practice habits might not be up to par but if the guy is active and our best pure runner, why not use him for more than 5 carries? Also, not to pick nits, but I loved the run blocking and hard running against NE. Even BJax looked decisive.

If you don't know the cadence of GO PACK GO your opinion doesn't matter
--John Jurkovic

by sidtheelf on Jan 4, 2011 11:28 AM CST reply actions  

Sidtheelf

Great signature line! Is that a recent Jurkovic quote?

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on Jan 4, 2011 11:49 AM CST up reply actions  

Its so weird to hear him on the radio in Chicago of all places now.

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Jan 5, 2011 12:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Don't know where to write about this, so how about here?

While signing out of my email account I saw a headline that said something along the lines of “ESPN reporter fired for comments” and I thought to myself, “He must have said something negative about the SEC.” I have a feeling OBSimH would appreciate that thought.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on Jan 4, 2011 10:26 PM CST reply actions  

I do.

And what did he say?

"There’s no reason Brian Cardinal should be blocking your shot on a fast break." - Golden State of Mind

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Jan 4, 2011 11:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Something sexist...

Worth a suspension and “sensitivity training,” but not fire-able…

by Bush League All Star on Jan 4, 2011 11:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Not fire-able

so that must mean he didn’t bash the SEC? ’Cause that would probably be a fire-able offense on ESPN!

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on Jan 5, 2011 2:27 PM CST up reply actions  

He got into it w/ a female sideline reporter

Called her ‘sweet baby.’ And that is ‘sexist,’ as they say. While people like Dana ‘F*** Jesus’ Jacobson get a pass. Gotta love it.

"Why do they call an orange an orange, but they don't call a banana a yellow?" - Andy Rooney

by mike_o on Jan 4, 2011 11:36 PM CST up reply actions  

She also told him not to call her that

And he responded with “Ok then asshole”. So it’s not like he’s a saint.

Greinke: "It’s not about the guacamole itself. I just don’t want to let them win."

by GoGregGo on Jan 5, 2011 7:03 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed



Manager

Img00243_small Kevin McCauley

Editors

Texbucky_small texwestern

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Ayrton_senna_1988_canada_small Vermont Cubs Fan

Fallout-3-1010_small PackApologist

Gassertaylor_small OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Linkedin_picture_small Zack Ward

Carson-palmer-hot-dog_small MatthewJStein