Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

NFL Network's "Top 100 Players of 2011"

For those of you who are priveleged enough to have NFL Network, I'm sure you are aware of the series they have running called the "Top 100." They previously ranked the top 100 players of all time, and now they are ranking the top 100 active players for the 2010-2011 season. This list is actually voted on by current NFL players, not analysts and writers like many other ranking shows. The series debuted last week with players 91-100, and tonight's episode counted down 81-90. I thought I'd create this FanPost as an open thread for debate and discussion about the list. Read the list, and offer your opinions. Who is on here that shouldn't be? Who is too low?

Star-divide

Miscellaneous List Facts:

  • 10 Miami Hurricanes on the list, the most of any school
  • 7 Packers on the list, the most of any team
  • 59 offensive players and 41 defensive players on the list
  • 12 QBs on the list
  • 2 teams with 0 players on the list
  • 5 TEs and 5 OTs on the list

And now the list...

* Bold = Packers

* Italics = Rookies

 

Episode 1: 91-100

100) Donovan McNabb, QB, WAS

99) Chad Clifton, LT, GB

98) Darren McFadden, RB, OAK

97) Shaun Phillips, OLB, SD

96) Nick Collins, FS, GB

95) Jon Beason, MLB, CAR

94) Frank Gore, RB, SF

93) Eric Berry, SS, KC

92) Lance Briggs, OLB, CHI

91) Terrell Owens, WR, CIN

 

Episode 2: 81-90

90) Joe Flacco, QB, BAL

89) Adrian Wilson, SS, ARI

88) Vernon Davis, TE, SF

87) Jordan Gross, LT, CAR

86) Josh Freeman, QB, TB

85) Jason Babin, DE, TEN

84) Joshua Cribbs, Weapon, CLE

83) Mike Williams, WR, TB

82) LaMarr Woodley, OLB, PIT

81) B.J. Raji, NT, GB

 

Episode 3: 71-80

80) Jared Allen, DE, MIN

79) D'Brickashaw Ferguson, LT, NYJ

78) Dallas Clark, TE, IND

77) Chris Snee, G, NYG

76) Santonio Holmes, WR, NYJ

75) Jay Ratliff, NT, DAL

74) Greg Jennings, WR, GB

73) Trent Cole, DE, PHI

72) Tony Romo, QB, DAL

71) Mario Williams, DE, HOU

 

Episode 4: 70-61

70) Miles Austin, WR, DAL

69) John Abraham, DE, ATL

68) Antrel Rolle, FS, NYG

67) Brian Waters, LG, KC

66) Richard Seymour, DE, OAK

65) Vonta Leach, FB, HOU

64) Tamba Hali, OLB, KC

63) Cameron Wake, OLB, MIA

62) Jerod Mayo, ILB, NE

61) Brandon Marshall, WR, DEN

Comment 241 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nick Collins is too low

Eric Berry is already ahead of him? Adrian Wilson a few years ago, sure, but not anymore. Same with Terrell Owens. Josh Cribbs is great on special teams, but also not sure how he gets ranked higher than Collins.

I think B.J. Raji shoots up this list in a hurry, too.

What teams didn’t make the list? Buffalo, Washington, Denver, Saint Louis, or Seattle? I’m going with Buffalo and Seattle.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 8, 2011 10:38 PM CDT reply actions  

Hmm...

Washington has London Fletcher. Denver has Dumervil and Champ Bailey. St. Louis has Steven Jackson and Sam Bradford. Seattle has. Buffalo for sure. Fred Jackson is probably their biggest name, and he’s nothing more than good. And who does Seattle have? Marshawn Lynch? I definitely agree with you here.

I also thought Collins was too low. Thje guy is as good of a playmaker as you’ll find at the safety spot. I realize last year wasn’t quite as good statistically as he was a couple years ago, but he’s still a Pro-Bowler. It’s funny though, because they have a reaction show afterwards with viewers’ comments scrolling across the bottom, and one guy said something to the effect of “no 1 would even no who nick collins was if the packers didn’t win the ssuper bowl yada yada” I laugh at his ignorance of both Nick Collins’ awesomeness and the english language.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 8, 2011 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Buffalo's best chance is Kyle Williams

He made the Pro Bowl at nose tackle. But their run defense was so awful it’s hard to make the case that he’s good enough.

I’m not sure Dumervil counts because he sat out 2010. But Champ’s still good enough to make it.

Washington’s best player is London Fletcher, but he always seems to sneak under the radar, so it’s possible he doesn’t make it. I think Orakpo is their next best guy. If they don’t make it and DeAngelo Hall does I’d be surprised. Hall made the Pro Bowl based on one game of Jay Cutler throwing the ball to him on multiple occasions, but overall he’s not that good, you just hear a lot about him because he’s always running his mouth.

Saint Louis: Steven Jackson has to make that list. He’s just so good. At first I thought Bradford, too, but I don’t think he would be ahead of Josh Freeman yet, though he doesn’t have as good a group of pass-catchers as Freeman.

And Seattle: Earl Thomas supposedly had a very good rookie season, but there’s just no way he beats out Eric Berry. But if Berry beat out Collins I guess anything is possible. Marshawn Lynch had one good run against a bunch of guys that were either afraid to try to tackle and/or were only going for the ball, so I don’t think he makes the cut. I think two years ago Lofa Tatupu makes it, but he’s really had a hard couple of years.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think Kyle Williams might actually be there. And while you’re right about Dumervil, I’m almost positive Champ is there. Fletcher might be passed over, but I hope not.

So we agree that Seattle has the least likely chance of having a player make the cut. So who is the other team? Is it one not listed here? I was thinking Miami, but Brandon Marshall is there. So it comes down to Seattle, Washington, and Buffalo. It probably comes down to Williams vs. Fletcher.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 12:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

What about Minnesota? Or Jacksonville?

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 9, 2011 12:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Jacksonville has Maurice Jones-Drew

Minnesota, I think, depends on whether or not Hank Baskett is still a Viking.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 1:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, those 2 are locks.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 1:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hank Baskett is a Viking and he's #19.

Wait, what are we talking about? Well, that’s his jersey number anyway.

"Believe me Delmar, woman is the most fiendish instrument of torture ever devised to bedevil the days of man."

by Ben T on May 9, 2011 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Buffalo

Doesn’t IIRC…. but Jarius Byrd? He was almost D rookie of the year

by PhoenicianPakFan on May 9, 2011 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jairus Byrd really fell off the map last season, though

So I don’t think he’ll make it.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 10, 2011 12:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ranking Berry ahead of Collins is idiocy, IMO.

Collins DID have that huge play in the Super Bowl, after all. Berry had an impressive rookie season, yes, but he’s not better than Collins by any stretch of the imagination.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 8, 2011 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1 for superb use of the word "idiocy"

"Flopped out my old fella."
-- New Zealand lawn bowler David File, on exposing himself to teammates because they were playing poorly

by Prince Fielder is Skinny on May 9, 2011 11:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Donovan McNabb and Terrell Owens made the list on legacy rather than their 2010-2011 season. They should not be there.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 8, 2011 11:10 PM CDT reply actions  

As much as you might hate T.O.

the man had 72 receptions for 983 yards and 9 touchdowns. Those are pretty decent numbers.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 8, 2011 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Decent yes

but top 100 players good? I disagree, but I’m biased against Owens. Since the list was compiled by other players you would think he wouldn’t make the top 1000 based on how much he probably annoys them.

As for McNabb: I’m kind of biased towards him but am also surprised he made the list. Apparently the players don’t think much of Shanahan’s job last year (neither do I).

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 12:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Would you guys mind rec'ing this?

The next 10 won’t be out for another week. I’d like to keep this alive as long as possible. When it disappears, I suppose I can make another one. But I think it’s better to have as much of the discussion in one place as possible.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 12:53 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

+1, then.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 9, 2011 12:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thank you very much.

And realize, when I’m asking to be rec’d, I’m only doing it for you fine people.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 1:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Consider this comment rec'd!

Oh wait, you mean the post? Sure thing, I would like to see it too, especially since I’ve wagered on Seattle and Buffalo to post a zilch.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 1:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Seattle gets nothing?

But…but…Hasselbeck?

Brewers, if you're really that desperate to disprove the saying "Defense wins championships" you're going to have to at least hit the ball occasionally.

by Tepo6688 on May 9, 2011 1:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

I will answer in Haiku form

He got the ball but
he did not score for his team
Al wins game for Pack

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 1:49 AM CDT up reply actions   4 recs

4th rec is on the board.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog
Donna Noble has left the library. Donna Noble has been saved.

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 19, 2011 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

What do we make of Cliffy cracking the list at 99?

Deserved? Super/Pro-Bowl respect?

