Pre-Game Injury Report: Lions at Packers
I don't expect the Green Bay Packers to bench every player who's nursing an injury. They still want to beat the Lions and they'll need to field a team. The only player who could be a healthy scratch is Aaron Rodgers, which is understandable due to his importance, but I would expect they'll be cautious on game time decisions for players who are listed on this week's injury report.
OUT: Randall Cobb, Greg Jennings, and James Starks. DOUBTFUL: Bryan Bulaga. QUESTIONABLE: Clay Matthews, and Charles Woodson. PROBABLE: Chad Clifton, Jermichael Finley, and Ryan Pickett.
If there were two players (other than Rodgers) that I'd like to see sit this weekend, it'd be Matthews and Woodson. Listing them as questionable would make them a game time decision, and I hope they decide to hold them out. The three players listed as probable should play, especially Clifton, who needs the game as a warm up for the playoffs. Reading between the lines, it doesn't look like Bulaga's ready to play and he should be out. They'll be thin at wide receiver without Jennings and Cobb, so look for fewer three receiver sets on Sunday.
I'm not sure who'll be returning kicks and punts in Cobb's absence. No one else has been asked to do either this season except Cobb.
My guess is that the Lions are treating this week like a normal game. Players who are a game time decision will probably play. Not only could a win help secure the No. 5 seed in the playoffs, it's a point of pride to finish strong on the road and end a nearly 20 year losing streak in Wisconsin. I expect all their injured players, except S Louis Delmas (who's been out for a few weeks with a knee injury), will try to play.
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think we’re just lulling the Lions into a false sense of security and then BANG! Rodgers throws for 3TD’s and Flynn with another one and the Packers win 35-7 … with Schwartz having that perplexed look on his face as McCarthy gives him some advice on hotels in the heart of New Orleans.
Proud fan of the 2010 Stanley Cup Champion Chicago Blackhawks and the 2010 Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers.
"You cannot dream yourself into a character; you must hammer and forge yourself into one."
by hawks61 on Dec 31, 2011 9:50 AM CST reply actions 3 recs
I think that's a horrible idea
too much injury risk there to two important players
by rip_city_swagger on Dec 31, 2011 1:50 PM CST up reply actions
not to mentiont the fact
Tramon was never a very good return guy
by DaveInTucson on Dec 31, 2011 5:25 PM CST up reply actions
The only way I'm good with this plan.....
is if MM has instructed Nelson or Williams to either call for a fair catch or let the ball bounce on EVERY punt return. You just can’t risk these guys getting hurt in a meaningless game. Otherwise, I agree its a horrible idea.
Can't we just let Graham Harrell do it?
by Charlie Kelly on Dec 31, 2011 2:18 PM CST up reply actions
I lol'd
Then agreed, sigh
"IF CARDS CAN SIGN SUPPAN THEY CAN GIVE ME A HOME"
by Buddhasillegitimatechild38 on Dec 31, 2011 2:58 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Forget that
So’uperman can handle that stuff no problem.
by Shoes31 on Dec 31, 2011 4:25 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
Who do you suggest they use?
Cobb is out, and Williams and Nelson are the only others who have any experience doing it. Guessing Sane might get the kick returns, but I don’t even know if he has done that. They just don’t have any other options. Unless you want to just give the game away to the lions, Williams and Nelson have to do it. If you have any other viable options, I’m sure McCarthy would love to hear about them, but they don’t exist.
Our Biggest Challenge is how we deal w/ Success!
also for Packers last year
<a href=‘http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/S/ShieSa00/gamelog/2010/’‘>PFR says Shields had 21 returns last year, which is weird, I don’t remember that at all.
Comes from mostly just hoping kicking game is not a disaster, I guess
by DaveInTucson on Dec 31, 2011 5:49 PM CST up reply actions
No Shields didn't do returns.
He had that ONE return against WI in the bowl game on a reverse. Otherwise he wasn’t ever used as a return man.
CBS on Shields ST play…
Played in all 13 games as either a wide receiver or the gunner on special teams … Voted UM’s Special Teams Player of the Year …
Not anywhere in the bio does it say a thing about him doing returns. Heck it doesn’t even say anything about him doing returns in HS, tho I think he might have. Packers TRIED him as a return guy, but he couldn’t hold onto the ball.
Our Biggest Challenge is how we deal w/ Success!
Shields was the kick returner for the Packers for most of last season
football does not build character, it reveals character.
Really?
You sure about that? He had 21 kick returns, Nelson had 22, Starks had 2 and Lee had 13… Shields was given the chance to be the kick returner early in the year but he was ineffective and dropped too many, so they took him off it relatively quickly. And went w/ the more sure handed Nelson and Lee and it seems to me someone else beside Starks. So in short he didn’t do most… He did SOME then was replaced by Nelson, Lee and Starks. Certainly not most!
