Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Packers 2012 Free Agents: Jermichael Finley

He's probably one of the toughest free agent decisions the Green Bay Packers have had to make in a while.


Receiving Kickoff Returns Punt Returns
G Rec Yds Y/G AVG Lng TD KR YDS AVG Lng TD PR Yds Avg Lng TD
16 55 767 47.9 13.9 41 8 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mike McCarthy noted recently that one of Finley's goals in 2011 was just to stay healthy. He missed a few games in 2009, and missed nearly the entire 2010 season. The potential has always been there, but the inconsistency was on display last season too. He's still very young (he'll turn 25 next month) and he's still got room for improvement.

He's not a Pro Bowl caliber player yet, but he's someone the opposing defense always has to account for because he can be a match-up nightmare. Defenses that attacked him (i.e. knocked him down as often as they could get away with) had some success, but as a tight end, he's often going to get sucked in on blocking assignments that could take away the threat of him down field.

I think they have to re-sign him. But for how much? 49ers TE Vernon Davis comes to mind, and he received a six-year, $42 million contract in 2010. But Davis had caught 13 touchdowns the season before while Finley has only caught 15 for his entire four-year career. Former Packer TE Evan Moore recently signed for two-years and almost $6 million, but that seems too low. Finley might be somewhere in the middle, $5 to $6 million per year, and he might end up with a contract similar to C Scott Wells (five-years, $25 to $30 million).

Sometimes a player reaches free agency because the Packers have no intention of re-signing them, which is what they did in recent years with Daryn Colledge, Cullen Jenkins, and Aaron Kampman. But Finley doesn't seem to be in that group. Coming into the 2011 season, it wasn't clear whether Finley could stay healthy for a full season. He's proven he can be durable, but he can become an even better blocker and receiver. If the Packers really believe in him, they might have caught a break because he could be more expensive in a year or two.

Poll
What will the Packers do with Jermichael Finley next season?
Re-sign him
866 votes
Let him go
252 votes

1118 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I see Vernon Davis as having better speed and better hands.

Finley’s good, but not quite that good.

by Curly Lambeau on Feb 2, 2012 3:00 PM CST reply actions  

Keep Him

We don’t really need to add TE to our list of needs this offseason and our backups haven’t really been all that breathtaking (though they make for great backups). I’m hoping for an incentive heavy contract that Finley has to play up to.

by leftisbetter on Feb 2, 2012 3:02 PM CST reply actions  

agreed on TE backups, especially with Quarless out indefinitely at the moment.

by Tracker J Dunn on Feb 2, 2012 4:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Also agree...

Finley is worth a contract with lots of incentives.

I think re-signing Wells is more important than getting Finley signed to a new, long-term deal.

by Slim11 on Feb 2, 2012 5:23 PM CST up reply actions  

It all depends on the price

He has not earned a top-tier TE contract, regardless of potential or athleticism or what have you. He barely makes the overall TE top 10 as guys like Davis, Graham, Gronkowski, and Hernandez are all much better than he is at both receiving and blocking.

by vitaminx on Feb 2, 2012 3:12 PM CST reply actions  

Hernandez is a stretch, imo. He’s pretty much only a receiver/H back.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on Feb 2, 2012 3:54 PM CST up reply actions   2 recs

I’d say JerMicheal is better than Hernandez, I don’t think he would be as much of a threat without Gronk on the other side. Still a good talent and young, but Finley is more dynamic, I wouldn’t mind him getting a few handoffs though.

by Tracker J Dunn on Feb 2, 2012 4:00 PM CST up reply actions  

well I wouldn’t go that far. Hernandez was the first of the two to emerge last year. But I will say the presence of the other is probably very helpful to each of them.

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Feb 2, 2012 10:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Note that one of the consequences of letting him go is risking the Bears signing him.

You’d really rather that not happen.

He’ll be a Packer next year – the question is at what price, and for how much longer.

by Ebongreen on Feb 2, 2012 4:04 PM CST reply actions  

Nothing we already haven't gone over extensively.

Give him a contract laden with incentives. If he meets those incentives he’ll be paid like a top tier TE.

