Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Packers 2011 Mock Draft.

 

It's never to early to take a look at next years draft. With that said, here is a possible mock draft scenario for the Green Bay Packers next April. Make sure you take a look at Mocking The Draft's 2012 NFL Mock Draft too. 

 

Round 1- David DeCastro/OG/Stanford- Ted Thompson has spent the last two first round draft choices on offensive tackles. Now it's time to move towards the interior of the offensive line. Drafting DeCastro would mean the Packers would have their five starters along the offensive line for the foreseeable future.

 

Round 2- Robert Lester/S/Alabama- Morgan Burnett is a star in the making but Nick Collins has probably played his last NFL game which means the Packers need a new safety.

 

Round 3- Stephen Gilmore/CB/South Carolina- I know the Packers have Tramon Williams and rising star Sam Shields on their roster. I also understand they have this guy named Charles Woodson. However, Woodson is getting on in years and the Packers understand that in this league you need to stop the pass.

 

Round 4- Kheeston Randall/DE/DT/Texas- The Packers need help on the front line and in a 3-4, you need players who can play both inside and out. Randall is one such player.

 

Round 5- A.J. Jenkins/WR/Illinois- I know the Packers have 47,000 pass catchers as it is. However, Donald Driver is only getting older and the Packers want to keep the “fab five” concept going with the wide receivers. Jenkins is a project receiver, which the Packers like.

 

Round 6- Edwin Baker/RB/Michigan State- The Packers will probably attempt to save money in the backfield for the next 5-7 years which means they will have to keep finding quality projects at the running back position. This is something they excel at though. I also expect them to cut Ryan Grant loose at the end of the season.

 

Round 7- Keith Tandy/CB/West Virginia- The Packers have three quality good corners right now along and they Morgan Burnett at safety. If they draft both Lester and Gilmore that will give them six good defensive backs. However, Woodson doesn't really count because of his age and the depth behind those six, well, they stink. At everything.

 

Undrafted Free Agents

B.J. Coleman/QB/Tennessee-Chattanooga- At the end of this season, Matt Flynn gets to walk away a free man which means the Packers will need another QB because Graham Harrell hasn't shown any reason as to why he could be a backup. Coleman has pro skills that need to be developed. Perfect place to do that is Green Bay.

 

Jaymes Brooks/OG/Virginia Tech. The Packers need to ad depth to the offensive line. Brooks would be a good place to start in that process.

Comment 62 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Graham Harrell hasn't shown anything?

Man, you were here over the summer when people swore up and down that he would make the team or another franchise would steal him away, were you?

Seriously though, Harrell has grown radically in his time here and hasn’t even gone through QB school yet. I think he’s done enough to be the backup once Flynn leaves town. Despite this I do think that the Packers will draft or acquire another young guy. MM loves his developmental QB’s almost as much as growing WR’s and TE’s.

My main question on DeCastro is if he can play center. The Packers aren’t a needs team so looking at the potential holes of our current roster against the guess of who is on the board makes predicting picks and players nigh impossible at this time of year. However, I do think that our needs inform the value of the draft pick to some degree, and drafting an interior lineman that high would require that player to be able to play center in order for the Packers to really get good value out of the pick. This is because Lang has been solid to an upgrade over Colledge and Sitton is about to become one of the better guards in the league. The big question mark is around Scott Wells. He’s great, but getting a bit older, a bit undersized, and his contract is up after this year.

The other thing that shouldn’t be ignored is the unfilled hole that Cullen Jenkins left and the fact that Mike Neal hasn’t gotten out of the training room much. Some D-line depth, especially a guy who can push the pocket, should create a bit more value than a potential back up interior lineman, which could be found in some of the mid rounds of the draft.

by PackApologist on Nov 2, 2011 12:46 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

First of all, thank you for your comments.