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 1:00 AM CDT reply actions  

Looking through Stroh's list of likely Packers, I realized that Cliffy probably made it ahead of players like Josh Sitton and Tramon Williams.

I like the big fella…. but no.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 1:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

Packers on the list...

We’ve got a couple already. But here goes…

Rodgers – Heard he’s #11 which might be too low… But 12 QB’s is way too many IMO. But its a QB driven league so they get voted higher than the should, just like the draft.

Jennings – CLearly one of the top playmaking WR in the NFL.

Clifton – Might be a slight reach, but given how well he’s played over the years he deserves some love. Curious which and how many LT are ahead of him.

Raji – Should be among the highest NT/DT in the NFL, Probably isn’t yet, but should be.

Matthews – Duhhhh, best LB in the NFL or at least best OLB in the NFL. He and Patrick Willis stand alone, IMO.

Woodson – best defensive player in the NFL the past 3 years and future HOF’er!

Collins – Among the best safeties in the NFL. Doesn’t get the pub that Adrian Wilson gets but is a better playmaker. Might be the best FS playing right now. Not sure which Reed plays, but Collins might be better right now than Reed.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 9, 2011 1:01 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm guessing that is it.

5 OTs taken if I’m not mistaken. We’ve seen Gross already. And they let it slip that there is 1 more Brown in addition to Cribbs. That is either Hillis or Joe Thomas. I’m guessing Thomas, which makes 2. Jake Long might be there. Um… help me out here on the others.

I saw that he was 11 too, but I wasn’t going to mention it until he’s announced for real.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 1:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

No way Peyton Hillis makes it over Thomas

Thomas is an elite LT. Hillis is a fan-favorite but I don’t think he’s that highly regarded among the players (at least not yet, but if he plays well for an entire season we’ll see). But there are a ton of NFL running backs who are much better than he is.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 1:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Josh Cribbs agrees, as do I.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 1:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

Gotta agree on that.

No way Hillis gets it over Thomas! That would be just WRONG! LOL

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 9, 2011 1:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

Other top tackles

D’Brickashaw Ferguson and maybe Matt Light (Pats offense was very good this year). Jason Peters from Philadelphia might make it, but he’s way too inconsistent, IMO. Also, Tyson Clabo is another overrated tackle.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 1:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Forgot to finish that

So I’m guess Ferguson, with Matt Light as my second guess. Unless players really liked “The Blind Side” I doubt Oher makes the list until he moves back to the right side.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 1:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Clifton-Gross-___-___-___

So fill the blanks.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 1:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Good catch...

Forgot about him… Yeah I might take him over Long. I think Thomas and Ferguson are among the top LT w/ Clady right behind them.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 9, 2011 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I thought of Clady as well.

IIRC he didn’t give up a single sack as a rookie. He was hurt last year though, wasn’t he?

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 6:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think he tore his patella tendon

and didn’t play so well in 2010. So I don’t think he’ll make the list. But he has been stellar in pass protection.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 10, 2011 12:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ferguson checks in at #79

So I guess that leaves Long and Thomas, unless Ryan Clady or Michael Roos makes it.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 16, 2011 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ferguson for sure...

Light isn’t that good. Over-hyped playing for NE and Belichich. Peters and Clabo shouldn’t be in the top 100, IMO.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 9, 2011 1:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Matt Light

Playing for New England will get you over-hyped.

If it’s 5 OTs, and we’ve already got Clifton and Gross, I think Thomas and Long are definitely better than those two, and Ferguson is the 3rd best. So I don’t think Light, Peters, or Clabo make it (though all of them made the Pro Bowl last year), but I think Light’s got the best chance of the group simply because playing for BB gets you on lists.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 1:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Clifton-Gross-Ferguson-Long-Thomas?

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 1:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's how I would put them

But I wouldn’t be surprised to see Long ahead of Thomas. Thomas has had a better career but Long may have had a better 2011.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 1:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Why do you say that?

Thomas blocked for the Madden cover boy!

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 1:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

If Thomas and Mack weren't on that line . . .

Peyton Hillis wouldn’t be on that cover!

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 1:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

That seems about right to me

Though it’d be a shame if Tramon doesn’t make the list. Oh, well, the more QBs think they can throw on him the better, in my opinion.

Adrian Wilson has slipped in the last couple years, too. A weak pass rush is not good for a safety, and having to play more coverage exposes him the same way that MM/Rodgers/Philbin exposed Polamalu in the Super Bowl.

The only thing I’d argue against is that CM3 and Willis stand alone. DeMarcus Ware is a beast, and Willis plays ILB, not OLB.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 1:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Willis plays ILB, not OLB.

Yeah thats why I said Matthews is “or at least best OLB in the NFL.” To kinda differentiate them a little. I thought of Ware shortly too. He might be as good as Matthews, close anyway. Wilson has always struggled w/ coverage, even zone. When the Cards D is working best he doesn’t have to play in coverage and is attacking at the LOS. Couple years ago he was OK in coverage, but now he’s pretty bad and the D isn’t working well enough to allow him to play to his strengths.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 9, 2011 8:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

Vernon Davis is #5 on the TE list.

I’m guessing the other 4 are Gates, Gonzalez, Witten, and Clark in some order. Where do we think Finley would have been on this list of he had played all year?

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 1:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Depends

Does that also assume that Gates played the entire year? And Clark? If yes, I think he makes #3 behind Gates and Witten. Witten is supposed to be the best blocker of the three, but Finley was on pace for some fine numbers, which would put him ahead of Clark and Gonzalez.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 1:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

I could be wrong with those 4.

Although I can’t really think of anyone the players would respect more than these guys.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 1:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

Only Mercedez Lewis comes to mind

But he’s really only had one good year, and I can’t see him being ahead of Gates/Witten/Davis/Clark/Gonzo.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 1:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Finley hasn't played enough to make the list.

If he played last year like he started, my guess is he’s 75ish… On the list, but not as high as he could be cuz it was only one year.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 9, 2011 1:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Kind of like Darren McFadden?

He put up some gaudy numbers, but has been hurt too much and hasn’t done it long enough to be any higher on the list.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 1:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

If he were to have played the whole season, based on his numbers and if it was constant...

He would have to be up in the 40 range. But then again he hasn’t been able to stay on the field which really hurts his value.

SUPER BOWL CHAMPS

by Chief Oshkosh on May 9, 2011 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Who are the QBs?

Obviously McNabb, Flacco, and Freeman are already on the list.

Obviously Brady, Manning, Brees, Rodgers, Vick and Rivers will be on the list. That leaves 3 spots.

Matt Ryan, Ben Roethlisberger, and Matt Schaub?

Does this mean Favre doesn’t make the list? But he’s a legend! and a Gunslinger!

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 1:43 AM CDT reply actions  

Eli Manning and Tony Romo would be the other possibilities I guess.

Of these last 5, how many are better than Joe Flacco? Does he deserve to be on the list?

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 2:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Forgot about Romo

Left Manning off the list on purpose.

I don’t think Flacco should have made it. I don’t think Romo makes it, but if he does I’m guessing he replaces Matt Ryan on that list. His outing in the NFC Championship game might have cost him dearly, as it was the highest-profile game of his career.

53 Bears, 1 Cup

by I voted for Kodos on May 9, 2011 2:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

As much as the thought might make me vomit, I think Eli makes it

At least over Schaub. Although I think Eli sucks, the fact is that Schaub hasn’t won anything. Hasn’t even had a winning season. Sure he’s thrown for tons of yards, but he seems to do it in that sneaky, Kyle Orton-ish way – you watch him and you don’t think he’s doing anything special, and he’s not winning games….but all of a sudden he’s got 4300 yards.

In the end, I think the Manning name and the SB ring puts Eli above him. So I think the last three will be Manning, Ryan/Romo, and the (alleged) rapist.

by Packers3485 on May 9, 2011 3:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Romo has had his share of playoff meltdowns too...

I would say Ryan over Romo. And I don’t think Flacco should be on the list. Neither for that matter should McNabb. Honestly, has Freeman done enough to be top 100? I wouldn’t say so… Roethlesberger yes, Schaub no. LIke I mentioned, to many QB’s on the list, IMO!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 9, 2011 8:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

For 2011?

There’s no way Romo makes this list. He was not playing well before getting injured.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 9, 2011 8:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ah, yep.

The Cowboys were so irrelevant I forgot he got hurt.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

for 2011

Isnt it a list of who they “project” to be the best in 2011? Romo’s bad season was 2010.

"I agree but dont agree"

by juggernaut400 on May 9, 2011 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nevermind, just re-read the opener.

"I agree but dont agree"

by juggernaut400 on May 9, 2011 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yep, they title it the same way the Madden games do.