I already told you! I deal with the god damn receivers so the linebackers don’t have to! I have coverage skills; I’m good at covering people! Can’t you understand that? What the hell is wrong with you people?!

by msc32887 on Feb 2, 2012 6:00 PM CST reply actions  

Definitely Sign Wells

We need Wells and in a pinch we could probably put him at TE and he might actually catch the ball. All kidding aside with the very young line that we have this year he will be even more valuable.

Everyone says that Finley is this GREAT threat and that defenses have trouble matching up with him, that would be true it he could catch ball. If he only catches half of his passes coverage for opposing Ds gets easier.

by AK-Dennis on Feb 2, 2012 10:31 PM CST reply actions  

I think we can afford it.

I mean, how much would they save by not resigning Driver at all (and just keeping all their current WRs with a possibly Gurly promotion) and possibly not resigning Quarless (given all the other tight ends on the roster and his injury)? Saving that money right there makes bringing back Finley seem a lot more doable.

I don’t know, every time I imagine us NOT resigning Finley, I see the same nightmare in my head. A motivated guy who gets the hands situation together just wrecking havoc on the rest of the league for another team, while we all shake our heads saying “we should have known he’d overcome the drops.” I don’t want to see that happen.

I’m in favor of letting Driver walk, and possibly one of our other 5 tight ends, and bringing back Finley. Even if he never develops outstanding hands, he is a weapon that opposing defenses have to account for, and he makes the jobs of Jennings, Nelson, Jones etc easier.

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Feb 3, 2012 5:40 AM CST reply actions  

Finley

Is right up there w/ the best TE’s. They’re all different. Finley is a guy that can go up and play the ball in the air alot better than the others. Davis is a speed guy, who at his size can outrun even most CB’s. Gronk is a power TE who when he gets in the open field Safeties can’t tackle alone and LB’s even have trouble with. But his talent level is very much in that category. As for his hands, the coaches all seem to be of the opinion that Finley has the best hands on the team. Now he had his problems catching the ball this year, no doubt, but in general he has excellent hands! I have zero concerns about Finley having any problems catching the ball in the future. In the 4 games he played in ’10 he had NO (Zero) drops, every one seems to forget that.

Our Biggest Challenge is how we deal w/ Success!

by Strohman on Feb 3, 2012 7:20 AM CST reply actions  

You forgot the third option

“Be really, really glad you don’t have to make this decision.”

by osc630 on Feb 3, 2012 8:48 AM CST reply actions  

Finley

What Iv`e seen he drops to many balls & celebrates when he catches one .From what I here in practice he does some outstanding things ,but its not transferring into the games! A little less showboating and a little more concentrating on catching the ball ,he might just become a pro bowler.

by BIRDMAN62 on Feb 3, 2012 12:23 PM CST reply actions  

Complain about Finley showboating.

But he only does it for 1st downs, just like Driver does! And nobody complains about Driver doing it! And btw, Driver drops alot more than he should too… In ’10 IIRC, he had the MOST drops and highest drop rate on the team!

Our Biggest Challenge is how we deal w/ Success!

by Strohman on Feb 3, 2012 8:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Clutchfwd__1__small
APC Open Thread #41: I think we should call it...your grave!
3445788_small
The 90 Man Roster By The Numbers: Offense

Recent FanPosts

Small
Over/Under at 12
2911820083_37e794a0f2_small
Bang The Drum - Running Back is not an absolete position
Small
Biggest trap games of all time
2911820083_37e794a0f2_small
Bang The Drum - Anyone else a bit worried about this???
3445788_small
The 90 Man Roster By The Numbers: Defense
Small
My look at the 2012 Green Bay Packers roster
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Small
Father Time
Accme_small
Flushing the Pro Bowl ?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Img00243_small Kevin McCauley

Editors

Texbucky_small texwestern

Author

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Ayrton_senna_1988_canada_small Vermont Cubs Fan

Fallout-3-1010_small PackApologist

Gassertaylor_small OBrienSchofieldismyHero

Linkedin_picture_small Zack Ward

Carson-palmer-hot-dog_small MatthewJStein