I may be wrong, but it seemed to me that this preseason Harrell had issues finding receivers. You are probably right though about him. I like Coleman’s skill set, he just needs to be developed. As far as DeCastro is concerned, I have not been a big fan of T.J. Lang, he has done alright, but he was in a competition with Sherrod this preseason and Sherrod is not even a natural guard so that tells me the Packers might be looking for another option. So I figured rather than continue to fool around, why not spend a 1st round draft choice and be done with it? I do agree with you about Wells though now that I think about it, and I think that will be 2013 when they fill that need. Randall is a defensive end in a 3-4, I just said he can play both inside and out because he is big enough to move inside on passing downs.

by Timothy Bryce on Nov 2, 2011 1:20 AM CDT reply actions  

An interesting take on our training camp this past year

It’s very interesting that you are basing your take on Lang around what happened in this early and flukey training camp. Personally I think it’s mistaken, but it’s interesting nonetheless. The way I viewed the LG battle this past year was more to get Sherrod reps and see what he could do rather than a lack of faith in Lang himself. The other thing is that MM and TT believe in competition and so just giving Lang the job doesn’t really fit into that way of doing things.

Right now as the season has gone on Lang has performed very well. He’s actually been an upgrade over Colledge and has held down the job. Simply replacing him iwth a first round pick may happen, but I don’t see a great need for that when there are other upgrades that could happen all over the team (particularly in the defensive front 7). Heck, even along the offensive line the center position has a shakier long term plan than LG now that Lang has settled in.

by PackApologist on Nov 2, 2011 10:16 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions   3 recs

I think Lang has done a pretty good job. The false start penalties have been a concern but as far as actual blocking goes, he’s looked good to me.

Though, I’ve read stuff that says DeCastro is a guy who could become a perennial all-pro OG, so I wouldn’t mind if they thought he was un upgrade. I don’t know if he’ll be around though when we’re up to pick. If a team thinks he can play C, he could get picked in the teens or early twenties.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2011 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

This article is pointless

Do you know for a fact that each and every one of the people you’ve selected will be seniors, or that they will certainly go into the draft? —no

Do you know for a fact that Collins is finished in the NFL? —no

Do you know that Flynn won’t resign with the packers because he enjoys the coushy job and wants to get a half a dozen rings? —no

I’m not trying to rain on your parade, but this is WAY too early to say what we’re going to need in the draft next year… besides a solid pass rushing DE. You’re even predicting who is good enough to pick as undrafter free agents…

You should be applauded for your inside into college football, but it’s way too early.

by Nels Winkler on Nov 2, 2011 1:25 AM CDT reply actions  

Settle man

No one knows for sure on Collins. At this point, it seems like it’s really 50-50 based on the things said by his agent.

I highly doubt Flynn will want to stay here if teams are lining up to sign him so he can become their starter — or at least have an opportunity to do so. He’s not going to get that with Rodgers here.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on Nov 2, 2011 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

That is why it is called a mock draft. I see them on every single other teams sites.

 Flynn will walk away because he is a starter in this league on a large chunk of teams. I predict either Washington or Denver.

Barring a miracle from heaven, Collins has played his final NFL game. The Packers have admitted this.

Only two players in my mock are underclassmen, Robert Lester and Stephen Gilmore. Two things to note about that. Number one, with the new rookie wage scale rules, we will see more underclassmen then ever declare. Second, the numbers show that many underclassmen who are defensive backs end up going in the 2nd-3rd round.

I decided to pick a couple of undrafted free agents because that is what the Packers do and i like it. I also agree with this culture concept the Packers are trying to create.

by Timothy Bryce on Nov 2, 2011 1:51 AM CDT reply actions  

it's called a mock draft, because you are being mocked.

TT would never draft a guard in the first round. He would draft a tckle, and have him turned into a guard.

dinasour type of guys choir boys

by mittsabishy on Nov 2, 2011 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions   3 recs

Collins....

Where in the world have you seen anything that says that the Packers have admitted he has played his last game????

I would imagine that somewhere in next years draft TT would be drafting a OLB.

Center is more of a need than G for the long term as Wells is starting to get up there and Lang has done a very good job IMO. He Run Blocking has been excellent and his Pass Blocking above average. He just has to cut down on the penalties.