The year of the SB is the year the season is named after.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 6:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Obviously Favre is #1 on the list....

they don’t even need to tease prior to the show!

Did you see the way he tanked the Vikings!? It was a thing of beauty…no other QB could have done it the way he did. Now, maybe it wasn’t intentional…

by PhoenicianPakFan on May 9, 2011 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Of course Favre is #1

As if that were even up for discussion.

Brewers, if you're really that desperate to disprove the saying "Defense wins championships" you're going to have to at least hit the ball occasionally.

by Tepo6688 on May 9, 2011 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

This list is very suspect.

We keep trying to apply current/recent performance logic to it, but much like the Pro Bowl, it appears to be based mostly on reputation. Stroh’s right, too many QBs. Hell, Favre probably would get in if he was planning to play next year. I won’t be surprised at all to see Romo on the list, even though he shouldn’t be. He’s the QB for the Dallas Cowboys — he would have to stink much worse than he does to not make the list. What about Sanchez? I think they are going to have to squeeze him in with the bar set at McNabb, Flacco, and Freeman.

"Believe me Delmar, woman is the most fiendish instrument of torture ever devised to bedevil the days of man."

by Ben T on May 9, 2011 10:44 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

McNabb is a legacy vote.

I think I’d take Flacco and Freeman over Sanchez though. I just don’t see anything special with Sanchez at all. He’s not bad, but he’s not a game-changer either.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

But for his interior line

Sanchez would be amongst the worst QBs in the NFL.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 9, 2011 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Matt Slauson represent!

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 9, 2011 6:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, Slauson's crappy.

Mangold, Damien Woody, and D’Brickashaw Ferguson are the standouts for that OL (In Woody’s case, WAS, because he’s a FA). Brandon Moore’s okay, but nothing spectacular.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 9, 2011 7:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

So let's see...

-Collins only at 96, with Eric Berry ahead of him.
-Josh Freeman ahead of Joe Flacco
-No Tramon Williams on the list (only 7 Packers players, Clifton, Collins, Raji, Jennings, -Woodson, Matthews, Rodgers)
-And Rodgers only at #11

I’m gonna go ahead and say this list is total crap, even before knowing the full content.
Did they ever disclosure exactly how the voting took place? Or just say vaguely that it’s voted by players?

Yeah… It’s crap.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 13, 2011 2:37 PM CDT reply actions  

I'll give you the Collins point and Rodgers point

But considering what Freeman had to work with last year versus what Flacco had, and Freeman had a higher QB rating (95.9 to 93.6), I agree with Freeman over Flacco. IMO Flacco is overrated and Freeman underrated.

Second, you do realize that a) the Packers had the most players on the list, and b) the Packers had more than twice as many players on the list than the average team, right? I don’t think the fact that the Packers had “only” seven on the list is an indication that the list is crap.

Greinke: "It’s not about the guacamole itself. I just don’t want to let them win."

by GoGregGo on May 13, 2011 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Are you ready to say Freeman is better than Flacco after 1 year and 2 points of passer rating? Freeman has only 1 great season. IIRC, Derek Anderson had 1 of those. That could very well be a 1 year wonder for Freeman.

About having 7 players, I have no problem with “only” 7 players, personally I wouldn’t put Clifton in there, but Tramon Williams not being in there is a travesty, nothing short of it. TO being in there, McNabb being in there, is an abomination. This isn’t a career list, is a 2011 list.

Again, if there’s no information of how they came up with that list, for all I care it’s random.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 14, 2011 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Flacco v. Freeman

Flacco’s been around an extra year and plays with a better surrounding cast. In Flacco’s second year his rating was 88.9.

Also, Freeman beat the Packers and Flacco didn’t . . .

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 14, 2011 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jennings is in the 71-80 group...

Just came out in the last day or so. About right I guess. There are about 5 WR that are clearly better and maybe more.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 13, 2011 3:20 PM CDT reply actions  

IMHO Jennings is grossly undervalued

Nobody runs better routes than him. Almost nobody is able to line up in so many spots as he is able to. You can’t put Andre Johnson in the slot, he’s not fluid enough. You can’t put Wes Welker in the flank, he’s not fast enough.

If Jennings was in a system that used a clear #1 target, like in Houston or Atlanta, he would have monster numbers. But Rodgers and MM distribute the ball all around.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 14, 2011 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

That may be true,

And I do agree he has incredible versatility, but Fitz and Andre are definitely ahead of him. They are the best WR in the league. After that, you have Megatron, Wayne, White, etc. Those guys are all great, and I think Jennings can be put in there at any spot. He is at that 2nd tier IMO.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 14, 2011 5:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

BTW did you see the ESPN WR rankings? They had Jennings at number 6.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/38223/power-rankings-top-10-nfl-receivers

"I'm tired of pretending I'm not a rock star from Mars."

by Kuhl on May 14, 2011 8:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

I can agree with that.

He definitely shouldn’t be lower than that, and he could arguably go a fews pots higher. And that’s what I said in my post. The second half of that list is kinda messed up though.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 16, 2011 7:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Love me some Jennings...

Lets not go overboard tho… He clearly isn’t in the top 5 WR in the NFL. Top 10 probably. Wayne, Johnson , Johnson, Welker and a few others are definitely above him are clearly better. You telling me that Andre Johnson can’t livne up anywhere and NOT get open? Give me a break…

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 14, 2011 11:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

I love Greg Jennings too

But you’re right. He’s probably more Top 10 material than Top 5. I agree on that.

But I disagree that he’s not better than Welker. Welker is great at finding holes in the zone, but part of the credit for his catches has to go to Belichick and Brady. They eat up zone D like nobody’s business. Also, his career YPC is in the Houshmanzadeh range, and he has the added benefit (statistically, though maybe not long-term health-wise) of lining up in the slot.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 14, 2011 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

part of the credit for his catches has to go to Belichick and Brady.

Can pretty much say the same for most WR! Offensive scheme and coaches adjusting to talents of WR, is essential… Think Jennings doesn’t benefit from having Rodgers and McCarthy drawing up plays to get him open?!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 15, 2011 12:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Coaches and and QBs

aren’t the only factors I mentioned in Welker being overrated.

And more importantly, Welker has the top coach and the #1 or 2 QB – that’s not just solid, that’s the best out there (offer void if Packers become dynasty and MM and AR take over those spots, but for the time being it’s BB and TB at the top).

The best coach and the best QB is a huge advantage.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 15, 2011 12:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

HC and QB

McCarthy is if not THE best QB and offensive coach in the league, certainly close. And Rodgers is certainly among the top few QB’s in the NFL. Belicheck is a defensive HC. Thats where he got his roots. As a Defensive coach. WHile McCarthy’s roots are on offense. I’m not certain how much Belicheck is involved in offensive game planning. Like McCarthy…. Is he involved in defensive game planning for the Pack? Using THE best HC thing doesn’t really apply if Belicheck is a Defensive HC. Don’t think I would go that route in an argument against Welker.

Welker and Jennings are completely different in ability, the way they are used, etc… But all we can really go on is production and in that regard I put Welker ahead of Jennings. Yards per reception is tilted heavily towards Jennings cuz he’s used deep alot. Welker isn’t that kinda receiever. That doesn’t make him less talented or amazing!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 15, 2011 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Belichick is certainly not just a defensive coach

Belichick got his start as a defensive coordinator, but where has most of his success been in recent years? The Patriots are always near the top in scoring. Year in, year out. Coordinators and coaches have left and BB still has great offenses, so it’s not just his assistants. I think his experience as a defensive coordinator gives him insight into how to expose and play against defenses. Last season the Patriots led the league in scoring but had a porous pass defense and you want to tell me that Belichick is just a defensive coach?

Rodgers is a great QB yes, but he hasn’t had as many years (yet) as Brady and he’s still improving (and will hopefully overtake Brady when the Packers repeat).

And as far as production: if numbers are all that counts then Matt Schaub had a better year than Rodgers. Jennings is used deep because he has the ability to go deep and stretch defenses, something Welker can’t do. In fact, Welker has benefitted from Randy Moss and his deep threat ability, so it’s been other receivers that have helped Welker, whereas Jennings has been the threat taking away coverage from his teammates. That will boost Welker’s stats but hurt Jennings. Notice that Welker didn’t even break 900 yards in the season where Moss was mostly gone. It’s much easier to get 100 catches when you never go deeper than 10 yards, and you’re not the focal point of the pass defense.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 15, 2011 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

In fact, Welker has benefitted from Randy Moss and his deep threat ability, so it’s been other receivers that have helped Welker, whereas Jennings has been the threat taking away coverage from his teammates. That will boost Welker’s stats but hurt Jennings.

