Finding Overpaid Packers: Where Performance Doesn't Meet Value

Jonathan Daniel

Some names shouldn't surprise, but others may when we examine which Packers were among the most overpaid at their positions based on Pro Football Focus' evaluations.

How does one truly measure whether an NFL player lived up to his contract? That's a tough call, considering each position is weighted differently in terms of importance and paid differently. Pro Football Focus took a stab at this by placing a dollar value on each player's performance (based on their PFF season grade) and comparing it to their actual hit against the salary cap in 2012. It's by no means an exact science, but in general it does a good job of describing whether a player was over- or under-paid.

A while back we took a look at the team overall, but every team will have players who don't live up to their contracts and others who outperform them. What's more interesting is to look at whether the team has players who rank among the top of the league at their position in relative value or lack thereof to see how the team is actually doing at paying players appropriately relative to other organizations around the league. Therefore, we took a look at PFF's breakdown of each position's most overpaid players to see which Packers made the lists.


John Kuhn - 3rd-worst value (-$1.6M net)

Kuhn didn't have a good year in run blocking, and PFF sums it up well: "He was the fourth-highest paid fullback in 2012, which is far too much for someone who is only an average run blocker." A good performance blocking for Aaron Rodgers couldn't outweigh that.

Wide Receiver

Greg Jennings - 5th-worst value (-$5.6M net)

You can correctly assume that a lot of Jennings' lack of value is due to his injury, but that's not all:

However, the fact remains that his production has declined across the board over the past three seasons. He hit new lows with 10.2 Yards Per Reception and 1.28 Yards Per Route Run

Tight End

Jermichael Finley - 2nd-worst value (-$4.2M net)

Oh good. I know I tend to give Finley the benefit of the doubt a lot, but I do acknowledge that PFF is probably right here. And he's getting a raise this year too.

For a player that offers little in terms of blocking, he has to do better as a receiver to avoid making this list next season, as continued unreliability will have Aaron Rodgers, and maybe the Packers this offseason, looking elsewhere.

No argument here.


Jeff Saturday - 6th-worst value (-$2.1M net)

In something that should surprise absolutely nobody, Saturday actually had a value of less than $1 million. And with three of the centers above him injured for much of the season, Saturday actually looks even worse.


Tramon Williams - 7th worst value (-$5.1M net value)

This one comes with a caveat: Williams was the 4th-worst value of players who were active for most of the season, as three other corners were injured early in the season and missed several games. The biggest contributor to Williams' negative grade was his run support, as PFF explains:

Williams actually had a decent 2012 season in coverage, allowing just 54 percent of targets to be completed, while defending 14 passes – only two players had more in the regular season. He didn’t fare well in run defense, though, finishing with a grade of -4.9, largely due to his Week 17 performance against the Vikings

That jives with what I remember: Williams was very good in coverage in a few games, mediocre in others, and was bad against the run across the board.


Charles Woodson - #1 worst value (-$10M net)

Ouch, that's a scary number. Part of it was Woodson's hefty contract, part of it was just his skills declining, and part of it was his injury. Combine all three factors and you have the worst value at the safety position across the league.

Interior Defensive Line

Ryan Pickett - #10 worst value (-$4.2M net)

This one probably was the biggest surprise of all to me. We all know that Pickett doesn't provide much help in the pass rush, and it appears that is why he appears here. I would argue that he's more valuable in general than this evaluation makes it seem, but PFF explains part of why he's here:

Ryan Pickett’s salary doesn’t quite match up with his job description in Green Bay. He is a run stuffer first and foremost ... To get $5.8m in value out of a one-dimensional player like that he would have to stop the run at an elite level and play a whole lot of snaps. Pickett does neither and that’s why his value is so low.

Overall Impressions

In general, I'm disappointed to see so many Packers on these lists. However, Ted Thompson definitely seems to recognize when a player isn't living up to his contract, and three of these players will not be with the team next season. It also seems to suggest that not giving Greg Jennings a new, big contract may be the right move - even though his cap hit drops for 2013, it seems impossible for him to live up to the numbers in the final three years of his deal in Minnesota.

Not a member? Join Acme Packing Company and start commenting | Follow @AcmePackingCo on Twitter | Like Acme Packing Company on Facebook | Subscribe to our RSS feed

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Acme Packing Company

You must be a member of Acme Packing Company to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Acme Packing Company. You should read them.

Join Acme Packing Company

You must be a member of Acme Packing Company to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Acme Packing Company. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.