CB and S are good spots for TT to draft in. Always need DL. ILB would be another spot for a good reserve LB/ST guy.

by mtpackfan on Nov 2, 2011 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

The rookie wage scale went into effect for the 2011 draft. It will have little bearing on underclassmen until the current CBA is coming to an end.

"I agree but dont agree"

by juggernaut400 on Nov 3, 2011 7:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why would the new rookie wage scale rules encourage more underclassmen to declare for the draft? Under the new rule, they’ll actually get less money than they would have before these rules. It seems that if it would have any effect, it would be the oppositie.

by MikeDB on Nov 4, 2011 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

I would agree…there is less of a reason to rush out now. Hopefully more kids will stay in school longer now since they can’t break the bank immediately.

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Nov 4, 2011 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Same rate...

Lets face it.. They will still make alot more money than they ever have. Not AS much, but still a ton, especially since most come from impoverished families.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on Nov 4, 2011 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

OH certainly…its still a CRAZY amount of money at least its somewhat controlled and hopefully this ends the lockouts forever. I guess my thinking was that the rush to get out there for the chance at 40 mill guaranteed is gone now so maybe some of these kids will stick around for that extra year so they have somethign to fall back on.

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Nov 6, 2011 7:46 AM CST up reply actions  

So you think...

THat they stay in school now and pass up the 25M guarenteed becuz they aren’t going to get the 40M? yeah that makes sense! This IS there something to fall back on. Problem is they don’t treat it as such. And spend wisely and invest for the future! They go spend crazy and waste it on stripers/hookers, booze and cars!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on Nov 6, 2011 10:06 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, this makes sense now...

his point made sense in the 2010 draft because they would have been paid by old rules.

In Every Climb and Place....

by PhoenicianPakFan on Nov 4, 2011 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

The reason as to why more underclassmen will declare is because they won’t get their big contract right away. So the sooner they declare, the sooner they can get through their rookie wage scale/slotted contract, the sooner they can get to their big contract.

by Timothy Bryce on Nov 4, 2011 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Hmm....

fair enough, I could see that. As long as it doesn’t hurt their draft stock by coming out early.

Although on the opposite side, coming back for a senior year does not run such a large risk of blowing a huge payday like it did either (see Locker).

In Every Climb and Place....

by PhoenicianPakFan on Nov 4, 2011 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

My mistake

Edwin Baker is only a junior, although I have heard that he intends to declare anyways.

by Timothy Bryce on Nov 2, 2011 2:01 AM CDT reply actions  

Why are we mocking a draft that already occured?

Hey there, Rip Van Winkle, next year is 2012.

In Every Climb and Place....

by PhoenicianPakFan on Nov 2, 2011 2:55 AM CDT reply actions   3 recs

Oops, my mistake. Wasn’t paying attention. Sorry everyone.

by Timothy Bryce on Nov 2, 2011 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dude

Right now, Lang is one of the best left guards in football, and make up one third of the best interior O-line in the NFL. So guard wouldn’t make sense.

Jay Cutler, first NFL quarterback to beat a playoff team with a losing record.

by arodgb on Nov 2, 2011 4:42 PM CDT reply actions  

I see you all talking about how good Lang is, yet I still see a QB who spends too much time running for his life. I picked guard for two reasons. One, they spent the last two 1st round draft choices on tackles, Sitton is considered one of the best in the league and unless the center is just that bad, QB’s are a little iffy about changing centers. So which position does that leave? Lang’s.

How about the rest of it though? Is there particular picks you would change? And why?

by Timothy Bryce on Nov 2, 2011 4:55 PM CDT reply actions  

We don't need to replace Lang

I can see us picking a C this year in the first few rounds. Wells is a baller, but he is a bit undersized, plus his contract is up this year ( I say we resign him though).

The greatest areas of concern for me are getting a DB, DE, and OLB, as well as a C/G. Can use depth elsewhere (such as RB). Probably will pick up a QB somewhere too, unless McCarthy really likes Graham.