Yep, I was gonna say this. Randy Moss helped Welker out A LOT! He totally stretched out the defense, and gave Welker a lot more room to work with.

Welker isn’t a #1 receiver. He’s a guy that needs to play off of others. Jennings has shown that he can be a #1 guy, especially last season after Finley went down.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on May 15, 2011 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Welker's the greatest #2 in the game today

Like you mentioned, he’s not a # 1 WR type. He’s a guy who’s excellent at getting open on short passes, and is a good dump off option, but he can’t stretch the field. Without someone to stretch the field for him, he wouldn’t have the success that he’s had the past few years.

"I'm tired of pretending I'm not a rock star from Mars."

by Kuhl on May 15, 2011 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know if Welker can be considered a #2

He’s now the top WR on his team, but he usually lines up in the slot. So he’s anywhere from a #1 to a #3, depending on how you judge it. I guess that does average out to a #2, though.

Don’t get me wrong, I think Welker is very good, but I wouldn’t put him in my top 10.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 15, 2011 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

I usually define a # 1

As a guy who can change a game with a big play. Welker’s very consistent, but he doesn’t seem like a gamechanger.

"I'm tired of pretending I'm not a rock star from Mars."

by Kuhl on May 15, 2011 6:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

In fact, Welker has benefitted from Randy Moss and his deep threat ability, so it’s been other receivers that have helped Welker

Did we just forget that Moss was traded after week 4? Or the damage Welker did with Miami (when he actually got on the field as a WR)?
He’s not a top 5 WR, but he should get some votes for a top 10 spot, whether or not he is in your specific list.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on May 17, 2011 4:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

never mind.

Seems to be a big argument below about it…

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on May 17, 2011 5:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'd agree.

I’d put him Top 5 if for no other reason than he did the clever bit about Sexy Rexy in the presser and that he always shows up for the Pats.

Damn solid guy.

by PhoenicianPakFan on May 17, 2011 7:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Rex bit

Was absolutely classic! Bout the funniest thing i’ve ever heard…

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 17, 2011 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Welker w/o Moss

I believe this is noted above, but he had 848 yards and averaged less than 11 yards a carry. Not exactly a spectacular season.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 17, 2011 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

As has also been noted...

He tore his ACL in Dec/Jan of the 09 season. So he wasn’t fully recovered from the injury, which usually takes into the 2nd year to return to normal. Basically he played last year while rehabbing his ACL. And he still put up impressive numbers. He’ll be back to full strength this year, so we will see how he performs healthy and w/o Moss!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 17, 2011 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Welker didn’t have Moss to help him last season did he? And Jennings has alway benefitted from having Driver, a #1 WR in his own right, not too mention the deepest WR group in the NFL for the past 3 years or so. THink that hasn’t taken alot of pressure off Jennings and made it alot easier for him? Like I said, They are completely different WR. I’ll leave it at that…

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 15, 2011 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Welker without Moss = Mediocre season

He had what, 850 yards? That’s not exactly Greg Jennings-level production.

Jennings has had Driver, who is good enough to take away catches but over the last few years hasn’t been good enough for defenses to focus on. Good depth players (like Jones and Nelson) take away catches but they’re getting those catches in part because the pass D is focused much more on stopping Jennings.

Would you trade Jennings for Welker?

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 15, 2011 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

No I wouldn't...

Thats immaterial. Like I said they play different roles for their teams. Welker is NE #1 WR tho. He plays the alot of roles for them but primarily the slot and is exceptional at it. We don’t have anyone that can stretch the field like Jennings can. Welker plays a role like Driver and if you asked me if I would tale Driver in his prime or Welker in his, I would take Welker any day!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 15, 2011 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think you're selling DD too short

Welker is probably the best slot receiver in the league, but he’s a strick slot receiver.

DD in his prime was much like Jennings, but slower. He could line up anywhere, ran great routes and catch the ball very well.

Also, this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkMmFFqK6yo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmanSEiVQuY&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKx9NDxbiSs&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuhXQFIctZM

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 15, 2011 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Belichick would trade Welker for Jennings

in a heartbeat. Welker is very good, but he’s a product of the system too.

As far as DD vs. Welker, that’s tough. Driver’s more versatile, but Welker is good at what he does. I’m too biased to answer hat objectively.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 15, 2011 7:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

What system?

Welker has had different offensive coordinators since arriving in NE. So…which system is he a product of? McDaniels’s system that was opened up by long bombs downfield to Randy Moss, or Bill O’Brien’s TE-based attack?

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 15, 2011 8:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

The "Bill Belichick" System?

I don’t know if there’a any other name for it. It varies from year to year, depending on personnel available, and also from coordinator to coordinator, but Belichick has consistenly had good offenses in his Patriots tenure – probably because he knows how coordinators think and is able to take advantage of that.

But Welker obviously benefitted more from Randy Moss’ presence than from the offense he played in this last season, where the tight ends were taking away catches, rather than Moss opening up the short passes to him. He only averaged 10.5 ypc (a yard shorter than his career average), but recovering from last season’s injury may have been a factor in that.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 16, 2011 12:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

+1

Exactly. The one constant with the Patriots has been Belicheck. Yeah, he loses offensive coordinators but it doesn’t really ever effect his offensive production. Like you said above, him being such a good defensive coach probably helps him in being able to know how he can beat defenses.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on May 16, 2011 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

And as much as I like McCarthy

I think Sean Payton and Belichick have to be considered top offensive coaches, too. And Reid and Turner would have to be in that conversation, too.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 15, 2011 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just not a fan of Turner

He seems like the coaching equivalent to Matt Schaub or Tony Romo. He can put up big numbers when it doesn’t matter, but when it comes to crunch time he can’t do anything.

"I'm tired of pretending I'm not a rock star from Mars."

by Kuhl on May 15, 2011 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Turner is a great offensive coach, just not a great head coach

He doesn’t seem to come up big in the big games. You’re right about that. But his teams do put up great offensive numbers, and his failings seem to be much more on the defensive side. But we’re only talking about the coaches as offensive gurus here.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 15, 2011 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think he does but not as much as Welker does in New England. Remember how much success he had with Miami early on in his career? I think he’s very much a product of their system.

Jennings is arguably the best route runner in the league, and is one of the best at YAC. I think he’d have success no matter where he was.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on May 15, 2011 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

He's the best WR for our system.

He’s the only elite guy that can do it all, line up everywhere, run great routes, has great hands, and great YAC ability.

The only other guy that I can think of that does what Jennings does is Austin, from DAL, but Jennings is better than him.

So, for our system, he’s better than Andre Johnson, Calvin, Fitzgerald, White, Rice… People get caught too much in bigger receivers, but that comes with a price. They’re not fluid enough to work on the slot.

And, remember the SB, MM loves using Jennings in the slot.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 15, 2011 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

So, for our system, he’s better than Andre Johnson, Calvin, Fitzgerald, White

The other recievers you mention are special talents/players that you change your system to fit what they are and do… Jennings isn’t like that IMO. Remember that McCarthy changed his system last year specifically to fit and focus on Finley’s talents, NOT Jennings!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 15, 2011 5:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

We won the SB because Jennings can line up in the slot

2 key plays happened because Jennings was there. The scheme is what it is because of Jennings. MM didn’t just create a couple of plays because of Jennings. The whole premise of MM’s system is that any receiver can line up anywhere, and Jennings being the best at it makes MM’s life much easier.

Finley and Jennings ALLOW MM to change his scheme and do what he wants. Those other guys don’t. They’d have to line up on the outside almost all the times.

They’re not Randy Moss, that can only run 2 routes, and cripples his team. But they don’t offer the possibilities Jennings does.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 15, 2011 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

What does lining up in the slot have to do w/ anything?

All it means to me is that Jennings is versatile. Not special… If lining up in the slot is a big deal, then Welker should be viewed higher than he is. THink what you want…. But McCarthy altered his entire offense specifically to fit Finley and not Jennings. Do I need to find you Proof of that? Cuz its everywhere and I just read it again this weekend. McCarthy made Finley the focal point of his offense becuz he is a special TE. Jennings is a very good WR, but McCarthy didn’t center his entire offense to suit Jennings. He DID alter it for Finley!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 15, 2011 8:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lining up BOTH at outside and flank

allows Jennings to go up against LBS, while still being great in a base offense.

About the system, again, see the SB. See the whole season.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 16, 2011 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Who did McCarthy change his system for?

Finley Not Jennings. Jennings is versatile, Finley is Special… Thats why.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

What part of created the system can't you understand?

As in CREATED. Not CHANGED. Not made some packages to accomodate. As in, the core of the system is based on Jennings’ skill set?

If you still haven’t gotten that after 3 posts saying the same thing, I give up.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 16, 2011 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

NO its not...

