| Sign Up | Google+

Who Should The Packers Sign To Contract Extensions During The Season?

Stay connected for news and updates

I liked this analysis of the NFC North's salary cap situation by Kevin Seifert. The Lions salary cap problem (only $736,000 available) is a result of the old salary cap rules. High draft choices are supposed to help bad teams, but they also created a different headache. From ESPN:

In 2012, Johnson ($18.5 million), Stafford ($16.1 million) and defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh ($12.2 million) would account for nearly 40 percent of the Lions' cap space under their current contract terms. For that reason, it seems almost certain that Johnson will have a new contract if he is a member of the Lions next season. 

The Lions have little chance to win without those three players, but they shouldn't cost them 40% of their salary cap either. Those weren't bad contracts. That's what it cost to sign the No. 1 and No. 2 overall picks in the years that they were drafted. 

Further down is a discussion about what the Green Bay Packers can do with their $12.8 million in salary cap room. From ESPN:

The Packers could approach guard Josh Sitton, tight end Jermichael Finley and/or punter Tim Masthay.

I never thought I'd see Masthay mentioned in the same sentence as either Sitton or Finley. What do you think of giving those players an extension?

                                                                                                                                                                                                               

Recent Posts

The Next Read

There are 41 Comments. Load Now. Loading

Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.

C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read

R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next

Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read

Comment Settings

Live comment alert: Hide it!

Comments for this post are closed.

tracking_pixel_5341_tracker tracking_pixel_5351_tracker