As far as individual picks? I don’t like the G in the first as mentioned, and I doubt Randall is there in the 4th.

by Shoes31 on Nov 2, 2011 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

If going on need (Not TT's way)

Pass Rush is our #1 priority. Walden has been near worthless and its limiting Clay’s effectiveness. Then Defensive depth. Everything else is way down the list. I would rather pick up an old cagey veteran to be a backup for our interior Oline.

"I agree but dont agree"

by juggernaut400 on Nov 3, 2011 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would rather pick up an old cagey veteran to be a backup for our interior Oline.

Also not Thompson’s way!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on Nov 3, 2011 8:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

but if his choices are cagey veteran or 1st round pick on a true guard, I believe he would pick the vet.

"I agree but dont agree"

by juggernaut400 on Nov 4, 2011 3:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

Doubt it...

THompson is all about the value of the pick. If an OG is rated as a 1st round pick and were the best player available, he would take him. When has Thompson ever picked up a cagey vet w/ no upside?!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on Nov 4, 2011 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Different situation

Chillar actually played in games for us. He came in on passing downs b/c he was supposedly our best pass coverage LB. Same thing with Howard Greene. We picked him up b/c he would see the field and help us on certain situations.

A backup OL would not see the field unless of an injury. Better to have younger players with upside, and who are cheaper, than vets with no upside with more of a salary cap hit in this situation.

by Shoes31 on Nov 4, 2011 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

I was just naming a cagey vet with no upside that Ted signed. Role was not taken into account.

Allen Barbre was a young player with physical upside that just couldn’t get the mental aspect. You don’t need high ceiling at every roster spot. You need a high floor at some as well.

"I agree but dont agree"

by juggernaut400 on Nov 4, 2011 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

When has Thompson ever picked up a cagey vet w/ no upside?!

That crappy corner we’ve been saddled with for a while now…. what’s his name? Woody, Woodson.. something like that. Seriously, why did we ever get him?

In Every Climb and Place....

by PhoenicianPakFan on Nov 4, 2011 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wood is both.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Nov 4, 2011 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

It is true. A lot of people had written him off when TT picked him up.

by MikeDB on Nov 4, 2011 6:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rodgers does run around a lot

Partially because he is a mobile QB. He doesn’t force interceptions like another QB did, instead he extends plays. The other reason for Rodgers getting sacked is that we have had injuries at the Tackle positions, and the replacements are still a bit raw. I’m perfectly happy with the Oline this year.

I’d really love to see a pass rusher OLB or a 3-4 DE who can get to the QB. I have heard it said that those positions aren’t too strong in the draft this year though…

"I'm here to talk about the economy today -- about the need to get four quarters of strong, consistent performance. That wasn't another Jay Cutler joke, I swear. It could be, but it's not."

by Kuhl on Nov 2, 2011 6:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

You know it's almost like we have an injured LT or something

Just because Rodgers is moving around doesn’t mean that Lang is doing poorly. There have been significant injuries to both our starting tackles through the year and right now we are without our starting LT and in his place is a guy who hadn’t started a game before stepping in this year. Replacing these guys throws off the cohesion and pass protection calls….especially on the left side with Clifton out.

The other thing to keep in mind is that Rodgers sometimes hangs back in the pocket a bit longer than most QB’s in order to let a play develop. He’s a bit like Big Ben in that way.

Now it seems you aren’t going to buy our accounts of Lang so I would recommend looking at some of the grades given out by profootballfocus.com. When you look at their grades given out after each week typically Lang grades out positively and they speak glowingly of the interior line play of the Packers.

by PackApologist on Nov 2, 2011 7:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

All that being said

the interior of the O-line is a bit shaky. It should probably be addressed in the draft, just probably not in the first round. Peter Konz would be amazing if he would go pro.

"I'm here to talk about the economy today -- about the need to get four quarters of strong, consistent performance. That wasn't another Jay Cutler joke, I swear. It could be, but it's not."

by Kuhl on Nov 2, 2011 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well depth wise sure

If we are talking about starting level talent I think the Packers are set along the interior line for at least a couple years….really the only long term question is center. Now the Packers desperately need depth for the interior line. One injury and we are in some pretty bad waters.