Same system thats been in place since McCarthy arrived… He didn’t create it a bit for Jennings. It was in place since he got here! Driver used to play the exact same role that Jennings now has. He adapted his offense to fit Finleys Unique skill set. He changed next nothing for Jennings. Jennings is versatile enough to play alot of roles in McCarthys scheme, but when McCarthy got his hands on FInley he changed ALOT to alter it to fit Finleys ability! He changed very little for Jennings, who basically took the role Driver used to have when he was our #1 WR. Jennings is versatile… Finley is SPECIAL!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

You are absolutely correct

It still doesn’t change the fact that we’re talking about skill set. You are absolutely correct in that Driver offered the same thing as Jennings, skillset wise.

So do James Jones and Jordy Nelson.

But it’s about how good Jennings is doing that. Since he came on board, our offense has been top 10 in scoring. It wasn’t the case in 06, when we were 22nd.

Now, of course a lot more factors into that than just Jennings’ insertion into the starting lineup. But it’s just a small sample to how Jennings affects the offense.

Regarding Finley being special, he is special because he is versatile. It’s also about mismatches, about lining him up in the flank against CBs in the RZ.

And still, in the end, we won the SB without Finley playing any kind of meaningful role. The same can’t be said about Jennings.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 16, 2011 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

The same can’t be said about Jennings

Well take Jennings out of the offense and there are 3 more recievers that can take up the roles he does. Finley on the other hand creates mismatches that no one else can. Finley isn’t just special cuz he’s versatile, he special cuz he has a unique skill set that very few TE in the NFL can. Gonzalez being the easiest and closest to Finley. But like you said Jones, Nelson and Driver all could do what alot Jennings does. FInley is unique. He’s a WR in a TE body, he can go up and high point the ball better than any TE i’ve ever seen. He outruns LB and runs over DB’s. He has size, speed, agility. He has the entire package as a recieving TE. Take Jennings out of the offense and its alot easier to adapt, cuz of Jones, Nelson. etc. Take Finley out and you have to undo all the changes you put into place.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yet it was Jennings

Catching that TD and that key 3rd down, all while working on the slot, going veritcally…

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 16, 2011 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Huh?

All Welker can do is line up in the slot! Jennings lines up outside and in the slot. He, like all of our other guys can line up anywhere in our system as I’m sure you aware. I think that does make him pretty special. Not because he has the capacity to do so but because he has the talent to beat you whether it’s on the outside or in the slot.

Could Welker line up outside and have success? Doubt it.

Who cares if he centered his offense around Finley and not Jennings? Finley is probably the most talented pass catching TE in the league. It’s knock like it’s a knock on Jennings that he’s the second option after Finley.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on May 16, 2011 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

All Welker can do is line up in the slot!

Sorry, but I totally disagree w/ that statement! Like I said from the start… DIfferent receivers, so different schemes. Welker doesn’t have the deep threat that Jenning does, but IMO he is the best WR in the NFL after the catch. Thats how he gets almost all his yards. Most of his receptions are about 5 yards, but he turns them into alot better gains. This year I think he’ll be back to what he was… He came back from his ACL in record time and that hurt his production. Second season after an ACL is usually when you get your explosiveness back.

Never said it was knock on Jennings that he is the #2 reciever on our team did I?

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/receiving/sort/receivingYardsAfterCatch

Wes Welker:
Receptions: 86
YAC: 411
avg: 4,77

Greg Jennings:
Receptions: 76
YAC: 415
avg: 5,46

Oh, and Jennings isn’t the 2nd receiver. He’s the 1st. Finley is a TE. And even considering him a receiver, he has never put up the numbers Jennings did. Outside of the first 4 games of this season, he has never been targeted more than Jennings.

Maybe he would if he would’ve stayed healthy, but if he’s not available, how can he be the #1 receiver?

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 16, 2011 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

He's the 2nd reciever behing Finley when he's healthy.

He is the #1 WR, see the distinction. Why do you think McCarthy changed his scheme to take advantage of Finley?.

Welker plays closer to the LOS there are alot more players to elude than 10-15 yds downfield where Jennings makes most of his catches. Welker has to elude LB, CB, S, DL… Jennings CB and safeties and he has alot more room to do it with. Welker is in much tighter areas.

We’ll see who the #1 reciever is in the offense next year, hopefully McCarthy finds a way to have Finley and Jennings as Co-#1 recievers.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Slot WRs have lots of advantages

The pass from the QB is shorter, they can go inside or outside, and they get lots of yards after the catch because their routes are high-percentage passes designed to get yac. Because slot receivers have these advantages teams usually put lesser receivers in that spot, and let the better receivers work outside (which takes more skill). You see the similar numbers put up by Danny Amendola in St. Louis last year, but I don’t think he’s a quality #1 outside WR. Welker, too, would be a very mediocre outside receiver, in my opinion.

Percy Harvin is probably the most dangerous slot receiver after the catch.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 16, 2011 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Welker also has to make his yards in much smaller spaces.

With more bodies taking up that space. Jennings plays in wide open spaces and has more room to elude only the CB and Safeties.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Smaller spaces but much closer to the QB

Which gives defenders less time to react to the pass. Much easier to get a catch 5 yards deep in the middle of the field than it is 10-15 yards deep and 15 yards wide. Gives the defender a lot of time to get to you. Also easier to get around LBs that aren’t fast enough for a WR.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 16, 2011 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

That extra 1/2 a second

It takes the all to get there as opposed to the time it takes a defender other than the CB to change direction and start running about an extra 10-15 yds to get to Jennings. By comparison Welker catches all those passes in front of everyone except the DL. And has LB staring him in the face, not to mention the CB covering him and the DL that just have to turn around and can practically reach out and touch him!

They are different WR w/ different skill sets and strengths. Makes comparing them very diffcult. Im done w/ this discussion.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

You don't think it's easier to get the ball to the slot receiver?

First, t’s much easier to get open on a LB than on a DB. Number two, that extra second or half second lets a DB cover a lot of ground. Third, and possibly the biggest reason it’s easier to get catches out of the slot, is that it’s easier for a QB to thread a needle that’s 10 yards away than it is to hit a small spot 30 yards away.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 16, 2011 6:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Last post...

Yes its easier to get the ball to him. I never said it wasn’t. BUT he has alot more defenders around him… Besides the CB that is covering him the LB’s are facing him and don’t have to turn around and run to where Jennings is BEHIND them. And DL can practically turn around and tackle him. He’s got ALOT more defenders around him than Jennings does 10-15 yd downfield. The ball arrives to Jennings ON TIME. Its not like hes standing there waiting for it, so Welker has alot more to contend w/ to make his YAC. Jennings is downfield and just has CB and Safeties to contend w/ and he has alot more room to operate.

AGAIN, they are very different WR w/ different strengths! They aren’t used in the same way whatsoever… So comparing them is very difficult!

End of Discussion for me… You can keep going yourself now.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why do you disagree with that? Have you ever seen him lined up outside?

I don’t know, I think Jennings is better after the catch, and there probably aren’t many guys better then him at it.

I didn’t say you said it was a knock, I just don’t understand what your point about it is. I mean, Belicheck didn’t change his system for Welker did he? I guess I just don’t understand the significance of it.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on May 16, 2011 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions   3 recs

No I haven't seen Welker outside much...

But he is a starting WR and in some sets has to line up outside. As I’ve stated repeatedly. They are different WR w/ different stregths. You don’t seem to be allowing me that for some reason. And it makes comparing them very difficult.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, I totally understand and agree. They’re very different receivers, that are hard to compare.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on May 16, 2011 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comparing them is difficult

But I still think Jennings would break records as the slot receiver in Bill Belichick’s offenses.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 16, 2011 6:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Doubt he would actually play in the slot in a Welker-type role,

but he’s a good receiver and would therefore do well anywhere.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on May 17, 2011 5:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

I won’t be home, nor near a computer on Sunday night. Can someone else post the next 10? You can either post it in the comments here, or throw up a new FanPost and copy-paste the 20 I already have. I’d like to keep this discussion going. Thanks.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 14, 2011 5:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Eh, Collins...

He still makes so many mental mistakes for my liking (bad angles mostly, but there is also the occasional lapse in judgement). He’s solid but nothing special yet.

by msc32887 on May 14, 2011 9:35 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, nothing special

aside from about a billion deflected passes and 17 interceptions in the past 3 years…

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 14, 2011 9:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nick Collins' hands

are the only thing preventing him from being up there with Ed Reed. They’re also both great returners – I think you could argue that Collins has better field vision than Brandon Jackson.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 14, 2011 10:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

He was one of the only bright spots on the 2008 "defense".

i think he had 3 pick-sixes that year.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 14, 2011 10:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would be remiss

in not mentioning his amazing play in the Super Bowl. That pick-six was a thing of BEAUTY.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 14, 2011 11:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, you would be remiss

And thank you for not being remiss.

