clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Wednesday Cheese Curds: Lukas Van Ness is the latest chapter in a familiar story

The Packers took another highly athletic defensive prospect this spring. Will it pay off?

If you buy something from an SB Nation link, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics statement.

Syndication: Journal Sentinel MARK HOFFMAN/MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL / USA TODAY NETWORK

The Packers continued what’s become a long-running roster-building tendency this spring, taking Iowa EDGE Lukas Van Ness in the first round. Another year, another first-round pick on defense.

The results, of course, have been mixed. Ups and downs, big swings and big misses as well as a couple of pretty big hits in Jaire Alexander and Rashan Gary.

Hit or miss, Van Ness fits the mold: a high-traits prospect who will have to grow his game to succeed. There’s a high-ceiling, low-floor quality to players like that at times, and it remains to be seen where on that spectrum Van Ness lands.

But if nothing else, it’s a familiar story.

All-around athleticism made Lukas Van Ness the perfect playmaker | Packers.com

Lukas Van Ness is an incredible prospect based on his traits alone, but concerting that athleticism to NFL success may take some time.

An opportunity for Packers’ offense lies with being more efficient off play-action | Packers Wire

The Packers’ play-action game could use some work, but installing a new starting QB is as good a time as any to revamp this part of the offense.

Way-too-early Packers 53-man roster projection: Which players will win key battles? | The Athletic ($)

Training camp is only about a month away, so you might as well take a crack at predicting the Packers’ 53-man roster.

One last offseason roster move for all 32 NFL teams | ESPN+ ($)

I don’t know what’s going to happen with the Packers this year, but ESPN, I can just about guarantee that they’re not going to sign Jarvis Landry.

Snake catcher finds python suspended between two cars | UPI

The snake was just channeling Jean-Claude Van Damme, okay?