That said let’s not mistake the current situation of the interior line with the situation we had at tackle back in 2009. At that point we really didn’t have the prospects to replace two aging starters. At the same time it’s very hard to acquire starting level tackle prospects. Typically those sorts of players are found in the first couple rounds of the draft. Right now there is two young and promising players and one veteran who might be a bit long in the tooth soon. The other part is that finding a developmental guard or center prospect can be done in later rounds of the draft, especially rounds 4-6. If you are drafting a guard or center in the first round he had better be starting right away and become a solid starter or Pro Bowler quickly. Do we have that starting spot ready for such a player? I’m not sure.

Really I would rather see the Packers trade down or invest that pick on the defensive side of the ball. A good pass rusher or solid d-lineman (even better would be both), would go a long way for this team.

by PackApologist on Nov 2, 2011 8:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry, should have clarified I was referring to depth

I’m definitely happy with the starting 5.

"I'm here to talk about the economy today -- about the need to get four quarters of strong, consistent performance. That wasn't another Jay Cutler joke, I swear. It could be, but it's not."

by Kuhl on Nov 2, 2011 8:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Fixed that for you
Right now there is two three young and promising players and one veteran who might be a bit long in the tooth soon.

13.

Grossman: Sup, you insulin needing bitch! The sex cannon has arrived! Now get the hell out of my locker room, you chinless mother fucker!

by Wiedmann on Nov 2, 2011 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think he's referring to the interior line only

Young and promising players = Sitton & Lang
Veteran who might be a bit long in the tooth soon = Wells

"I'm here to talk about the economy today -- about the need to get four quarters of strong, consistent performance. That wasn't another Jay Cutler joke, I swear. It could be, but it's not."

by Kuhl on Nov 3, 2011 12:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ah, perhaps.

I got thrown by the sentences leading into it.

13.

Grossman: Sup, you insulin needing bitch! The sex cannon has arrived! Now get the hell out of my locker room, you chinless mother fucker!

by Wiedmann on Nov 3, 2011 1:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Our biggest need is pass rush

I’m not as down on Mike Neal as Brandon and many others here are (….now, if he has a third season in a row of injuries, THAT’S when I’ll be willing to slap the “Justin Harrell 2.0” tag on him), but there still is no way we can rely on him until he proves he can stay on the field, so we need a high round pick at DE if one is available. OLB is also a major position of need (unless something unexpected happens this year and Zombo/Walden/So’oto starts looking like a starter in the second half), and it’s not anywhere in your drat.

I know Thompson’s reputation is that he tends to not draft for need, but I don’t see much of a chance of him waiting until the 4th round to address the defensive front seven, unless there are truly NO good players available each time our pick comes up.

Also, I know Davon House has shown literally nothing so far due to injuries and whatnot, but I highly doubt we spend another two picks on CBs, in addition to another pick on a safety….

Angelo: Right….so anyways Jay, I’m sure you understand that we needed to make this move and I wanna wish you the best of luck.

Cutler: (Swoops bangs out of eyes by throwing his head back) Whatever, I don’t need this team or you.
/Leaves in a huff
//Writes bad poetry on his blog

Grossman: What the fuck is Wilford Brimley’s problem?

by Packers3485 on Nov 4, 2011 3:51 AM CDT reply actions  

Does TT draft accoring to need?

He did take an OT in the first round of each of the last two drafts. I expect next year’s draft to be defensive heavy with the defensive line and the outside linebacker and a replacement for possibly Nick Collins or Woodson to be the priorities.

Taking the best player available, I find, means that TT will not reach for an OLB (for example) in the first round, if he also finds another need such as DL or DB or maybe RB available who he (and his staff) rate much higher. He’s not going to pick a QB or WR or TE or OT in the first round, even if they are graded higher.

If there is a center in college of the quality of the Pouncey brothers this year, TT might draft a center to replace Wells in 1-2 years.