That play brings a smile to my face when I think about it. I’m sure everyone at the Super Bowl party I was at remembers me for two things: 1) being very stubborn (one could argue boorish, perhaps) about getting the best seat in the house on the basis of my strong Packers fandom, and 2) being the guy who jumped up screaming and yelling as the play happened, jumping up when he crossed the goal line, and pounding the floor and cheering for about 5 minutes afterwards.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 14, 2011 11:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

YOU ARE Full OF SHIT!!

One of the top safeties in the NFL… Watch what he does for our D… Clearly among the top 5 or so safeties in the NFL!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 14, 2011 11:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Gonna get my comment in before this one blows up.....

I agree that Collins is Top 5 of safeties. Thats also why he’s not higher in the list. Safeties are going to be one of the least selected positions on this list. Skill positions have the most picks, then going to defense you are going to have pass rushers and great corners probably….and then theres room for a few safeties. The fact that Collins made the list at all, I think makes him Top 5 in the league, cause thats all the safeties that will probably be on that list.

by PhoenicianPakFan on May 14, 2011 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

exactly!!!

Collins is a playmaker any way you cut it…

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 15, 2011 12:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

If he had better hands he’d have 9-10 picks every year. There’s not many better playmaking safties out there than him. Probably only Polamalu and Reed.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on May 15, 2011 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Early

in his career Collins dropped his share of INT’s. I honestly don’t ever remember one last year. The past 3 years his hands have been excellent.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 15, 2011 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

You may have repressed this memory

But Collins dropped a pick against the Bears on the last drive, with about 2 minutes to go.

I didn’t un-suppress this memory until after the NFC Championship game.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 15, 2011 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

thats one then...

Hardly an indictment for for him having hands of stone… I think Woodson had more dropped INT’s than Collins this year… NE ring a bell?

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 15, 2011 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not sure of the accuracy of the source

But Jersey Al claims 5 dropped INTs by Collins this year. (http://www.jerseyal.com/GBP/2011/02/19/green-bay-packers-2010-player-evaluations-%E2%80%93-defense-%E2%80%93-nick-collins/)

Also, just in that Bears game alone, I think Collins dropped a potential INT in the 2nd quarter, too.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 15, 2011 7:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I remember Nick dropping a few INTs this year.

And I remember being surprised by that because he was so great in that area, at least from what I remembered, the previous 2 years.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 16, 2011 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Really? I think he dropped 2 (possibly 3) alone against the Bears @ Soldier field this season.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on May 16, 2011 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry for taking so long to reply, been busy.

Never said he wasn’t one of the top 5 safeties in the NFL, sorry if what I wrote implied that. But for me to consider him elite he needs to fix his reoccurring problem with angles. He’s still young and has years to fix this very correctable problem…I’ll come back to this question of whether he is elite or not after another season.

by msc32887 on May 16, 2011 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would say top 5

Pretty much makes you elite! But thats just me… Anyway its more like Top 3 than 5. Clearly he isn’t in the class of Reed or Polamalu, but he’s right behing them. He has their ballhawking but isn’t the all around talent they are. Then again he was a 2nd rd choice and they were both 1st… So you can’t really expect him to be as good as them.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think we are in agreement for where Collins belongs in the hierarchy of NFL free safetys today.

But just have different definitions of elite. Ah, semantics. Either way, I think we are all in agreement that he belongs above Eric Berry.

by msc32887 on May 16, 2011 6:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Early in his career, Collins was like Sharper

A great playmaker, but he gave up too many plays by gambling.

Since 08, he has stopped that. Capers loves to play single-high safety, and Collins is often times the last line of defense. Yet I can only remember 3 instances where he allowed a big gain, against Chicago where he simply stopped, and against the Eagles and Steelers where he took a bad angle on a running play.

He’s the 3rd best safety in the league. Polamalu and Reed are the best 2, and the distance between them and Collins is big, but he’s the next best.

There was an article on PFF or FO, don’t remember which, about STOPS, where the author counted how many stops (tackles behind the LOS, sacks, ints, pass defelctions…) each player had, and Collins was middle of the road in the safeties.

However, the author didn’t compute how many times the guy was targeted, and that’s a big mistake. By playing single-high most of the time, he’s not in a great position to make many plays. And if he does his job right, and he does, the QBs usually won’t take shots at him, which is what happens.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 15, 2011 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

counted how many stops (tackles behind the LOS, sacks, ints, pass defelctions…) each player had,

Thats cuz Collins isn’t a big sturdy safety, nor is he a Strong Safety. Collins is a backend playmaking ballhawk. You don’t use him in the box like you would a Polamalu. That doesn’t suit his skills. Not sure what Balt calls Reed, but he is one of those safties that is a tweener IMO. He can play SS or FS. Collins is a pure FS and should not be used at the LOS. So thats (tackles or TFL) a poor reflection of his talent. Who has more INT’s the past 3 or 4 years among safties? Thats a much more important stat than a couple missed tackles! Reed and Polamalu are clearly the top 2 in the NFL, tho Reed might showing some wear and starting to slide…

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 15, 2011 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, I agree, but

Read the article before you make any conclusions…
http://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/green-bay-packers-point-of-veau-collins-should-thank-his-lucky-stars-not-complain

I do agree that he doesn’t post those numbers because of where he lines up, but it’s not about being a FS or a SS… Reed is a FS that rarely lines up in the box yet he has the numbers.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 15, 2011 6:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

My point is...

Besides the fact that he plays safety, he is a backend threat and a ballhawk. The stops stats is misleading to me. I value his turnover plays and things of that nature over tackles, even on WR. We play man coverage alot and when we do, Collins is in zone coverage. The CB in that situation are the guys that should make the tackle alot of times. Balt plays alot moreof zone than the Packers, as do the Steelers. So Collins isn’t ever the 1st player to have a chance to get a stop of a WR, much less a RB. I would say playing zone puts Reed and Polamalu in position to make alot more of those plays.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 15, 2011 8:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Collins' job isn't at the line of scrimmage

He’s the guy that prevents deep passes from happening. And he’s very good at that. I read that article, too, and it seemed like a “stop” was a little subjective, too. Collins does take bad angles sometimes, but mostly he’s pretty solid.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 15, 2011 7:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Okay, the Seahawks had 0 players on the list.

Cowboys had 6 players? Wiscy Tango Foxtrot…

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 15, 2011 8:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Wiscy Tango Foxtrot…

A Wisconsin homer all the way

"I'm tired of pretending I'm not a rock star from Mars."

by Kuhl on May 15, 2011 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Tony Romo is 72nd?

Wow…

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 15, 2011 8:58 PM CDT reply actions  

Romo at 72

Who doesn’t make it in? I’m going with Matt Ryan not making the list.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 16, 2011 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

For quick reference:

100.D. McNabb Redskins, QB
99.C. Clifton Packers, OT
98.D. McFadden Raiders, RB
97.S. Phillips Chargers, DE
96.N. Collins Packers, S
95.J. Beason Panthers, LB
94.F. Gore 49ers, RB
93.E. Berry Chiefs, S
92.L. Briggs Bears, LB
91.T. Owens Bengals, WR
90.J. Flacco Ravens, QB
89.A. Wilson Cardinals, S
88.V. Davis 49ers, TE
87.J. Gross Panthers, OT
86.J. Freeman Buccaneers, QB
85.J. Babin Titans, DE
84.J. Cribbs Browns, QB
83.M. Williams Buccaneers, WR
82.L. Woodley Steelers, LB
81.B. Raji Packers, DT
80.J. Allen Vikings, DE
79.D. Ferguson Jets, OT
78.D. Clark Colts, TE
77.C. Snee Giants, G
76.S. Holmes Jets, WR
75.J. Ratliff Cowboys, DE
74.G. Jennings Packers, WR
73.T. Cole Eagles, DE
72.T. Romo Cowboys, QB
71.M. Williams Texans, DE

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 16, 2011 12:05 AM CDT reply actions  

Thanks Kodos.

I had my graduation party last night, plus I was watching basketball.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 16, 2011 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

The post is now updated.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 16, 2011 8:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

There are 14 receivers ranked ahead of Greg Jennings

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-top100-2011/09000d5d81fd9b08/Top-100-Greg-Jennings-reacts?module=HP_cp2

This list is horse manure, nothing short of it.
I understand if people don’t put Jennings in their top 5 receivers list (I disagree but I can see why), but FOURTEEN guys ahead of him?

No. Freaking. Way.