Our Biggest Challenge is how we deal w/ Success!
Shields' kick returns were all late in the season
Including one in the Philly playoff game.
Jordy Nelson returned kickoffs early; he only had 2 after week 5
Patrick Lee had return duty mostly in 3 games in the middle of the season, although he did have a couple in the Super Bowl, too
by DaveInTucson on Jan 1, 2012 10:48 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, I seem to remember they tried him out early in the preseason..
he dropped too many so they went with Nelson in the regular season. Then late in the season they gave Shields a few chances again (presumably with the mindset that he had fixed his dropping issues) and he didn’t last long again.
In Every Climb and Place....
by PhoenicianPakFan on Jan 1, 2012 10:51 AM CST up reply actions
Thats what it was.
I knew he did alot in preseason, but thought he had some early too. I knew he got a couple late but wasn’t sure how many. I know he dropped a bunch but didn’t know if it was preseason or early regular.
Our Biggest Challenge is how we deal w/ Success!
I wasn't arguing with you, I was just saying that he does have some experience doing kick returns
whether or not he did returns in college. I remember being thoroughly underwhelmed when he did returns last year, as the only positive attribute he seemed to have was straight line speed.
football does not build character, it reveals character.
I don’t think there all that concerned about this game. If they were, they wouldn’t be sitting all the guys that they’re going too.
I’m sure they’re hoping/thinking they can win but if they don’t, than that’s fine too. They should have somebody like Pat Lee do it. I’m pretty sure he’s been used a time or two as a return guy for us. I’m pretty sure he looked bad doing it, but who cares? The game is pretty much meaningless to us; and especially so if the sit Woodson, Matthews, and Rodgers.
It’d
Fire Slocum
by packallday555 on Jan 1, 2012 1:37 AM CST up reply actions
Pat Lee?
Sure he isn’t a great return man, but he has done it for us and is more expendable comparatively to Tramon or Jordy.
Good times never seemed so good!
Lee
Has only ever done kick returns and he might be the guy for that today, but he has no experience doing punt returns. They are alot different…
Our Biggest Challenge is how we deal w/ Success!
yeah, it takes some serious guts to do punt returns IMO
football does not build character, it reveals character.
sit everyone that needs to, Rodgers shouldn't play more than 1 half
since they got home field in beating the Bears, they have 3 full weeks to rest their injured players – which is a pretty long time. Hopefully that can let Jennings get 100%, Bulaga and Clifton ready, etc. The bye week will let guys with nagging injuries rest up (since it’s 2 weeks between games). They know what they’re doing – they’ll have everyone back and ready to go for the playoffs.
Against the Lions, I think Rodgers will only play a few series, maybe 1 full quarter. But they need to come out gangbusters and have 3 really good drives to show the league they’re ready for the playoffs. I don’t want them to come out flat like they did against KC and kind of go through the motions. Then Flynn can come in and show what he can do. I definitely dont think Rodgers plays more than the first half
by rip_city_swagger on Dec 31, 2011 1:55 PM CST reply actions
I'm not worried about the Pack coming out flat
The Pack man-handled Detroit earlier this year. Rodgers put up over 79 yards in the first half on Thanksgiving. Granted. Detroit lost Ndamukong Suh, Chris Houston and Louis Delmas before the end of the third quarter, but those guys were never really a factor anyway.
"But the point is, finger-pointing is just what sports fans do when something doesn't go right." -- Kurt Mensching
by RealityIsOptionable on Dec 31, 2011 8:34 PM CST up reply actions
You're right
Its not like Suh had a sack or even a quarterback pressure before he left the game. Its not like Houston is the second coming of Charles Woodson, but then again …..who is. I think everyone kind of had the feeling that Rodgers was just toying with the Lions during the first half of that game. Kind of like when my dog flips a live field mouse up into the air for awhile before he puts it out of its misery.
In the unlikely event Green Bay looses Sunday, it is only because they are not trying.
"But the point is, finger-pointing is just what sports fans do when something doesn't go right." -- Kurt Mensching
by RealityIsOptionable on Dec 31, 2011 9:43 PM CST up reply actions
This is going to be one of the funner games of the year...
Going to see lots of So’oto and Lattimore, plus we’ll see Jarrett Bush playing the slot (he’s a natural for that position)…
It will be fun seeing the yungins getting some playtime.
Hope Dominguez gets some playing time on the line as well
Looking forward to the Packers three-peating and visiting President Ron Paul at the White House in 2013

by 
