At this point in the year, when you don’t even have an idea of draft order, it all seems even more speculative than usual.

by MikeDB on Nov 4, 2011 10:06 AM CDT reply actions  

Dan has Lester in the first round of his MTD mock. Him falling to the end of the 2nd round seems pretty optimistic. Stephon Gilmore is also a guy who’s getting 1st-2nd round grades from what I’ve seen, so the end of the 3rd is a long tumble.

What is the deal with Collins? I haven’t been able to follow every little detail of the season. What’s the deal with the injury long-term?

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Nov 4, 2011 1:12 PM CDT reply actions  

There hasn’t been anything more on him. I read a couple of weeks ago that he’ll know in 6 months.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on Nov 4, 2011 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, the paper today says it will be at least another 3-4 months before he knows more

He’s out of the neck brace and able to do some exercise to stay in shape, though.

Angelo: Right….so anyways Jay, I’m sure you understand that we needed to make this move and I wanna wish you the best of luck.

Cutler: (Swoops bangs out of eyes by throwing his head back) Whatever, I don’t need this team or you.
/Leaves in a huff
//Writes bad poetry on his blog

Grossman: What the fuck is Wilford Brimley’s problem?

by Packers3485 on Nov 4, 2011 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lester and Gilmore

What I did was I found several mocks out there who had Lester in the 60’s in Gilmore in the 90’s.

by Timothy Bryce on Nov 4, 2011 2:40 PM CDT reply actions  

CBS

About the best draft site around, w/ actual scouts had them both in the 70’s. Gilmore at 72 and Lester 75.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on Nov 4, 2011 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think this is way off

Thompson is going to take 2 TEs and 3 QBs in this upcoming draft. Just to screw with people.

http://twitter.com/WhalesLarry ...but only if you want to see someone still trying to figure Twitter out.

by Mitchell Maurer on Nov 5, 2011 1:48 PM CDT reply actions  

The sad thing is,

I wouldn’t be shocked if he drafted 6 TEs this year…

"I'm here to talk about the economy today -- about the need to get four quarters of strong, consistent performance. That wasn't another Jay Cutler joke, I swear. It could be, but it's not."

by Kuhl on Nov 5, 2011 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would be happy if he took an OLB in the first round that is pimp...

Then after that, he can take nine kickers and punters and put them at skill positions.

That dog just won't hunt.

by Bush League All Star on Nov 6, 2011 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

The opponent would always have to be prepared for the punt

Play Masthay at QB occasionally with Crosby as the Running Back?

"I'm here to talk about the economy today -- about the need to get four quarters of strong, consistent performance. That wasn't another Jay Cutler joke, I swear. It could be, but it's not."

by Kuhl on Nov 6, 2011 1:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

They'll be expecting fake punts but.....

not fake… not-punts.

In Every Climb and Place....

by PhoenicianPakFan on Nov 6, 2011 1:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Is that even supposed to make sense?

13.

Grossman: Sup, you insulin needing bitch! The sex cannon has arrived! Now get the hell out of my locker room, you chinless mother fucker!

by Wiedmann on Nov 6, 2011 1:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not really....

his comment just reminded me of Zoolander.

In Every Climb and Place....

by PhoenicianPakFan on Nov 6, 2011 1:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

I should have known.

By & large your comments are gibberish, but every once in a while you have a brief moment of clarity. For the record, I like both types of your posts.

13.

Grossman: Sup, you insulin needing bitch! The sex cannon has arrived! Now get the hell out of my locker room, you chinless mother fucker!

by Wiedmann on Nov 6, 2011 1:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

I like Masthay at RB. If he doesn’t see a hole on 3rd he can just punt it away quickly! haha

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Nov 6, 2011 7:51 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts


Manager

Img00243_small Kevin McCauley

Editors

Texbucky_small texwestern

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Ayrton_senna_1988_canada_small Vermont Cubs Fan

Fallout-3-1010_small PackApologist

Gassertaylor_small OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Linkedin_picture_small Zack Ward

Carson-palmer-hot-dog_small MatthewJStein