Well, screw you, rest of the NFL. It looks like we’ll need to woop your butt again so you learn your lesson. This is just fuel for another SB.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 16, 2011 11:29 AM CDT reply actions  

14???????

Fourteen??

XIV???????

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 16, 2011 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah...that's bullshit.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 16, 2011 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would be upset if the list meant anything.

I’m fairly confident that there are not 14 receivers out there with a better combination of speed, hands, body control, and route running than greg. Especially route running, he’s one of the best.

All is vanity.

by levnclf on May 16, 2011 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hardly proof that he's better

This list is about as accurate as your average Pro Bowl ballot.

It’s fun for discussion, but hardly definitive.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 16, 2011 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Voted on by only players...

Makes it better than Pro Bowl in that the fans biased isn’t involved… The ones who should be doing this and the Pro Bowl are the player personnel guys. They are paid to scout NFL players. They know better then Fans, players and coaches.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh yeah. So does that mean Eric Berry is really better than Collins too?

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on May 16, 2011 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not at all.

Berry has one good season to his name. If he keeps it up…maybe. Probably not for a few years.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 16, 2011 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Did I say anything at all about Berry?

No, I think its a travesty that Berry is ahead of Collins at this point.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Boom. +1.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 16, 2011 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

So in one case, it's a travesty and it's wrong

And in another case, it’s proof?

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 16, 2011 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I didn't say anything was proof did I?

In fact I pointed out how it is still flawed and offered an explanation on how to improve it! Thats far from using it as proof of anything. Its pointing out that while better than allowing fan bias, it is still flawed, just less so…

Why are you arguing? That seemed entirely clear…

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

you are dodging this argument

more than the goalposts dodge mason crosby

I hope Kotsay gets hit by a dump truck and slips into a coma where he is stuck forever in Baseball purgatory having to bat against a three-headed, six-armed Lefty Hydra consisting of Billy Wagner, Damaso Marte, and Randy Johnson. - Shoeless In SC
It's like trying to sneak the sun past the rooster. - Hawk Harrelson

by blackoutsox on May 17, 2011 2:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not dodging a damn thing...

He’s reading things that just aren’t there. I didn’t present as proof of anything, Just like I didn’t say Berry should have been ahead of Collins.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 17, 2011 5:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

He did not say anything was proof...

he said that voting in this was done by players, which is better than fan bias but not as good as personnel guys/scouts.

by PhoenicianPakFan on May 17, 2011 7:37 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

The LEFT goalpost

He’s okay with the right one, but the other one has a beef with him I don’t know why.

He must be jealous from that church bell.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 17, 2011 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ugh, sadly, I think he will be.

Don’t get me wrong, I like Wes a lot, I just don’t think he was better than Jennings this year.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 16, 2011 6:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Today I am on the side of Peter King

Here’s his 71-100:

71. OLB Brian Orakpo, Washington
72. DE John Abraham, Atlanta
73. G Jahri Evans, New Orleans
74. C Maurkice Pouncey, Pittsburgh
75. CB Devin McCourty, New England
76. CB Vontae Davis, Miami
77. QB Eli Manning, Giants
78. WR Brandon Lloyd, Denver
79. WR Santonio Holmes, Jets
80. DE Robert Mathis, Indianapolis
81. QB Joe Flacco, Baltimore
82. G-T Marshal Yanda, Baltimore
83. TE Jermichael Finley, Green Bay
84. DE Elvis Dumervil, Denver
85. QB Jay Cutler, Chicago
86. WR Brandon Marshall, Miami
87. CB Joe Haden, Cleveland
88. TE Dallas Clark, Indianapolis
89. C Nick Mangold, Jets
90. Josh Freeman, Tampa Bay
91. T D’Brickashaw Ferguson, Jets
92. LB Chad Greenway, Minnesota
93. QB Tony Romo, Dallas
94. WR Stevie Johnson, Buffalo
95. CB Brent Grimes, Atlanta
96. WR Hines Ward, Pittsburgh
97. QB Sam Bradford, St. Louis
98. CB Brandon Flowers, Kansas City
99. FS Eric Weddle, San Diego
100. CB Sam Shields, Green Bay

I believe he states that Collins is higher up on his list (and I’m sure Jennings is, too). But Cliffy probably doesn’t make his list (understandable) but Finley and Shields do. Flacco seems a bit high, as does Eli Manning, but at least McNabb and Owens aren’t on it.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 16, 2011 12:17 PM CDT reply actions  

IMHO Finley and Shields don’t deserve a spot on the 100 for what they did so far, but it is about 2011, and with their talent and youth, they could very well play like top 100 talent.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 16, 2011 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Both have a ton of talent, but J-Mike has been injured too much to crack the top 100 and Shields is a very raw Nickel back. I don’t care who it is, there shouldn’t be a nickel back in the top 100. Also, I don’t think Orakpo should be ahead of Dumervil or Mathis. IMO both are better pass rushers.

"I'm tired of pretending I'm not a rock star from Mars."

by Kuhl on May 16, 2011 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Mathis specially.
Talk about underrated player. He does have the benefit of playing alongside Freeney, but look at his numbers. 74 sacks in 7 seasons and 36 FF.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 16, 2011 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dumervil has 2 really good seasons, a bleh season, and a season on IR, though.

Orakpo has 2 solid seasons.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 16, 2011 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

As a pass rusher I'll take Dumervil

As an all around OLB I’ll take Orakpo.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dumervil's a DE

So its not fair to compare them on things such as pass coverage. The main similarity between the two is pass rush, and IMO Dumervil blows Orakpo out of the water in that regard.

"I'm tired of pretending I'm not a rock star from Mars."

by Kuhl on May 16, 2011 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dumervil is actually an OLB, or at least that’s what he was when he had that great year.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on May 16, 2011 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

From how I understood it

He’s playing DE in the new 4-3. Although I may have that wrong.

"I'm tired of pretending I'm not a rock star from Mars."

by Kuhl on May 16, 2011 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

He's extremely small for even a 43 DE.

5’11 250 according to NFL. Means he’s gonna get run over and at alot as a DE. He should only be playing 34 OLB or playing in pass rush. But didn’t Denver give him a big contract a year or so ago? Are they willing to pay him all that money for only rushing the QB?

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 5:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I think they did

In all honesty, Denver moving to a 4-3 is really dumb. Especially when they drafted the best 3-4 OLB pass rusher in the draft.

"I'm tired of pretending I'm not a rock star from Mars."

by Kuhl on May 16, 2011 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just a guess

But I have to think that Miller and Dumervil will be DE on pass downs and OLB in base D. It seems the only smart way to use them and not force them to actually play DE when they clearly aren’t… They might take a page out of the Packers book and use a 2-4-5 in nickel and alot of passing downs.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

From what I heard from a DEN fan, Dumervil and Ayers are the DEs.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 16, 2011 8:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I really don't understand what the hell the Broncos are doing

Dumervil SUCKED as a 4-3 DE but was GREAT at the 3-4.

Then, they get a strick 3-4 guy in Von Miller, a MONSTER, but a strick 3-4 OLB…

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 16, 2011 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

"I really don't understand what the hell the Broncos are doing"

Thats what I was thinking from the day they fired……yes, fired McDaniels. He finally cleaned up that circus and then they fired him. I wonder if they could have been good had he gotten another year or two.

by PhoenicianPakFan on May 16, 2011 9:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

They needed to give him a proper GM.

And Von Miller isn’t a 3-4 OLB or a 4-3 DE, he’s a pass-rusher “playmaker”. I’d expect him to play some kind of ball-seeking role, maybe as a WLB on 1st downs and up at the line ready to rush on 3rd downs.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on May 17, 2011 5:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

He is an OLB

Every projection I’ve seen has Miller as an OLB, even with the 4-3. IMO, that’s a waste of an incredible talent.

"I'm tired of pretending I'm not a rock star from Mars."

by Kuhl on May 17, 2011 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

He bulked up

He was at 246 at his pro day and had almost the same numbers at his combine.

The guy is a prototypical 3-4 OLB. He doesn’t have the frame to play 4-3 DE on running downs, he’ll fail miserably at that.

And, like Kuhl said, it’s a damn waste of talent to play him at 4-3 OLB.

He has potential to be a difference maker a la CM3 and Ware in a 3-4. But he won’t make that impact in a 4-3.

John Fox is an idiot. That guy is playing football like it’s the 70’s, focusing on the run instead of the pass. That’s what he did in Carolina, and that’s what it looks like he’s doing in Denver.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 17, 2011 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

He did get to a Super Bowl in Carolina,

and a few deep playoff runs with that style (and Jake Delhomme, wow)

Miller should become the centrepiece of that defense, like LT was in New York. Just let him find the ball.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on May 19, 2011 4:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

IMHO McDaniels was an idiot

Terrible trades, even worse draft picks. I mean, trading a future 1st rounder to get Alphonso Smith in the 2nd round? Getting blocking TEs in the 2nd?
He wasn’t a good HC either. An incredible OC, but a lousy HC and an even lousier GM.

But they followed it with an even worse move, getting a guy that had never done anything other than play QB as a GM in Elway, and picking a shitty, shitty HC in John Fox. Who, funnily enough, also traded a future 1st round pick to get Everette Brown!

I’m not complaining, though, hate those fucktards since the SB.

"IT IS TIME"

by PackersRS on May 17, 2011 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

From everything I've heard....

John Elway is doing a great job in the FO for them.

by PhoenicianPakFan on May 17, 2011 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hard to screw up when you can't make any transactions.

Plus he’s not the GM, he’s more of a figurehead/QB coach.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on May 19, 2011 4:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

He did make a competent QB out of Orton.

Denver’s biggest mistake was assuming he’d learnt how to be a GM under Belichick.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on May 19, 2011 4:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't believe that he did.

Difference in quality of receivers was the difference betweem Orton in Chicago and Orton in Denver, just as it was the difference between Cutler in Denver and Cutler in Chicago.
And, we knew that when the Orton-Cutler trade was made.
Some of us tried to tell the Bares’ fans that then, but, of course, they did not want to hear it, lol.

"It's a great day to be great, baby!"

"Here I am, brain the size of a planet,
and they ask me to pick up a piece of paper.
You call that job satisfaction?
'Cause, I don't."

THE BEARS STILL SUCK!

by NorthStarr on May 19, 2011 9:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

LOL

I predicted when Cutler got to Chicago he would throw 25 INT’s… And he Did!

Been on the Cards site some, and they’re thinking trading for Orton would be a great move. I told them, its a bad move cuz they’ll be better, but probably won’t be able to land a Franchise QB w/ Orton. They will be to good to get a high draft pick and not quite good enough to make the playoffs. Kinda stuck in no mans land…

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 19, 2011 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, on the other hand

at least there’s someone throwing the ball to Fitzgerald who actually knows WTF he’s doing. Same with Breaston, too.

Don’t underestimate the sheer suckiness that could be the NFC West this year. St. Louis has made some steps towards getting Sam Bradford additional options (Clayton’s arrival in ‘09, Pettis, Salas, and Kendricks in the draft this year) but needs to improve on defense (and they might not have gotten a better 4-3 DE than Quinn; that is the PERFECT system for him), but it’ll be a few years before they get going, probably. Seattle is trying to beef up the interior OL (and find a QB) and San Francisco is a rolling disaster.

Someone HAS to win that division. Kyle Orton-led Arizona could possibly do it.

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog
Donna Noble has left the library. Donna Noble has been saved.

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 19, 2011 10:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

St Louis...

Got better and is easily the best team in that division, IMO. Cards are about 7 good starters away. Need a QB (better one than Orton), 2 recievers (WR or TE), 2 good OL, Another DL, a playmaking OLB to go w/ Schofield, and a Safety. Gonna take a couple years…

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 19, 2011 11:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Fitzgerald + Breaston works

but Breaston hasn’t started more than 11 games in a season yet. I’m not sure what happened with him. Was he benched? Injured?

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog
Donna Noble has left the library. Donna Noble has been saved.

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on May 19, 2011 11:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Unproductive starting....

Think he was injured a little… But going against starting CB gave him problems too. Couldn’t get open. He’s a #3 WR. I would rather have James Jones starting than Breaston any day!

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 20, 2011 12:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

My opinion, too.
St Louis… Got better and is easily the best team in that division, IMO.

The Rams should never have lost that (Week 17) Division Championship game to Seattle.
They (like the Saints) are better than that.

"It's a great day to be great, baby!"

"Here I am, brain the size of a planet,
and they ask me to pick up a piece of paper.
You call that job satisfaction?
'Cause, I don't."

THE BEARS STILL SUCK!

by NorthStarr on May 20, 2011 1:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Even if so (and, I disagree about the Rams),
Someone HAS to win that division. Kyle Orton-led Arizona could possibly do it.

they would almost certainly be one-and-done in the playoffs, and that would make Stroh’s point even more valid, IMO.

"It's a great day to be great, baby!"

"Here I am, brain the size of a planet,
and they ask me to pick up a piece of paper.
You call that job satisfaction?
'Cause, I don't."

THE BEARS STILL SUCK!

by NorthStarr on May 20, 2011 1:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

I remember that.
I predicted when Cutler got to Chicago he would throw 25 INT’s

In fact, I made a note of it on my computer when you predicted that, and opened that note and looked at it when he did it, lol.

"It's a great day to be great, baby!"

"Here I am, brain the size of a planet,
and they ask me to pick up a piece of paper.
You call that job satisfaction?
'Cause, I don't."

THE BEARS STILL SUCK!

by NorthStarr on May 20, 2011 1:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

He did in the 34...

But w/ them going back to a 43 we don’t really know where they’ll line him up. I don’t really think he fits the 43 very well at all. Too small for DE and can’t play OLB in a 43 D. He should be kept in a pass rush only role for a 43 team, but he’s getting paid alot to be a part-time player.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not a real OLB role anyway.

Probably some kind of hybrid “find the ball, go and get it” role on early downs.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by insertscreenname on May 17, 2011 5:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Where is Peter King's listing?

I think he clearly puts T. Williams, C. Woodson, B. Raji, C. Matthews, N. Collins, G. Jennings, and A. Rodgers in the top 90 right? Giving us 9 total in the top 100. Apart from Sam Shields I really don’t think that’s too farfetched actually…

Ring Out Ahoya!

by bleedbluegold03 on May 18, 2011 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Unrelated to this post

I finally got around to reading the “Favre Number Retirement Post” and I have to say, Strohman, you put the team on your back, doo. Great work. I know we have our disagreements (an average of about 1.5 per post, maybe?), but good gravy you owned Gman on that one. I don’t know if I’ve ever given one person so many rec’s on one thread. Very good work.

"A weapon based on Time . . ." mused Viktor Mulciber. "Well, why not? The one force no one knows how to defeat, resist, or reverse. It kills all forms of life sooner or later. With a Time-weapon you could become the most feared person in history."
"I'd rather be loved," said Root.
Mulciber shrugged. "You're young."

by I voted for Kodos on May 16, 2011 10:46 PM CDT reply actions  

Thanks..

Nice of you to say so.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 16, 2011 11:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

That guy

seems to still not get it.
LMFAO!

"It's a great day to be great, baby!"

"Here I am, brain the size of a planet,
and they ask me to pick up a piece of paper.
You call that job satisfaction?
'Cause, I don't."

THE BEARS STILL SUCK!

by NorthStarr on May 20, 2011 2:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

OK, I just watched the reaction show for that last epsiode.

Jay Glazer and Willie McGinest agreed he was one of the biggest snubs on the list, and in the fan poll he was #21. 14 frcikin receuvers ahead of him? Serously? He couldn’t even believe that, and we all know how humble he is. Heck, after watching that show he’s better than even I thought. I didn’t realize the numbers he’s had over the last few seasons.

Greg also mention how he was shocked that Tramon didn’t make it.

I should be home for this week’s episode so I think I’ll be able to post the list.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 21, 2011 1:38 PM CDT reply actions  

I was kinda surprised Tramon didn't make it too.

But it wasn’t hard to figure out when we found out that 7 Packers made the list that he wasn’t. Have to figure w/ another season playing at that level he would make it next year. And really it was his first season as a starter, so had to kind of figure he didn’t make it.

You've been Stroh'd™!!!

by Strohman on May 21, 2011 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just think:

We had the most players on the list of any team, and we have at least 2 more guys that have a legitimate argument to be on there (Tramon, Sitton if Gs weren’t so under-appreciated).

We are all extremely fortunate to be Packer fans right now.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

by Omaha Sun on May 21, 2011 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would just like to point out....

that I hate all Top 10 / Top 100 / Ranking / Countdown shows on NFL Network. The offseason on that channel is so slow.

I actually did like that NFL History series about the AFC though. It was informative. They should do more shows like that. Find some NFL historians and footage or pictures from way back in the ’30 or ’40s and talk about what the NFL was like then. More interesting than a bunch of people picking Top 100s out of their asses and then having a second show to argue about it.

by PhoenicianPakFan on May 21, 2011 4:50 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed



Manager

Img00243_small Kevin McCauley

Editors

Texbucky_small texwestern

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Ayrton_senna_1988_canada_small Vermont Cubs Fan

Fallout-3-1010_small PackApologist

Gassertaylor_small OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Linkedin_picture_small Zack Ward

Carson-palmer-hot-dog_small MatthewJStein